Attachment 15 - Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 148 KB Posted

Attached to
Requst for Proposal (RFP) Propeller/Blade Set Overhaul Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
70Z08021R21313B00_RFP
Issued by
Department of Homeland Security US Coast Guard

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Requst for Proposal (RFP) Propeller/Blade Set Overhaul, newest first.
File Type Posted
SF 30 Amendment A00004.pdf PDF
Amendment A00003 Questions_Answers.pdf PDF
Attachment 12 - Schedule of Supplies_Services 70Z08021R21303B00 Amendment A00002.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
SF 30 Amendment A00003.pdf PDF
Solicitation 70Z08021R21303B00 UPDATED.pdf PDF
SF 30 Amendment A00002.pdf PDF
Amendment A00002 Questions_Answers.pdf PDF
Attachment 24 - Descriptions for Schedule of Supplies_Services.pdf PDF
SF 30 Amendment A00001.pdf PDF
Attachment 18 - 75_65 WLIC_WLR prop Inspection Report.pdf PDF
Attachment 17 - 65 WYTL Prop Inspection Report.pdf PDF
Attachment 13 - SF 1424 - Inventory Disposal Report.pdf PDF
Attachment 8 - 2010012222440_PrpFxdPtchRprLH_110A_R.pdf PDF
Attachment 20 - 160 WLIC prop Inspection Report.pdf PDF
Attachment 14 - BARCODE SPEC D-000-0100-Rev.pdf PDF
Attachment 11 - R-245-0128 Rev G - 270.pdf PDF
Attachment 6 - REV A_R-245-0493 225 WLB.pdf PDF
Attachment 1 - 65 WYTL Propeller Overhaul 2020.pdf PDF
Attachment 21 - WLR F prop Inspection Report.pdf PDF
Attachment 16 - Order Placement Procedures.pdf PDF
Attachment 12 - Schedule of Supplies_Services 70Z08021R21303B00.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 7 - 2010014570573_PrpFxdPtchRprRH_87_R.pdf PDF
Attachment 5 - 160 WLIC Propeller Overhaul 2020.pdf PDF
Solicitation 70Z08020R21297B00 FINAL.pdf PDF
Attachment 23 - 110 Propeller Inspection Compliance Form - v6 (5-21-2020).pdf PDF
Attachment 22 - 87 Propeller Inspection Compliance Form v3 (5-21-2020).pdf PDF
Attachment 19 - 140 WTGB Prop Inspection Report.pdf PDF
Attachment 10 - R-245-0074 - 210B.pdf PDF
Attachment 9 - R-245-0127 - 210A.pdf PDF
Attachment 4 - 140 WTGB Propeller Overhaul 2020.pdf PDF
Attachment 3 - 75F WLR Propeller Overhaul 2020.pdf PDF
Attachment 2 - 65 75 WLIC WLR Propeller Overhaul 2020.pdf PDF
Show all 32

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Past Performance Questionnaire

Contract/Order #: _____________________________________________________________

Individual Completing Questionnaire: _____________________________________________

The same ratings used in the Contractor Performance Assessment Review System shall be used to evaluate Past Performance in this questionnaire.

A common five level assessment rating system is used to evaluate a contractor’s performance.

Ratings range from Unsatisfactory to Exceptional. Here is a breakdown of each category:

Quality of Products or Service

Schedule

Cost Control

Management

Utilization of Small Business

0 = Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

1 = Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

2 = Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

3 = Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the

Governments benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

4 = Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the

Governments benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

0 1 2 3 4 N/A

1. Quality of Product or Service – please rate

Did the customer get what was specified?

Did the customer consider the final product high in quality?

If warranty issues arose, were they promptly corrected?

Comments:

2. Schedule - Timeliness of Performance – please rate

Was the contract completed on time? If not, reason why not (growth work, Contractor delayed, government delayed?)

3. Cost Control – please rate X

Comments: N/A for firm fixed-priced contracts

4 Management – please rate

How was the customer service? Was the

Contractor committed to customer satisfaction?

Was interaction between the contractor and the government satisfactory or does it need improvement?

Would you use this company again

(Why/Why not)?

Were subcontracts involved? Comments?

5 Utilization of Small Business

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .