Attachment 13 96 CTG Self-Scoring Matrix_Amend 03.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 298 KB Posted Mar 7, 2025

Attached to: Technical and Management Advisory Services (TMAS) 3 - Industry Days
Solicitation number: Not on record
Issued by: Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Test Center

About this file

Written by GovTribe AI · Mar 7, 2025

This file is a Self-Scoring Matrix for the Technical and Management Advisory Services (TMAS) 2 solicitation, numbered FA2486-20-F-1001, dated 6 October 2020. The matrix provides a comprehensive scoring mechanism for potential offerors across multiple evaluation categories, including general capabilities, technical expertise, Defense Security Service (DSS) vulnerability ratings, and Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPAR) ratings. The scoring matrix allows offerors to self-evaluate their performance across 19 distinct criteria, with maximum possible points totaling 83,000, covering areas such as total positions, geographically separated work locations, cybersecurity engineering support, systems testing, and contract performance history.

The evaluation criteria are structured to assess offerors' capabilities in supporting complex technical environments, particularly in aerospace and defense sectors. Key scoring areas include the number of positions supporting C4ISR systems, functional testing for ground/airborne sensors, cybersecurity compliance and penetration testing, mission planning, data links, and space situational awareness. The matrix also evaluates financial stability, personnel security clearances, and past performance ratings, with weight factors applied to each category to determine the overall competitiveness of the offeror. The document is designed to provide a structured, quantitative approach to evaluating potential contractors for technical and management advisory services.

View the file

Other files

File	Type	Posted
TMAS 3 Industry Days Questions and Answers.pdf	PDF	Apr 2, 2025
Attachment 13 AEDC Self-Scoring Matrix Amendment 02.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Mar 7, 2025
Attachment 13 412 TW Self-Scoring Matrix.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Mar 7, 2025
Contractor Attendee List.pdf	PDF	Mar 7, 2025
TMAS 3 Industry Day - Arnold and Edwards.pdf	PDF	Mar 7, 2025
Attachment 5 AEDC Eval Criteria Amendment 02.pdf	PDF	Mar 7, 2025
Attachment 5 96 CTG Eval Criteria_Amendment 03.pdf	PDF	Mar 7, 2025
Attachment 5 412 TW Eval Criteria.pdf	PDF	Mar 7, 2025
Attachment 13 96 TW Self-Scoring Matrix.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Mar 7, 2025
Attachment 5 96 TW Eval Criteria.pdf	PDF	Mar 7, 2025

On GovTribe

Work with this file

Download the original file
Contacts named in this file
Similar government files
Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

Self Score Sheet

TMAS 2 96 CTG

SOLICITATION # FA2486-20-F-1001

ATTACHMENT 13_AMENDMENT 03, 6 October 2020

SELF-SCORING MATRIX

OFFEROR NAME: [FILL IN OFFEROR NAME HERE]

Note: See Attachment 05, Evaluation Criteria, for Additional Information

Note: Offerors only fill in the orange shaded blocks throughout

Eval Criteria Section	Category	Max Count	Offeror's Position/Location Total	Points Per Position/ Location (1,000 Points/Max Count)	Weight Factor	Max. Possible Points	Offeror's Self-Score	Offeror's Weighted Self-Score
3.1	General
3.1.1	Number of total positions. (max CME count)	400		2.50	5	5,000	0	0
3.1.2	Number of geographically separated work locations supported with at least 10 CMEs each. (max location count)	7		142.86	4	4,000	0	0
3.1.3	Number of incumbent positions transitioned in a 90 day span.	400		2.50	5	5,000	0	0
3.1.4	Number of non-incumbent Cybersecurity Engineering Support positions hired in a 30 day span.	10		100.00	5	5,000	0	0
3.1.5	Number of personnel supporting programs requiring an adjudicated, current non-critical sensitive investigation (secret)/Tier 3 Investigation or above. (max positions)	400		2.50	5	5,000	0	0
3.1.6	Financial stability - ability to cover up to three months of base year cost. truncate decimals--e.g. enter 22.6 percent as "22"	25		40.00	3	3,000	0	0
3.2	Technical
3.2.1	Number of Contracts/TOs providing C4ISR systems support in aircraft and/or inter-connected system-of-systems (SoS) across the full Battlespace Arena and Kill-Chain. (max count = 5) Min CMEs = 125	5		200.00	5	5,000	0	0
3.2.2	Number of Contracts/TOs providing functional testing for ground/airborne sensors and/or electronic warfare. (max count = 5) Min CMEs = 50	5		200.00	4	4,000	0	0
3.2.3	Number of Contracts/TOs providing functional testing of offensive and defensive cyber warfare programs. (max count = 5) Min CMEs = 50	5		200.00	4	4,000	0	0
3.2.4	Number of Contracts/TOs providing Cybersecurity compliance testing. (max count = 5) Min CMEs = 50	5		200.00	4	4,000	0	0
3.2.5	Number of Contracts/TOs providing Cybersecurity IT penetration testing. (max count = 5) Min CMEs = 20	5		200.00	4	4,000	0	0
3.2.6	Number of Contracts/TOs providing Cybersecurity non-traditional (avionics and embedded systems) penetration testing. (max count = 5) Min CMEs = 50	5		200.00	4	4,000	0	0
3.2.7	Number of Contracts/TOs providing Mission Planning testing for aircraft. (max count = 5) Min CMEs = 100	5		200.00	4	4,000	0	0
3.2.8	Number of Contracts/TOs providing Data Links developmental test support. (max count = 5) Min CMEs = 75	5		200.00	4	4,000	0	0
3.2.9	Number of Contracts/TOs providing Space situational awareness developmental test support. (max count = 5) Min CMEs = 20	5		200.00	4	4,000	0	0

Eval Criteria Section	Category	1000 Points	750 Points	500 Points	0 Points	-500 Points	-1000 Points	Weight Factor	Max. Possible Points	Offeror's Self-Score
3.3	DSS Vunerability Rating
3.3.1	Most recent DSS vulnerability assessment	Superior	Commendable	Satisfactory	No Current Rating Available	Marginal	Unsatisfactory	1	1,000

Eval Criteria Section	Category	Percentage of CPAR Ratings (Cannot Exceed 100.00% in Total)	Points for Each Rating	Weight Factor	Max Possible Points	Offeror's Self-Score	Offeror's Weighted Self-Score
3.4	Work Sample CPAR Ratings
3.4.1	CPAR categories rated "exceptional" over last 5 years		1,000	18	18,000	0	0
3.4.2	CPAR categories rated "very good" over last 5 years		900	18	16,200	0	0
3.4.3	CPAR categories rated "satisfactory" over last 5 years		800	18	14,400	0	0
3.4.4	CPAR categories rated "marginal" over last 5 years		(250)	18	(4,500)	0	0
3.4.5	CPAR categories rated "unsatisfactory" over last 5 years		(1,000)	18	(18,000)	0	0

Totals 0.00% 18,000 0 0

Maximum Total Score	83,000
Offeror's Total Self-Score	0

Summation Instructions

Instructions for Atch 09 Self Scoring Matrix FOPR 48
Tab Scoring Sheet:	The purpose of this workbook is to assist the Offeror in calculating the number of positions being utilized by work sample against some of the evaluation criteria. This will also provide additional reference points to the Government Technical team in helping better locate and validate the Offeror's substantiation of their Self-Score

Summation Tab	This worksheet will automatically populate the Offeror's Self Score based on the data entered on the Work Sample Sheet tabs.
Work Sample Sheets:	Match up the Work Samples being used based on the identifier selected in Attachment 10, Work Sample Cover Sheet, to the tabs in this workbook. Below is a sample worksheet filled out:

Contract/TO #:	FA9876-17-F-1234	Enter in the Work Sample Contract/TO #
WS Category	Cat-1	Select the Work Sample Category applicable to the Work Sample based on the categories listed in Attachment 05 Eval Criteria section 3.0
# Geo Locations	2	Starting with WS 1, enter in the number of geographically separated locations (GSL) on the Contract/TO. On WS 2, enter in the number of GSLs that were not included with WS 1. Continue with WS 3, 4, and 5.
		Each GSL can only be counted once. For example, WS 1 has GSLs of Robins AFB and Hill AFB, so a 2 would be entered. WS 2 has GSLs of Robins AFB and WPAFB, a 1 would be entered as Robins AFB was already accounted for. WS 3 has GSLs of Hill AFB, WPAFB, Tinker AFB, and Hanscom AFB, so a 2 would be entered to account for the new GSLs.

Criteria 3.1.1 (Point in Time):	9/15/16	Criteria 3.2.3 (Point in Time):	N/A	Enter in the Single Point in Time that will be used for each specific Criteria. If the work sample does not address one of the Criteria, enter N/A for the Date in Time. The sample shows for Criteria 3.1.5 the Single Point in Time used to determine the number of Positions is 15 September 2016. The sample uses a different Point in Time for Criteria 3.2.5, 15 June 2017. Criteria 3.2.4 is not covered by this sample so N/A was entered. The Point/Period in Time entered here will be checked against tte Start and End Dates entered in Columns O and P.
Criteria 3.1.3 (Period in Time):	9/15/2016-11/13/2016	Criteria 3.2.4 (Point in Time):	N/A
Criteria 3.1.4 (Period in Time):	9/15/2016-10/14/2016	Criteria 3.2.5 (Point in Time):	6/15/17
Criteria 3.1.5 (Point in Time):	9/15/16	Criteria 3.3.1 (Point in Time):	6/15/17
Criteria 3.2.1 (Point in Time):	9/15/16	Criteria 3.3.2 (Point in Time):	6/15/17
Criteria 3.2.2 (Point in Time):	9/15/16

Position Identification			Evaluation Criteria
UID	Name	Labor Category	3.1.1	3.1.3	3.1.4	3.1.5	3.2.1	3.2.2	3.2.3	3.2.4	3.2.5	3.3.1	3.3.2	Start Date	End Date or Present	Reference(s)
1234.ABC.01	Johnson, John	Program Manager	1		1	1		1						6/1/16	5/30/18	WS-1, Pgs 4, 18
1234.ABC.02	Adams, Abigail	Systems Engineer	1		1									6/1/16	4/15/17	WS-1, Pgs 4, 26
1234.ABC.02	Richards, Robert	Systems Engineer		1							1	1	1	5/1/17	Present	WS-1, Pgs 5, 52
1234.ABC.03	Griffin, Gail	Acquisition Logistician	1		1		1							6/1/16	Present	WS-1, Pgs 4, 28

Unique Identification Number (UID): Enter in the UID used during the performance of the contract or if no UIDs were used create a UID for each unique position
Name:	Enter the full name of the individual associated with the UID under Column A
Labor Category:	Enter in the labor category as used in the performance of the contract
Evaluation Category:	Put a "1" under those columns in which a position meets the requirements for each criteria. In the Sample UID 1234.ABC.01, John Johnson, applies to Categories 3.1.1, 3.1.4, 3.1.4, and 3.2.2, thus "1"s were included under those Criteria
Start Date:	Enter the date upon which the contractor personnel under Column B began working, not the date the UID under Column A was put on contract
End Date or Present:	Enter either the date upon which the contractor personnel under Column B stopped working or enter "Present" if they are still currently working under the contract
Reference(s):	Include the reference(s) that substantiate this position/contractor personnel within Volume II

Summation

FOPR # 48 - AFLCMC/WWU (F-22 Division)

SOLICITATION # FA8622-19-R-8138

ATTACHMENT 09

SELF-SCORING MATRIX

OFFEROR NAME: [FILL IN OFFEROR NAME HERE]

Note: See Attachment 05, Evaluation Criteria, for Additional Information

Note: Offerors only fill in the orange shaded blocks throughout

		Eval Criteria Section	Category	Offeror's Position/Location Total				Points Per Position/ Location (1,000 Points/Max. Count)	Weight Factor	Max. Possible Points	Offeror's Self-Score	Offeror's Weighted Self-Score		Offeror's WS Rollup	WS-1	WS-2	WS-3	WS-4	WS-5
		3.1	General
	1	3.1.1	Number of total positions (Max. count = 93)					10.75	5	5,000	0	0		0	0	0	0	0	0
		3.1.2	Number of geographically separated work locations supported (Max. count = 3)					333.33	1	1,000	0	0		0	0	0	0	0	0
	2	3.1.3	Number of non-incumbent positions hired in a 30 day span (Max. count = 16)					62.50	3	3,000	0	0		0	0	0	0	0	0
	3	3.1.4	Number of incumbent positions transitioned in a 60 day span (Max. count = 77)					12.99	4	4,000	0	0		0	0	0	0	0	0
	4	3.1.5	Number of total positions supporting programs which require an adjudicated Single Scope Background Investigation (SSBI)/Tier 5 Investigation
(Max. count = 93)					10.75	3	3,000	0	0		0	0	0	0	0	0
		3.2	Technical
	5	3.2.1	Number of positions whose primary purpose is providing A&AS support for fifth-generation fighter aircraft (Max. count = 86)					11.63	5	5,000	0	0		0	0	0	0	0	0
	6	3.2.2	Number of positions whose primary purpose is providing A&AS support for low-observable non-fighter aircraft (Max. count = 86)					11.63	4	4,000	0	0		0	0	0	0	0	0
	7	3.2.3	Number of positions whose primary purpose is providing A&AS support for modern fourth-generation fighter aircraft
(Max. count = 86)					11.63	3	3,000	0	0		0	0	0	0	0	0
	8	3.2.4	Number of positions whose primary purpose is providing acquisition program management A&AS support for fifth-generation fighter aircraft (Max. count = 34)					29.41	4	4,000	0	0		0	0	0	0	0	0
	9	3.2.5	Number of positions whose primary purpose is providing acquisition program management A&AS support for low-observable non-fighter aircraft (Max. count = 34)					29.41	3	3,000	0	0		0	0	0	0	0	0
	10	3.2.6	Number of positions whose primary purpose is providing acquisition program management A&AS support for modern fourth-generation fighter aircraft (Max. count = 34)					29.41	2	2,000	0	0		0	0	0	0	0	0
	11	3.2.7	Number of positions who provide Agile acquisition A&AS support for fifth-generation fighter aircraft (Max. count = 30)					33.33	5	5,000	0	0		0	0	0	0	0	0
	12	3.2.8	Number of positions who provide Agile acquisition A&AS support for low-observable non-fighter aircraft (Max. count = 30)					33.33	4	4,000	0	0		0	0	0	0	0	0
	13	3.2.9	Number of positions who provide Agile acquisition A&AS support for modern fourth-generation fighter aircraft (Max. count = 30)					33.33	3	3,000	0	0		0	0	0	0	0	0
	14	3.2.10	Number of positions whose primary purpose is providing security management A&AS support (Max. count = 8)					125.00	3	3,000	0	0		0	0	0	0	0	0
	15	3.2.11	Number of positions whose primary purpose is providing system security engineering (SSE) A&AS support (Max. count = 4)					250.00	2	2,000	0	0		0	0	0	0	0	0
		Eval Criteria Section	Category	1000 Points	800 Points	600 Points	400 Points	200 Points	Weight Factor	Max. Possible Points	Offeror's Self-Score	Offeror's Weighted Self-Score		Offeror's WS Rollup	WS-1	WS-2	WS-3	WS-4	WS-5
	16	3.2.12	Providing relevant avionics engineering A&AS support	DoD Fifth-Generation Fighter Aircraft	DoD Low-Observable Non-Fighter Aircraft	DoD Modern Fourth-Generation Fighter Aircraft	DoD Major Weapon System Aircraft	Other DoD Aircraft	2	2,000		0		0	0	0	0	0	0
	17	3.2.13	Providing relevant radar engineering A&AS support	DoD Fifth-Generation Fighter Aircraft	DoD Low-Observable Non-Fighter Aircraft	DoD Modern Fourth-Generation Fighter Aircraft	DoD Major Weapon System Aircraft	Other DoD Aircraft	2	2,000		0		0	0	0	0	0	0
	18	3.2.14	Providing relevant communication, navigation, and identification engineering A&AS support	DoD Fifth-Generation Fighter Aircraft	DoD Low-Observable Non-Fighter Aircraft	DoD Modern Fourth-Generation Fighter Aircraft	DoD Major Weapon System Aircraft	Other DoD Aircraft	2	2,000		0		0	0	0	0	0	0
	19	3.2.15	Providing relevant electronic warfare engineering A&AS support	DoD Fifth-Generation Fighter Aircraft	DoD Low-Observable Non-Fighter Aircraft	DoD Modern Fourth-Generation Fighter Aircraft	DoD Major Weapon System Aircraft	Other DoD Aircraft	2	2,000		0		0	0	0	0	0	0

Eval Criteria Section	Category	1000 Points	750 Points	500 Points	0 Points	-500 Points	-1000 Points	Weight Factor	Max. Possible Points	Offeror's Self-Score
3.3	DSS Vunerability Rating
3.3.1	Most recent DSS vulnerability assessment	Superior	Commendable	Satisfactory	No Current Rating Available	Marginal	Unsatisfactory	1	1,000

Eval Criteria Section	Category	Percentage of CPAR Ratings (Cannot Exceed 100.00% in Total)	Points for Each Rating	Weight Factor	Max Possible Points	Offeror's Self-Score	Offeror's Weighted Self-Score
3.4	Work Sample CPAR Ratings
3.4.1	CPAR categories rated "exceptional" over last 5 years		1,000	10	10,000	0	0
3.4.2	CPAR categories rated "very good" over last 5 years		750	10	7,500	0	0
3.4.3	CPAR categories rated "satisfactory" over last 5 years		500	10	5,000	0	0
3.4.4	CPAR categories rated "not applicable" over last 5 years		0	10	0	0	0
3.4.5	CPAR categories rated "marginal" over last 5 years		(500)	10	(5,000)	0	0
3.4.6	CPAR categories rated "unsatisfactory" over last 5 years		(1,000)	10	(10,000)	0	0

Totals 0.00% 10,000 0 0

Maximum Total Score	54,000
Offeror's Total Self-Score	0

WS-1

Work Sample 1

Contract/TO #:

WS Category

# Geo Locations

Criteria 3.1.1 (Point in Time):	Criteria 3.2.3 (Point in Time):	Criteria 3.2.9 (Point in Time):
Criteria 3.1.3 (Period in Time):	Criteria 3.2.4 (Point in Time):	Criteria 3.2.10 (Point in Time):
Criteria 3.1.4 (Period in Time):	Criteria 3.2.5 (Point in Time):	Criteria 3.2.11 (Point in Time):
Criteria 3.1.5 (Point in Time):	Criteria 3.2.6 (Point in Time):	Criteria 3.2.12 (Point in Time):
Criteria 3.2.1 (Point in Time):	Criteria 3.2.7 (Point in Time):	Criteria 3.2.13 (Point in Time):
Criteria 3.2.2 (Point in Time):	Criteria 3.2.8 (Point in Time):	Criteria 3.3.1 (Point in Time):

Position Identification			Evaluation Criteria																			Period of Performance
UID	Name	Labor Category	3.1.1	3.1.3	3.1.4	3.1.5	3.2.1	3.2.2	3.2.3	3.2.4	3.2.5	3.2.6	3.2.7	3.2.8	3.2.9	3.2.10	3.2.11	3.2.12	3.2.13	3.2.14	3.2.15	Start Date	End Date or Present	Reference(s)

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

WS-2

Work Sample 2

Contract/TO #:

WS Category

# Geo Locations

Criteria 3.1.1 (Point in Time):	Criteria 3.2.3 (Point in Time):	Criteria 3.2.9 (Point in Time):
Criteria 3.1.3 (Period in Time):	Criteria 3.2.4 (Point in Time):	Criteria 3.2.10 (Point in Time):
Criteria 3.1.4 (Period in Time):	Criteria 3.2.5 (Point in Time):	Criteria 3.2.11 (Point in Time):
Criteria 3.1.5 (Point in Time):	Criteria 3.2.6 (Point in Time):	Criteria 3.2.12 (Point in Time):
Criteria 3.2.1 (Point in Time):	Criteria 3.2.7 (Point in Time):	Criteria 3.2.13 (Point in Time):
Criteria 3.2.2 (Point in Time):	Criteria 3.2.8 (Point in Time):	Criteria 3.3.1 (Point in Time):

Position Identification			Evaluation Criteria																			Period of Performance
UID	Name	Labor Category	3.1.1	3.1.3	3.1.4	3.1.5	3.2.1	3.2.2	3.2.3	3.2.4	3.2.5	3.2.6	3.2.7	3.2.8	3.2.9	3.2.10	3.2.11	3.2.12	3.2.13	3.2.14	3.2.15	Start Date	End Date or Present	Reference(s)

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

WS-3

Work Sample 3

Contract/TO #:

WS Category

# Geo Locations

Criteria 3.1.1 (Point in Time):	Criteria 3.2.3 (Point in Time):	Criteria 3.2.9 (Point in Time):
Criteria 3.1.3 (Period in Time):	Criteria 3.2.4 (Point in Time):	Criteria 3.2.10 (Point in Time):
Criteria 3.1.4 (Period in Time):	Criteria 3.2.5 (Point in Time):	Criteria 3.2.11 (Point in Time):
Criteria 3.1.5 (Point in Time):	Criteria 3.2.6 (Point in Time):	Criteria 3.2.12 (Point in Time):
Criteria 3.2.1 (Point in Time):	Criteria 3.2.7 (Point in Time):	Criteria 3.2.13 (Point in Time):
Criteria 3.2.2 (Point in Time):	Criteria 3.2.8 (Point in Time):	Criteria 3.3.1 (Point in Time):

Position Identification			Evaluation Criteria																			Period of Performance
UID	Name	Labor Category	3.1.1	3.1.3	3.1.4	3.1.5	3.2.1	3.2.2	3.2.3	3.2.4	3.2.5	3.2.6	3.2.7	3.2.8	3.2.9	3.2.10	3.2.11	3.2.12	3.2.13	3.2.14	3.2.15	Start Date	End Date or Present	Reference(s)

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

WS-4

Work Sample 4

Contract/TO #:

WS Category

# Geo Locations

Criteria 3.1.1 (Point in Time):	Criteria 3.2.3 (Point in Time):	Criteria 3.2.9 (Point in Time):
Criteria 3.1.3 (Period in Time):	Criteria 3.2.4 (Point in Time):	Criteria 3.2.10 (Point in Time):
Criteria 3.1.4 (Period in Time):	Criteria 3.2.5 (Point in Time):	Criteria 3.2.11 (Point in Time):
Criteria 3.1.5 (Point in Time):	Criteria 3.2.6 (Point in Time):	Criteria 3.2.12 (Point in Time):
Criteria 3.2.1 (Point in Time):	Criteria 3.2.7 (Point in Time):	Criteria 3.2.13 (Point in Time):
Criteria 3.2.2 (Point in Time):	Criteria 3.2.8 (Point in Time):	Criteria 3.3.1 (Point in Time):

Position Identification			Evaluation Criteria																			Period of Performance
UID	Name	Labor Category	3.1.1	3.1.3	3.1.4	3.1.5	3.2.1	3.2.2	3.2.3	3.2.4	3.2.5	3.2.6	3.2.7	3.2.8	3.2.9	3.2.10	3.2.11	3.2.12	3.2.13	3.2.14	3.2.15	Start Date	End Date or Present	Reference(s)

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

WS-5

Work Sample 5

Contract/TO #:

WS Category

# Geo Locations

Criteria 3.1.1 (Point in Time):	Criteria 3.2.3 (Point in Time):	Criteria 3.2.9 (Point in Time):
Criteria 3.1.3 (Period in Time):	Criteria 3.2.4 (Point in Time):	Criteria 3.2.10 (Point in Time):
Criteria 3.1.4 (Period in Time):	Criteria 3.2.5 (Point in Time):	Criteria 3.2.11 (Point in Time):
Criteria 3.1.5 (Point in Time):	Criteria 3.2.6 (Point in Time):	Criteria 3.2.12 (Point in Time):
Criteria 3.2.1 (Point in Time):	Criteria 3.2.7 (Point in Time):	Criteria 3.2.13 (Point in Time):
Criteria 3.2.2 (Point in Time):	Criteria 3.2.8 (Point in Time):	Criteria 3.3.1 (Point in Time):

Position Identification			Evaluation Criteria																			Period of Performance
UID	Name	Labor Category	3.1.1	3.1.3	3.1.4	3.1.5	3.2.1	3.2.2	3.2.3	3.2.4	3.2.5	3.2.6	3.2.7	3.2.8	3.2.9	3.2.10	3.2.11	3.2.12	3.2.13	3.2.14	3.2.15	Start Date	End Date or Present	Reference(s)

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated Dec 13, 2025.