Attachment 13 412 TW Self-Scoring Matrix.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 43 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- Not on record
About this file
The file is a Self-Scoring Matrix for the Technical and Management Advisory Services (TMAS) 2 Task Order FA2486-20-F-1003, designed to evaluate potential contractors across multiple performance categories. The matrix includes four primary evaluation sections: Task Order Management, Technical Capabilities, Defense Security Service (DSS) Vulnerability Rating, and Work Sample Contractor Performance Assessment Report (CPAR) Ratings.
The scoring methodology covers detailed criteria such as number of positions, geographical work locations, transition capabilities, personnel security clearances, technical expertise in areas like program management, flight test support, engineering, electronic warfare, and range instrumentation. Contractors can self-score across 26 specific subcategories, with weight factors ranging from 2-5 and maximum possible points totaling 115,000. The matrix allows offerors to document their capabilities across technical, management, and performance dimensions, with points awarded based on demonstrated experience in supporting Air Force test center operations and technical advisory services.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Self Score Sheet
| TMAS 2 412TW Task Order |
| FA2486-20-F-1003 |
| ATTACHMENT 13 |
| SELF-SCORING MATRIX |
| OFFEROR NAME: [FILL IN OFFEROR NAME HERE] |
| Note: See Attachment 05, Evaluation Criteria, for Additional Information |
| Note: Offerors only fill in the orange shaded blocks throughout |
| Eval Criteria Section | Category | Max Count | Offeror's Position/Location Total | Points Per Position/ Location (1,000 Points/Max Count) | Weight Factor | Max. Possible Points | Offeror's Self-Score | Offeror's Weighted Self-Score |
| 3.1 | Task Order Management | |||||||
| 3.1.1 | Number of total positions (max CME count) | 75 | 13.33 | 3 | 3,000 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3.1.2 | Number of geographically separated work locations supported | 2 | 500.00 | 2 | 2,000 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3.1.3 | Number of incumbent positions transitioned in a 90 day span | 75 | 13.33 | 3 | 3,000 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3.1.4 | Number of non-incumbent engineering support positions hired in a 30 day span | 10 | 100.00 | 4 | 4,000 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3.1.5 | Percentage of positions filled within 30 days of vacancy opening, truncate decimals--e.g. enter 22.6 percent as "22" | 100 | 10.00 | 5 | 5,000 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3.1.6 | Financial stability - ability to cover up to three months of base year cost, truncate decimals--e.g. enter 22.6 percent as "22" | 25 | 40.00 | 3 | 3,000 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3.1.7 | Number of personnel supporting programs requiring an adjudicated, current non-critical sensitive investigation with Special Access Program (SAP) or above | 25 | 40.00 | 3 | 3,000 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3.1.8 | Number of personnel supporting programs requiring an adjudicated, current critical sensitive investigation with Special Compartmented Information (SCI) | 25 | 40.00 | 5 | 5,000 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3.2 | Technical | |||||||
| 3.2.1 | Number of Contracts/TOs providing Program Management A&AS support utilizing Theory of Constraints or Critical Chain Project Management (Max count 5) | 5 | 200.00 | 3 | 3,000 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3.2.2 | Number of Contracts/TOs providing Program Management A&AS support utilizing web-based schedule management software (Max count 5) | 5 | 200.00 | 3 | 3,000 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3.2.3 | Number of Contracts/TOs providing Program Management A&AS support in the area of flight test (Max count 5) | 5 | 200.00 | 5 | 5,000 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3.2.4 | Number of Contracts/TOs providing Program Management A&AS supporting facilities/infrastructure, construction projects, drawings design reviews, inspections and/or cost estimates (max count = 5) | 5 | 200.00 | 5 | 5,000 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3.2.5 | Number of Contracts/TOs providing Program Management A&AS supporting Air Vehicle Management activities. | 5 | 200.00 | 5 | 5,000 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3.2.6 | Number of Contracts/TOs providing Range and Instrumentation A&AS support in the areas of real-time data processing and wireless instrumentation (max count = 5) | 5 | 200.00 | 5 | 5,000 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3.2.7 | Number of Contracts/TOs providing A&AS engineering support in flight and ground test planning, provisioning, executing, analyzing and reporting (max count = 5) | 5 | 200.00 | 4 | 4,000 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3.2.8 | Number of Contracts/TOs providing software engineering in the areas of leading-edge Internet technologies and programming languages (max count = 5) | 5 | 200.00 | 3 | 3,000 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3.2.9 | Number of Contracts/TOs providing A&AS systems engineering support for Range Test Capabilities or for modeling and simulation environments for aircraft systems testing. (max count = 5) | 5 | 200.00 | 3 | 3,000 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3.2.10 | Number of Contracts/TOs providing electronic warfare engineering A&AS support (max 5) | 5 | 200.00 | 5 | 5,000 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3.2.11 | Number of Contracts/TOs providing electronic warfare engineering A&AS support within an Anechoic Chamber, Free Space (max 5) | 5 | 200.00 | 4 | 4,000 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3.2.12 | Number of Contracts/TOs providing electronic warfare engineering A&AS support within Open Air Range (OAR) (max 5) | 5 | 200.00 | 4 | 4,000 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3.2.13 | Number of Contracts/TOs providing A&AS support on Free Space Anechoic Chamber I&M programs (max 5) | 5 | 200.00 | 4 | 4,000 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3.2.14 | Number of Contracts/TOs providing A&AS electronic warfare support in flight and ground test planning, provisioning, executing, analyzing and reporting (max count = 5) | 5 | 200.00 | 3 | 3,000 | 0 | 0 |
| Eval Criteria Section | Category | 1000 Points | 750 Points | 500 Points | 0 Points | -500 Points | -1000 Points | Weight Factor | Max. Possible Points | Offeror's Self-Score |
| 3.3 | DSS Vulnerability Rating | |||||||||
| 3.3.1 | Most recent DSS vulnerability assessment | Superior | Commendable | Satisfactory | No Current Rating Available | Marginal | Unsatisfactory | 1 | 1,000 |
| Eval Criteria Section | Category | Percentage of CPAR Ratings (Cannot Exceed 100.00% in Total) | Points for Each Rating | Weight Factor | Max Possible Points | Offeror's Self-Score | Offeror's Weighted Self-Score |
| 3.4 | Work Sample CPAR Ratings | ||||||
| 3.4.1 | CPAR categories rated "exceptional" over last 5 years | 1,000 | 30 | 30,000 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3.4.2 | CPAR categories rated "very good" over last 5 years | 900 | 10 | 9,000 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3.4.3 | CPAR categories rated "satisfactory" over last 5 years | 800 | 10 | 8,000 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3.4.4 | CPAR categories rated "marginal" over last 5 years | (250) | 10 | (2,500) | 0 | 0 | |
| 3.4.5 | CPAR categories rated "unsatisfactory" over last 5 years | (1,000) | 40 | (40,000) | 0 | 0 |
Totals 0.00% 30,000 0 0
| Maximum Total Score | 115,000 |
| Offeror's Total Self-Score | 0 |
&"Times New Roman,Regular"&10FA2486-20-F-1003
ATTACHMENT 13
Page &P of &N
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .