Attachment 1 - PPQ.docx
DOCX document 56 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Administrative and Logistical Support Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- N6883625Q0053
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) for Solicitation Number N6883625Q0053, issued by the Naval Supply Systems Command for Administrative and Logistical Support Services. The solicitation seeks contractor support for the Naval Construction Training Center (NCTC) in Gulfport, Mississippi, and two additional learning sites in Fort Leonard Wood, MO and Sheppard Air Force Base, TX. Required services include student liaison support, safety and occupational health support, information technology assistance, equipment mechanical support, mailroom operations, administrative and executive command support, and student registrar services.
The PPQ is designed to capture detailed performance evaluations across seven key assessment areas: quality, schedule/timeliness, customer satisfaction, management/personnel, cost/financial management, safety/security, and general compliance. Contractors will be rated using an adjective scale ranging from Exceptional (E) to Unsatisfactory (U), with definitions provided for each rating level. The form allows past clients to provide comprehensive feedback on the contractor's performance, including specific strengths, weaknesses, and an overall recommendation for future work, which will be used to evaluate the contractor's past performance risk for this solicitation.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| N6883625Q0052 A0003.pdf | ||
| N6883625Q0053 A0002.pdf | ||
| N6883625Q0053 A0001.pdf | ||
| Attachment 3 CBA.pdf | ||
| N6883625Q0053.pdf | ||
| Attachment 2 - WDs.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT 1
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE N68836-25-Q-0053
Please return the completed questionnaire as indicated on page one (1) of the SF1449, Block 8. For any questions pertaining to the questionnaire, please contact: robert.s.edwards42.civ@us.navy.mil
CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)
| 1. Contractor Information | |
| Firm Name: | CAGE Code: |
| Address: | DUNs Number: |
Phone Number:
Email Address:
Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:
2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain) Percent of project work performed:
If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):
3. Contract Information Contract Number:
Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):
Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify): Contract Title:
Contract Location:
Award Date (mm/dd/yy):
Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):
Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):
Explain Differences:
Original Contract Price (Award Amount):
Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable): Explain Differences:
| 4. Project Description: | |||
| Complexity of Work | High | Med | Routine |
How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, as what this requirement is asking for)
CUSTOMER/CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)
5. Customer/Client Information Name:
Title:
Phone Number:
Email Address:
SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION DISCLOSURE LIMITATIONS AS OUTLINED IN FAR 2.101 & 3.104 APPLY
6. Describe the client’s role in the project:
7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):
8. Client’s Signature:
NOTE: NAVSUP REQUESTS THAT THE CLIENT COMPLETES THIS QUESTIONNAIRE AND SUBMITS DIRECTLY BACK TO THE QUOTER. THE QUOTER WILL SUBMIT THE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO NAVSUP WITH THEIR QUOTE, AND MAY DUPLICATE THIS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FUTURE SUBMISSION ON OTHER SOLICITATIONS. CLIENTS ARE HIGHLY ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT QUESTIONNAIRES DIRECTLY TO THE QUOTER. HOWEVER, QUESTIONNAIRES MAY BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO NAVSUP. PLEASE CONTACT THE QUOTER FOR NAVSUP POC INFORMATION. THE GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO VERIFY ANY AND ALL INFORMATION ON THIS FORM.ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE
RATING DEFINITION NOTE
| (E) Exceptional |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective. |
| An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO |
significant weaknesses identified.
| (VG) Very Good |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor |
were effective.
A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.
| (S) Satisfactory |
| Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. |
There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.
| (M) Marginal |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not |
fully implemented.
A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.
| (U) Unsatisfactory |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an |
unsatisfactory rating.
| (N) Not Applicable |
| No information or did not apply to your contract |
| Rating will be neither positive nor |
negative.
Contractor Information (Firm Name): Client Information (Name):
TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT
PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS
YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.
1. QUALITY:
| a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance)
E
VG
S
M
U
N
2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:
| a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedule |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| c) The contractor’s ability to meet special needs (such as expedited delivery or crisis support) for delivery requirements? |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:
| a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the services? |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes; |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication)
| c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer? |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| d) Overall customer satisfaction |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR
| a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force? |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| c) Government Property Control |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| e) Utilization of Small Business concerns |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| f) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the services) |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| g) How would you rate the contractor’s ability to effectively manage, coordinate, and integrate subcontractors? |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
| a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions of the contract |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| b) Contractor’s ability to control costs |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
c) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.
Yes
No
f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below.
Yes
No
6. SAFETY/SECURITY
a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues? (Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.)
E
VG
S
M
U
N
b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements.
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
7. GENERAL
| b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues) |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below)
Yes
No
d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor.
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks. Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary):
image1.png image2.png
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .