Attachment 1 PPQ.docx

DOCX document 35 KB Posted

Attached to
West Regional Architect - Engineer Services (WRAES) - Synopsis Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
80AFRC23R0024
Issued by
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Armstrong Flight Research Center

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to West Regional Architect - Engineer Services (WRAES) - Synopsis, newest first.
File Type Posted
80AFRC23R0024_Amendment02.pdf PDF
80AFRC23R0024_Amendment01.pdf PDF
Attachment 2 WRAES Provisions.pdf PDF
Attachment 3 PWS - Western Regional Multiple Award A-E -Redacted.pdf PDF
Exhibit A - AFRC Architect-Engineer Contractor Performance Evaluation Standards.pdf PDF
80AFRC23R0024 Synopsis.pdf PDF
Attachment 4 SF330.pdf PDF
Exhibit B - NASA-STD-10001 BIM 2020.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ATTACHMENT 1

SYNOPSIS NUMBER: 80AFRC23R0024

ARCHITECT-ENGINEER PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

INSTRUCTIONS AND RATING GUIDELINES

This evaluation is to be completed as indicated below. The A-E firm must provide one evaluation for each past performance customer contact identified in SF 330, Section F. This package consists of the following:

SectionDescriptionWho Completes
Section IBasic Contract InformationA-E firm
Section IIEvaluator Identification InformationCustomer Evaluator
Section IIIA-E Past Performance QuestionnaireCustomer Evaluator

Past Performance Questionnaires will not be accepted directly from the A-E firm. Customer Evaluators must send evaluations directly to the Contract Specialist and Contracting Officer. The Customer Evaluator must submit their completed questionnaire to the address listed below, to arrive no later than 2:00 pm Pacific Time (PT) on May 26, 2023.

Contract Specialist:Jamill Hayes
Email Address:jamill.m.hayes@nasa.gov

and

Contracting Officer:Jenny Staggs
Email Address:jenny.y.staggs@nasa.gov

Section I To be completed by the A-E firm submitting a SF 330 for evaluation.

A-E Team Name:

Contract Title:

Contract Number:

Contract Award Date:

Contract Completion Date:

Point of Contact (Customer Evaluator) Name/Address/Office Phone Number:

Brief Description of Work Performed:

Section II To be completed by Customer Evaluator.

NASA will NOT divulge the names of the individuals providing reference information about an A-E team’s past performance.

Name of A-E Contractor Being Evaluated:

A-E Contractor’s Status (Prime or Subcontractor):

A-E Contract Number:

Description of A-E Services Provided:

A-E Contract Period of Performance:

A-E Contract or Subcontract Value at Award:
$
A-E Contract or Subcontract Value at Completion:
$

For design contracts which were completed by the A-E team and awarded for construction:

1) The final estimated construction contract award price.

2) The actual construction award price.

1) $

2) $

Evaluator’s Company/Agency Name:

Evaluator’s Name (Typed/Printed):

Evaluator’s Signature:

Phone Number:

Facsimile Number:

E-mail address:

Dates of Involvement in Contract:

Date Questionnaire Completed:

Section III

ARCHITECT-ENGINEER PAST PERFORMANCE REPORT

RATING DEFINITIONS

For each question below, please rate the contractor from Unsatisfactory to Excellent (as defined below) and please elaborate on the specifics of your rating in the Narrative Summary. A rating of Not Applicable should be used if either the question is not applicable or the answer is unknown. The Not Applicable rating is neutral and will have no impact on the assessment of Past Performance. The Contracting Officer may contact the respondent for additional information, if needed.

Quality of Work
Cost Control

& Estimating

Compliance with Performance Schedules
Management Effectiveness

Excellent

There were no quality problems.
There were no cost issues.
There were no delays.
Responses to inquiries, technical, service, and administrative issues were effective and responsive.

Good

Technical issues did not impact achievement of contract requirements.
Cost issues did not impact achievement of contract requirements.
Delays did not impact achievement of contract requirements.
Response to inquiries, technical, service, and administrative issues were usually effective and responsive.

Fair

Technical issues required minor Client resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements.
Cost issues required minor Client resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements.
Delays required minor Client resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements.
Response to inquiries, technical, service, and administrative issues were somewhat effective and responsive.

Poor

Technical issues required major Client resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements.
Cost issues required major Client resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements.
Delays required major Client resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements.
Response to inquiries, technical, service, and administrative issues were marginally effective and responsive.

Unsatisfactory

Non-conformances or technical issues compromised the achievement of contract requirements, despite use of Client’s resources.
Cost issues compromised performance of contract requirements.
Delays compromised the achievement of contract requirements, despite the use of Client’s resources.
Response to inquiries, technical, service, and administrative issues were not effective and not responsive.

Section III (Cont’d)

Item

FACTORS/RATINGS

Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Unsatisfactory
Not Applicable

Quality of Work

1
Overall skill level & technical competence of A-E’s personnel
2
Ability to identify risk factors and alternatives for alleviating risk
3
Ability to identify and solve problems expeditiously
4
Overall quality of delivered products

Cost Control

5
Ability to control contract cost (if the contract experienced an overrun, please comment in the Narrative Summary)
6
Ability to search for and apply cost efficient practices
7
Ability to provide accurate and complete cost estimates

Compliance with Performance Schedules

8
Ability to complete major tasks or key project milestones on schedule
9
Ability to provide timely reports and documentation submittals

Management Effectiveness

10
Ability to effectively coordinate, integrate & manage subcontractors
11
Ability of management team to show innovation and a proactive approach to problem identification and resolution
12
Ability to effectively interface with the Customer’s staff
13
Ability to respond to customer changes
14
Ability to meet project requirements
15
Ability to effectively communicate pertinent issues throughout the contract

Customer Satisfaction

16
How would you rate the A-E’s overall management performance on this contract
17
How would you rate the A-E’s overall technical performance on this contract
18
Would you use this A-E again? (If “No”, please comment in the Narrative Summary)
YES
No

Section III (Cont’d)

NARRATIVE SUMMARY (Use this section to elaborate on the specifics of the rating and to explain additional information not included above)

Item
Comments

PAST PERFORMANCE TRANSMITTAL LETTER - SAMPLE

This acquisition is for Architect-Engineer (A-E) Services for design and related services in support of general construction, alteration, modification, maintenance and repair, new construction of buildings, facilities and real property for the NASA Western Regional Area of Operations.

The NASA Western Regional Area of operations includes the Armstrong Flight Research Center (AFRC) and the Ames Research Center (ARC) specifically; with (optional) back-up capacity in support of other NASA Centers and Federal Tenants at NASA facilities including the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) in Pasadena, CA; Goldstone Deep Space Communications Complex in Fort Irwin, CA; Edwards Air Force Base, CA and the NASA launch alliance at the Vandenberg Space Force Base in California. This regional multiple award contract will provide a highly flexible contracting vehicle for participating Centers. Combined Synopsis Number: 80AFRC23R0024.

A-E CONTRACTOR LETTER: FORMAT

[Date of Letter] [Name and Address of A-E’s Customer] Attention: [Name and Designation of Customer Evaluator]

Dear [Customer Contact Name]:

We are currently responding to the NASA, Armstrong Flight Research Center Synopsis 80AFRC23R0024. NASA is requesting that customers of entities responding to the synopsis participate in the evaluation process. We have included our project for your company/agency as a past performance reference. An Architect-Engineer Past Performance Report is enclosed. We respectfully request that you complete Sections II and III of the enclosed evaluation and return the signed, completed questionnaire to both addresses listed below. Your completed questionnaire must arrive no later than 2:00 pm Pacific Time (PT) on May 26, 2023.

Contract Specialist:Jamill Hayes
Email Address:jamill.m.hayes@nasa.gov

and

Contracting Officer:Jenny Staggs
Email Address:jenny.y.staggs@nasa.gov

In order to maintain the integrity of this process, DO NOT return the Past Performance Report to us. Return it to the email addresses listed above. Please direct any questions to the Contracting Officer, Jenny Staggs, at (661) 276-7029 or via e-mail.

Sincerely, [Name of Signer] [Designation of Signer]

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .