Attachment 1 -PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE FOR GENERAL CONTRACTOR.pdf
PDF 153 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 47PJ0025R0034
About this file
This is a Past Performance Questionnaire template for general contractors bidding on a xeriscaping project at the Huron Federal Building. The questionnaire must be completed by references and submitted to Contracting Officer Kristen Feickert by 12:00 PM Central Time, February 7, 2025.
The questionnaire requires information about similar projects, defined as landscaping/xeriscaping work completed within the past 10 years, performed on commercial or government building grounds of at least 30,000 square feet, involving turf grass lawn areas and planting beds, with an initial contract value over $100,000. The evaluation form includes ratings from Poor to Excellent across categories including quality of workmanship, cooperative behavior, deficiency correction, management effectiveness, and timely performance. References must provide detailed justification for ratings and indicate whether they would award to the contractor again.
View the file
Other files
Show all 19
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment 1 -PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
INSTRUCTIONS: For each Offeror reference, the Offeror shall complete Section 1 and then distribute the Past Performance Questionnaire (Attachment 1), including Section 1, to each Reference for completion. The References shall email the completed Past Performance Questionnaire to Kristen Feickert, Contracting Officer at kristen.feickert@gsa.gov not later than 12:00 PM Central Time, February 7, 2025. The email subject line should contain the solicitation number 47PJ0025R0034 and the name of the offeror.
A SIMILAR PROJECT means a project that meets all of the following:
• Construction was substantially completed within 10 years prior to the submission deadline;
• Construction was done on the grounds surrounding a commercial or government building that has at least 30,000 gross square feet of grounds;
• The purpose of the project was principally for landscaping or xeriscaping consisting of turf grass lawn areas and planting beds; and
• The total contract cost at award was greater than or equal to $100,000.00.
SECTION 1 – TO BE COMPLETED BY THE OFFEROR
Name of Offeror/Firm:
Contract Number:
Was the Offeror the General Contractor:
Place of Performance (City and State):
Period of Performance (include start date and substantial completion date):
Gross Square Footage of Grounds:
Contract Value at initial award: $
Total Contract Value (including modifications): $
Briefly describe all landscape/xeriscape construction work performed under this contract:
Continued on next page
Section 2 – TO BE COMPLETED BY THE REFERENCE NOTE: If the offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last ten (10) years, that meet the Similar Project definition, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.
Name of Respondent/Title:
Firm Name:
Address:
Phone:
Email:
Performance Information: Please check the level of the Offeror’s overall performance in each of the past performance categories listed below. Check “N/A” if the factor does not apply to the contract being rated. If any portion of the contract performance was performed by subcontractors, please include the subcontractor’s performance on the same chart.
KEY: Poor – A Poor rating indicates the Offeror/Firm completely failed to meet the requirements.
Marginal – A Marginal rating indicates the Offeror/Firm failed to meet some of the contract requirements.
Average – An average rating indicates the Offeror/Firm met the contract requirements.
Very Good – A Very Good rating indicates the Offeror/Firm exceeded some of the contract requirements.
Excellent – An Excellent rating indicates the Offeror/Firm significantly exceeded the contract requirements.
PAST PERFORMANCE CATEGORY Poor Marginal Average Very Good Excellent N/A
Quality of workmanship
Reasonable and cooperative behavior and commitment to customer satisfaction
Identification/correction of deficient work in a timely manner
Effectiveness of management
Timely performance of contract requirements
Overall Rating of the Contractor’s Performance
Continued on next page
1. Would you award to this contractor again? YES NO _
2. Could you provide another contact for further information? YES NO
Remarks: (Please provide detailed facts concerning specific events/actions to justify your rating. Attach additional pages if necessary):
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .