Attachment 1 - Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 279 KB Posted

Attached to
Special Operations Aviation (SOA) Training, Readiness, Management Support (TRMS) Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
H92239-24-R-0007
Issued by
United States Special Operations Command

About this file

This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire issued by the United States Army Special Operations Command (USASOC) as part of a competitive source selection for a Request for Proposal (RFP) for Special Operations Aviation (SOA) Training, Readiness, Management Support (TRMS).

The questionnaire requests information from customers or agencies about the past performance of offerors related to program and operations management, flight instructional support, training development, and logistical and technical support. Relevant past performance may include experience in NAICS code 611512 "Flight Training." The questionnaire includes criteria for rating the contractor's performance in these areas on a scale of Exceptional to Unsatisfactory. The questionnaire also requests information on any contract terminations or pending terminations. The goal is to provide USASOC with a past performance assessment to evaluate the offerors as part of the RFP H92239-24-R-0007 source selection.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Show all 14

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

HEADQUARTERS, UNITED STATES ARMY SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND

2929 DESERT STORM DRIVE

FORT LIBERTY, NC 28310-9110

SUBJECT: Offeror Past Performance Assessment in Support of Request for Proposal (RFP) H92239-24-R-0007 – US Army Special Operations Aviation Training

Dear Sir/Ma’am, The United State Army Special Operations Command (USASOC) is currently conducting a competitive source selection to evaluate offerors in the subject RFP. As part of this evaluation, we have requested that the offerors provide information about their past performance on same or similar federal, state, or local government or commercial contracts as compared to the North American Industry Classification Code (NAICS) 611512 “Flight Training.” Relevant past performance may include any experience related to program and operations management, flight instructional support, training development, and logistical and technical support provided by the Contractor listed herein.

Your assessment of their performance is extremely valuable to our evaluation. Please complete the enclosure and return to the USASOC HQ, BLDG E2929, Desert Storm Dr., Fort Liberty, NC 28310. ATTN: Justin Burke or send via email to justin.burke@socom.mil, no later than 21 October 2024.

Your cooperation is greatly appreciated.

Justin W. Burke Contracting Officer

HQ, USASOC

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

US Army Special Operations Aviation Training

H92239-24-R-0007

NOTICE: Once completed, this questionnaire will be considered sensitive and shall NOT be released to the offeror.

Section 1: Contract Identification

Section 2: Customer or Agency Identification

1. Customer or Agency Name: __________________________________________________

2. Customer or Agency Description (if applicable): __________________________________

3. Place of Contract Performance: ________________________________________________

Section 3: Evaluator Identification

1. Name: ____________________________________________________________________

2. Title/Role: _________________________________________________________________

3. Contact Information: Email: ____________________________Phone: _________________

4. Amount of time evaluator worked on Subject contract: _______________(years/month/days)

1. Contractor’s Name: _________________________________________________________

2. Contract Number (for Past Performance Reference): _______________________________

3. Contractor’s Role in the Contract: Prime ______ Subcontractor______ (check which applies)

4. Cage Code: _____________

5. Contract Type: ____________________

6. Was this a competitive contract? Yes _________ No _________

7. Period of Performance: to ______________________________________________________

8. Initial Contract Cost: $_________________________

9. Current/Final Contract Cost: $________________________

10. Reason for Cost Difference (if any): $_______________________

11. Description of Services Provided:

Section 4: Evaluation

Please indicate your satisfaction level with the Contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided below.

Code Reference Guide E: Exceptional- Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the

Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

V: Very Good- Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

S: Satisfactory- Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

M: Marginal- Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

U: Unsatisfactory- Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

NA: Not Applicable- Did not apply to this acquisition; or questionnaire respondent has no knowledge of, and/or did not observe, the contractor’s performance in this area.

Program & Operations Management Effectiveness of overall contract management Timely and effective contract performance/conformance problem resolution Quality Control standards and methods

Flight Instructional Support Compliance with applicable local and federal policies, laws, regulations, and Standard Operating Procedures Conformance to Performance Work Statement (PWS) requirements Provide instructors to execute rotary wing flight and/or flight simulator training

Training Development Develop training media and publications Create Program of Instruction (POI) approved by Organization Conduct Quality Assurance of instructional material

Logistical and Technical Support Ability to hire and retain a highly capable workforce Maintained qualifications, certifications, and clearances of Contractor personnel

Additional Information:

1. If you indicated a rating of M (Marginal) or U (Unsatisfactory) for any of the above sections, please give a brief explanation of why:

2. Government Contracts Only:

Has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default? Yes ___ No ___ Has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for convenience? Yes ___ No ___ Are there any pending terminations? Yes ___ No ___ If you answered yes to any of the above, please explain:

Section 5: Narrative Summary

Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor, or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs, in the future? Yes _____ No ______

Please provide any additional comments that you have concerning the Contractor’s performance in the space provided:

Evaluator Signature Date

1 Contractors Name:
2 Contract Number for Past Performance Reference:
4 Cage Code:
5 Contract Type:
8 Initial Contract Cost:
9 CurrentFinal Contract Cost:
10 Reason for Cost Difference if any:
11 Description of Services Provided 1:
1 Customer or Agency Name:
2 Customer or Agency Description if applicable:
3 Place of Contract Performance:
1 Name:
2 TitleRole:
3 Contact Information Email:
Phone:
4 Amount of time evaluator worked on Subject contract:
2024-09-18T12:07:30-0400
BURKE.JUSTIN.WESLEY.1115812781
Check Box2: Off
Check Box3: Off
Check Box4: Off
Check Box5: Off
Date6_af_date:
Date7_af_date:
Text14:
Text15:
Text16:
Check Box17: Off
Check Box 18: Off
Check Box18: Off
Check Box19: Off
Dropdown20: [Select One]
Check Box21: Off
Check Box22: Off
Check Box23: Off
Check Box24: Off
Date25_af_date:
Dropdown21: [Select One]
Dropdown22: [Select One]
Dropdown23: [Select One]
Dropdown24: [Select One]
Dropdown25: [Select One]
Dropdown26: [Select One]
Dropdown27: [Select One]
Dropdown28: [Select One]
Dropdown29: [Select One]
Dropdown30: [Select One]

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .