Attachment 1 Contractors Performance Evaluation Sheet.docx
DOCX document 25 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- N6264926QB040
About this file
This is a Contractor's Performance Evaluation Sheet template designed to assess contractor performance on a Performance Based Service Contract (PBSC). The evaluation form captures the contractor name, contract number, and performance period, then rates performance across three primary areas: Quality of Service, Regulation Compliance, and Effective Communication. Each area uses a five-point adjectival rating scale consisting of Exceptional (E), Very Good (VG), Acceptable/Satisfactory (S), Marginal (M), and Unsatisfactory (U), with detailed definitions provided for each rating level. The form includes space for evaluator comments and requires the signature, printed name, title, phone number, and date of the evaluating official.
The rating definitions establish clear performance benchmarks: Exceptional ratings indicate services that exceed PBSC standards with high probability of success; Very Good ratings indicate satisfaction of standards with good probability of continued success despite minor correctable problems; Satisfactory ratings indicate substantial compliance with minor inconsistencies readily correctable with minimal government impact; Marginal ratings indicate partial failure to meet standards with deficiencies potentially correctable through communication; and Unsatisfactory ratings indicate major failures to meet standards with minimal probability of success unless proper corrective action is implemented. This evaluation tool is associated with solicitation N6264926QB040 for Unit Dolly Jacking and Carrying Services at Naval Base Yokosuka, Japan.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SHEET
1. NAME OF CONTRACTOR:
2. CONTRACT NO.:
3. PERFORMANCE PERIOD OR DATE OF OPERATION:
AREAS TO BE EVALUATED
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Acceptable |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
Quality of Service
Regulation Compliance
Effective Communication
COMMENTS:
Name and Title of Evaluator:
Phone No.:
Signature:
Date:
ADJECTIVAL RATINGS:
(a) Exceptional (E): The services performed by the Contractor are considered to have exceeded the performance standards described in “Performance Based Service Contract (PBSC)” and demonstrates a high probability of success without any problems during the remaining period of the contract.
(b) Very Good (VG): The services performed by the Contractor are considered to have satisfied the performance standards and demonstrates a good probability of success during the remaining period of the contract. Even if the Contractor had minor problems on its performance, the Contractor has demonstrated that it could correct such problems without any damage to the Government.
(c) Satisfactory (S): The Contractor’s performance is considered to have substantially met the stated performance standards and demonstrates a good probability of success during the remaining period of the contract. Even if the Contractor had minor problems on its performance, the Contractor has demonstrated that it could correct such problems with minimal damage to the Government. Although some minor inconsistency or weakness exists, it can be readily corrected.
(d) Marginal (M): The Contractor’s performance is considered to have partially failed meeting the stated performance standards, and the response to correct the deficiency was marginal. That is, a substantial number of the Contractor’s performance records responses “good,” but a deficiency or weakness exists, and it/they may be susceptible or correction through the exchange of information. There is marginal probability of success during the remaining period of the contract.
(e) Unsatisfactory (U): The Contractor failed meeting one or more of the stated performance standards, and the failure was considered “major.” Even if the failure was minor, the Contractor did not or could not correct the deficiency properly and/or it adversely affected the Government operation. In such a case, probability to success during the remaining period of the contract is minimal unless a proper corrective action is made.
N6264926QB040 Attachment (1)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .