Attachment 03 Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 434 KB Posted

Attached to
Passenger air terminal services at Naval Air Station Jacksonville, FL
Solicitation number
N6883626QS049
Issued by

About this file

This is a Past Performance Questionnaire template used by NAVSUP (Naval Supply Systems Command) for solicitation N68836 to evaluate contractor performance on previous or current contracts.

The questionnaire is completed in two parts: contractors provide information in Blocks 1-4 regarding their firm details, work role (prime, subcontractor, or joint venture), contract specifics (contract number, type, award/completion dates, pricing), project description, and relevance to the current requirement. Clients or contracting officers complete Blocks 5-8, providing their contact information, role in the project, and signature. The form requests detailed evaluation of contractor performance across seven primary categories: Quality (technical data preparation, quality standards compliance, problem resolution, quality control); Schedule/Timeliness of Performance (delivery compliance, resource utilization, special needs response); Customer Satisfaction (end-user satisfaction, contractor cooperation, dispute resolution); Management/Personnel/Labor (on-site management, workforce capability, government property control, small business utilization); Cost/Financial Management (terms/conditions compliance, cost control, termination history, financial stability); Safety/Security (safety compliance, security requirements adherence); and General compliance with contractual terms. Each evaluation element uses a six-point scale: Exceptional (E), Very Good (VG), Satisfactory (S), Marginal (M), Unsatisfactory (U), and Not Applicable (N). The form includes detailed rating definitions and instructions that questionnaires should be completed by clients and submitted directly to quoters, with quoters then forwarding completed forms to NAVSUP alongside their quotes.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Conformed N6883626QS049 0002.pdf PDF
Amendment A0002 SF30.pdf PDF
Attachment 02 PWS Rev2.pdf PDF
Amend 0002 Q and A attachment.pdf PDF
Attachment 04 WD 2015-4539 NFL.pdf PDF
Amendment A0001 SF30.pdf PDF
Attachment 02 PWS Rev1.pdf PDF
Amend 0001 Q and A attachment.pdf PDF
Attachment 01 CDRL.pdf PDF
Solicitation N6883626QS049.pdf PDF
Attachment 02 PWS.pdf PDF
Show all 11

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION DISCLOSURE LIMITATIONS AS OUTLINED IN FAR 2.101 & 3.104 APPLY

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

N68836 (RFQ or RFP number)

Please return the completed questionnaire as indicated on page one (1) of the SF1449, Block 8. For any questions pertaining to the questionnaire, please contact:

CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)

1. Contractor Information Firm Name: CAGE Code:

Address: DUNs Number:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:

2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain) Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

3. Contract Information Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify):

Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Explain Differences:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):

Explain Differences:

4. Project Description:

Complexity of Work High Med Routine How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, as what this requirement is asking for)

CUSTOMER/CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)

5. Customer/Client Information Name:

Title:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

6. Describe the client’s role in the project:

7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

8. Client’s Signature:

NOTE: NAVSUP REQUESTS THAT THE CLIENT COMPLETES THIS QUESTIONNAIRE AND SUBMITS DIRECTLY BACK TO THE QUOTER. THE QUOTER WILL SUBMIT THE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO NAVSUP WITH THEIR QUOTE, AND MAY DUPLICATE THIS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FUTURE SUBMISSION ON OTHER SOLICITATIONS. CLIENTS ARE HIGHLY ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT QUESTIONNAIRES DIRECTLY TO THE QUOTER. HOWEVER, QUESTIONNAIRES MAY BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO NAVSUP. PLEASE CONTACT THE QUOTER FOR NAVSUP POC INFORMATION. THE GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT

TO VERIFY ANY AND ALL INFORMATION ON THIS FORM.

RATING DEFINITION NOTE

(E) Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.

An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating.

Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

(VG) Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.

(S) Satisfactory Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract.

There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.

ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE

(M) Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.

(U) Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.

(N) Not Applicable No information or did not apply to your contract Rating will be neither positive nor negative.

Contractor Information (Firm Name):

Client Information (Name):

TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT

PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.

1. QUALITY:

a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts E VG S M U N

b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance E VG S M U N

c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance

E VG S M U N

d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance)

E

VG

S

M

U

N

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedule E VG S M U N

b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract

E VG S M U N

c) The contractor’s ability to meet special needs (such as expedited delivery or crisis support) for delivery requirements?

E VG S M U N

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the services? E VG S M U N

b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes;

E VG S M U N

responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication)

c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer?

E VG S M U N

d) Overall customer satisfaction E VG S M U N

4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR

a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force?

E VG S M U N

b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort E VG S M U N

c) Government Property Control E VG S M U N

d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel E VG S M U N

e) Utilization of Small Business concerns E VG S M U N

f) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the services)

E VG S M U N

g) How would you rate the contractor’s ability to effectively manage, coordinate, and integrate subcontractors?

E VG S M U N

5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions of the contract E VG S M U N

b) Contractor’s ability to control costs E VG S M U N

c) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.

Yes

No

f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below.

Yes

No

6. SAFETY/SECURITY

a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues?

(Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.)

E

VG

S

M

U

N

b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements.

E VG S M U N

7. GENERAL

b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues) E VG S M U N

c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below) Yes No

d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor.

E VG S M U N

Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks. Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary):

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .