ATTACHMENT_03_-_140P8622Q0088_-_SOW.pdf

Final 6.8.22

P ag e1

Golden Gate National Recreation Area Environmental Programs Office

Site Specific Hazardous Materials Survey and Specification Package

Fort Funston Bunkers

Scope of Work June 2022

1.0 PROJECT OVERVIEW, BACKGROUND and OBJECTIVES

1.1 Project Overview

Golden Gate National Recreation Area (GOGA), a unit of the National Park Service (NPS), issues the following Scope of Work (SOW) and Request for Quotation (RFQ) for hazardous materials (“hazmat”) testing and specification design to support permanent closure of three underground bunkers at Fort Funston (FOFU).

This project will complete a comprehensive hazardous materials survey at the Fort Funston Nike Missile Magazines (“Fort Funston bunkers”) so that other projects may complete abatement of hazardous conditions (lead, asbestos and other potential toxic materials on surfaces) and risk assessment necessary for final disposition – closure in place.

Upon completion of the hazmat survey the Contractor will provide a summary of existing environmental conditions that must be abated or remediated before closure. Contractor must also provide a Specification for hazmat abatement and remediation including independent engineer’s estimate for completing work.

1.2 Site Background

The Fort Funston bunkers are three abandoned cold-war era underground Nike Missile Magazines with building numbers Building 200, Building 201 and Building 202. The United States Army constructed the Fort Funston Missile Magazines to support coastal defense operations.

The Army de-commissioned Fort Funston and transferred the property to the National Park Service. The Army retains some responsibility for environmental contamination resulting from its operations. The United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), under the authority of the Formerly Used Defense Sites (FUDS) Program, is charged with assessing any adverse environmental impacts resulting from Army activities. The USACE contracted Tetra Tech, Inc.

(Tetra Tech) to conduct site investigation and response activities per a Site Inspection (SI) in 2005-2009.

The Nike missile magazines were known to have hydraulic lift systems which contain hydraulic fluid filled lines that had been observed as leaking following examination by the USACE in 2005.

The Fort Funston Nike bunkers were last entered by the Army Corps per the FUDS SI in 2009 which removed hydraulic oil from bunker hydraulic lines and cleaned and then sampled cement floor for hydrocarbons. The Army Corps cleaned up some minor hydraulic releases, sampled soil beneath the release (where there were cracks in the cement) and closed and locked the bunker doors after determining no further action was warranted.

e2

Work documentation and summary of findings was produced by Tetra Tech in the draft Site Inspection Report, Former Fort Funston and Former San Francisco Nike Battery 59, Formerly Used Defense Site Number J09CA7080 AND J09CA0941, dated January 2010. The USACE did not complete the final report. (***file would be available to the winning contractor.)

1.3 Scope of Services

The Contractor shall provide work plan and health and safety plan submittal and services necessary to conduct a complete Hazardous Materials Survey for the interior and exterior of all rooms in the three Fort Funston bunkers sufficient to develop a specification that the NPS may use to solicit a contractor to provide select abatement prior to abandoning the bunkers in place (potentially filling with sand as final site management).

The areas and rooms to be surveyed per this task are three (3) magazines – each substantially the same build out. Although the park does have as-builts which will be provided following solicitation award, the park provides here the standard design schematic (multiple NIKE magazines at various geographic locations were built using the same design) for bidding purposes as ATTACHMENT 04 – NIKE Magazine Plan and Section Design.

The Contractor shall provide the Contracting Officer (CO) a letter response to this Request for Quotation including an estimate of costs, supplies and services necessary to complete RFQ Task Items listed in Section 2.0. This letter response to the RFQ establishes and documents that the Contractor understands task intent, elements, and schedule for completing each task item.

The Contractor shall state in the Proposal all Technical Assumptions underlying the contractor submitted Technical Proposal and Cost Estimate.

Contractor shall use a Certified Asbestos Consultant (CAC) or Certified Industrial Hygienist (CIH) [or Certified Site Surveillance Technician (CSST) under direct supervision of CAC or CIH];

to conduct a Hazardous Materials Survey. The park requires a letter work and safety plan for NPS comment and approval. The Contractor shall then conduct the Hazardous Materials Survey in accordance with the approved work plan.

Contractor shall provide Hazardous Materials Survey, Lead and Asbestos Containing Materials (ACM) Compliance Plan and associated Specifications, for work that must be done in a future phase by a Construction Contractor to close the bunkers in place. This compliance plan and these specifications will comprise part of the construction contract bidding package.

This specification package must be sufficient to allow Construction Contractor to bid and execute specification to conduct hazardous materials stabilization and abatement to support final site closure.

1.4 Summary of Work

The NPS needs a hazardous materials survey for – primarily - presumed asbestos containing materials; lead-based paint; polychlorinated biphenyls in electrical equipment and caulking;

mercury in switches and thermostats; lead electrical coverings, and other hazardous materials similarly found on similar project sites.

Lead paint is presumed. The contractor shall conduct paint sampling sufficient to show condition of lead-based paint to determine where (and in amounts measured in square footage) lead e3 based paint does NOT need stabilization and subsequent abatement (for poor condition paints) or encapsulation (for paint layers in good condition).

The final product per this Purchase Order (PO) is a complete hazardous materials survey for the three identified buildings (interior and exterior) and an Abatement Specification Package sufficient for bidding and implementation by prime Construction Contractor per future contract.

1.5 Site and Project-Specific Requirements

1.5.1 Building Entry

Each bunker has two entries. One entry is a hinged two-sided steel horizontal elevator door which is defunct and welded shut. The other viable entry is a door that opens to a stairway shaft into the magazine. The lock on the door may need to be cut. The door may no longer open freely which could require welding to open door or to reset hinge(s). Welding is ‘hotwork’ which requires permission in advance from the park fire marshal.

1.5.2 Magazine Entry

A) The stairway into the magazine is of smaller tread than typical and may be compromised.

The Contractor shall ensure safe method of entry and egress and may need to conduct a Ladder and Rigging Evaluation as required to allow safe entry and bringing equipment into bunkers for survey and sampling.

B) Air Quality Monitoring may be needed for personnel entry into bunkers (the design and monitoring requires Certified Industrial Hygienist {CIH} or equivalent) to monitor personal breathing space and bunker air quality.

C) Bunkers may be considered a confined space (non-permitted).

D) Water and electricity is not available at the site.

E) As the bunker entry portals are surrounded by parking lot, Contractor will need to develop and implement a Traffic Management Plan as part of the Work Plan; include local fencing and signage including signage about project purpose and points of contact.

All tasks and elements necessary for safe bunker entry, work and egress must be identified and risk mitigated via presentation in the draft site and task-specific Health and Safety Plan (HASP) for park acceptance.

1.6 Existing Hazardous Materials Reports

The NPS has no knowledge of previous lead and/or asbestos surveys for these buildings with one exception:

• Excerpt of: “Asbestos-Containing Materials (ACM) Survey Report for National Park Service, United States Department of Interior, Golden Gate National Recreation Area, California. Mactec. September, 2012”.

(ATTACHMENT 05 – Table 1.0 Summary of Suspect ACM and ATTACHMENT 06 – Table 2.0 Summary of Suspect ACM).

e4

The 2012 Mactec report sampled Building N (Magazine A) and Building O (Magazine B) at the Fort Barry Nike Magazines. These magazines are substantially the same as the three bunkers at Fort Funston, so extant building materials are likely the same or similar. For the purposes of this survey use the same naming convention as was used in the 2012 Mactec survey.

1.7 Compliance

The NPS is responsible for conducting compliance review and providing project stipulations.

The Contractor is responsible for ensuring its work plan comports with all governing federal, state and local laws, regulations and decision rules and implementing project stipulations. The Contractor shall consider in project design all requirements necessary to conduct work.

2.0 TASKS

TASK A - Review Existing Documentation and Data, Site Visit and Project Management

1. Subtask 1: Review NPS-supplied documents Determine and acquire additional information required to complete survey and specifications.

2. Subtask 2: Site Visit

The Contractor will attend a Site Visit to aid Contractor in survey design, understanding project requirements and developing survey work plan and field plan. Consider everything necessary to enter, work in and exit the bunkers and necessary to complete hazardous materials surveys.

3. Subtask 3: Project Management Contractor will attend post-award meeting; lead conference calls sufficient to develop work plan and HASP for submittal; comment resolutions meetings and convene meetings necessary to develop and facilitate site field work. Contractor will design, plan and execute all project tasks necessary to complete hazmat survey and specification design.

Submittals: Meeting Notes (following each meeting within 5 business days)

TASK B: Develop Site Survey Work plan and Health and Safety Plan

The Contractor shall provide a work plan and Health and Safety Plan submittal and services necessary to conduct a Hazardous Material Survey for NPS review and acceptance.

The NPS will review work plan and HASP at the 80% milestone. Contractor will incorporate comments and update accordingly.

1. Subtask 1: Develop 80% draft and 100% Final Work Plan and HASP.

1.1) Work plan and HASP: Within 15 working days of the Contract’s award date, the

Contractor shall submit a draft Work plan and HASP for NPS review. The Plan submitted shall be in both digital (text file format [Word]) and hard copy format.

1.2) Work plan Requirements: The work plan shall contain the following information:

e5

1) Background, Purpose and Need, Regulatory Issues,

2) Scope of Work including specifics of site sampling

3) Field Design, Field Schedule and Means, Methods. Work Practices

4) Incorporate in work plan (and complete in Survey/Report) Table One below

5) Proposed project management, and other sections common to reports of this nature per regulatory requirements and industry practice

A. Project Boundaries Identification The Contractor shall use Computer Aided Design (CAD) or line floor plans in order to identify and record all lead/asbestos samples and other hazardous materials and debris.

The data thus collected shall be compared to the Hazmat Survey Action Levels provided in Table 1 and included in the Survey/Report.

1.3) HASP requirements: The task- and site-specific Health and Safety Plan must contain all information sufficient to demonstrate the Contractor has completely designed field work to incorporate all tasks and procedures necessary to conduct work called forth in this SOW and contains all mitigation measures, safety Standard Operating Procedures, Job Hazard Analyses and similar necessary to demonstrate tasks and hazard risks are identified and mitigated.

Submittals: 80% and 100% Work plan and HASP e6

TABLE ONE (1): Hazmat Survey Action Levels

Homogenous Layer

Location Action Level Friable? Condition BAAQMD Notification?

ASBESTOS

M a te ri a l D e s c ri p ti o n

Suspect ACM Y/N/NA Y/N/NA

Regulated ACM >1% Asbestos

Asbestos Containing Waste Stream

Friable (CA hazardous waste) vs Non friable (Non-hazardous waste)

Regulated ACM Friable Asbestos >1%

LEAD

Presumed Lead Paint

Paint on structures built before Jan 1, Lead Based Paint (surface)

1.0 mg/cm2 or 0.5 percent by weight

Lead Containing Paint (surface)

0.5 mg/cm2 or 1,000 ppm

Paint (XRF)

Positive reading according to PCS sheet parameters. If negative reading then confirm with paint chip sample and analysis.

Paint (Film)

0.06 percent of the weight of the total nonvolatile content of the paint or the weight of the dried paint film

Paint (Paint Chip)

Greater than detectable using ASTM sampling techniques and NLLAP recognized laboratories.

Material Waste Stream

Is lead containing waste stream exempt from RCRA regulations?

Waste Stream

Federal hazardous waste if TCLP is greater than 5 mg/L.

Ca hazardous waste if STLC is greater than 5 mg/L.

OTHER MATERIALS (PCBs, Hg, etc.)

e7

TASK C: Conduct Field Work

The Contractor shall include all items and costs necessary to conduct field work in one mobilization to reduce costs, project complexity and environmental impacts.

1. Subtask 1:Complete Field Work at Fort Funston Bunkers

1.1) Conduct Hazardous Materials Survey:

The Contractor shall utilize an EPA Accredited Inspector using required OSHA and EPA (AHERA, ASHARA and NESHAPS) methodology and standard industry best practices to assess all site materials, determine their general condition, and determine those that are suspect hazardous materials.

A) Visual Assessment

A.1 ALL: The Contractor shall conduct a visual examination of both vertical and horizontal interior and exterior surfaces/component systems and determine the presence of affected suspect hazardous material including but not limited to asbestos, lead, PCBs, mercury and other likely hazmat.

A.2 Asbestos Condition Assessment: The Contractor shall identify all potential ACM that could be impacted by future bunker closure activities. The Contractor shall determine the friability of all suspect ACM as classified by NESHAP, i.e. Friable, Non-friable Category I or Non-friable Category II. Each homogenous area shall be identified and noted as such in the field notes for selecting sampling locations.

A.3 Identification and Assessment of Other Materials: as necessary depending upon review of existing surveys and/or field finds.

1.2) Develop List of Suspect Materials by Homogenous Area:

For each identified suspect material the Contractor shall develop a list of homogenous areas (by type, texture and color) for each type of suspect material location. Designate, based upon estimated age and evaluation of building materials and system installation, any Presumed Asbestos Containing Materials (PACM). The contractor will then sample per this list.

1.3) Develop List of Friable Suspect Asbestos Containing Materials For each identified suspect asbestos containing material the Contractor shall determine the friability by industry standard touch test.

1.4) Develop Suspect Materials List Sampling and Analysis Plan

For each identified suspect material homogenous area collect enough data to determine type and hazardous material percentages that allow the Contractor to design specifications for abatement.

The Contractor shall utilize AHERA and ASHARA methodology to determine minimum number of asbestos samples required for each homogeneous areas such that an abatement design or management plan may be based off sample results without the need for further rounds of testing (notwithstanding discovery of previously unknown layers via initial inspection/sampling).

e8

A.1 Asbestos Sampling The Contractor shall enter all areas identified for sampling ACM; identify the ACM by bulk sample or assumption; record the results of the samples or assumptions on Contractor-developed floor drawings; and quantify the amount that will be included in the project waste stream generated that requires special disposal. If applicable, destructive sampling to locate ACM in interstitial or inaccessible areas is authorized.

The Contractor shall photograph each sample location and properly locate to faithfully illustrate on subsequent material survey map and drawings.

The Contractor is not required to patch all entries and penetration holes into interstitial areas but IS required to patch all friable surfaces disturbed by sampling.

Use procedures and techniques for bulk sample location described in 40 CFR Part 763.86.

The building is not occupied. Contractor must provide means and methods in work plan that Contractor will employ to prevent fiber releases during sampling.

A.2 Sampling for Other Materials As necessary and defined in the work plan.

TASK D: Final Submittals and Reporting The Contractor shall provide the CO with a report submittal which documents all work conducted on predecessor tasks. The NPS will review the report at the 80% milestone.

Contractor will incorporate comments and update accordingly.

1. Subtask 1: Develop 80% draft and 100% Final Hazardous Materials Survey/Report

1.1) Site Hazardous Materials Survey/Report: The Contractor shall ensure the building survey/report represents work conducted.

The Contractor shall provide, at a minimum, in the report:

A) A Site Background and Brief History of Events to Date.

B) A Description of Activities Section Including but Not Limited to:

• Site Description;

• Copies of pictures taken of field activities, including mobilization, demobilization, emplaced equipment, sample locations, and equipment operations.

• A written log of site activities

• Description of data and information collected including tabulation of data, highlighting of exceedances, lab reports, figures of sampling locations, discussions of deviations from the work plan and QA/QC.

• Description of any site spills and corrective measures taken

C) Discussion of Results;

Provide results and a discussion of analytical results, including any exceedances of applicable screening levels established by the Contractor in Table One.

• Sample Data Analysis, Analytical Reports and Evaluation of Findings

• Waste Characterization and Quantity Estimation e9

• Hazardous Materials Survey including location, type, amounts and condition of each materials surveyed. Locations must be legibly presented on electronic site plan visible via Adobe and/or Microsoft without need for special software (e.g.

CAD).

D) Conclusions and Recommendations for Additional Field and/or Reporting Work.

Included logistic and regulatory requirements necessary to close bunkers in place.

E) Specifications for pre-construction stabilization/abatement - if necessary (e.g. major asbestos fiber release that must be abated immediately).

F) Specifications (Lead, Hazmat and Asbestos Compliance Plan) for stabilization/abatement work to be performed by Construction Contractor. The NPS, at its sole discretion, may offer Optional Task Item 7.1 for Contractor to provide oversight of third parties conducting stabilization and or abatement work.

Report must be submitted in hard copy and electronically.

1.2) Sample Data Analysis and Evaluation of Findings

The Contractor shall provide text that generally presents the data and suggest next steps based upon data interpretation. Contractor shall also provide sample data in tabular form that show exceeded action levels.

1.3 ) Waste Characterization and Quantity Estimation

The Contractor shall perform waste stream assessment and characterization to determine if asbestos containing waste (ACW), lead paint streams and other discovered hazardous materials will be considered regulated or non-regulated under Federal and State laws and regulations.

The Contractor shall estimate the quantity (e.g. the square or linear feet) of each asbestos, lead and other discovered hazardous materials-containing building component and material. The Contractor shall estimate the volume of debris or waste potentially requiring disposal as California hazardous waste or as non-hazardous waste.

1.4 ) Hazardous Materials Survey

A) The FINAL Survey Report shall incorporate NPS comments on the draft report and include the following information and Contractor’s certification that data used to develop recommendations have been reviewed, validated and have met QA/QC objectives.

1. Site Description and Overview

2. Deviation, if any, from the original work plan and HASP

3. Field activities and equipment description

4. Sample location selection

5. Survey results shall be tabulated and mapped on building floor plan and in CAD

6. Waste characterization and quantification

7. QA/QC procedures

8. Laboratory reports

9. Field logs and Photographs (Photographs are required for ALL homogenous areas and repaired areas sampled)

10. SubContractors used

11. Laboratory Qualifications

12. Class A cost estimate for implementing demolition recommendation/requirements per Compliance Plan and Specifications with assumptions and limitations B) The FINAL Survey Report shall include a description of evaluated materials in both textual and tabular format. Exceedances shall be highlighted. The tabular format, for asbestos, shall follow the example provided in Table 2:

TABLE TWO (2): Hazmat Survey Reporting Table

OSHA EPA Quantity

Material TSI Surfacing Other Misc

PACM Cat 1 Cat 2 BAAQMD Reportable

ASBESTOS

Boiler Insulation

Fire Brick

Brick Mortar

12x12 Tile (and mastic)

TSI #1

Mudded Joints

Acoustic Ceiling tile

Cement Asbestos Board

Asbestos Concrete

Miscellan eous #2

Etc.

1.5 ) Develop Site Specifications (Compliance Plan) for Project Bidding

A) Design Guidance

The presumptive method for managing hazardous building materials is to remove the safety hazard, not encapsulate, wherever practicable and not overly in opposition to other NPS management objectives. Where the park cannot remove, due to physical or financial constraints, provide the best solution for stabilization to support penetrations or encapsulation.

B) Asbestos

1. Asbestos Abatement: Define Surfacing Materials, TSI and Miscellaneous components and homogenous areas for each; show ACM and PACM identified through sampling and testing of suspect material on separate Sheets. Limit scope to Base with additive or optional items listed as separate line items.

A. Environmental Abatement specification section shall be performance-based, include 3rd party oversight and qualifications, and require specific pre and post construction submittals.

B. Define specific areas to be abated.

C. Add a bid option with unit cost.

C) Lead Paint

1. Consider LB and LCP surfaces impacted by bunker closure activities.

A. Contractor shall assume all existing paint contains lead except for those previously sampled areas which show otherwise and those areas sampled as part of this Task Order. Any specific hazard abatement requirements should be based on the nature and condition of the lead-containing paint (LCP) and the extent to which they will be impacted during construction or by new work.

B. Environmental Abatement specification section shall be performance based, include 3rd party oversight and qualifications, and require specific pre and post construction submittals. Work to be conducted and generated waste packaged/transported/disposed of per EPA, OSHA, State, and Federal regulations.

C. Define condition for each paint type and or homogenous area.

D. Define specific areas to be cleaned only.

E. Define specific areas to be stabilized only.

F. Define specific areas to be abated.

2. As bunker will be closed in place, there will be no areas of paint that need repainting; all non-intact layers must be stabilized.

D) Other Hazards As required based upon site-specific findings.

Submittal: Final Hazardous Materials Survey/Report

2. Subtask 2: Compile letter response to NPS comments and Finalize Submittal The Contractor shall develop a Response to NPS Comments document that incorporates NPS comments on draft report and meeting notes, provides resolution for all comments and documents changes made between the draft and final reports.

Submittal: Comment Response Document

3. Subtask 3: Develop Site Specifications (Compliance Plan) for Project Bidding

The Contractor shall develop a draft and final Site Specifications (including Compliance Plan) for Project Bidding. The final Site Specifications shall be submitted according to project timeline that incorporates NPS comments on draft version and response to comment meeting notes and meets all Task Order requirements and directions.

Submittal: Final Site Specifications (including Compliance Plan) for Project Bidding

3. Subtask 3: Compile letter response to NPS comments and Finalize Submittal The Contractor shall develop a Response to NPS Comments document that incorporates NPS comments on draft Specifications and meeting notes, provides resolution for all comments and documents changes made between the draft and final versions.

Submittal: Comment Response Document

3.0 NPS POINTS of CONTACT

A. Contract Specialist:

Michael Gabriel Contract Specialist Golden Gate National Recreation Area Building 201, Fort Mason San Francisco, CA 94123 Email: michael_gabriel@nps.gov

B. Park Contact (POC) and/or Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR):

Tony Di Stefano Building 201, Fort Mason, CA 94123 Desk: (415) 561-4956 Email: Tony_Di_Stefano@nps.gov

4.0 FEE and PAYMENT

If the Contractor suspects that unforeseen conditions cause estimated costs or time allotted necessary to complete agreed upon tasks to be exceeded the Contractor shall notify the CO and COR, in writing (email) at earliest possible time.

5.0 SCHEDULE

As soon as possible after Notice of Award and before beginning any work, the Contractor shall submit Progress Schedule. Contracting Officer will review the Progress Schedule for format and content.

The schedule listed below governs all submittal work products. All other work product and task schedules shall be approved by NPS such that they coincide with the sequencing necessary to meet the schedule of submittal schedule. The schedule is based upon CO Notice to Proceed (NTP) and presented in working days.

80% Draft Work plan and HASP NTP + 15 working days 80% NPS Review NTP + 25 working days 80% Response to Comments NTP + 35 working days

80% Draft Submittals Report NTP + 50 working days 80% NPS Review NTP + 65 working days

80% Response to Comments NTP + 80 working days 100% Final Submittals NTP + 90 working days

END SCOPE OF WORK

6.0 TASK OFFER BID SHEET

TASK ITEM BID ITEMS (Lump Sum)

TASK A: Project Management and Review Existing Documentation and Data

TASK B: Develop Site Investigation Work Plan and Health and Safety Plan

TASK C: Conduct Field Work $ _________________

TASK D: Final Reporting and Submittals $ _________________

7.0 OPTIONAL OFFER BID SHEET

TASK ITEM BID ITEMS

Option: LINE 20 : Survey Additional Rooms or portions of room (per square foot)

Option 7.1 Oversee Third Party Hazmat Abatement per Compliance Plan (Lump Sum)

END SECTION

ATTACHMENTS

ATTACHMENT 04 – NIKE Magazine Plan and Section Design

ATTACHMENT 05 (Table 1.0 Summary of Suspect ACM - A), and ATTACHMENT 06 (Table 2.0 Summary of Suspect ACM - B) – Excerpt of: “Asbestos- Containing Materials (ACM) Survey Report for National Park Service, United States Department of Interior, Golden Gate National Recreation Area, California”. Mactec. September, 2012”.

Draft Site Inspection Report, Former Fort Funston and Former San Francisco Nike Battery 59, Formerly Used Defense Site Number J09CA7080 AND J09CA0941. Tetra Tech, 2009. (***file would be available to the wining contractor.)