Attachment 01_Past Performance Questionaire 03MAR2020.doc
DOC document 55 KB Posted
- Attached to
- LANGUAGE AND CULTURE SERVICES Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- W91247-19-R-0017
About this file
This document includes a past performance questionnaire and details of a related federal contract opportunity for language and culture services. The Mission and Installation Contracting Command at Fort Bragg is soliciting proposals for language and culture support services required at Fort Bragg and throughout the continental United States. The services include training and supervision for linguists to achieve and maintain proficiency levels up to Interagency Language Roundtable Level 3. Additional objectives are to provide pre-engagement language and culture instruction to achieve proficiency Level 1 or higher. The contract type will be firm-fixed-price. The period of performance for the base year is 1 June 2020 through 31 May 2025, including a 30-day phase-in period. There are also four one-year option periods. The competition is a total small business set-aside with a NAICS code of 611630 and size standard of $12 million. Questions are due by 11 March 2020. The past performance questionnaire requests evaluations of offerors' performance on similar prior contracts and should be returned by 18 March 2020.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 18
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
U.S. ARMY MISSION AND INSTALLATION CONTRACTING COMMAND MICC-FORT BRAGG
2175 REILLY ROAD, STOP A FORT BRAGG, NC 28310-5000
03 March 2020 MICC Center Fort Bragg
SUBJECT: Offeror Past Performance Assessment in Support of Request for Proposal (RFP) Number (W912M-19-R-0017)
Dear Sir/Ma’am;
The Mission and Installation Contracting Command Center Fort Bragg (MICC Center-FB) is currently conducting a competitive source selection to evaluate offerors on subject RFP. As part of this evaluation, we have requested that the offerors provide information about their past performance on same or similar federal, state or local government or commercial contracts as compared to North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) 611630. You have been identified as the point of contact cited on the enclosure.
Your assessment of their performance is extremely valuable to our evaluation. Please complete the enclosure and return no later than 15 days after receipt of request or 18 March 2020, whichever occurs first. All questionnaires shall be submitted directly by electronic mail to both Sydney Johnson/ sydney.g.johnson.civ@mail.mil (Contract Specialist) and A. Carlos Lopez/ abelardo.c.lopez.civ@mail.mil (Procuring Contracting Officer), not later than the proposal due date and time.
Your cooperation is greatly appreciated. Questions may be directed to POC or the undersigned at (910) 432-7350.
Sincerely, Abelardo C. Lopez
Contracting Officer
Encl (1)
PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE FORM
Contractor:____________________ Contract No.:____________________________
Subcontract No. (if applicable):_________________________________
POC:________________________
Title:________________________ (Name)
(E.G. PCO/ACO/TM)
(Agency, Telephone No., E-mail Address & Fax Number) The following questions pertain to the contractor’s record of past (within the past three years) and current performance. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of a federal contract. Therefore, it is important that our information be as factual and accurate as possible. Please provide examples and/or explanations (use additional pages if necessary). The following adjectival ratings shall be used in your response.
Outstanding: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Acceptable: Performance meets contractual requirements. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective.
Unacceptable: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective.
PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)
A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
Contractor/Company Name/Division:
Address:
Program Identification/Title:
Contract Number:
Contract Type:
Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):
Contract Award Date:
Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:
Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:
B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number:
Address:
E-mail Address:
PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent)
A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship
· Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
· Good
· Acceptable
· Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
· Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Comments:
B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).
· Acceptable
· Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
· Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.
· Acceptable
· Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
· Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs (Use this Question on Cost Reimbursement Type Contracts Only).
· Acceptable
· Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
· Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
E. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest
· Acceptable
· Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
· Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
F. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.
G. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:
Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?
If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:
H. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:
Organization:
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number
Address:
E-mail Address:
PART III. RETURN INFORMATION
Please return this completed Questionnaire via e-mail directly to both Sydney Johnson/ sydney.g.johnson.civ@mail.mil (Contract Specialist) and A. Carlos Lopez/ abelardo.c.lopez.civ@mail.mil (Procuring Contracting Officer), not later than the proposal due date and time.
Attachment 01 - Past Performance Questionnaire
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .