Attachment 01 Past Performance Information.pdf
PDF 148 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Fire Training Structures and Props (FTSP) Maintenance Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- N6817124Q0112
About this file
This document is an Attachment 01 - Past Performance Information for a federal contract opportunity. It provides details on the contractor's past performance on similar contracts, including contract number, procuring agency, period of performance, dollar value, description of work, and an assessment of whether the contractor's past performance is very relevant, relevant, somewhat relevant, or not relevant to the current requirement.
The related federal contract opportunity is for Fire Training Structures and Props (FTSP) Maintenance Services, solicited by the Department of the Navy Naval Supply Systems Command. The purpose is to provide annual preventive maintenance on fire-fighting training devices at nine Government installations. The selected vendor must demonstrate experience and qualifications in maintaining the training devices currently fielded throughout the region.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| N6817124Q0112-0002.pdf | ||
| N6817124Q0112-0001.pdf | ||
| N6817124Q0112.pdf | ||
| Attachment 02 Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf | ||
| Attachment 03 Site Survey.pptx | PPTX presentation | |
| Attachment 04 QASP.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment (1) Past Performance Information Source Selection Information see FAR 3.104
Reference #1 Reference #2 Reference #3 Contract Number(s) and type of contract
Procuring agency and name of reference point(s) of contact (not to exceed 3) and telephone number(s) at the Federal, State, Local Government or commercial entity for which the contract was performed
Euro/Dollar value of the contract
Period of performance
Detailed Description of the work
Clear statements describing whether the contract was completed on time, with a quality product conforming to the contract, without any degradation in performance or customer satisfaction.
Discuss any cost growth if the contract was not completed for the original contract amount
The number, type, frequency, duration and impact of any quality, delivery or cost problems in performing the contract, the corrective action taken, if any, and the effectiveness of the corrective action
Does the contractor consider their past performance to be very relevant and why:
See definitions below relevant and why:
somewhat relevant and why:
Does the contractor consider their past performance to be NOT relevant and why:
The definitions for “Relevant”, ”Not Relevant” “scope”, “size” and “complexity” are as follows:
Past Performance Relevancy Ratings
Adjectival Rating Description Very Relevant Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.
Relevant Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.
Somewhat Relevant Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.
Not Relevant Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.
Scope Defined as having experience in the areas defined in the PWS
Magnitude The measure of the similarity of the dollar value of actually performed work that exists between the PWS and the quoter’s referenced contracts during the stated five-year period established by the solicitation.
Complexity Defined as degree of functions performed
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .