Attachment_0005__Past_Performance.docx
DOCX document 37 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 140P5126R0004
About this file
This is a Past Performance Questionnaire for National Park Service Solicitation Number 140P5126R0004 regarding rehabilitation of the maintenance complex roofs at Chickamauga and Chattanooga National Military Park (CHCH), located under Interior Region 2 South Atlantic Gulf. The questionnaire requests references to complete an evaluation of a contractor's past performance on similar roofing work to support source selection for the current solicitation.
The scope of work includes abatement of existing asbestos-cement roofing, removal and replacement of rotted roof sheathing, replacement of slate shingles where required, installation of new sub-roofing and roofing materials, sounding and salvaging of existing slate shingles for reuse, and repair of the gutter system. The questionnaire requests evaluation across five key performance areas using a five-tier scale (Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, Unsatisfactory, or N/A): contractor's ability to meet requirements, timeliness of product delivery, ability to resolve timeliness problems, quality of work and task completion, and overall contractor performance across requirements, schedule, and price. Respondents are instructed to provide explanatory narratives with their ratings and submit completed questionnaires prior to the RFP closing date. The information collected is designated as Source Selection Sensitive and cannot be used for promotional or endorsement purposes by the contractor.
View the file
Other files
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Solicitation#140P5126R0004
Please complete this Questionnaire and Submit with your Quote
We are currently in the process of preparing our proposal for the National Park Service, Interior Region 2 South Atlantic Gulf, Solicitation Number: 140P5126R0004 for Chickamauga and Chattanooga National Military Park (CHCH. The work will address the abatement of all existing asbestos-cement roofing, removal and replacement of rotted roof sheathing, and replacement of slate shingles where required. Installing new sub roofing and roofing in areas required. Removal and replacement of rotted sheathing will require complete removal of all roofing materials. Sounding and salvaging existing slate shingles for reuse and repairing the gutter system. As part of our proposal, we have listed you as a reference on our performance for this type of service with your agency under the previous/current contract listed below. Your input on our performance is therefore requested.
Notice to Contractor
Information provided in this questionnaire is intended for use as source selection information and as such is deemed Source Selection Sensitive. Statements or comments provided in the questionnaire do not signify an express or implied endorsement of any product, supply, service, or enterprise.
This information shall not be construed as an endorsement by the Government or its employee(s) of the contractor for advertising purposes or in a manner that implies the contractor, its products, or services, are approved, endorsed, or considered by the Government to be superior to other products or services.
The contractor shall not be permitted to use any information provided in this questionnaire to publicize, or otherwise circulate, promotional materials that state or imply Governmental, organizational, group, expert, or individual endorsement or consumer testimonial of a product, service, or position which the contractor represents.
Please complete this Questionnaire and submit with your quote
Questionnaire is due to prior to the closing of RFP #140P5126R0004.
POC name:
POC phone number:
POC e-mail address:
Thank you.
************************************************************************************* NAME OF OFFEROR:
Phone: ________________________ Fax: _____________________
E-Mail: _______________________
I. Current or Historical Contract Information CONTRACT REFERENCED:
1. Contract or Identifying Number:
2. Contract Value:
3. Period of Performance:
4. Brief description of items provided:
5. Name of Person Completing Questionnaire:
Agency/Company:
Title: Phone:
E-mail:
II. EVALUATION. Please rate the Contractor utilizing the guide below. Explanatory narratives for as many responses as possible would be appreciated. These narratives need not be lengthy, just detailed. Attach additional pages if more space is needed.
Evaluation Definitions –
The following definitions should be used in the assessment of Contractor performance.
EXCEPTIONAL
Performance EXCEEDS MOST contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns.
VERY GOOD
Performance EXCEEDS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns, for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were highly effective.
SATISFACTORY
Performance MEETS contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed contains minor issues or concerns, for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
MARGINAL
Performance MEETS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed includes significant problems, issues, or concerns for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were only somewhat effective.
UNSATISFACTORY
Performance DOES NOT MEET contractual requirement. The performance of the areas being assessed includes serious problems, issues, or concerns for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.
| NOT APPLICABLE (N/A) |
| Performance information not recent or relevant as defined in the |
Solicitation. Unable to provide assessment.
Past Performance Evaluation Question 1. Performance What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet your requirements?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Performance
Comments, if any.
Questions 2 and 3. Timeliness
What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to provide products in a timely manner?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Timeliness
Ability to Resolve Timeliness Problems
Question 4. Quality of Work
What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet requirements of tasks and the overall quality of the work?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Quality of Shipments
Question 5. Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance
What is your overall rating of Contractor’s performance (requirements, schedule, and price) on contract being assessed?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
General Comments:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .