Attachment 0002 - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 82 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Solicitation_G-16 Cargo Parachute and Supplies Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- W912CH-24-R-0080
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire related to a federal contract opportunity. The solicitation is for approximately three 5-year, firm-fixed price, indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity multiple award contracts for various G-16 cargo parachute and related supplies, with a NAICS code of 314999. The contract will be a 100% small business set-aside. The questionnaire requests the respondent to provide candid feedback on the contractor's past performance in areas such as quality, schedule, management, and business relations. Responses will be used to evaluate offers for the award of the federal contracts. The solicitation number is W912CH-24-R-0080, and responses to the questionnaire are due by a specified date.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| W912CH24R0080-0005.pdf | ||
| Attachment 0002 - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx | DOCX document | |
| Additional Questions and Answers_W912CH-24-R-0080.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| W912CH24R0080-0004.pdf | ||
| Attachment 0001 - Pricing Workbook.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Questions and Answers_Solicitation W912CH-24-R-0080.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| W912CH24R0080-0003.pdf | ||
| Specification Conversion Table and Deviation Package.pdf | ||
| Pre-Proposal Conference QA_W912CH-24-R-0080.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| W912CH24R0080-0002.pdf | ||
| Attachment 0006 - SPI AB16570128 NSN 1670016570128.pdf | ||
| Attachment 0002 - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx | DOCX document | |
| W912CH24R0080-0001.pdf | ||
| Pre Proposal Conference W912CH24R0080.pdf | ||
| W912CH24R0080.pdf | ||
| Attachment 0004 - First Article Waiver Worksheet.pdf | ||
| Attachment 0001 - Pricing Workbook.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 0005 - CUI 2023.pdf |
Show all 18
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
CUI
Attachment 000X: Past Performance Questionnaire
[Solicitation Number] [Program Name] Please provide your candid response to the following questions. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of federal contracts. Therefore it is important that your information be as factual and accurate as possible. If you do not have the appropriate knowledge with the company in question, please forward this questionnaire to the person who does. Upon completion of this questionnaire, please forward by email to [name], [email] by [date]. Thank you for your assistance. Comment by Hessell, Dawn M CIV USARMY ACC (USA): Contract Specialist and/or Contracting Officer
PART I - IDENTIFICATION (To be completed by the Offeror)
A. RELEVANT CONTRACT
Contractor/Company Name/Division:
Address:
Program Identification/Title:
Contract/Task Order Number:
Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):
Contract Award Date:
Contract Period of Performance End Date:
Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion:
Place of Performance:
Brief Description of the Relevant Contract Scope:
B. OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number:
FAX Number:
Address:
E-mail Address:
PART II - EVALUATION (To be completed by Respondent’s Point of Contact)
RATING SCALE & DEFINITIONS
Table 1 identifies the rating scale and descriptions. Please apply the rating that most closely matches your assessment for each area of consideration listed below. Please include a written narrative for each rating applied, utilizing the adjectival rating definition in Table 1.
Table 1
A. Quality
1. Assess the contractor’s quality and workmanship of the parachutes in accordance with the contract terms and conditions. (i.e. to Government technical data package, technical specifications, testing).
|_| Exceptional |_| Very Good |_| Satisfactory |_| Marginal |_| Unsatisfactory |_| Too soon to tell |_| Not Applicable
Comments:
For any adverse issues, give your assessment of the extent to which the contractor was at fault (e.g. mostly attributable to contractor, evenly attributable to contractor and customer/end user, only somewhat attributable to contractor) and your assessment of the extent to which customer/end user was at fault (e.g. changes to the specification requirements, unrealistic or ambiguous specification requirements, etc.) or other factors beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the contractor.
2. Assess the contractor’s xxx Comment by Hessell, Dawn M CIV USARMY ACC (USA): Any additional questions you need information on in the Quality area.
B. Project Schedule:
1. Assess the timeliness of contractor performance for Product Deliverables: To what extent did the contractor adhere to the original contract delivery schedules (unless the delivery schedule was revised due to fault of the Government) on an overall basis. Please include the contractor’s efforts that contributed negatively or Positively positively to the delivery schedule and provide comments if any Ddelivery extensions were granted, and why the extensions were needed.
|_| Exceptional |_| Very Good |_| Satisfactory |_| Marginal |_| Unsatisfactory |_| Too soon to tell |_| Not Applicable
Comments:
For any adverse issues give your assessment of the extent to which the contractor was at fault (e.g. mostly attributable to contractor, evenly attributable to contractor and customer/end user, only somewhat attributable to contractor) and your assessment of the extent to which customer/end user was at fault (e.g. changes to the specification requirements, unrealistic or ambiguous specification requirements, etc.) or other factors beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the contractor.
C. Management / Business Relations:
1. Program Management: Assess the contractor’s timeliness, completeness and quality of problem identification, corrective action plans, proposal submittals (especially responses to change orders, Engineering Change Proposals (ECPs), or other UCAs), the contractor's history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, effective business relations, and customer satisfaction. Consider the contractor’s responsiveness to the program as it relates to meeting contract/order requirements during the period covered by the report. Comment by Goepper, Craig A CIV USARMY ACC (USA): Spell out the acronym, first time used Comment by Goepper, Craig A CIV USARMY ACC (USA): Do we want to know about contractor's history of performance re this area of consideration, or only for the contract being assessed?
|_| Exceptional |_| Very Good |_| Satisfactory |_| Marginal |_| Unsatisfactory |_| Too soon to tell |_| Not Applicable
For any adverse issues give your assessment of the extent to which the contractor was at fault (e.g. mostly attributable to contractor, evenly attributable to contractor and customer/end user, only somewhat attributable to contractor) and your assessment of the extent to which customer/end user was at fault (e.g. changes to the specification requirements, unrealistic or ambiguous specification requirements, etc.) or other factors beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the contractor.
2. Subcontract Management: Assess the contractor’s success with timely award and management of subcontracts. What efforts were taken to ensure early identification of subcontract problems and the timely application of corporate resources to preclude subcontract problems from impacting overall prime contractor performance.
|_| Exceptional |_| Very Good |_| Satisfactory |_| Marginal |_| Unsatisfactory |_| Too soon to tell |_| Not Applicable
For any adverse issues give your assessment of the extent to which the contractor was at fault (e.g. mostly attributable to contractor, evenly attributable to contractor and customer/end user, only somewhat attributable to contractor) and your assessment of the extent to which customer/end user was at fault (e.g. changes to the specification requirements, unrealistic or ambiguous specification requirements, etc.) or other factors beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the contractor.
D. General Comments:
Any additional information, which your organization deems relevant or important, is welcome by our evaluation team. Please provide any other relevant or important performance information.
PART III - RESPONDENT IDENTIFICATION
Please provide a point of contact who compiled or completed this questionnaire and who, if needed, may be contacted by our evaluation team regarding the information provided in this questionnaire.
Organization:
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number:
Address:
E-mail Address:
CUI Source Selection Information, FAR 2.101 and 3.104 image1.png
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .