Attach 6_ Bldg 223 Fire Alarm System - Asbestos and LCP Survey.pdf

Limited Asbestos &

Limited Lead-Containing Paint Report

Replace Obsolete Fire Alarm Systems Project

Buildings 220, 222, 223, 224, and 228

6905, 6805, 6707, 6705, and 6605 Randall Avenue

F.E. Warren Air Force Base, Wyoming

Terracon Project No. 24207059

May 3, 2021

Prepared for:

Farris Engineering, Inc.

Colorado Springs, Colorado

Prepared by:

Terracon Consultants, Inc.

Cheyenne, Wyoming http://terranet.terracon.com/dept/marketing/PublishingImages/brandingbar.jpg

Farris Engineering, Inc.

650 1st Street

Colorado Springs, CO 80907

Attn: Mr. Job Guerra

E: jguerra@farris-usa.com

Re: Limited Asbestos and Lead Based Paint Sampling Report

Replace Obsolete Fire Alarm Systems Project

Farris Construction Project No. 1100367/Contract No. FA7000-16-D-0002

90 CES/CEN Project No. 1083207

Buildings 220, 222, 223, 224, and 228

6905, 6805, 6707, 6705, and 6605 Randall Avenue

F.E. Warren Air Force Base, Wyoming

Terracon Project No. 24207059

Dear Mr. Guerra:

Terracon Consultants, Inc. (Terracon) was contracted by Farris Engineering, Inc. (Client) to conduct a limited asbestos and lead-containing paint survey for Buildings 220, 222, 223, 224, and 228

(6905, 6805, 6707, 6705, and 6605 Randall Avenue), F.E. Warren AFB, Wyoming. The survey was conducted in general accordance with the Agreement between Farris Engineering and

Terracon and fee proposal dated September 29, 2020.

Asbestos-containing materials were not identified in the project areas of Buildings 220, 222, 223, 224, and 228 identified by Farris Engineering, Inc. Lead-containing paints were not identified in the project areas of Buildings 220, 222, 223, 224, and 228 identified by Farris Engineering, Inc. Please refer to the attached report for details.

Terracon appreciates the opportunity to provide this service to Farris Engineering, Inc. If you have any questions regarding this report, please contact the undersigned at (307) 632-9224.

Sincerely, Terracon Consultants, Inc.

Prepared By: Reviewed By:

Brian K. Ramsell Kevin M. Troyer

Project Manager Senior Industrial Hygienist

AHERA-Accredited Asbestos Inspector AHERA-Accredited Asbestos Inspector

Terracon Consultants, Inc. 1505 Old Happy Jack Road Cheyenne, WY 82001

P [307] 632-9224 F [307] 637-5756 www.terracon.com

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION

1.1 Project Objective

BUILDING DESCRIPTION

ASBESTOS FIELD ACTIVITIES

3.1 Visual Assessment

3.2 Suspect ACM

3.3 Physical Assessment

3.4 Sample Collection

3.5 Sample Analysis

LCP FIELD ACTIVITIES

4.1 Visual Assessment

4.2 Physical Assessment

4.3 Sample Collection

4.4 Laboratory Analysis

REGULATORY OVERVIEW

5.1 Asbestos

5.2 Lead Containing Paint

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

6.1 Asbestos

6.2 Lead Containing Paint

LIMITATIONS/GENERAL COMMENTS

APPENDIX A ASBESTOS SURVEY SAMPLE LOCATION SUMMARY

APPENDIX B LEAD SAMPLE LOCATION SUMMARY

APPENDIX C ANALYTICAL LABORATORY DATA

APPENDIX D DRAWINGS

APPENDIX E PHOTO LOG

APPENDIX F ACCREDITATIONS

Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 1

LIMITED ASBESTOS AND LEAD-CONTAINING PAINT SURVEY

Replace Obsolete Fire Alarm Systems Project

Buildings 220, 222, 223, 224, and 228

6905, 6805, 6707, 6705, and 6605 Randall Avenue

Warren AFB, Wyoming

INTRODUCTION

Terracon Consultants, Inc. (Terracon) conducted a Limited Asbestos and Lead-Containing Paint

(LCP) Survey for Buildings 220, 222, 223, 224, and 228 (6905, 6805, 6707, 6705, and 6605

Randall Avenue), F.E. Warren AFB, Wyoming. The survey was limited to building components anticipated to be impacted by the planned fire alarm systems replacement project as identified by

Job Guerra of Farris Engineering, Inc. during pre-survey site-walk of the building. The survey was conducted March 30-31, 2021 by AHERA1-accredited Asbestos Inspectors.

1.1 Project Objective

The objective of the survey was to determine the presence or absence of asbestos in walls and ceiling materials and the presence or absence of lead in painted components which may be impacted by the fire alarm and fire suppression replacement project.

The purpose of the asbestos survey was to satisfy the requirements of the United States

Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 61-

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP), Subpart M, National

Emission Standard for Asbestos and the United States Occupational Safety and Health

Administration (USOSHA) 29 CFR 1926.1101 Asbestos Standard for Construction. The NESHAP prohibits the release of asbestos fibers to the atmosphere during renovation or demolition activities.

NESHAP requires that potentially regulated asbestos-containing building materials be identified, classified, and quantified prior to planned renovation or demolition activities.

The asbestos inspection and sampling process were conducted in accordance with standards of the USEPA 40 CFR Part 763 Subpart E 763, known as the Asbestos Hazard Emergency

Response Act (AHERA), USEPA NESHAP 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart M, CDPHE Regulation No.

8, Part B, 5 CCR 1001-10, Part B, USOSHA 29 CFR 1926.1101 and other applicable industry standards. Samples were delivered to an accredited laboratory for analysis by Polarized Light

Microscopy (PLM).

1 AHERA = Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act

Limited Asbestos and Lead-Containing Paint Report

Replace Obsolete Fire Alarm Systems ■ Warren AFB, Wyoming

Buildings 220, 222, 223, 224, and 226

May 3, 2021 ■ Terracon Project No. 24207059

Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 2

The purpose of the lead-containing paint inspection was to meet the informational requirements for compliance with the OSHA construction standard for lead (29 CFR 1926.62), which defines lead-containing paint as paint containing any detectable lead. The inspection was not intended to meet the requirements of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)

Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead-Based Paint (LBP) Hazards in Housing (24

CFR 35), Lead-Safe Housing Rule; EPA’s regulations under 40 CFR 745, Renovation, Repair and

Painting (RRP); or USEPA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) for waste determination. Samples of suspect LCP were collected from randomly selected painted wall substrates (drywall walls). Care was taken include all layers of paint with little or no substrate material. Samples were delivered to an accredited laboratory for analysis by Flame AAS.

1.2 Reliance

This report is for the exclusive use of Farris Engineering, Inc. and Warren Air Force Base for the project being discussed. Reliance by any other party on this report is prohibited without written authorization from Terracon, Farris Engineering, Inc., and Warren Air Force Base. Reliance on this report by Farris Engineering, Inc. and Warren Air Force Base, and all authorized parties will be subject to the terms, conditions, and limitations stated in the proposal, this report, and

Terracon’s Agreement for Services. The limitation of liability defined in Terracon’s Agreement for

Services is the aggregate limit of Terracon’s liability to Farris Engineering, Inc. and Warren Air

Force Base.

BUILDING DESCRIPTION

Building 220, 6905 Randall Avenue

Building 220 is an approximate 43,080 square foot wood-framed structure with an attic and a basement built in 1905. The building is a two-story structure with a stone masonry foundation and gabled roofing. The exterior consists of brick masonry and brick veneer. Based on information provided by 90th Civil Engineering Squadron (90 CES), the building reportedly underwent full renovation in 2008 and repairs may have been conducted since then.

Interior finishes included carpeting and vinyl floor tiles on floors, drywall on walls and ceilings, and suspended ceiling panels below drywall ceilings in the basement.

The building heating and cooling is supplied by a forced-air heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) system with air handing units (AHUs) located in the attic and distributed throughout the building through ductwork.

Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 3

Building 222, 6805 Randall Avenue

Building 222 is an approximate 43,080 square foot wood-framed structure with an attic and a basement built in 1905. The building is a two-story structure with a stone masonry foundation and gabled roofing. The exterior consists of brick masonry and brick veneer. Based on information provided by 90 CES, the building reportedly underwent full renovation in 1996 and repairs may have been conducted since then.

Interior finishes included carpeting and vinyl floor tiles on floors, drywall on walls and ceilings, and

Building 223, 6707 Randall Avenue

Building 223 is an approximate 38,120 square foot wood-framed structure with an attic and a basement built in 1904. The building is a two-story structure with a stone masonry foundation and gabled roofing. The exterior consists of brick masonry and brick veneer. Based on information

Interior finishes included carpeting and vinyl floor tiles on floors, drywall on walls and ceilings, and

Building 224, 6705 Randall Avenue

Building 224 is an approximate 38,120 square foot wood-framed structure with an attic and a basement built in 1904. The building is a two-story structure with a stone masonry foundation and gabled roofing. The exterior consists of brick masonry and brick veneer. Based on information provided by 90 CES, the building reportedly underwent full renovation in 1995 and repairs may

Interior finishes included carpeting and vinyl floor tiles on floors, drywall on walls and ceilings, and

Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 4

Building 226, 6605 Randall Avenue

Building 226 is an approximate 43,080 square foot wood-framed structure with an attic and a basement built in 1906. The building is a two-story structure with a stone masonry foundation and gabled roofing. The exterior consists of brick masonry and brick veneer. Based on information

Interior finishes included carpeting and vinyl floor tiles on floors, drywall on walls and ceilings, and

ASBESTOS FIELD ACTIVITIES

The asbestos survey was conducted March 30-31, 2021 by Mr. Brian Ramsell, Mr. Michael

Downey, and/or Mr. Kyle Leonard, AHERA-accredited asbestos inspectors. Copies of Mr.

Ramsell’s, Mr. Downey’s and Mr. Leonard’s asbestos inspector accreditations can be found in

Appendix F. A summary of survey activities is provided below.

The scope of the asbestos inspection was conducted to identify ACM in building materials which will be impacted by planned fire alarm systems replacement project. A building material is considered to be ACM if the asbestos content is greater than 1% asbestos. Sampling was conducted in accordance with standards of the AHERA under Title 40 of the Federal Register and other applicable industry standards (including NESHAP and USOSHA asbestos regulations).

3.1 Visual Assessment

Survey activities were initiated with visual observation of the interior walls and ceilings of the buildings project areas to identify and document homogeneous areas of suspect ACM. A homogeneous area (HA) consists of building materials that appear similar throughout in terms of color and texture with consideration given to the date of application. Although reasonable effort was made to survey accessible suspect materials, additional suspect but unsampled materials could be located in voids or in other concealed areas.

Should suspect materials other than those which were identified during this survey are uncovered during renovation activities, those materials should be assumed asbestos-containing until sampling and analysis can confirm the presence or absence of asbestos.

Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 5

3.2 Suspect ACM

Building materials in the project areas of the subject buildings generally observed by the inspectors to be suspect ACM included:

◼ Drywall and Taping Mud;

◼ Wall and Ceiling Texture; and

◼ Lay-In Ceiling Panels (suspended ceilings).

No materials were assumed to be ACM.

Photographs of suspect ACM can be found in Appendix E.

3.3 Physical Assessment

A physical assessment of each identified homogeneous area of suspect ACM was conducted to assess the friability and condition of the material. A friable material is defined by the USEPA as a material that can be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure when dry.

Friability was assessed by physically touching suspect materials.

3.4 Sample Collection

Based on results of the visual observation, each material was classified into one of three available types of material descriptions.

◼ Surfacing Material refers to a wide range of trowel or spray-applied materials typically used for acoustical or fire-retardant purposes. Examples include spray-applied fire retardants and acoustical texture ceilings.

◼ Thermal System Insulation (TSI) refers to insulation that is applied to heating or mechanical system components. Examples include pipe, tank and boiler insulation.

◼ Miscellaneous Materials refers to all other materials that do not fall into one of the above categories. Examples include floor tile, adhesives, and ceiling tiles.

Once the material classification was determined, the inspector then determined the friability of the material. The USEPA distinguishes between friable and non-friable forms of ACMs. Friable materials can be crumbled or reduced to powder by hand pressure, whereas non-friable materials cannot. Friable materials are more likely to release fibers into the air, especially during renovation and demolition activities. Therefore, the distinction between friable and non-friable materials is important.

Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 6

USEPA have identified two categories of materials, Regulated Asbestos-Containing Materials

(RACM) and Non-Friable ACM, for the purpose of identifying materials that can or cannot remain in a building during demolition.

• RACM are defined as friable materials, and non-friable materials that have a high probability of becoming friable during demolition activities. RACM are categorized as all friable ACM, Category I non-friable ACM that may become friable (subject to sanding, grinding, cutting or abrading during the demolition process), or Category II non-friable

ACM that has a probability of becoming crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to a powder by the force expected to act on the material in the course of normal demolition operations

(that are performed in accordance with USEPA NESHAP demolition guidance).

• Non-regulated asbestos-containing materials (non-RACM) are those non-friable materials likely to remain non-friable during normal demolition operations. Non-RACMs are categorized as either Category I non-friable ACM that will not be subject to sanding, grinding, cutting or abrading during the demolition process, or Category II non-friable ACM that has a low probability of becoming crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to a powder by the force expected to act on the material in the course of normal demolition operations.

USEPA regulations require proper removal and disposal of all RACM and non-RACM prior to renovation or demolition activities.

The following Bulk Sampling protocol for friable and Category I and II non-friable materials was used to determine the number of samples to be collected for friable materials and non-friable materials deemed potential RACM (non-friable materials with potential to be rendered friable during normal demolition).

Table #1 - Bulk Sampling Strategy

Material Homogeneous Area

Units Minimum Number of Samples

Friable Surfacing Less than 1000

1000 to 5000

More than 5000

SF 3

Friable and Non-Friable Thermal System Insulation

LF / SF / EA 3

Friable and Non-Friable Miscellaneous Materials LF / SF / EA 3

Suspect building materials that are considered surfacing are collected in a statistically random manner using a random number generator.

Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 7

Bulk samples of newly identified suspect ACM were collected in accordance with the sampling protocols outlined in 40 CFR Part 763, Subpart E. Samples of suspect materials were collected from randomly selected locations in each HA. Bulk samples were collected using wet methods, as applicable, to reduce the potential for fiber release. Samples were placed in sealable containers and labeled with unique sample numbers using an indelible marker.

The selection of sample locations and frequency of sampling were based on Terracon’s visual and physical assessments and the assumption that like materials in the same area are homogeneous in content.

The following were collected by Terracon from each building:

Building 220: 22 samples from 7 homogenous areas of suspect ACM in project areas.

Building 222: 19 samples from 5 homogenous areas of suspect ACM in project areas.

Building 223: 19 samples from 5 homogenous areas of suspect ACM in project areas.

Building 224: 19 samples from 5 homogenous areas of suspect ACM in project areas.

Building 226: 19 samples from 5 homogenous areas of suspect ACM in project areas.

A summary of suspect ACM samples collected during the survey is included as Appendix A.

Sample location diagrams are included as Appendix D. Photographs of suspect ACM can be found in Appendix E.

3.5 Sample Analysis

The inspector shipped the samples along with a completed chain-of-custody (COC) to the laboratory. The laboratory then arranged the samples in numerical order. If a discrepancy between the samples exists, this is noted and initialed on the log sheet. The laboratory signed a copy of the chain-of-custody to acknowledge receipt. The inspector retained the signed copy for evidentiary purposes. Further, the laboratory assigned a laboratory number to each sample received. The laboratory labeled both the analytical report and the sample container with this laboratory number for cross-reference purposes.

Bulk samples were submitted under chain of custody to Eurofins EMLab P&K (EMLab) of Denver, Colorado, for analysis of asbestos by polarized light microscopy with dispersion staining techniques per EPA’s Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials (600/R-

93/116). The percentage of asbestos, if present, was determined by microscopic visual estimation. EMLab is accredited by the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program

(NVLAP Lab No. 500053-0). The laboratory analytical report and COC are provided in Appendix

C.

Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 8

LCP FIELD ACTIVITIES

The limited lead-containing paint (LCP) inspection was conducted March 30-31, 2021 by Mr. Brian

Ramsell. A summary of survey activities is provided below.

The LCP survey was conducted to provide the client with information to help comply with USOSHA requirements for evaluating the potential for lead exposure during disturbance of painted building components. The LCP testing was not performed to the HUD “Guidelines for the Evaluation and

Control of Lead-Based Paint Hazards in Housing” or USEPA regulation 40 CFR 745, Amendment to Final Rule: Lead; Requirements for Lead-Based Paint Activities in Target Housing and Child-

Occupied Facilities; Certification Requirement and Work Practice Standards for Individuals and

Firms since these guidelines and regulation do not apply to commercial facilities, such as this site.

4.1 Visual Assessment

Sampling activities began with visual observation to identify unique combinations of paint most prevalent in the building. A unique combination of paint consists of paint that is applied to a building material and has similar component type, substrate, visible color, and texture.

4.2 Physical Assessment

A physical assessment of each unique combination of paint was conducted to assess the condition of the paint. Paint was visually assessed and assigned a condition of intact, top layer failure, multi-layer failure and substrate failure.

4.3 Sample Collection

The painting history of a given location in older buildings often will vary from place to place due to factors including variability in paints used, paint film thickness, variable retention of older paint layers before repainting, demolition/installation of walls during renovations, and unknown historic non-homogenous painting schemes. As such, a given color and building component combination that is apparent often will not provide consistent testing results for lead.

Terracon attempted to conduct LCP testing in a sufficient number of areas to establish trends in lead content based on distinguishable characteristics such as color or building component.

Photographs of painted building components can be found in Appendix E.

Based on Terracon’s visual observations, chip samples were collected from painted building components. Paint chip samples included all layers of paint with care taken to minimize collection of the substrate. Samples were placed in sealable containers and labeled with unique sample

Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 9 numbers using an indelible marker. This number (along with other information such as sample location, color, substrate, and condition) was recorded in the sample log.

The following were collected by Terracon from each building:

Building 220: 2 representative paint chip samples from the project area.

Building 222: 1 representative paint chip sample from the project area.

Building 223: 1 representative paint chip sample from the project area.

Building 224: 1 representative paint chip sample from the project area.

Building 226: 1 representative paint chip sample from the project area.

The inspector shipped the samples along with a completed chain-of-custody document to the laboratory. The laboratory then arranged the samples in numerical order. If a discrepancy between the samples exists, this is noted and initialed on the log sheet. The laboratory signed a copy of the chain-of-custody to acknowledge receipt. The inspector retained the signed copy for evidentiary purposes. Further, the laboratory assigned a laboratory number to each sample

4.4 Laboratory Analysis

The inspector shipped the paint chip samples along with a completed chain-of-custody (COC) to the laboratory. The laboratory then arranged the samples in numerical order. If a discrepancy between the samples exists, this is noted and initialed on the log sheet. The laboratory signed a copy of the chain-of-custody to acknowledge receipt. The inspector retained the signed copy for evidentiary purposes. Further, the laboratory assigned a laboratory number to each sample

The paint chip samples were submitted under COC to EMSL of Indianapolis, Indiana for analysis by flame atomic absorption spectrophotometry (AAS) in accordance with USEPA SW-846 Methods

3050B/7000B Acid Digestion of Sediments, Sludges, and Soils / Flame Atomic Absorption

Spectrophotometry. EMSL is accredited by the AIHA® Laboratory Accreditation Programs, LLC under the Industrial Hygiene Laboratory Accreditation Program (IHLAP; Accreditation No.

157245). The laboratory analytical report and COC are provided in Appendix C.

Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 10

REGULATORY OVERVIEW

5.1 Asbestos

The asbestos NESHAP (40 CFR Part 61, Subpart M) regulates asbestos fiber emissions and asbestos waste disposal practices. The asbestos NESHAP regulation also requires the identification and classification of existing ACM according to friability prior to demolition or renovation activity. Friable ACM is a material containing more than 1% asbestos that, when dry, can be crumbled, pulverized or reduced to powder by hand pressure. Friable ACMs are considered RACM.

The asbestos NESHAP regulation classifies ACM as RACM, Category I nonfriable ACM or

Category II nonfriable ACM. RACM includes all friable ACMs, along with Category I and Category

II nonfriable ACMs that have become friable; will be or have been subjected to sanding, grinding, cutting or abrading; or have a high probability of becoming or have become crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder in the course of renovation or demolition activity. Category I nonfriable ACM are exclusively asbestos-containing packings, gaskets, resilient floor coverings, resilient floor covering mastics and asphalt roofing products that contain more than 1% asbestos. Category II nonfriable ACM are all other nonfriable materials other than Category I nonfriable ACM that contain more than 1% asbestos. Category II nonfriable ACM generally includes but is not limited to cementitious material such as: cement pipes, cement siding, cement panels, glazing, mortar and grouts.

The Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality (WDEQ), enforces the Asbestos NESHAP as adopted by reference under authority of Sections 35-11-110, 112, 114, and 202 through 212 of the Wyoming Environmental Quality Act, 1993 and in accordance with provisions of Sections

16-3-101 through 16-3-115 of the Wyoming Administrative Procedures Act. The owner or operator must provide WDEQ with written notification at least 10 working days prior to the commencement of asbestos abatement activities that will disturb RACM in amounts greater than or equal to 160 square feet, 260 linear feet or 35 cubic feet.

The USOSHA asbestos standard for construction (29 CFR 1926.1101) regulates workplace exposure to asbestos. The USOSHA standard requires that employee exposure to airborne asbestos fibers be maintained below the permissible exposure limits (PELs) of 0.1 asbestos fiber per cubic centimeter of air (0.1 f/cc) as an 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA) or 1.0 f/cc as a 30-minute excursion limit. The USOSHA standard classifies construction and maintenance activities that could disturb ACM and specifies work practices and precautions that employers must follow when engaging in each class of regulated work.

Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 11

5.2 Lead Containing Paint

The USOSHA lead standard for general industry 29 CFR 1910.1025 and lead standard for construction (29 CFR 1926.62) regulates workplace exposure to lead. USOSHA regulates construction activities that disturb lead-containing material regardless of the concentration.

Personnel performing renovation or demolition activities that may disturb painted components with concentrations of lead above the designated analytical detection limit should comply with all current

USOSHA regulations in order to minimize employee exposure.

Construction work covered by USOSHA standards includes any repair or renovation activities or other activities that disturb in-place lead-containing materials but does not include routine cleaning and repainting where there is insignificant damage, wear, or corrosion of existing lead-containing coatings or substrates. Employers must assure that no employee will be exposed to lead at concentrations greater than the PEL of 50 micrograms per cubic meter (g/m3) averaged over an eight-hour period without adequate protection. The USOSHA standard also establishes an action level of 30 g/m3, which if exceeded, triggers requirements for recurrent exposure monitoring, medical surveillance program, and training about lead. USOSHA does not define the amount of lead in paint that constitutes lead containing paint. An exposure assessment per trigger task should be conducted to determine if actual airborne levels are below the required USOSHA action and permissible levels.

To protect families from exposure to lead from paint, dust, and soil, Congress passed the

Residential Lead-Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act of 1992, also known as Title X. Section 1018 of this law directed HUD and USEPA to require the disclosure of known information on lead-based paint and lead-based paint hazards before the sale or lease of most housing built before 1978.

USEPA and HUD The HUD and USEPA define lead-based paint as any coating that has a lead concentration equal to or greater than (≥) 1.0 mg/cm2 or ≥0.5% by weight. Most private housing, public housing, federally-owned housing, and housing receiving federal assistance are affected by this rule.

Applicable certification, occupant protection, and clearance requirements and work practice standards for lead-based paint are found in regulations issued by USEPA at 40 CFR Part 745 known as the Lead Renovations, Repair and Painting Rule and in regulations issued by HUD at

24 CFR Part 35 known as the Lead Safe Housing Rule.

The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) gave the USEPA authority to regulate the waste status of demolition and renovation debris, including lead-containing materials. Specific notification and testing requirements must be addressed prior to transporting, treating, storing, or disposing of hazardous wastes. Lead-containing wastes are considered hazardous waste under

RCRA if Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) results exceed 5 milligrams per liter

Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 12

(mg/L). USEPA exempts from most RCRA requirements for those generators whose combined hazardous waste generation is less than 100 kilograms (kg) per month.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

6.1 Asbestos

Asbestos-containing materials (ACM) were not identified, as a result of laboratory analysis, in the samples collected from the project areas of buildings 220, 222, 223, 224, and 226.

Should renovation work require disturbance of any other building material not identified in this survey report, or other valid asbestos survey report(s), an asbestos inspection must be conducted by an AHERA-accredited asbestos inspector in accordance with state and federal regulations.

6.2 Lead Containing Paint

Paint containing detectable quantities of lead were not identified, as a result of laboratory analysis, in the representative paint samples collected from the project areas of buildings

220, 222, 223, 224, and 226.

The analyses of representative paint chip samples yielded results below the laboratory detection limit. While the paints sampled were representative of the component, substrate, color, and condition, additional layers of paint may be present throughout each building. Terracon recommends additional sampling of painted surfaces where additional layers of paint are encountered.

The USOSHA Lead Standard, 29 CFR 1926.62 Lead, does not define lead paint based on content. Any detectable lead in a paint makes it lead paint for the purpose of complying with

USOSHA regulations to determine worker exposure. The standard requires that employers perform an initial exposure determination using airborne exposure monitoring, historical data, or objective data.

A summary of the paint chip sample locations and analysis is presented in Appendix B. Laboratory analytical reports are included in Appendix C.

LIMITATIONS/GENERAL COMMENTS

The Limited Asbestos and Lead Containing Paint Survey was limited to the planned fire alarm systems replacement project areas of Buildings 220, 222, 223, 224, and 226 as identified by Farris

Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 13

Engineering. Should renovation work require disturbance of any building material not identified in this survey report, an asbestos inspection must be conducted by AHERA-accredited asbestos inspectors in accordance with local, state, and federal regulations prior to disturbance. If additional but unsampled suspect ACMs are revealed during renovation activities, the material(s) must be assumed to contain asbestos and treated as such unless sampled by an accredited inspector and laboratory analysis determines otherwise.

This asbestos and lead containing paint survey was conducted in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in the same locale. The results, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this report are based on conditions observed during our survey of the project area.

The information contained in this report is relevant to the date on which this survey was performed and should not be relied upon to represent conditions at a later date. This report has been prepared on behalf of and exclusively for use by Farris Engineering, Inc. for specific application to their project as discussed herein. This report is not a bidding document. Contractors or consultants reviewing this report must draw their own conclusions regarding further investigation or remediation deemed necessary. Terracon does not warrant the work of regulatory agencies, laboratories, or other third parties supplying information which may have been used in the preparation of this report. No warranty, express or implied is made.

A-1

APPENDIX A

F. E. WARREN AIR FORCE BASE

WARREN AFB, WYOMING

TERRACON PROJECT NO. 24207059

ASBESTOS SURVEY SAMPLE LOCATION SUMMARY

BUILDING 220, 6905 RANDALL AVENUE, WARREN AFB, WYOMING

HA No.

Sample

Number Sample Location Material Description Layer

Lab Results

% Asbestos

NESHAP

Category

OSHA

Category

AHERA

Assessment Condition HA Locations

Estimated

Quantity1

01-WB1 01-WB1-01 Room B04, NW Corner Wall, ~2.5' Up 5/8" White Drywall & White Taping Mud

L1 - White Drywall w/ Brown Paper

L2 - White Mud

L3 - Cream Tape

L4 - White Compound w/ Paint

ND

ND

ND

ND

Nonfriable

Non-ACM Miscellaneous N/A Good

Throughout Building, Walls and

Hard Ceilings

Not

Quantified 01-WB1 01-WB1-02 Room B21, SW Corner Wall, ~2' Up 5/8" White Drywall & White Taping Mud

L1 - White Drywall w/ Brown Paper

L2 - White Mud

L3 - Cream Tape

L4 - White Compound w/ Paint

ND

ND

ND

ND

Nonfriable

Non-ACM Miscellaneous N/A Good

01-WB1 01-WB1-03 Dorm 106, Closet, NW Corner Wall, ~4' Up 5/8" White Drywall & White Taping Mud

L1 - White Drywall w/ Brown Paper

L2 - White Mud

L3 - Cream Tape

L4 - White Compound w/ Paint

ND

ND

ND

ND

Nonfriable

Non-ACM Miscellaneous N/A Good

02-PL5 02-PL5-04

Corridor B01 (by Room B04), North Wall, ~3.5' from East, ~7' Up Painted White Orange Peel Texture

L1 - White Drywall w/ Brown Paper

L2 - White Texture w/ Paint

ND

ND

Nonfriable

Non-ACM Surfacing N/A Good

Throughout Building, Walls and

Hard Ceilings

Not

Quantified

(estimated

>5,000 SF)

02-PL5 02-PL5-05

Corridor B01 (by Room B07), West Wall, ~7' from North, ~7' Up Painted White Orange Peel Texture

L1 - White Drywall w/ Brown Paper

L2 - White Texture w/ Paint

ND

ND

Nonfriable

Non-ACM Surfacing N/A Good

02-PL5 02-PL5-06

Corridor B01 Game Room (by Rooms B12, B16, and B19), South Side by Stairwell, West

Wall, ~.25' from South, ~7' Up

Painted White Orange Peel Texture L1 - White Drywall w/ Brown Paper

L2 - White Texture w/ Paint

ND

ND

Nonfriable

Non-ACM Surfacing N/A Good

02-PL5 02-PL5-07

Dorm 106, Closet, North Wall, ~1' from West, ~4' Up Painted White Orange Peel Texture L1 - White Texture w/ Paint ND

Nonfriable

Non-ACM Surfacing N/A Good

02-PL5 02-PL5-08

Dorm 206, Common Area Living Room, North

Wall, ~16.5' from East, ~1.5' Up Painted White Orange Peel Texture L1 - White Texture w/ Paint ND

Nonfriable

Non-ACM Surfacing N/A Good

02-PL5 02-PL5-09

Dorm 202, Kitchen, South Wall, ~2' from East, ~1.5' Up Painted White Orange Peel Texture

L1 - White Drywall w/ Brown Paper

L2 - White Texture w/ Paint

ND

ND

Nonfriable

Non-ACM Surfacing N/A Good

02-PL5 02-PL5-10

Attic at Stairwell, North Wall of Stairwell, ~3' from West, ~1' Up Painted White Orange Peel Texture

L1 - White Drywall w/ Brown Paper

L2 - White Texture w/ Paint

ND

ND

Nonfriable

Non-ACM Surfacing N/A Good

03-CT2 03-CT2-11

Corridor B01 (by Room B04), along North

Wall, ~4' from East, ~6.75' Up

2' x 2' White LICP w/ Odd Shaped Pits and Pinholes

L1 - Beige Ceiling Tile w/ White

Surface

ND

Friable

Non-ACM Miscellaneous N/A Good

Throughout Finished Basement, Suspended Ceilings

Not

Quantified 03-CT2 03-CT2-12

Room B01, Game Room (by Rooms B12, B16, and B19), South Side by Stairwell, along

West Wall, ~.25' from South, ~7' Up

2' x 2' White LICP w/ Odd Shaped Pits and Pinholes

L1 - Beige Ceiling Tile w/ White

Miscellaneous N/A Good

03-CT2 03-CT2-13

Corridor B01 (by Room B07), ~9.5' from

North, ~5.5' from West, ~7' Up

2' x 2' White LICP w/ Odd Shaped Pits and Pinholes

L1 - Beige Ceiling Tile w/ White

Miscellaneous N/A Good

1 Estimated quantities are based on a cursory field evaluation of the project area, and actual quantities may vary significantly, especially if asbestos containing materials are present in hidden and/or inaccessible areas not evaluated as part of this survey. ~ = approximately;

SF = square feet; LF = linear feet; EA = each (number of pipe fittings counted).

A-2

Sample

Number Sample Location Material Description Layer

Lab Results

% Asbestos

NESHAP

Category

OSHA

Category

AHERA

Assessment Condition HA Locations

Estimated

Quantity1

04-CT2 04-CT2-14

Corridor B01 Restroom (by Room B12), along

South Wall, ~2' from West, ~6.75' Up

2' x 2' White Drywall LICP w/ White Vinyl

Covering

L1 - White Ceiling Tile w/ White

Miscellaneous N/A Good

Throughout Finished Basement, Suspended Ceilings

Not

Quantified

04-CT2 04-CT2-15

Corridor B01 Restroom (by Room B12), 1' from North, ~2.5' from East, ~6.75' Up

2' x 2' White Drywall LICP w/ White Vinyl

Covering

L1 - White Ceiling Tile w/ White

Miscellaneous N/A Good

04-CT2 05-CT2-16

Room B01, Game Room (by Rooms B12, B16, and B19), ~9.5' from North, ~17.5' from

East, ~7' Up

2' x 2' White LICP w/ Short Fissures, Odd

Shaped Pits and Pinholes L1 - Gray Ceiling Tile ND

Friable

Non-ACM Miscellaneous N/A Good

05-CT2 05-CT2-17

Room B01, Game Room (by Rooms B12, B16, and B19), ~13.5' from North, ~33' from

East, ~7' Up

2' x 2' White LICP w/ Short Fissures, Odd

Shaped Pits and Pinholes

L1 - Beige Ceiling Tile w/ White

Miscellaneous N/A Good

Throughout Finished Basement, Suspended Ceilings

Not

Quantified

05-CT2 05-CT2-18

Room B01, Game Room (by Rooms B12, B16, and B19), ~14' from South, ~28.5 from

East, ~7' Up

2' x 2' White LICP w/ Short Fissures, Odd

Shaped Pits and Pinholes

L1 - Beige Ceiling Tile w/ White

Miscellaneous N/A Good

05-CT2 06-CT2-19

Room B01, Game Room (by Rooms B12, B16, and B19), ~11' from North, ~14 from

East, ~7' Up

2' x 2' White LICP w/ Various Sized

Fissures, Pits, and Various Sized Pinholes

L1 - White Ceiling Tile w/ White

Miscellaneous N/A Good

06-CT2 06-CT2-20

Room B01, Game Room (by Rooms B12, B16, and B19), ~13.5' from North, ~18.5 from

East, ~7' Up

2' x 2' White LICP w/ Various Sized

Fissures, Pits, and Various Sized Pinholes

L1 - Beige Ceiling Tile w/ White

Miscellaneous N/A Good

Throughout Finished Basement, Suspended Ceilings

Not

Quantified

06-CT2 07-CT2-21

Room B01, Game Room (by Rooms B12, B16, and B19), ~9.5' from North, ~19 from

East, ~7' Up

2' x 2' White LICP w/ Deep Various Sized

Fissures, Shallow Pits, and Pinholes

L1 - Beige Ceiling Tile w/ White

Miscellaneous N/A Good

07-CT2 07-CT2-22

Room B01, Game Room (by Rooms B12, B16, and B19), ~11.5' from North, ~19 from

East, ~7' Up

2' x 2' White LICP w/ Deep Various Sized

Fissures, Shallow Pits, and Pinholes

L1 - White Ceiling Tile w/ White

Miscellaneous N/A Good

BUILDING 222, 6805 RANDALL AVENUE, WARREN AFB, WYOMING

HA No.

Sample

Number Sample Location Material Description Layer

Lab Results

% Asbestos

NESHAP

Category

OSHA

Category

AHERA

Assessment Condition HA Locations

Estimated

Quantity2

01-WB1 01-WB1-01

Basement, Room B05, Mechanical Room, SE

Corner Wall, ~1.5' Up 5/8" White Drywall & White Taping Mud

L1 - White Drywall w/ Brown Paper

L2 - White Joint Compound

L3 - Cream Tape

L4 - White Compound w/ Paint

ND

ND

ND

ND

Nonfriable

Non-ACM Miscellaneous N/A Good

Throughout Building, Walls and

Hard Ceilings

Not

Quantified

01-WB1 01-WB1-02

First Floor, West Wing, Room 125, Utility

Room, NE Corner Wall, ~4' Up 5/8" White Drywall & White Taping Mud

L1 - White Drywall w/ Brown Paper

L2 - White Joint Compound

L3 - Cream Tape

L4 - White Compound w/ Paint

ND

ND

ND

ND

Nonfriable

Non-ACM Miscellaneous N/A Good

01-WB1 01-WB1-03

Second Floor, Middle Wing, Attic Stairwell, NE

Corner Wall, ~4' Up 5/8" White Drywall & White Taping Mud

L1 - White Drywall w/ Brown Paper

L2 - White Joint Compound

L3 - Cream Tape

L4 - White Compound w/ Paint

ND

ND

ND

ND

Nonfriable

Non-ACM Miscellaneous N/A Good

02-PL5 02-PL5-04

Basement, West Wing, Room B02, Supply

Room (adjacent to Communication Room, North Column, South Wall, ~7' Up

Painted White Orange Peel Texture L1 - White Drywall w/ Brown Paper

L2 - White Texture w/ Paint

ND

ND

Nonfriable

Non-ACM Surfacing N/A Good

Throughout Building, Walls and

Hard Ceilings

Not

Quantified

(estimated

>5,000 SF) 02-PL5 02-PL5-05

Basement, East Wing, Kitchen, North Wall at

Ceiling, ~6' from East Wall, ~7' Up Painted White Orange Peel Texture L1 - White Texture w/ Paint ND

Nonfriable

Surfacing N/A Good

2 Estimated quantities are based on a cursory field evaluation of the project area, and actual quantities may vary significantly, especially if asbestos containing materials are present in hidden and/or inaccessible areas not evaluated as part of this survey. ~ = approximately;

A-3

Sample

Number Sample Location Material Description Layer

Lab Results

% Asbestos

NESHAP

Category

OSHA

Category

AHERA

Assessment Condition HA Locations

Estimated

Quantity2

02-PL5 02-PL5-06

First Floor, East Wing, Room 122, SE Storage

Room, South Wall, ~2.5' from East Wall, ~1'

Up

Painted White Orange Peel Texture L1 - White Texture w/ Paint ND Nonfriable

Non-ACM Surfacing N/A Good

02-PL5 02-PL5-07

First Floor, Unit 110, Kitchen, West Wall, ~2' from South Wall, ~1' Up Painted White Orange Peel Texture L1 - White Texture w/ Paint ND

Nonfriable

Non-ACM Surfacing N/A Good

02-PL5 02-PL5-08

First Floor, Middle Wing, Lobby 116, East

Wall, ~12' from North, ~5.5' Up Painted White Orange Peel Texture

L1 - White Drywall w/ Brown Paper

L2 - White Texture w/ Paint

ND

ND

Nonfriable

Non-ACM Surfacing N/A Good

02-PL5 02-PL5-09

Second Floor, West Wing, Room 224, Telephone Room, North Wall, ~3" from West, ~2.5' Up

Painted White Orange Peel Texture L1 - Brown Paper

L2 - White Texture w/ Paint

ND

ND

Nonfriable

Non-ACM Surfacing N/A Good

02-PL5 02-PL5-10

Second Floor, Middle Wing, Unit 208, Kitchen, South Wall, ~6' from East, ~5.5' Up Painted White Orange Peel Texture

L1 - Brown Paper

L2 - White Texture w/ Paint

ND

ND

Nonfriable

Non-ACM Surfacing N/A Good

03-CT2 03-CT2-11

Basement, Middle Wing, Room B08 (adjacent to Laundry Room), along North Wall, ~1' from

East, ~7' Up

2' x 2' White LICP w/ Short Fissures, Odd

Shaped Pits and Pinholes

L1 - Beige Ceiling Tile w/ White

Miscellaneous N/A Good

Throughout Finished Basement and Corridors on 1st and 2nd

Floors, Suspended Ceilings

Not

Quantified 03-CT2 03-CT2-12 Basement, Middle Wing, Room B09, Day

Room, ~3' from South, ~2' from East, ~7' Up

2' x 2' White LICP w/ Short Fissures, Odd

Shaped Pits and Pinholes

L1 - Beige Ceiling Tile w/ White

Miscellaneous N/A Good

03-CT2 03-CT2-13

Basement, Middle Wing, Room B10, Theater

Room, NE Corner, ~7' Up

2' x 2' White LICP w/ Short Fissures, Odd

Shaped Pits and Pinholes

L1 - Beige Ceiling Tile w/ White

Miscellaneous N/A Good

04-CT2 04-CT2-14

Basement, Middle Wing, Room B11, Day

Room, along East Wall, 7' from South, ~7' Up

2' x 2' White LICP w/ Various Sized Deep

Fissures, Various Sized Deep Pits, and

Pinholes, Densely Grouped

L1 - Beige Ceiling Tile w/ White

Miscellaneous N/A Good

Throughout Finished Basement and Corridors on 1st and 2nd

Floors, Suspended Ceilings

Not

Quantified

04-CT2 04-CT2-15

Basement, Middle Wing, Room B11, Day

Room, along East Wall, 9' from South, ~7' Up

2' x 2' White LICP w/ Various Sized Deep

Fissures, Various Sized Deep Pits, and

Pinholes, Densely Grouped

L1 - Beige Ceiling Tile w/ White

Miscellaneous N/A Good

04-CT2 04-CT2-16

Basement, Middle Wing, Room B10, Theater

Room, along West Wall, ~5' from South, ~7'

Up

2' x 2' White LICP w/ Various Sized Deep

Fissures, Various Sized Deep Pits, and

Pinholes, Densely Grouped

L1 - Beige Ceiling Tile w/ White

Miscellaneous N/A Good

05-PL5 05-PL5-17

Basement, Middle Wing, Room B11, Day

Room, ~5' from South, ~7' from West, ~7' Up

2' x 2' White LICP w/ Various Sized Deep

Fissures, Various Sized Deep Pits, and

Pinholes

L1 - Beige Ceiling Tile w/ White

Miscellaneous N/A Good

Throughout Finished Basement and Corridors on 1st and 2nd

Floors, Suspended Ceilings

Not

Quantified

05-PL5 05-PL5-18

Basement, Middle Wing, Room B11, Day

Room, along North Wall, ~8.5' from West, ~7'

Up

2' x 2' White LICP w/ Various Sized Deep

Fissures, Various Sized Deep Pits, and

Pinholes

L1 - Beige Ceiling Tile w/ White

Miscellaneous N/A Good

05-PL5 05-PL5-19

Basement, Middle Wing, Room B10, Theater

Room, ~5' from South, ~4' from East, ~7' Up

2' x 2' White LICP w/ Various Sized Deep

Fissures, Various Sized Deep Pits, and

Pinholes

L1 - Beige Ceiling Tile w/ White

Miscellaneous N/A Good

BUILDING 223, 6707 RANDALL AVENUE, WARREN AFB, WYOMING

HA No.

Sample

Number Sample Location Material Description Layer

Lab Results

% Asbestos

NESHAP

Category

OSHA

Category

AHERA

Assessment Condition HA Locations

Estimated

Quantity3

01-WB1 01-WB1-01

Basement, West Wing, Room B06, Laundry

Room, Ceiling, ~7.5' from North, ~8' from

West, ~6.5' Up

5/8" White Drywall & White Taping Mud

L1 - White Drywall w/ Brown Paper

L2 - White Joint Compound

L3 - Cream Tape

L4 - White Compound w/ Paint

ND

ND

ND

ND

Nonfriable

Non-ACM Miscellaneous N/A Good

Throughout Building, Walls and

Hard Ceilings

Not

Quantified

3 Estimated quantities are based on a cursory field evaluation of the project area, and actual quantities may vary significantly, especially if asbestos containing materials are present in hidden and/or inaccessible areas not evaluated as part of this survey. ~ = approximately;

A-4

Sample

Number Sample Location Material Description Layer

Lab Results

% Asbestos

NESHAP

Category

OSHA

Category

AHERA

Assessment Condition HA Locations

Estimated

Quantity3

01-WB1 01-WB1-02

First Floor, Middle Wing, Unit 107, Kitchen, SE Corner Wall, ~4.5' Up 5/8" White Drywall & White Taping Mud

L1 - White Drywall w/ Brown Paper

L2 - White Joint Compound

L3 - Cream Tape

L4 - White Compound w/ Paint

ND

ND

ND

ND

Nonfriable

Non-ACM Miscellaneous N/A Good

01-WB1 01-WB1-03

Middle Wing, Attic Stairwell, SW Corner Wall, ~4' Up 5/8" White Drywall & White Taping Mud

L1 - White Drywall w/ Brown Paper

L2 - White Joint Compound

L3 - Cream Tape

L4 - White Compound w/ Paint

ND

ND

ND

ND

Nonfriable

Non-ACM Miscellaneous N/A Good

02-PL5 02-PL5-04

Basement, West Wing, Room B06, Laundry

Room, Ceiling, ~3' from South, ~10' from

West, ~6.5' Up

Painted White Orange Peel Texture L1 - White Drywall w/ Brown Paper

L2 - White Texture w/ Paint

ND

ND

Nonfriable

Non-ACM Surfacing N/A Good

Throughout Building, Walls and

Hard Ceilings

Not

Quantified

(estimated

>5,000 SF)

02-PL5 02-PL5-05

Basement, East Wing, Room B08, Kitchen, North Wall, ~9' from West, ~6' Up Painted White Orange Peel Texture

L1 - White Drywall w/ Brown Paper

L2 - White Texture w/ Paint

ND

ND

Nonfriable

Non-ACM Surfacing N/A Good

02-PL5 02-PL5-06

First Floor, East Wing, Room 120, Storage

Room by Stairwell, South Wall, ~2.5' from

West, ~3' Up

Painted White Orange Peel Texture L1 - White Drywall w/ Brown Paper

L2 - White Texture w/ Paint

ND

ND

Nonfriable

Non-ACM Surfacing N/A Good

02-PL5 02-PL5-07

First Floor, Middle Wing, Lobby 102, West

Wall, ~8' from South, ~5.5' Up Painted White Orange Peel Texture

L1 - White Drywall w/ Brown Paper

L2 - White Texture w/ Paint

ND

ND

Nonfriable

Non-ACM Surfacing N/A Good

02-PL5 02-PL5-08

First Floor, West Wing, Common Area 115, Ceiling, ~6' from South, 2.5' from West, ~9' Up Painted White Orange Peel Texture

L1 - White Drywall w/ Brown Paper

L2 - White Texture w/ Paint

ND

ND

Nonfriable

Non-ACM Surfacing N/A Good

02-PL5 02-PL5-09

Second Floor, Middle Wing, Unit 205, Kitchen, North Wall, ~2' from West, ~1.5' Up Painted White Orange Peel Texture

L1 - Yellow Tape

L2 - White Texture w/ Paint

ND

ND

Nonfriable

Non-ACM Surfacing N/A Good

02-PL5 02-PL5-10

Second Floor, East Wing, Room 220, Storage

Room by Stairwell, North Wall, ~2.5' from

East, ~6" Up

Painted White Orange Peel Texture L1 - White Drywall w/ Brown Paper

L2 - White Texture w/ Paint

ND

ND

Nonfriable

Non-ACM Surfacing N/A Good

03-CT2 03-CT2-11

Basement, West Wing, Room B01, Day Room adjacent to Laundry Room, ~9' from North, ~16' from East, ~6.5' Up

2' x 4' White LICP w/ Short Fissures, Odd

Shaped Pits and Pinholes

L1 - Beige Ceiling Tile w/ White

Miscellaneous N/A Good

Throughout Finished Basement and Corridors on 1st and 2nd

Floors, Suspended Ceilings

Not

Quantified

03-CT2 03-CT2-12

Basement, Middle Wing, Room B16, Ceiling, ~4' from North, ~2.5' from West, ~6.5' Up

2' x 4' White LICP w/ Short Fissures, Odd

Shaped Pits and Pinholes

L1 - Beige Ceiling Tile w/ White

Miscellaneous N/A Good

03-CT2 03-CT2-13

Basement, East Wing, Room B11, Old Dorm

Office, ~6' from North, ~7' from West, ~6.5' Up

2' x 4' White LICP w/ Short Fissures, Odd

Shaped Pits and Pinholes

L1 - Beige Ceiling Tile w/ White

Miscellaneous N/A Good

04-CT2 04-CT2-14

Basement, West Wing, Room B01, Day Room adjacent to Laundry Room, ~7' from North, ~12' from East, ~6.5' Up

2' x 4' White LICP w/ Various Sized Deep

Fissures, Various Sized Deep Pits, and

Pinholes

L1 - Beige Ceiling Tile w/ White

Miscellaneous N/A Good

Throughout Finished Basement and Corridors on 1st and 2nd

Floors, Suspended Ceilings

Not

Quantified

04-CT2 04-CT2-15

Basement, East Wing, Room B12, Game

Room, Ceiling, ~9' from North, ~14' from

West, ~6.5' Up

2' x 4' White LICP w/ Various Sized Deep

Fissures, Various Sized Deep Pits, and

Pinholes

L1 - Beige Ceiling Tile w/ White

Miscellaneous N/A Good

04-CT2 04-CT2-16

Basement, East Wing, Room B12, Game

Room, Ceiling, ~11' from North, ~13' from

West, ~6.5' Up

2' x 4' White LICP w/ Various Sized Deep

Fissures, Various Sized Deep Pits, and

Pinholes

L1 - Beige Ceiling Tile w/ White

A-5

Sample

Number Sample Location Material Description Layer

Lab Results

% Asbestos

NESHAP

Category

OSHA

Category

AHERA

Assessment Condition HA Locations

Estimated

Quantity3

05-CT2 05-CT2-17

Basement, East Wing, Room B12, Game

Room, Ceiling, ~10' from South, ~10' from

West, ~6.5' Up

2' x 4' White LICP w/ Long and Short

Deep Fissures, Various Sized Pits, and

Pinholes

L1 - Beige Ceiling Tile w/ White

Miscellaneous N/A Good

Throughout Finished Basement and Corridors on 1st and 2nd

Floors, Suspended Ceilings

Not

Quantified

05-CT2 05-CT2-18

Basement, East Wing, Room B12, Game

Room, Ceiling, ~11' from North, ~6' from

West, ~6.5' Up

2' x 4' White LICP w/ Long and Short

Deep Fissures, Various Sized Pits, and

Pinholes

L1 - Beige Ceiling Tile w/ White

Miscellaneous N/A Good

05-CT2 05-CT2-19

Basement, East Wing, Room B12, Game

Room, Ceiling, ~13.5' from South, ~7' from

East, ~6.5' Up

2' x 4' White LICP w/ Long and Short

Deep Fissures, Various Sized Pits, and

Pinholes

L1 - Beige Ceiling Tile w/ White

Miscellaneous N/A Good

BUILDING 224, 6705 RANDALL AVENUE, WARREN AFB, WYOMING

HA No.

Sample

Number Sample Location Material Description Layer

Lab Results

% Asbestos

NESHAP

Category

OSHA

Category

AHERA

Assessment Condition HA Locations

Estimated

Quantity4

01-WB1 01-WB1-01

Basement, Room 004, Mechanical Room, Southwest Corner, ~4' Up 5/8" White Drywall & White Taping Mud

L1 - White Drywall w/ Brown Paper

L2 - White Mud

L3 - Cream Tape w/ Paint

ND

ND

ND

Nonfriable

Non-ACM Miscellaneous N/A Good

Throughout Building, Walls and

Hard Ceilings

Not

Quantified

01-WB1 01-WB1-02

1st Floor, Unit 108, Kitchen, Northeast Corner

Wall…