Attach 3_Addendum to FAR 52.212-2 Evaluation_23JUL2025.pdf

Addendum to FAR 52.212-2 Evaluation – Commercial Products and Services

1. In accordance with FAR Parts 12 and 13, the award will be made based on price and other factors that is determined to be the most beneficial to the Government, with appropriate consideration given to the RFP’s stated evaluation factors.

2. Contract Award will be made utilizing the procedures in FAR Part 13.106, evaluating price and other factors as stated in this attachment.

3. The offeror must get an Acceptable rating in ALL Technical Phase I subfactors in order to be considered for evaluation during Technical Phase II. The acceptable offers will then be subjected to comparative analysis of the technical and management approach, past performance and price.

4. Volume IV – Solicitation, Offer and Award Documents and Certifications/Representations will only be evaluated as responsive/non-responsive. Any required documentation, regardless of Volume, that is missing, incomplete or incorrectly completed may be deemed non-responsive and will not be further considered for award.

6. Discussions: The Government intends to make the award without conducting discussions;

however, discussions may be held, if the Contracting Officer deems necessary.

FACTORS AND SUBFACTORS TO BE EVALUATED

The following evaluation factors and subfactors will be used to evaluate each quote: Award will be made to the offeror whose quote is most advantageous to the Government based upon an assessment of the evaluation factors and subfactors described below. The Government reserves the right to make an award based upon the Cost/Price factor in the event that the Technical and Past Performance evaluation results of all the offerors’ quotes are substantially the same.

Factor 1: The Technical Phase I Factor will be evaluated on an Acceptable/Unacceptable basis and is further divided into the subfactors listed below. If any subfactor is found to be Unacceptable, the entirety of the quote’s Factor 1 submission will be deemed Unacceptable.

a. Subfactor 1 – Prime Contractor’s Business Licenses

b. Subfactor 2 – Prime Contractor’s Prior Experience

Factor 2: The Technical Phase II – Technical and Management Approach Factor will be evaluated using Comparative Analysis IAW FAR 13.106. Technical and Management Approach is further divided into the following subfactors:

a. Subfactor 1 – Management Plan (Staffing Plan)

b. Subfactor 2 – Warehouse Information and Required Documents

c. Subfactor 3 – Delivery Plan and Claim Handling

Factor 3: Past Performance: Each offeror’s past performance will be reviewed to determine relevancy and confidence based on the past performance quality rating.

Factor 4: Cost/Price: The resulting award will be a Requirements Contract with Firm-Fixed Price CLINs. Prices will be analyzed and evaluated in accordance with FAR 13.106-3 techniques to evaluate price to be fair and reasonable.

EVALUATION APPROACH

1. The overarching evaluation approach for all factors and subfactors is as follows:

The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous, the best value, to the Government in accordance with FAR Part 13. Comparative analysis, as allowed by FAR Part 13.106- 2 will be utilized.

VOLUME I:

FACTOR 1- Technical Phase I: Subfactor 1 and 2 will be rated either acceptable or unacceptable. A rating of unacceptable for either subfactor 1 or 2 will result in an overall unacceptable rating and will not be eligible for an award.

<Table 1>

Rating Description

Acceptable Proposal meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation and

PWS

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation and PWS

(1) Subfactor 1: Prime Contractor’s Business Registration: (ACCEPTABLE/UNACCEPTABLE) The offeror shall be evaluated on submitted copies of current and valid registration issued by the ROK Government as listed below.

The prime contractor shall possess all the required both English and Korean versions of license/permission issued by the ROK Government. The prime contractor’s license/permission shall not be substituted by the sub-contractor.

(a) Valid Business Registration (사업자 등록증)

(b) Business Registration and Cargo Vehicle Transportation Business permission(화물자동차 운송 주선사업 허가증)

(c) Cargo Vehicle Transportation Forwarder Business Permission(화물자동차 운송사업

허가증).

(d) The driver’s two cargo transport qualifications(운전자의 화물운송 자격증 2 개)

(e) Commercial license plates for all trucks(모든 트럭의 영업용 번호판)

(f) Ladder Truck – Vehicle Registration(자동차 등록증) and Vehicle Insurance(자동차

보험증권)

(g) Property Damage Insurance (재물손해보험)

Quotes will not be considered technically acceptable if the quote attempts to meet this requirement through the licenses and experience of Subcontractors, Joint Ventures or other types of partnerships.

(2) Subfactor 2: Prime Contractor’s Prior Experience: (ACCEPTABLE/UNACCEPTABLE) The offerors shall be evaluated on provided documentation demonstrating a minimum of two (2) years’ experience within the last seven (7) years in the same type of services. The offeror shall provide evidence of prior experience in the following format:

i. The title of the Project or Contract No. for the Commercial or Government requirement

ii. A clear description of qualifying work experience (type of service and quantity of work)

iii. Length of contract/project (From year/month/date-To: year/month/date)

iv. Value of contract/ project in KRW per year

v. Complete Point of Contact information of Client Organization (including, name, phone no.

and e-mail.)

Quotes will not be considered technically acceptable if the quote attempts to meet this requirement through the licenses and experience of Subcontractors, Joint Ventures or other types of partnerships.

FACTOR 2: TECHNICAL Phase II Technical and Management Approach (COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS): Each subfactor listed below will be evaluated utilizing Comparative Analysis of the technical quotes of each offer who was found Acceptable during the Technical Phase I evaluation.

Technical and Management Approach: The offeror shall provide a Technical and Management Approach that demonstrates how the Contractor will complete all major tasks contained in the PWS. The offeror must show their understanding and capability in accomplishing all requirements.

The Offerors are cautioned that “mirroring/copying” the technical requirements of the PWS with a statement of intent to perform does not reflect an understanding of the requirement of capability to perform. The following subfactors will be especially evaluated:

Subfactor 1: Management Plan (Staffing Plan): The offeror shall submit a staffing plan which clearly demonstrates how the offeror will perform the requirements for Pick-up and Delivery Furniture/Appliance for Osan Air Base. The offeror shall clearly identify the number of labors, material, equipment and transportation that will be used in each location to perform all pick-up and delivery tasks per PWS as defined in Part 4 and 5.

The offeror should provide a written staffing plan and provide manning charts showing a proposed organizational structure to meet the requirements in the PWS. The plan should include:

• Identify management structure.

• Management responsibilities and supervisor and responsibilities and methods of supervision.

• Number, type and capacity of vehicles and equipment.

• If sub-contractors are used, the contractor shall have a sub-contractor plan. At minimum, the sub-contractor plan will include the following:

(1) List of each sub-contractor by name.

(2) Purpose/scope of each sub-contractor.

(3) Sub-contractor Agreement signed by both the prime contractor and sub-contractors.

Note: The feasibility of the proposed Staffing Plan will be assessed against the offeror’s overall technical and management approach to ensure the offeror has proposed adequate qualified personnel in appropriate labor categories to satisfy all PWS requirements.

Subfactor 2: Warehouse Information and Required Documents:

- Both English and Korean versions of prime contractor’s valid and current “Warehouse Rental Agreement”(창고임대차계약서) and “Register of General Building”(일반건축물대장)issued by ROK and “fire-damage Insurance”(화재손해보험).

- -Description of contractor’s ability to meet the specified warehouse requirements, including storage conditions, accessibility, and compliance with safety standards

Subfactor 3: Delivery Plan and Claim Handling:

- Description of the delivery plan including timelines, resource allocation, and contingency planning.

- Description of Claim Handling Process including timelines, resource allocation, and contingency planning.

VOLUME II:

FACTOR 3 – Past Performance (COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS)

The Government will evaluate the offeror’s record of past and current performance to ascertain the probability of successfully performing the required efforts of the PWS. The past performance evaluation considers each offeror’s demonstrated relevant record of performance in supplying products and services that meet the contract’s requirements. Past Performance will be evaluated utilizing Comparative Analysis of the past performance records of each offer who was found Acceptable during the Technical Phase I evaluation

Note: In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so spare that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorable or unfavorable on past performance. Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have neutral past performance.

VOLUME III:

FACTOR 4 - PRICE

Price analysis will be conducted for each proposal to ensure completeness and the Total Evaluated Price (TEP) is fair and reasonable.

(1) Completeness. The offeror shall complete the pricing information for all CLINs/Sub-CLINs identified for the base period plus four (4) option years. Any underlying assumptions, including proposed escalation rates between the 1st and subsequent periods shall be clearly explained.

(2) Price Reasonableness. Price should also reflect fair market value and be reasonable when compared to the independent Government estimate, current market prices for same or similar services and/or when compared among other technically acceptable offerors.

(3) Price is not scored. The Government will review the price proposal to determine the extent to which it is reasonable, and consistent with the technical proposal. Price shall include all CLINs, Sub-CLINs as listed on the Price Schedule including option periods. The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussion. Therefore, Offerors are instructed that submitted proposals should contain their best pricing.

(4) FAR Clause 52.217-8, Option to Extend Services: As part of price evaluation, the Government will evaluate its option to extend services (FAR Clause 52.217-8 - Option to Extend Services) by adding a six-month equivalent to the Offeror’s final option period prices to the Offeror’s total price.

Offerors are required only to price the base and four (4) options. Offerors shall not submit a price for the potential one-half-year extension of services period.

*** All offerors interested in competing for this requirement are required to submit their price proposal in Korean Won (KW) only. A proposal submitted in currency other than Korean Won will not be considered for award.”

End of ADDENDUM to FAR 52.212-2 Evaluation – Commercial Products and Services

VOLUME II: