ATT7 TechReview ADMIN.docx
DOCX document 34 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W912DY20Q0209
About this file
This document is a request for quote (RFQ) from the Department of the Army Corps of Engineers Engineering Support Center Huntsville for fitness equipment and installation services at Fort Bragg's Human Performance Training Center. The RFQ requires weights, fitness machines, and various fitness equipment as well as delivery and installation. Quotes are due by September 2, 2020 and pricing must be valid for 120 days. The contract type will be firm-fixed price subject to funding availability. Installation must start by January 11, 2021 and be complete by May 3, 2021 at Fort Bragg as specified. Evaluation criteria are price, past performance, technical compliance of items, and schedule. Questions are due by August 20, 2020.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ADMIN Technical Documents Compliance/Technical Review #1 Ft. Bragg – Human Performance Training Center THOR3 Fitness Equipment, Vendor Directions:
The Technical Documents Checklist section (below) must be completed and returned in Word format by the contractor performing as the lead quoter. A quote that is submitted without the necessary documents compliance may not be considered for award.
Technical Documents Checklist
Vendor (Lead Quoter) Company _______________________________________ Point-of-Contact for this RFQ ____________________________ Email _______________________________________________ Telephone ___________________________________________
1. Are technical documents organized sequentially according to Attachment 2, Furniture Item Descriptions (FID), Section 1.1?
Yes ____ No ____ If No, please do not continue; to be considered for award, technical documents shall be organized sequentially according to the FID.
2. Are technical documents annotated to draw the reader’s attention to the product descriptions and quality requirements required in FID, Section 2.0?
Yes ____ If Yes, please continue to question 3.
No ____ If No, please do not continue; to be considered for award, technical documents shall be complete and formatted as stated above.
3. Are technical documents annotated to draw the reader’s attention to the item descriptions required in FID, Section 3.0?
Yes ____ If Yes, please continue to question 4.
No ____ If No, please do not continue; to be considered for award, technical documents shall be complete and formatted as stated above.
4. Do all quoted items meet all current GSA test requirements (excluding open market items)?
Yes ____ If Yes, please submit Attachment 8 in Word format along with your company’s quote by the required due date.
No ____ If No, please do not continue; to be considered for award, all testing shall be approved by GSA and current.
Vendors: Do not go beyond this point, unless requested by the Government during clarifications or communications.
Technical Documents Compliant: Yes/No
Comments: ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Signed: ___ Title: Interior Designer Date:
Technical Review of Quoted Items
[Vendor]
3.1 Item No.
Product Provided:
Warranty:
Environmental:
1st Review:
3.2 Item No.
1st Review:
3.3 Item No.
1st Review:
3.4 Item No.
1st Review:
3.5 Item No.
1st Review:
3.6 Item No.
1st Review:
3.7 Item No.
1st Review:
3.8 Item No.
1st Review:
3.9 Item No.
1st Review:
3.10 Item No.
1st Review:
3.11 Item No.
1st Review:
3.12 Item No.
1st Review:
3.13 Item No.
1st Review:
3.14 Item No.
1st Review:
3.15 Item No.
1st Review:
3.16 Item No.
1st Review:
3.17 Item No.
1st Review:
3.18 Item No.
1st Review:
3.19 Item No.
1st Review:
3.20 Item No.
1st Review:
3.21 Item No.
1st Review:
3.22 Item No.
1st Review:
3.23 Item No.
1st Review:
3.24 Item No.
1st Review:
3.25 Item No.
1st Review:
3.26 Item No.
1st Review:
3.27 Item No.
1st Review:
3.28 Item No.
1st Review:
3.29 Item No.
1st Review:
3.30 Item No.
1st Review:
3.31 Item No.
1st Review:
3.32 Item No.
1st Review:
3.33 Item No.
1st Review:
3.34 Item No.
1st Review:
3.35 Item No.
1st Review:
3.36 Item No.
1st Review:
3.37 Item No.
1st Review:
3.38 Item No.
1st Review:
3.39 Item No.
1st Review:
3.40 Item No.
1st Review:
3.41 Item No.
1st Review:
3.42 Item No.
1st Review:
3.43 Item No.
1st Review:
3.44 Item No.
1st Review:
3.45 Item No.
1st Review:
3.46 Item No.
1st Review:
3.47 Item No.
1st Review:
3.48 Item No.
1st Review:
3.49 Item No.
1st Review:
3.50 Item No.
1st Review:
3.51 Item No.
1st Review:
3.52 Item No.
1st Review:
3.53 Item No.
1st Review:
3.54 Item No.
1st Review:
3.55 Item No.
1st Review:
3.56 Item No.
1st Review:
3.57 Item No.
1st Review:
3.58 Item No.
1st Review:
3.59 Item No.
1st Review:
3.60 Item No.
1st Review:
3.61 Item No.
1st Review:
3.62 Item No.
1st Review:
3.63 Item No.
1st Review:
3.64 Item No.
1st Review:
3.65 Item No.
1st Review:
3.66 Item No.
1st Review:
3.67 Item No.
1st Review:
3.68 Item No.
1st Review:
3.69 Item No.
1st Review:
3.70 Item No.
1st Review:
3.71 Item No.
1st Review:
3.72 Item No.
1st Review:
3.73 Item No.
1st Review:
3.74 Item No.
1st Review:
3.75 Item No.
1st Review:
3.76 Item No.
1st Review:
3.77 Item No.
1st Review:
3.78 Item No.
1st Review:
3.79 Item No.
1st Review:
3.80 Item No.
1st Review:
Tech. Review Summary:
Technically Acceptable: YES/ NO
Signed: Title: Interior Designer Date:
Attachment 7
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .