Att III - Past Perf Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 35 KB Posted

Attached to
FY2023 DOCKSIDE REPAIRS TO NOAA SHIP OREGON II
Solicitation number
1305M222RNMAN0017
Issued by

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
GEM SENSORS CATALOG.pdf PDF
Columbia L-WL-CWH Series Boilers Installation Ops and Maintenance.pdf PDF
OT-S3801-14.pdf PDF
NOAA_Weight_Reporting_Spreadsheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Asbestos Survey Report 1998.docx DOCX document
NOAA Standard Specification S2906 Arc Welding on Waterborne Vessels _ June 1982.pdf PDF
Oregon II Hydraulic Hose List.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
OT-S3801-101 (1).pdf PDF
NOAA Standard Specification S1600 Structural Access Cuts _ August 1994.pdf PDF
OT-S3801-1.pdf PDF
MOC-510-1B HVAC Cleaning.pdf PDF
OT-555-001 Rev - .pdf PDF
MOC-631-2D Coating Systems for Steel Surfaces.pdf PDF
OT-S3801-10.pdf PDF
AMC-631-4 Aluminum Coating Systems _ December 1992.pdf PDF
AMC-573-1C Weight Handling Gear Testing.pdf PDF
OR-S9-0-5 Rev A Booklet of General Plans.pdf PDF
ASHRAE Standard 151 - HVAC Balancing _ Testing.pdf PDF
OT-S3801-11.pdf PDF
AMC-000-1f General Requirements for Ship Repair Work on NOAA Ships.pdf PDF
NOAA General Technical Requirements 25 March 2014 .pdf PDF
Att V-DOL Employee Rights Jobsite Poster.pdf PDF
Att VI-NOAA AIRS PROCESS.docx DOCX document
Att 1-O2 FY23 DS Specification 06-24-22.pdf PDF
OT-S3801-13.pdf PDF
AMC-077-1A Asbestos Containing Materials.pdf PDF
Att IV-Schedule of supplies or services.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
OT-S3801-12.pdf PDF
AMC-583-1B General Requirements for Liferaft Inspections _ December 1998.pdf PDF
Att II-Past Perf Proposal.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Show all 30

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE FOR

TORFP 1305M222RNMAN0017

Name of Company Being Evaluated: _______________________________________

REFERENCE CONTRACT #:_____________________________________________
(the contract the evaluation is based on)

Brief Title/Description of the Work: ______________________________________________

Evaluator’s Name:___________________________

Evaluator’s email: ____________________ Evaluator’s Phone Number: _______________

Evaluator’s Agency or Company Name: __________________________________________

Send Completed Questionnaire to Michelle.Blake@noaa.gov no later than 4:00 PM Eastern, August 29, 2022.

1. QUALITY OF SERVICE

Assess the contractor’s performance to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship (e.g. commonly accepted technical, professional, or environmental standards).

(Check the appropriate rating box. Please provide comments for ratings other than Satisfactory.)

RATING
ADJECTIVAL RATING
DEFINITION

EXCEPTIONAL

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

VERY GOOD

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

SATISFACTORY

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were

MARGINAL

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

UNSATISFACTORY

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Comments:

Attachment III

Attachment III

Source Selection Information

Source Selection Information

2. SCHEDULE

Assess the timeliness of the contractor against the completion of the contract, task orders, milestones, delivery schedules, and administrative requirements (e.g. efforts that contribute to or affect the schedule variance).

(Check the appropriate rating box.)

RATING
ADJECTIVAL RATING
DEFINITION

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

3. COST CONTROL

Assess the contractor’s effectiveness in forecasting, managing, and controlling cost. (Check the appropriate rating box.)

RATING
ADJECTIVAL RATING
DEFINITION

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

4. MANAGEMENT

Assess the integration and coordination of all activities needed to execute the contract, specifically the timeliness, completeness and quality of problem identification, corrective action plans, proposal submittals, the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, and customer satisfaction.

(Check the appropriate rating box.)

RATING
ADJECTIVAL RATING
DEFINITION

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS, IF ANY:

Rater’s Name: Rater’s Signature: Date:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .