Att 2 PRF 20037A H-1 Lot 7_8.pdf

CUI

PRF 200037A

13 July 2022

SUPERSEDING

PRF 200037

3 June 2022

CAGE 89297

PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATION

SYSTEM SPECIFICATION

FOR

UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS

H-1 TRAINING DEVICES

TRAINING DEVICE MODERNIZATION PROGRAM (TDMP)

NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER

TRAINING SYSTEMS DIVISION

12211 SCIENCE DRIVE

ORLANDO, FL 32826

APPROVED BY:

Captain Kevin McGee (or Designee)

Program Manager, Naval Aviation Training Systems and Ranges (PMA-205)

APPROVED BY:

John Jabara (Acting)

PMA-205 APME (or Designee)

APPROVED BY:

Melissa Benish as Designee

APEO (T&E) (or Desginee)

APPROVED BY:

Jose Valez as Designee

Product Support Manager (or Desginee)

DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT D: Distribution authorized to Department of Defense (DoD) and US DoD Contractors only; (Administrative and

Operational Use Only) 01 January 2021). Other requests shall be referred to Department of Navy, PEO(CS)/PMA-205, 47123 Buse Road, RADM William

A. Moffett Building, Patuxent River, Maryland, 20670-1547.

Controlled by: Department of Navy

Controlled by: NAWCTSD

CUI Category: CTI Distribution/Dissemination Control: FEDCON

POC: Steve Coln, stephen.c.coln.civ@us.navy.mil mailto:nelish.b.patel.civ@us.navy.mil i

Revision History

Revision Affected

Paragraph(s) Changes

Initial

Release

6/2/2022

Not applicable

A

Title Modified title to accurately reflect program name.

Global Updated from “PRF 20037” to “PRF 20037A” and date to match the revision.

2.2.2 Added references DoDI 8510.01, NIST SP 800-131A Revision 2, UFC 4-000-

01, UFC 4-020-01 and MCO 5530.14A.

2.2.2 Removed references to the UH-1 and AH-1 Naval Tactics, Techniques, and

Procedures (NTTPs).

3.1.2 Changed from “…existing mode” to “ existing flight mode, standby mode, initialization mode, freeze mode and playback mode” for clarity.

3.1.2.1 Added flight mode requirements.

3.1.2.2 Added standby mode requirements.

3.1.2.3 Added initialization mode requirements.

3.1.2.4 Added freeze mode requirements.

3.1.2.5 Added playback mode requirements.

3.1.2.5.1 Added playback performance requirements.

3.1.7.1.a Added “…to function, perform, and respond to control inputs IAW NAV 01-

110HCG-1 and…”

3.1.7.1.b Changed from “react to the effects provided by the simulated world IAW

NTTP 3-22.3-UH1, and” to “respond to IOS control inputs.”

3.1.7.1.c Deleted “accurately reflect station failures on MFDs, aural tones, and WCAs” since the requirement is specified in (a.).

3.1.7.1.1.d & e. Added Advanced Precision Kill Weapon System II and MK 66 2.75 UH-1Y weapons.

3.1.7.2.a Added “…to function, perform, and respond to control inputs IAW NAV 01-

H1AAD-1 and…”

3.1.7.2.b Changed from “react to the effects provided by the simulated world based on

NTTP 3-22.3-UH1, and” to “respond to IOS control inputs.”

3.1.7.2.c Deleted “accurately reflect station and dispenser failures on MFD and WCAs, with the associated aural tones, and WCAs” since the requirement is referenced in (a.).

3.1.7.4 Added requirement to simulate the 77 gallon fuel tank.

3.3.13.2.1.2.c Deleted “implement the TEn interfaces without the use of deprecated messages”.

3.3.13.2.4 e. Added requirement to connect TEn subsystem to the trainer’s KVM.

4.2 f. Added “pre-move inspection/test and post-move inspection/test” requirements for the 2F196B-3 and 2F227-1.

4.3.1.18 Modified the TEn verification requirement.

6.2 Added “Changes from previous issue” information.

A.3.1.3.1.2.1, A.3.1.3.1.3.2, A.3.1.3.1.8.b, A.3.1.3.1.10.c

A.3.1.3.1.11.1.2.1, A.3.1.3.2.2.4.1

Changed “2D” and “3D” to “2-D” and “3-D”

A.3.1.3.1.4.5 Added requirement for animatated two deck crew models.

A.3.1.3.1.7.5 h.(1) Renumbered list to start at i versus ix.

A.3.1.3.1.11.1.9 Changed from “The LSE model…on carriers…” to “LSE and deck crew models…on the deck of carriers…” and deleted “and in host trainer command locations, such as airfields, LZs and CALs”

A.3.1.3.1.11.1.9.1 Added “deck crew” requirement

A.3.1.3.1.11.1.9.2 Revised LSE and deck crew requirements

A.3.1.3.1.11.1.9.3 Revised the LSE placement and orientation requirements

CUI PRF 200037A

13 July 2022 ii

Revision Affected

Paragraph(s) Changes

A.3.1.3.1.11.1.9.3.1 Added deck crew placement, orientation, and motion requirements.

A.3.1.3.3.13 Added “two deck crew model” requirement and updated reference from

“A.3.1.3.1.11.1.8” to “A.3.1.3.1.11.1.9”.

A.3.1.4.2.2.3 Added the abbreviation ASGSI.

A.3.1.4.2.2.3.4 Added “glideslope indication” to the requirement heading.

A.3.1.4.5.3.4 c. Added “tree branches” to the requirement.

A.3.1.4.5.5 b.(1) Moved “Host trainer-controlled and sea-state models to subsection i. and changed “i. Ten” to “ii. TEn-controlled motion models”.

A.3.1.4.5.5 c. Updated reference from “A.3.1.3.1.11.1.8” to “A.3.1.3.1.11.1.9”.

A.3.1.5.1.1.2.1.a Changed “real time” to “real-time and “databse” to “database”

A.3.1.5.1.3 Changed from “..have an adjustable gamma..” to “…have a gamma…”, added requirement “NIR image component”, and moved “fine tuning the overall system gamma” to new subsection b.

A.3.1.5.1.3.a Added requirement to “produce a linear measured luminance response”

A.3.1.5.1.3.b Added “adjust and fine tune the overall system gamma in real time”

A.3.1.5.2.1.2 Changed “exisiting” to “existing”

A.4.3.4 Added “function” in the title and within the requirement, added new reference

“B.4.1.1.12.3”, and deleted “by displaying, in each channel, a gray scale bar pattern of no less than ten bars of different intensities within the scale and demonstrating that the VS system has functionality to adjust the gamma response of the system”.

B.3.1.5.2.2 Changed “adajacent” to “adjacent”

B.3.1.5.3.c Added “…and subtending no less than three degrees…” to the requirement.

B.4.1.1.6.3 b.(4) Added “…displayed in the scene agains the black flat-field background, placed at a distance from the eyepoint at which the 1-m sides subtend an angle that is no less than 3.2 degress and…’ to existing requirement, and replaced “and” with “where”.

B.4.1.1.11.3.1.3.a Changed from “Multiple cross blend luminance measurement pais…across the blend…” to “Multiple sets of luminance measurement pairs…across and along the blend…”

B.4.1.1.12.3 Added Gamma compensation function verification requirements, referenced in

A.4.3.4.

B.4.1.1.12.3.1 Added Gamma compensation verification test patterns and functionality requirement

B.4.1.1.12.3.2 Added Gamma compensation verification test instrument requirement

B.4.1.1.12.3.3 Added Gamma compensation vertification test methodology requirement

B.4.1.1.12.3.3.1 Added OTW RGB and sensor channels requirement

B.4.1.1.12.3.3.2 Added OTW NIR channels

H.3.2.2.4 Added security hardware requirement for FTD containers.

H.3.3.4 Changed from “TABLE B-I” to “TABLE B-II”

H.3.3.6.3 Changed title from “Filters” to “Duct filter rack” and moved the minimum efficiency reporting value requirement to subsection “H.3.3.6.3.2 Duct filter rating”.

H.3.3.6.3.2 Added minimum efficiency reporting value requirement for duct filters.

H.3.3.6.3.3 Added requirement for securing duct penetration.

H.3.3.7.3 Changed from “TABLE B-II” to “TABLE B-III” and “TABLE B-III” to

“TABLE B-IV”

H.3.3.10.5 Changed “containerfronts” to “container fronts”

H.3.7.5 Moved “The container’s walls shall include R-16 insulation and coating to minimize heat transfer from and to the outside environment.” to subsection

“H.3.7.5.3 Container wall insulation”.

H.3.7.5.2 Added container wall insulation requirement.

H.3.7.5.3 Added requirement for securing container walls with equipment and ductwork.

H.3.7.7 Changed from “…noise that will be generated by…” to “noise generated by…”

H.3.8.2 Changed from “…that shall be installed at the IOS” to “…located at the IOS” iii

Revision Affected

Paragraph(s) Changes

H.3.9.1.1 Added subsection for cabling in raised floor and concealed space of the container.

H.3.9.1.2 Added elevated cable storage requirement in the container.

Revision A changes Approved

Marcus Richman, APME PMA-205 iv

SRB SPECIFICATION CERTIFICATION FORM

RESPONSIBILITY SRB Representative

NAME/TITLE

CONCURENCE

APME Co-Chair John Jabara/APME See cover page

APML Co-Chair Howard Hiser/Product Support Manager

(PSM)

See cover page

APMT&E Co-Chair Melissa Benish/APMT&E See cover page

Training Systems-

Systems Engineering

Hoa Pham/USMC Training Systems

Branch Head NAWCTSD

Via SRB comment adjudication spreadsheet

Software Brad Cope/Software Branch Head

NAWCTSD

Via SRB comment adjudication spreadsheet

Visual Ron Wolff/Principal Visual Engineer Via SRB comment adjudication spreadsheet

Aero Chad Farwig/Applied Modeling and

Simulation Branch Head

Via SRB comment adjudication spreadsheet

Cybersecurity John Rooks/Cybersecurity NAWCTSD Via SRB comment adjudication spreadsheet

Program

Management

Kent Campbell/Program Management

NAWCTSD

Via SRB comment adjudication spreadsheet v

Table of Contents

Para./Section Title Page

1. SCOPE

1.1 Identification

2. APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS

2.1 General

2.2 Government documents

2.2.1 Specifications, standards, and handbooks

2.2.2 Other Government documents, drawings, and publications

2.3 Non-Government publications

2.4 Order of precedence

3. REQUIREMENTS

3.1 Performance and functional requirements

3.1.1 Training missions and objectives

3.1.2 Required modes

3.1.2.1 Flight mode

3.1.2.2 Standby mode

3.1.2.3 Initialization mode

3.1.2.4 Freeze mode

3.1.2.5 Playback mode

3.1.2.5.1 Playback performance

3.1.3 Aircraft simulation

3.1.3.1 Design Basis Aircraft (DBA)

3.1.3.1.1 DBA criteria data

3.1.3.2 Simulation data hierarchy

3.1.3.3 System performance

3.1.3.4 Avionics equipment performance

3.1.3.4.1 Avionics data ports

3.1.3.5 Warning, cautions, and advisories

3.1.4 Environmental effects

3.1.4.1 Wind and wake

3.1.4.1.1 Mountain wind

3.1.4.1.1.1 Mountain areas

3.1.4.1.2 Ship wakes and airwakes

3.1.5 Major cockpit component characteristics

3.1.5.1 Multi-Functional Display (MFD)

3.1.5.2 Circuit breaker panels

3.1.5.3 External lighting control panel

3.1.5.4 Helmet Mounted Sight and Display (HMSD)

3.1.6 Tech Refresh Mission Computer (TRMC)

3.1.7 Weapon, countermeasure systems, and non-weapon stores

3.1.7.1 UH-1Y devices

3.1.7.1.1 Weapons

3.1.7.1.2 Sensors and countermeasures

3.1.7.1.2.1 BRITE Star II simulation

vi

CUI

3.1.7.1.2.2 BRITE Star II image simulation

3.1.7.2 AH-1Z devices

3.1.7.2.1 Weapons

3.1.7.2.2 Sensors and countermeasures

3.1.7.2.2.1 Target Sight System (TSS) simulation

3.1.7.2.2.2 TSS image simulation

3.1.7.3 Flares

3.1.7.4 Non-weapon stores

3.1.8 Flight modeling

3.1.8.1 Flight dynamics modeling

3.1.8.1.1 Blade element rotor modeling

3.1.8.1.2 Automated Test Guide (ATG) functionality

3.1.8.2 Control Loading System (CLS) upgrade and refurbishment

3.1.8.2.1 Friction and inertia

3.1.8.2.1.1 Coulomb friction

3.1.8.2.1.2 Viscous friction

3.1.8.2.1.3 Smoothness

3.1.8.2.2 Stiffness

3.1.8.2.3 Flight control tolerances

3.1.8.2.4 Secondary control assembly

3.1.8.2.4.1 Throttles

3.1.8.2.4.2 Rotor brake

3.1.8.3 System dynamic response

3.1.9 Instructor Operator Station (IOS)

3.1.9.1 IOS computational systems performance

3.1.9.2 IOS monitor screens

3.1.9.3 IOS software

3.1.9.3.1 Flight parameters IOS test page

3.1.9.3.2 Instrument Approach Procedures (IAPs)

3.1.9.3.3 Ground Controlled Approaches (GCAs)

3.1.9.3.4 IOS embedded NATOPS, NATIP, and T&R manuals

3.1.9.4 IOS monitor console

3.1.9.5 Cockpit monitoring system (CMS)

3.1.9.5.1 Video feed controls

3.1.9.6 IOS keyboards

3.1.10 Visual system modifications

3.1.11 Simulated Link 16

3.1.11.1 Link 16 messages

3.1.11.1.1 Broadcasting Link 16

3.1.11.1.2 Receiving Link 16

3.1.11.1.3 Transparent messages

3.1.11.2 Link-16 hardware

3.1.11.3 Link-16 IOS control

3.1.11.4 Link 16 Zeroize

vii

CUI

3.1.11.5 Link 16 TEn operation

3.1.11.5.1 Link 16 TEn model operation

3.1.11.5.2 Link 16 ADVTE operation

3.1.12 System Daily Operational Readiness Test (DORT)

3.2 Trainer specific modifications

3.2.1 UH-1Y trainer upgrades

3.2.1.1 Input/Output

3.2.2 AH-1Z trainer upgrades

3.2.2.1 Detachable cockpit jump seat

3.3 Supportability requirements

3.3.1 Reliability

3.3.1.1 Power supply reliability

3.3.2 Maintainability

3.3.2.1 Mean-Time-To-Repair (MTTR)

3.3.2.2 Maximum-repair-time (Mmax)

3.3.2.3 Mean-Preventive-Maintenance-Time (Mpt)

3.3.3 Environmental conditions

3.3.3.1 Operating temperature

3.3.3.2 Non-operating temperature

3.3.3.3 Operating relative humidity

3.3.3.4 Non-operating relative humidity

3.3.4 Transportability

3.3.5 Materials and processes

3.3.5.1 Parts

3.3.5.1.1 Custom designed microelectronic devices

3.3.5.1.2 Power supplies

3.3.5.2 Materials

3.3.5.2.1 TPE reparability

3.3.5.2.2 Flammable materials

3.3.5.2.2.1 Fire retardant additives

3.3.5.2.3 Fungus-inert materials

3.3.5.2.4 Hazardous materials

3.3.5.2.4.1 Use of hazardous materials

3.3.5.2.4.2 Marking of hazardous items

3.3.5.2.4.3 Precautions

3.3.5.2.5 Metals

3.3.5.2.6 Wood products

3.3.5.2.6.1 Preservation

3.3.5.2.6.2 Fire retardancy

3.3.5.2.6.3 Termite protection

3.3.5.2.6.4 Grade

3.3.5.2.7 Radioactive material

3.3.6 Manufacturing processes

3.3.6.1 Painting, and preparation for painting

viii

CUI

3.3.6.2 Nonskid surfaces

3.3.6.3 Corrosion prevention

3.3.7 Electromagnetic Environmental Effects (E3)

3.3.7.1 Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC)

3.3.7.1.1 Intra-system EMC

3.3.7.2 Electromagnetic Interference (EMI)

3.3.7.3 Electrostatic Discharge (ESD)

3.3.7.4 Lightning

3.3.7.5 Bonding

3.3.7.5.1 Direct current (DC) bonding levels

3.3.8 Nameplates and product markings

3.3.8.1 Lettering, permanency, and legibility

3.3.8.2 Trainer nameplate

3.3.8.2.1 Data matrix bar codes

3.3.8.2.1.1 Trainer bar code

3.3.8.2.1.2 Initial Support Kit (ISK) bar code

3.3.8.3 Marking of units, assemblies, subassemblies, and parts

3.3.8.3.1 Units

3.3.8.3.1.1 Location of ID plates

3.3.8.3.1.2 ID plate information

3.3.8.3.2 Plug-in assemblies

3.3.8.3.2.1 Assembly chart

3.3.8.3.3 Fuse holders

3.3.8.3.3.1 Fuse rating

3.3.8.3.3.2 Spare fuses

3.3.8.3.4 Controls and indicating devices

3.3.8.3.4.1 Function and operation marking

3.3.8.3.4.2 Function and operation marking location

3.3.8.3.5 Sockets

3.3.8.3.5.1 Identification and marking of sockets

3.3.8.3.5.2 Chassis marking of sockets

3.3.8.3.5.3 Chassis marking of sockets, reverse side

3.3.8.3.5.4 Location chart for sockets

3.3.8.3.5.4.1 Location chart markings

3.3.8.3.6 Printed wiring boards

3.3.8.3.6.1 Electrical operation interference

3.3.8.3.6.2 Ink type

3.3.8.3.6.3 Marking considerations

3.3.8.3.7 Terminals, terminal blocks, and strips

3.3.8.3.7.1 Marking of terminals, terminal blocks, and strips

3.3.8.3.7.2 Marking for limited space areas

3.3.8.3.8 ESD marking

3.3.8.3.8.1 ESD sensitive assemblies

3.3.8.3.8.1.1 ESD symbols

ix

CUI

3.3.8.3.8.1.2 ESD symbol location for assemblies

3.3.8.3.8.2 ESD sensitive equipment

3.3.8.3.8.2.1 ESD symbol location for equipment

3.3.8.3.8.2.2 ESD symbol visibility

3.3.8.3.8.2.3 ESD caution statement location for equipment

3.3.8.3.8.3 External equipment terminals

3.3.8.3.9 Fluid and gaseous lines

3.3.8.3.9.1 Fluid lines marking

3.3.8.3.9.2 Pressurized lines

3.3.8.3.9.3 Lines conducting hazardous fluids or dangerous gases

3.3.8.3.9.4 Line markings legibility and permanency

3.3.8.3.9.5 Line marking location

3.3.8.4 Reference designators

3.3.8.4.1 Replaced units

3.3.8.4.2 Major additions

3.3.8.4.3 Reference designators for new equipment

3.3.8.4.3.1 Assignment of reference designators

3.3.8.4.3.2 Identification of unmodified GFE

3.3.8.4.3.3 Marking and location of reference designators

3.3.8.5 Cable and wire markings

3.3.8.5.1 Damage due to markings

3.3.8.5.2 Cable and wire marking location

3.3.8.5.3 Cable marking method

3.3.8.5.4 Cable marking information

3.3.8.5.4.1 “W” and “P” cable designations

3.3.8.5.4.1.1 “W” cable designations

3.3.8.5.4.1.2 Numerical portion of “W” designations

3.3.8.5.4.1.3 “P” cable designations

3.3.8.5.4.1.4 Numerical portion of “P” designations

3.3.8.5.4.2 To-from designators

3.3.8.5.4.3 Assembly and part number

3.3.8.5.4.3.1 Assembly and part number marking location

3.3.8.6 CaNDI marking

3.3.8.6.1 Plug-in modules charts for CaNDI

3.3.8.6.2 CaNDI identification, nameplates, and labels

3.3.8.7 Warning marking for simulated and modified equipment

3.3.8.7.1 Trainer-use-only identification

3.3.8.7.1.1 Visibility of other markings

3.3.8.8 Safety markings

3.3.8.8.1 Safety marking of guards, barriers, and access doors, covers, and plates .35

3.3.8.8.2 Safety marking location

3.3.8.8.3 Marking of safety hazards

3.3.8.8.4 Marking of internal safety hazards

3.3.8.8.5 Laser safety marking

x

CUI

3.3.8.8.6 Equipment energized from multiple power sources

3.3.8.8.6.1 Multiple power sources marking location

3.3.9 Interchangeability

3.3.10 Electrical safety

3.3.10.1 Emergency equipment power disconnect

3.3.10.2 Emercency power off (EPO) control devices

3.3.10.2.1 Equipment power removal

3.3.10.2.2 EPO control device characteristics

3.3.10.2.2.1 EPO control device visibility

3.3.10.2.2.2 EPO control device size

3.3.10.2.2.3 EPO control device inadvertent actuation

3.3.10.2.3 EPO control device marking

3.3.10.2.4 EPO control device marking method, permanency, legibility, durability, and lettering

3.3.10.3 Temperature sensing alarms

3.3.11 Human engineering

3.3.11.1 Human engineering performance

3.3.11.2 Trainee station Human-Machine Interface (HMI) characteristics

3.3.12 Security and privacy

3.3.12.1 Cybersecurity

3.3.12.1.1 Processing of national security information

3.3.12.1.2 Cybersecurity requirements for operating systems (OSs)

3.3.12.1.3 Network devices

3.3.12.1.4 Virus protection

3.3.12.1.5 Software management system

3.3.12.1.6 Configuration criteria

3.3.12.1.7 Audit logging

3.3.12.1.8 Backup management system

3.3.12.1.9 Account management

3.3.12.1.10 Clock synchronization

3.3.12.1.11 Encryption

3.3.12.1.11.1 Cryptography requirements

3.3.12.2 Cabinet door locks

3.3.13 Computational system requirements

3.3.13.1 Computational hardware components and peripherals

3.3.13.1.1 Internal networks

3.3.13.1.2 Network printer

3.3.13.1.3 Non-visual system displays

3.3.13.1.4 I/O subsystem

3.3.13.2 Computational subsystems

3.3.13.2.1 Host Computational System (HCS)

3.3.13.2.1.1 HCS software

3.3.13.2.1.2 Host-TEn interface

3.3.13.2.1.3 Host-visual interface

xi

CUI

3.3.13.2.2 Aural cueing and communication system

3.3.13.2.3 IOS computational systems

3.3.13.2.4 TEn computational system

3.3.13.2.5 Control Loader (CL) and cockpit shaker computational system

3.3.13.2.6 Cybersecurity computational system

3.3.13.3 KVM switch architecture

3.3.13.4 Uninterruptible Power Supply (UPS)

3.3.13.5 Open architecture

3.3.13.5.1 Standard hardware interfaces

3.3.13.5.2 Open hardware architecture

3.3.13.5.3 Open software architecture

3.3.13.6 Backup and recovery

3.3.13.6.1 Backup images

3.3.13.6.2 Optical disc image

3.3.13.7 Spare computational resource requirements

3.3.13.8 Computational network spare capacity

3.3.13.9 I/O subsystem spare capacity

3.3.13.10 Training device Software

3.3.13.10.1 Commercial and Non-Developmental Item (CaNDI) software

3.3.13.10.2 Non-commercial software

3.3.14 Logistics

3.3.14.1 Maintenance

3.3.14.2 Maintenance concept

3.3.14.2.1 Levels of maintenance

3.3.14.3 Qualitative maintainability requirements

3.3.14.3.1 Special tools

3.3.14.3.1.1 Special tools holders

3.3.14.3.2 Lamps

3.3.14.3.3 Blown fuse indicator lights

3.3.14.3.3.1 Visibility of CaNDI and GFE blown fuse indicator lights

3.3.14.3.4 Utility receptacles

3.3.14.3.4.1 Equipment racks in row configurations

3.3.14.3.4.2 Standalone equipment racks

3.3.14.3.4.3 Other trainer areas

3.3.14.3.5 Maintenance ICS

3.3.14.3.6 Accessibility

3.3.14.3.6.1 Non-repairable assemblies

3.3.14.3.6.2 Routine servicing and maintenance

3.3.14.3.6.3 Cable slack

3.3.14.3.6.3.1 Cables slack behind equipment panels

3.3.14.3.6.3.2 Cables in concealed spaces

3.3.14.3.6.3.3 Equipment connection and disconnection

3.3.14.3.6.4 Parts

3.3.14.3.6.4.1 Front panel and sub-chassis removal

xii

CUI

3.3.14.3.6.5 Assemblies

3.3.14.3.6.5.1 Units, assemblies, subassemblies, and parts accessibility

3.3.14.3.6.5.2 Locking devices

3.3.14.3.6.5.3 Interior components and parts accessibility

3.3.14.3.6.5.4 Mounting screws, test points, adjustment points, lubricating points accessibility

3.3.14.3.6.5.5 Access panels

3.3.14.3.6.5.6 Accessibility for test probes and maintenance tools

3.3.14.3.6.5.7 Mounting of replaceable assemblies

3.3.14.3.6.6 Covers, panels, and doors

3.3.14.3.6.6.1 Equipment balance

3.3.14.3.6.6.2 Removable covers

3.3.14.3.6.6.3 Hinged front panels

3.3.14.3.6.6.4 Grounding of parts and assemblies mounted on hinged doors, panels, and covers

3.3.14.3.6.6.5 Opening of hinged panels

3.3.14.3.6.7 Handles

3.3.14.3.6.7.1 Enclosure handles

3.3.14.3.6.8 Modular assemblies

3.3.14.3.6.8.1 Keying of modular assemblies

3.3.14.3.6.8.2 Assembly sockets

3.3.14.3.6.8.3 Grouping of modular assemblies

3.3.14.3.7 Circuit cards

3.3.14.3.7.1 Circuit card connectors

3.3.14.3.7.2 Circuit card connectors, power and ground

3.3.14.3.7.3 Wiring board extender cards

3.3.14.3.7.3.1 Indexing system for extender cards

3.3.14.3.7.3.2 Conducting surfaces of extender cards

3.3.14.4 Facilities and facility equipment

3.3.14.4.1 Trainer maintenance access

3.3.14.4.2 Trainer power requirements

3.3.14.4.3 Safety

3.3.14.4.4 Cables

3.3.14.4.5 Equipment cooling

3.3.14.4.6 Life safety

3.3.14.4.7 Fire protection

3.4 Interface requirements

3.4.1 Government-Furnished Property (GFP) interfaces

3.4.2 External interface requirements

3.4.3 Internal interface requirements

3.5 Fabrication

3.5.1 Workmanship

3.5.1.1 Cleaning

3.5.1.2 Threaded fasteners

xiii

CUI

3.5.1.3 Wiring

3.5.1.3.1 Harnesses and cable form containment

3.5.1.3.2 Insulation deformation

3.5.1.3.3 Burns, abrading, and pinch marks

3.5.1.3.4 Wires and cables clearance

3.5.1.4 Shielding

3.5.1.4.1 Fraying

4. VERIFICATION

4.1 Methods of verification

4.2 Verification events

4.3 Inspections and tests

4.3.1 Verification of performance and functional requirements for training devices

4.3.1.1 AH-1Z and UH-1Y training missions and objectives verification

4.3.1.2 Required modes

4.3.1.3 Aircraft simulation

4.3.1.3.1 Cockpit and helmet instrumentation verification

4.3.1.3.2 Cockpit and helmet instrumentation performance verification

4.3.1.3.3 DBA criteria data and simulation data hierarchy

4.3.1.4 System performance

4.3.1.5 Verification of environmental effects

4.3.1.6 Verification of major cockpit component characteristics requirements

4.3.1.7 Verification of Technical Refresh Mission Computer (TRMC)

4.3.1.8 Weapons, countermeasures, and non-weapon stores verification

4.3.1.9 Flight dynamics modeling verification

4.3.1.9.1 Quantitative validation tests

4.3.1.9.2 Qualitative testing

4.3.1.9.3 Auto fidelity tests (AFT)

4.3.1.10 Verification of control loading system upgrade and refurbishment

4.3.1.11 Verification of IOS

4.3.1.12 VS performance and functional verification

4.3.1.13 Verification of Link 16

4.3.1.14 Verification of DORT

4.3.1.15 Computational systems requirements verification

4.3.1.16 Verification of I/O subsystem modification

4.3.1.17 Verification of software requirements

4.3.1.18 USMC TEn verification

4.3.1.18.1 Verification of detachable jump seats

4.3.2 Verification of flight training device performance and functional requirements

4.3.2.1 Training scenarios for flight training devices systems

4.3.2.2 Stress tests

4.3.2.3 Malfunctions tests

4.3.2.4 Threat environment tests

xiv

CUI

4.3.2.5 Circuit breaker tests

4.3.2.6 Cockpit and helmet instrumentation performance

4.3.2.7 Control loading system

4.3.2.7.1 Flight control mechanical characteristics tests

4.3.2.7.2 Coulomb friction

4.3.2.7.3 Viscous friction

4.3.2.7.4 System dynamic response verification

4.3.2.7.4.1 System dynamic response time history tests

4.3.2.8 Reliability verification

4.3.2.8.1 Assessment duration

4.3.2.8.2 Data collection and tracking

4.3.2.8.3 Failure criteria

4.3.2.8.3.1 Relevant failure classification

4.3.2.8.3.2 Failures applicable to MTBF determination

4.3.2.8.4 Reliability assessment conditions

4.3.2.8.5 Environmental conditions during reliability assessment

4.3.2.8.6 Electrical stresses during reliability assessment

4.3.2.9 Maintainability verifications

4.3.2.9.1 MTTR elements subject to tracking

4.3.2.10 Environmental conditions verification

4.3.2.10.1 Thermal survey

4.3.2.10.1.1 Temperature measurements

4.3.2.10.1.2 Temperature measuring instruments

4.3.2.10.1.3 Data recording

4.3.2.10.1.4 Data to be collected

4.3.2.10.2 Hot spots

4.3.2.11 Transportability verification

4.3.2.12 Materials and processes

4.3.2.13 Manufacturing processes verification

4.3.2.14 E3 verifications

4.3.2.14.1 EMC verifications

4.3.2.14.1.1 Intra system EMC verifications

4.3.2.14.2 EMI verifications

4.3.2.14.3 ESD verifications

4.3.2.14.4 Facility lightning verifications

4.3.2.14.5 Bonding verifications

4.3.2.15 Nameplate and product markings verification

4.3.2.16 Interchangeability verification

4.3.2.17 Electrical safety verification

4.3.2.18 Human engineering verification

4.3.2.19 Cybersecurity verifications

4.3.2.20 Computational system verifications

4.3.2.20.1 Computational system test procedures

4.3.2.20.2 Computational system software tests

xv

CUI

4.3.2.20.3 Cold-start initial conditions

4.3.2.20.4 Cold-start results

4.3.2.20.4.1 Spare measurement program(s)

4.3.2.20.4.1.1 Spare processing capacity testing

4.3.2.20.4.1.2 Spare memory testing

4.3.2.20.4.1.3 Spare storage testing

4.3.2.20.4.1.4 Computational network spare capacity testing

4.3.2.20.4.1.5 I/O subsystem spare capacity testing

4.3.2.20.4.2 Software stability testing

4.3.2.21 Logistics verifications

4.3.2.21.1 Maintenance verification

4.3.2.21.2 Qualitative maintainability requirements verification

4.3.2.22 Facilities and facility equipment

4.3.3 Interface verifications for training devices

4.3.4 Fabrication verification for training devices

5. PACKAGING

6. NOTES

6.1 Definitions

6.1.1 Commercially available off-the-shelf (COTS) item

6.1.2 Commercial Item

6.1.3 Control Drawing

6.1.4 Failure definitions and criteria

6.1.4.1 Chargeable failures

6.1.4.2 Non-chargeable failures

6.1.4.3 Non-relevant failures

6.1.4.4 Relevant failures

6.1.5 Cybersecurity-Enabled Operating System

6.1.6 Initial Support Kit (ISK)

6.1.7 Interchangeable item

6.1.8 Non-Developmental Item (NDI)

6.1.9 Scheduled Maintenance

6.1.10 Trainer Peculiar Equipment (TPE)

6.1.11 Unscheduled on-site maintenance

6.1.12 User interface

6.1.13 Verification methods

6.1.13.1 Analysis

6.1.13.2 Demonstration

6.1.13.3 Examination

6.1.13.4 Test

6.2 Changes from previous issue

xvi

FIGURES

Fig. No. Title Page

FIGURE 1. Sample Trainer Nameplate

FIGURE 2. Unit ID Plate

FIGURE 3. ESD Symbols

FIGURE 4. ESD Caution Label

FIGURE 5. Examples of Cable Markings

FIGURE 6. Trainer Use Only Identification

FIGURE 7. Multiple Power Source Label

APPENDICES

Appendix Title Page

A H-1 Training Devices Baseline Configuration Upgrade Common

Image Generator and Synthetic Environment Visual and Sensor

Database and Moving Models Performance Requirements

B H-1 Training Devices Visual Display System (VDS) Performance

Requirements

C Systems Malfunctions

D Military Simulator Flight Fidelity Validation Tests and Tolerances

Rotary Wing Aircraft

E CAOE Parts List

F TEn Controlled Moving Models

G TECRs

H Container Performance Requirements

CUI PRF 20037A

System Specification

For

United States Marine Corps

H-1 Training Devices

AH-1Z and UH-1Y

1. SCOPE

This specification establishes the functional, performance and testing requirements for training device modernizations to Flight Training Devices (FTDs) and Full Flight Simulator (FFS) located at Marine Corps Air Station (MCAS) New River, NC; MCAS Kaneohe Bay, HI; JRB Belle

Chasse, LA; JRB McGuire, NJ; MCAS Camp Pendleton, CA; and MCAS Futenma, JP.

1.1 Identification

The H-1 training device modernization will upgrade a total of sixteen existing training devices consisting of FTDs and an FFS for UH-1Y and AH-1Z aircraft. The primary use of the FTDs and

FFS will be to instruct United States Marine Corps (USMC) H-1 pilots and co-pilots in the skills necessary to complete the AH-1Z and UH-1Y Training and Readiness (T&R) manual throughout all stages of pilot and co-pilot development. Device numbers will be used to identify aircraft type, trainer type, and FTD location. For the purposes of this specification, the terms FTD, FFS, trainer(s), training system, and training device are equivalent and refer to all devices listed below, unless otherwise indicated. The trainers are located at the sites below.

a. 2F196-1 UH-1Y FTD, MCAS New River, NC;

b. 2F197B-2 AH-1Z FTD, MCAS New River, NC;

c. 2F226-1 UH-1Y FTD, MCAS New River, NC;

d. 2F227-2 AH-1Z FTD, MCAS New River, NC;

e. 2F196B-3 UH-1Y FTD, MCAS Kaneohe Bay, HI;

f. 2F227-1 AH-1Z FTD, MCAS Kaneohe Bay, HI;

g. 2F226-2 UH-1Y FTD, JRB Belle Chasse, LA;

h. 2F227-4 AH-1Z FTD, JRB Belle Chasse, LA;

i. 2F196B-4 UH-1Y FTD, JRB McGuire, NJ;

j. 2F227-3 AH-1Z FTD, JRB McGuire, NJ.

k. 2F196B-2 UH-1Y FTD, MCAS Camp Pendleton, CA;

l. 2F197-1 AH-1Z FTD, MCAS Camp Pendleton, CA;

m. 2F206-1 UH-1Y FFS, MCAS Camp Pendleton, CA;

n. 2F215-1 AH-1Z FFS, MCAS Camp Pendleton, CA;

o. 2F226-3 UH-1Y FTD, MCAS Futenma, JP; and

p. 2F227-5 AH-1Z FTD, MCAS Futenma, JP.

2. APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS

2.1 General

The documents listed in this section are specified in sections 3 and 4 of this specification. This section does not include documents cited in other sections of this specification or recommended for additional information or as examples. While every effort has been made to ensure the completeness of this list, document users are cautioned that they must meet the specified requirements of documents cited in sections 3 and 4 this specification, whether or not they are listed.

2.2 Government documents

2.2.1 Specifications, standards, and handbooks

The following specifications, standards, and handbooks of the exact revision listed below form a part of this specification to the extent specified herein.

Department of Defense (DoD) Standard Practices

MIL-STD-130N - Identification Marking of U.S. Military Property

MIL-STD-461G - Requirements for the Control of Electromagnetic

Interference Characteristics of Subsystems and

Equipment

MIL-STD-464D - Electromagnetic Environmental Effects, Requirements for Systems

(Copies of these documents are available online at http://assist.dla.mil, or from the Standardization

Document Order Desk, 700 Robbins Avenue, Building 4D, Philadelphia, PA 19111-5094.)

2.2.2 Other Government documents, drawings, and publications

The following Government documents, drawings, and publications of the exact revision level shown form a part of this document to the extent specified herein.

Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)

21 CFR 1040 - Performance Standards for Light-Emitting Products

29 CFR 1910 - Occupational Safety and Health Standards

(Copies of these regulations are downloadable from http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/browse/collectionCfr.action?collectionCode=CFR)

Committee on National Security Systems (CNSS) Instruction

CNSSI 1253 - Security Categorization and Control Selection for

National Security Systems, 27 Mar 2014

(The above document are downloadable from https://www.cnss.gov/CNSS/issuances/Instructions.cfm)

DoD Cybersecurity Documents

DoDI 8500.01 - Cybersecurity dated 14 Mar 2014

DoDI 8510.01 - Risk Management Framework (RMF) for DoD

Information Technology (IT) – Incorporating

Change 3, dated 29 December 2020

NIST SP 800-131A Revision

- Transitioning the Use of Cryptographic Algorithms and Key Lengths, dated March 2019

(The above document are downloadable from www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/850001_2014.pdf)

DoD Handbooks

MIL-HDBK-454N - General Guidelines For Electronic Equipment

(Copies of these documents are available online at http://assistdocs.com/search/search_basic.cfm, or from the

Standardization Document Order Desk, 700 Robbins Avenue, Building 4D, Philadelphia, PA 19111-5094.)

http://assist.dla.mil/ https://www.cnss.gov/CNSS/issuances/Instructions.cfm http://assistdocs.com/search/search_basic.cfm

Naval Air Systems Command (NAVAIR) Documents

NAVAIR 01-H1AAD-1 - Naval Air Training and Operations Procedures

Standardization (NATOPS) Flight Manual, AH-1Z

Helicopter, 15 January 2020

NAVAIR 01-110HCG-1 - Naval Air Training and Operations Procedures

Standardization (NATOPS) Flight Manual, UH-1Y

Aircraft, 15 January 2020

NAVAIR NTRP 3-22.4-AH-

1Z

- AH-1Z Naval Aviation Technical Information

Product (NATIP), 22 March 2022

NAVAIR NTRP 3-22.4-

UH-1Y

- UH-1Y Naval Aviation Technical Information

Product (NATIP), 22 March 2022

NAVMC 3500.104C - UH-1Y Training and Readiness (T&R) Manual, 24 November 2021

NAVMC 3500.20D - AH-1Z Training and Readiness (T&R) Manual, 24 November 2021

20-AVI-H1SS-023 Rev- - System Specification for Digital Interoperability

(DI) Increment I on AH-1Z and UH-1Y

(Copies of the above documents will be provided by the Naval Warfare Center Training Systems Division

(NAWCTSD) as Government-Furnished Information)

National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) - Federal Information Processing

Standards (FIPS)

FIPS 140-3 - Security Requirements for Cryptographic Modules, dated 22 March, 2019

(The above document is downloadable from http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/fips/fips140-2/fips1402.pdf)

Tactical Environment (TEn) Documents

NAVAIR 28-TEN6.2-INS-01 - Overview and Installation Guide, 20 March 2018

NAVAIR 28-TEN6.2-ICD-01 - Interface Control Document (ICD), Rev. K, 11

November 2016

NAVAIR 28-TEN6.2-TST-01-

VOL3

- Trainer Test Procedures and Results Report (TTPRR)

Volume 3, 8 February 2018

NAVAIR 28-TEN6.2-USG-01 - TEn User’s Guide, 20 March 2018

NAVAIR 28-TEN6.2-NOT-01 - USMC TEn Release Notes, 17 April 2018

(Copies of the above TEn documents will be provided as Government-Furnished Information.)

Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC)

UFC 3-600 - Design of Fire Protection System

UFC 4-000-01 - DoD Security Engineering Facilities Planning

Manual

UFC 4-020-01 - DoD Security Engineering Facilities Planning

Manual (The above documents are downloadable from http://www.wbdg.org/references/pa_dod.php)

United States (U.S.) Army Corps of Engineers http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/fips/fips140-2/fips1402.pdf http://www.wbdg.org/references/pa_dod.php

EM-385-1-1

- Safety - Safety and Health Requirements

(Available: http://140.194.76.129/publications/eng-manuals/em385-1-1/2003_English/toc.htm)

U.S. Marine Corps Publications

MCO 5530.14A - Marine Corps Physical Security Program Manaul

U.S. Navy Publications

USNTPS-FTM-No 106 - United States Naval Test Pilot School Manual –

Rotary Wing Performance

USNTPS-FTM-No 107 - United States Naval Test Pilot School Manual –

Rotary Wing Stability and Control

(Available from: http://doni.daps.dla.mil)

2.3 Non-Government publications

The following documents of the exact revision listed below form a part of this document to the extent specified herein.

American National Standards Institute (ANSI)

ANSI Z535.1-2006 (R 2011) - Safety Colors

ANSI Z535.2-2011 - Environmental and Facility Safety Signs

ANSI Z535.3-2011 - Criteria for Safety Symbols

ANSI Z535.4-2011 - Product Safety Signs and Labels

ANSI Z535.5-2011 - Safety Tags and Barricade Tapes (for Temporary

Hazards)

(Copies of these documents are available from www.ansi.org, http://global.ihs.com/, or Global Engineering

Documents, 15 Inverness Way, East Englewood, CO 80112.)

ANSI/ESDA/JEDEC

ANSI/ESDA/JEDEC JS-001-

- For Electrostatic Discharge Sensitivity Testing, Human Body Model (HBM) - Component Level

(Copies of these documents are available from www.ansi.org, http://global.ihs.com/, or Global Engineering

Documents, 15 Inverness Way, East Englewood, CO 80112.)

American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)

ASME Y14.44-2008 - Reference Designations for Electrical and Electronics

Parts and Equipment

(Copies of this document are available from http://www.asme.org, http://global.ihs.com, or Global

Engineering Documents, 15 Inverness Way, East Englewood, CO 80155-6800)

Electronic Industries Alliance (EIA)

EIA RS-471 - Symbol and Label for Electrostatic Sensitive Devices

(Copies of this document are available from www.eia.org, or http://global.ihs.com/, or Global Engineering

Documents, 15 Inverness Way, East Englewood, CO 80155-6800 http://140.194.76.129/publications/eng-manuals/em385-1-1/2003_English/toc.htm http://doni.daps.dla.mil/ http://www.ansi.org/ http://global.ihs.com/ http://www.ansi.org/ http://global.ihs.com/ http://www.asme.org/ http://global.ihs.com/ http://www.eia.org/ http://global.ihs.com/

Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)

IEEE 1003.1-2008 - Standard for Information Technology – Portable

Operating System Interface ( POSIX)

(Copies of this document are available from www.ieee.org or IEEE Service Center, 445 Hoes Lane, Piscataway, NJ 08854-1331.)

National Fire Protection Association (NFPA):

NFPA-70 - National Electrical Code, 2010 Edition

NFPA-72 - National Fire Alarm and Signaling Code, 2015

Edition

NFPA-75 - Standard for the Protection of Information

Technology Equipment 2009 Edition

NFPA-101 - Life Safety Code

NFPA-110 - Standard for Emergency and Standby Power

Systems, 2016 Edition

NFPA-2001 Standard on Clean Agent Fire Extinguishing

Systems, 2012 Edition

(Copies of these documents are available from http://www.nfpa.org/catalog or National Fire Protection

Association, 11 Tracy Drive, Avon, MA 02322)

2.4 Order of precedence

In the event of a conflict between the text of this specification and the references cited herein, the text of this specification takes precedence. Nothing in this specification, however, supersedes applicable laws and regulations, unless a specific exemption has been obtained.

3. REQUIREMENTS

Requirements in this specification shall be applicable to all devices below unless indicated otherwise:

a. 2F196-1 UH-1Y FTD,

b. 2F197B-2 AH-1Z FTD,

c. 2F226-1 UH-1Y FTD,

d. 2F227-2 AH-1Z FTD,

e. 2F196B-3 UH-1Y FTD,

f. 2F227-1 AH-1Z FTD,

g. 2F226-2 UH-1Y FTD,

h. 2F227-4 AH-1Z FTD,

i. 2F196B-4 UH-1Y FTD,

j. 2F227-3 AH-1Z FTD,

k. 2F196B-2 UH-1Y FTD,

l. 2F197-1 AH-1Z FTD,

m. 2F206-1 UH-1Y FTD,

n. 2F215-1 AH-1Z FFS,

o. 2F226-3 UH-1Y FTD, and

p. 2F227-5 AH-1Z FTD.

http://www.ieee.org/ http://www.nfpa.org/catalog

3.1 Performance and functional requirements

The modified training device performance and functional baseline shall

a. preserve the performance and functionality defined by the results from the baseline configuration audit (BCA) and the pre-modification inspection (PMI) of the existing training devices, as specified in the contract, to describe the simulation characteristics and trainer performance of each flight training device prior to contractor modifications, including all functional relationships between various systems of the trainer, such as flight fidelity, control loading, cockpit shaker systems, instructor stations, dynamic motion seats, cockpit, debrief, and visual system (VS);

b. include the added functionality and performance defined in this specification (PRF

200037A); and

c. not introduce new deficiencies to the BCA and PMI results.

3.1.1 Training missions and objectives

The training devices shall provide

a. full tactical and familiarization navigation training;

b. night vision goggle (NVG) training;

c. instrument flight rules (IFR) navigation;

d. emergency procedures training to AH-1Z and UH-1Y pilots and co-pilots;

e. performance and functionality necessary to conduct training of safety of flight, crew coordination, Naval Aviation Training and Operational Procedure Standardization (NATOPS) procedures, all available aircraft communications modes, shipboard operations, forward looking infrared (FLIR), basic and advanced tactics, weapons delivery procedures, flight formation and electronic counter measures (ECM) operations;

f. interoperability network functionality to connect to the classified Government Aviation

Distributed Virtual Training Environment (ADVTE) network via the Tactical Environment (TEn) as a separate entity in a shared synthetic environment at training locations that have the network available to connect; and

g. simulator training for the contents of T&R syllabus NAVMC 3500.104C and

NAVMC 3500.20D.

3.1.2 Required modes

The training devices shall maintain the existing flight mode, standby mode, initialization mode, freeze mode, and playback mode.

3.1.2.1 Flight mode

The flight mode is the normal operational mode with the following functionality:

a. cockpit, weapons, visual, aural, motion, and control loading systems;

b. ability for the instructor to randomly insert and remove simulation malfunctions listed in

Appendix C;

c. mission record, demonstration record, leadship record, and leadship playback functionality;

and

d. operates both independently from, and linked to other USMC trainers.

3.1.2.2 Standby mode

Standby mode shall

a. have each computational system, subsystem and the respective software applications for each in a ready to launch condition; and

b. have additional data or conditions that shall be applied in order to initiate training.

3.1.2.3 Initialization mode

Initialization mode shall

a. be the condition of the computational system and subsystem where all data and conditions required to accomplish a training scenario, such as databases and initial conditions, are loaded; and

b. the trainer enters freeze mode at completion of the intialization.

3.1.2.4 Freeze mode

Freeze mode shall have the computational system and subsystems in a condition where all training scenario data and conditions are maintained in a static state until a different mode is selected.

3.1.2.5 Playback mode

The playback mode shall provide the means for replay of the recorded simulation data to include play, pause, forward, reverse, total time recorded, and time elapsed when playing.

3.1.2.5.1 Playback performance

The host playback of recorded simulation shall

a. replay all aircraft flight paths and instrument interactions;

b. replay all tones and weapon effects;

c. replay all inserted malfunctions and associated system feedback;

d. replay visual models in visual scene;

e. replay any weapons and countermeasures effects;

f. replay Intercommunication System (ICS) and communications (COMM) audio, to include transmit and receive;

g. replay all weather effects including brownout for ownship and companionship aircraft; and

h. restore to state prior to playback when playback mode ends.

3.1.3 Aircraft simulation

3.1.3.1 Design Basis Aircraft (DBA)

The DBA as used herein shall be representative of the AH-1Z Lot 16 (serial number (S/N)169862) and UH-1Y Lot 13 (S/N 169291) aircraft.

3.1.3.1.1 DBA criteria data

The trainer shall simulate or stimulate hardware and software elements as found on the DBA equipment except as required elsewhere in this specification.

3.1.3.2 Simulation data hierarchy

Criteria data order of precedence shall be

a. directly measured aircraft flight test data (highest precedence),

b. corrected and normalized flight test data,

c. estimated data derived from engineering test facilities such as test stands and validated flight simulations,

d. design data, and

e. data derived by analytical methods.

3.1.3.3 System performance

The training devices shall

a. have DBA systems simulated or stimulated for all modes of operation In Accordance

With (IAW) 3.1.2, and

b. have simulated aircraft systems in the AH-1Z FTD/FFS and UH-1Y FTD/FFS operate and respond to controls and stimuli in the same way that the corresponding system operates and responds IAW NAVAIR 01-H1AAD-1 and NAVAIR 01-110HCG-1 (hereinafter referred to as the

AH-1Z and UH-1Y NATOPS Manuals); and NAVAIR NTRP 3-22.4-UH-1Y and NAVAIR NTRP

3-22.4-AH-1Z (hereinafter referred to the UH-1Y and AH-1Z NATIP manuals).

3.1.3.4 Avionics equipment performance

Stimulated or simulated aircraft avionics equipment that is integrated as part of the FTD/FFS shall match the performance of the DBA equipment, except as required elsewhere in this specification.

3.1.3.4.1 Avionics data ports

The FTDs/FFSs shall have avionics data ports

a. to monitor, access, and record 1553 and ARINC-429 databus messages; and

b. be placed at the Systems Engineering Integrated Product Team (IPT) chosen location.

3.1.3.5 Warning, cautions, and advisories

The training devices shall display have aircraft warnings, cautions, advisories (WCA) IAW the

DBA and C.1.

3.1.4 Environmental effects

3.1.4.1 Wind and wake

3.1.4.1.1 Mountain wind

The following mountain wind types and wind characteristics shall be modeled:

a. boundary layer winds,

b. demarcation line phenomena,

c. anabatic winds,

d. katabatic winds,

e. mountain waves and rotors,

f. turbulence

(1) mechanical turbulence,

(2) convective turbulence,

(3) shear zone turbulence,

(4) air mass turbulence,

(5) backlash turbulence,

(6) downflow turbulence.

g. valley winds,

h. converging

(1) diverging,

(2) funneling.

3.1.4.1.1.1 Mountain areas

The wind model area for mountain winds shall

a. account for real-world effects in the mountainous terrain of the Bridgeport area as defined by A.3.1.3.2.5.1,

b. account for real-world effects in the mountainous terrain of the Hawaii area defined by

A.3.1.3.2.6.1, and

c. be limited to 0.5 geocells in size for each area.

3.1.4.1.2 Ship wakes and airwakes

Wake effects shall

a. be simulated on the ownship helo resulting from the close proximity to surface ship structures and take into account ambient winds, surface ship speed, ownship helo speed, turbulence, and sea state effects; and

b. be simulated on the ownship helo that are caused by aircraft wakes emanating from other aircraft in close proximity.

3.1.5 Major cockpit component characteristics

3.1.5.1 Multi-Functional Display (MFD)

The MFDs for the 2F196-1, 2F226-1, 2F197B-2, 2F196B-3, 2F227-1, 2F196B-4, 2F226-2, 2F197-

1, 2F206-1, 2F215-1, and 2F196B-2 training devices shall

a. have simulated MFDs at each pilot and co-pilot station

b. display the instructor operator station (IOS) on the left MFD and TEn on the right MFD,

c. operate the IOS and TEn via the MFD through touch-screen functionality,

d. provide the multi-touch technology to enable the pinch to zoom functionality on both

MFDs, and

e. have bezel keys IAW NAVAIR NTRP 3-22.4-UH-1Y and NAVAIR NTRP 3-22.4-AH-1Z

3.1.5.2 Circuit breaker panels

The circuit breaker panels in the training device shall

a. stimulate the form, fit, function, and performance of the DBA;

b. replicate the DBA hardware; and

c. be controlled from the IOS.

3.1.5.3 External lighting control panel

The external lighting control panel shall

a. stimulate the form, fit, function, and performance of the DBA; and

b. replicate the DBA hardware.

3.1.5.4 Helmet Mounted Sight and Display (HMSD)

The training devices shall

a. be able to plug in a HMSD into the cockpit as per NAVAIR 01-H1AAD-1 and NAVAIR

01-110HCG-1, and

b. emulate the DBA’s functionality.

3.1.6 Tech Refresh Mission Computer (TRMC)

Each training device shall have two fully operational and integrated TRMCs containing the latest version of combined system configuration set (CSCS) operation flight program available at

Critical Design Review (CDR).

3.1.7 Weapon, countermeasure systems, and non-weapon stores

3.1.7.1 UH-1Y devices

The UH-1Y weapons, sensors, and countermeasure systems shall

a. be simulated to function, perform, and respond to control inputs IAW NAVAIR 01-

110HCG-1 and NAVAIR NTRP 3-22.4-UH-1Y, and

b. respond to IOS control inputs.

3.1.7.1.1 Weapons

The training devices shall simulate the following UH-1Y weapons:

a. automatic gun - GAU-17/A,

b. automatic gun - GAU 21,

c. automatic gun – M240,

d. Advanced Precision Kill Weapon System II (APKWS II), and

e. rockets - MK 66 2.75-inch

(1) high explosive,

(2) illumination,

(3) smoke, and

(4) flechette.

3.1.7.1.2 Sensors and countermeasures

The training devices shall simulate the following UH-1Y sensors:

a. AN/APR-39D(V)2 Radar Warning System (RWS),

b. AN/AAR-47(V)2 Missile/Laser Warning System (MLWS),

c. AN/ALE-47 Counter Measure Dispensing System (CMDS), and

d. BRITE Star II.

3.1.7.1.2.1 BRITE Star II simulation

The BRITE Star II shall

a. be modeled IAW the DBA Brite Star II sensor,

b. have selectable and scalable degradations in pre-point,

c. have a maintaining point (drift),

d. have image focus,

e. have gain/level requirements to break out targets, and

f. perform tracking functionality that matches the DBA tracker performance.

3.1.7.1.2.2 BRITE Star II image simulation

The BRITE Star II CTV and FLIR image shall be simulated IAW Appendix A.

3.1.7.2 AH-1Z devices

The AH-1Z weapons, sensors, and countermeasure systems shall

a. be simulated tofunction, perform, and respond to control inputs IAW NAVAIR 01-

H1AAD-1 and NAVAIR NTRP 3-22.4-AH-1Z, and

b. respond to IOS control inputs.

3.1.7.2.1 Weapons

The training devices shall simulate the following AH-1Z weapons:

a. Hellfire II missile - AGM-114K and AGM-114N

b. JAGM missile,

c. Sidewinder – AIM-9M,

d. Rockets - MK 66 2.75-inch

(1) high explosive,

(2) illumination,

(3) smoke,

(4) flechette.

e. APKWS II, and

f. M-197 20-mm cannon.

3.1.7.2.2 Sensors and countermeasures

The training devices shall simulate the following AH-1Z sensors:

a. AN/APR-39D(V)2 RWS,

b. AN/AAR-47(V)2 MLWS,

c. AN/ALE-47 CMDS, and

d. Target Sight System (TSS).

3.1.7.2.2.1 Target Sight System (TSS) simulation

The TSS sensor shall

a. be modeled IAW the DBA TSS,

b. have selectable and scalable degradations in pre-point,

c. have a maintaining point (drift),

d. have image focus, and

e. have gain/level requirements to break out targets.

3.1.7.2.2.2 TSS image simulation

The TSS CTV and FLIR image shall be simulated IAW Appendix A.

3.1.7.3 Flares

The training devices shall simulate the following flares:

a. flares (illumination) – LUU-2,

b. flares (illumination) - SUU-25, and

c. flares (illumination) - SUU-44.

3.1.7.4 Non-weapon stores

The training devices shall simulate the 77 gallon fuel tank IAW NAVAIR 01-H1AAD-1 and

NAVAIR 01-110HCG-1.

3.1.8 Flight modeling

3.1.8.1 Flight dynamics modeling

The AH-1Z and UH-1Y aero models shall

a. simulate the dynamics of the aircraft based on the solution of the six degrees of freedom equations of motion;

b. respond to all flight and power plant controls and the simulated environment IAW the aircraft validation data;

c. include aerodynamic, inertial, and aero elastic effects for altitudes up to service ceiling as specified in the NATOPS manuals (NAVAIR 01-H1AAD-1 and NAVAIR 01-110HCG-1) and airspeeds to cover the complete documented flight envelope of the DBA(s);

d. provide flight dynamics representing the DBAs to the extent required in the flight model tolerances listed in Appendix D and as required to perform intended training tasks;

e. provide trainer tests and results IAW U.S. Naval Test Pilot School Manuals for performance testing (USNTPS-FTM-No 106) and stability and control testing (USNTPS-FTM-No

107USNTPS-FTM-No 107);

f. record and plot the engineering parameters associated with the flight test data in the trainer.

3.1.8.1.1 Blade element rotor modeling

The AH-1Z and UH-1Y rotor models shall

a. utilize the blade element modeling approach for the rotor systems to provide a high-fidelity simulation of helicopter static and dynamic performance throughout the flight envelope;

b. utilize a model structure that is directly analogous to the physical components of the actual rotor system for the DBA, to facilitate the…