Atch (L-5)_Relevancy_Information_of_the_PP_Contract.docx

DOCX document 29 KB Posted

Attached to
SAILOR 2025 (S2025) READY RELEVANT LEARNING (RRL) FISCAL YEAR 2022 CONTENT CONVERSION
Solicitation number
N61340-21-R-0032
Issued by

About this file

This document contains an attachment to a draft request for proposal for the Sailor 2025 Ready Relevant Learning Fiscal Year 2022 Content Conversion effort. The Navy seeks to award a single-award indefinite-delivery indefinite-quantity contract to accelerate learning for sailors through modernized delivery of training content. The effort aims to rapidly update course content to disseminate critical warfighting knowledge. The estimated period of performance is fiscal year 2022. Offerors must submit relevant past performance examples and pricing information. Questions are due by January 4, 2021, with final proposal release anticipated in March 2021. The Naval Air Systems Command will evaluate proposals and make award. The North American Industry Classification System code is 541330 with a size standard of $41.5 million.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
RRL FY22 CC Presolicitation QuestionsAnswers Beta.Sam.Gov Posting 2 16Feb2021.pdf PDF
RRL FY22 CC Presolicitation QuestionsAnswers Beta.Sam.Gov Posting 10Feb2021.pdf PDF
RRL FY22 CC Industry Day 16Dec2020 Attendees List.pdf PDF
RRL FY22 CC Industry Day Slides 16Dec20_Presented.pdf PDF
FY22 RRL CC PreSol Questions.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 1 - FY22 CC IDIQ SOW - Draft RFP 4Nov20.docx DOCX document
Atch (1)_APPENDIX B Acronym List - Draft RFP 9Sep20.docx DOCX document
Attachment 3 - Form 4330_Data-Item-Transmittal_Form.pdf PDF
Atch (1)_APPENDIX G Sailor 2025 RRL Operational Engaging Instructional Strategies - Draft RFP 9Sep20.docx DOCX document
Atch (L-2) Small Business Participation Committment Document (SBPCD).docx DOCX document
Atch (1)_APPENDIX M NETC RRL Video Streaming Guidance - Draft RFP 9Sep20.odt ODT document
Exhibit A_FY22 RRL CONTENT CONVERSION (A00X) Engineering CDRLs - 09 Sep 20.docx DOCX document
N6134021R0032 RRL FY22CC DRAFT RFP 4Dec20.pdf PDF
Atch (L-1) Q-A Form.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Atch (L-4)_Contractor Performance Assessment Questionaire(CPAQ).docx DOCX document
Atch (1)_APPENDIX H Sailor 2025 RRL Use of Blooms Taxonomy Action Verbs - Draft RFP 9Sep20.odt ODT document
Atch (L-6) CLIN Pricing Form.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Atch (1)_APPENDIX F Sailor 2025 RRL Content Delivery Modes - Draft RFP 9Sep20.odt ODT document
Atch (1)_APPENDIX I Sailor 2025 RRL Content Conversion Media Type Characteristics - Draft RFP 9Sep20.pdf PDF
Atch (1)_APPENDIX C Terms and Definitions - Draft RFP 14Oct20.docx DOCX document
Atch (1)_APPENDIX D CDRL List - Draft RFP 9Sep20.docx DOCX document
Atch (L-3)_PastPerformanceContractReferenceWorksheet.docx DOCX document
Exhibit F_FY22 RRL CONTENT CONVERSION (F00X) Training CDRLs - 09 Sep 2020.docx DOCX document
Attachment 2 - FY22 CC DO 001 - Draft RFP 1Dec20.docx DOCX document
Atch (1)_APPENDIX E Risk Assessment Example Format - Draft RFP 9Sep20.pptx PPTX presentation
Atch (1)_APPENDIX J Mobile Learning Roadmap - Draft RFP 9Sep20.docx DOCX document
Exhibit B_FY22 RRL CONTENT CONVERSION (B00X) Admin CDRLs - 09 Sep 20.docx DOCX document
Atch (1)_APPENDIX L NETC RRL Single User Gaming and Simulation Guidance - Draft RFP 9Sep20.odt ODT document
Atch (1)_APPENDIX K S2025 xAPI Requirements - Draft RFP 9Sep2020.docx DOCX document
Show all 29

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Attachment L-5

Relevancy Information of the Past Performance Contract Reference Worksheet S2025 RRL FY22 CC: Solicitation No. N6134021R0032

Complete this form as per Section L Part B 1.2 Prime or Principal Subcontractor’s Name: ____________________________ Contract Number*: ____________________________

* If proposing to an entire Single Award IDIQ contract, identify the Base Contract Number and no more than three Delivery/Task Order Numbers as well (No more than three DOs/TOs as outlined in Section L Part B 1.1(n)) Relevancy Information

a. Contract Types
Contract Type: Compare the contract type (e.g., FFP, CPFF, CPAF, etc.) of the past performance contract reference to the contract type of this solicitation’s effort.
b. Total Dollar Amount of Past Performance Contract
Compare the total dollar amount of the past performance contract reference to the proposed amount the prime or principal subcontractor is proposing to complete for the instant solicitation requirement. The amount the prime or principal subcontractor is proposing to complete for the instant solicitation requirement shall match the amount identified in Section L.B.2.1(a)(i) Offeror Summary Table. The past performance contract reference dollar amount compared to the instant solicitation requirement shall be the dollar amount relevant to the scope requirement reflected above.
c. Relevant Dollar Amount of Past Performance Contract Reference
Relevant Dollar Amount of Past Performance Contract Reference: Compare the Relevant dollar amount of the past performance effort by the Prime or principal subcontractor under the past performance contract reference to the dollar amount of the effort proposed to be performed by the Prime or principal subcontractor under this solicitation’s effort.
d. Locations and Divisions (include CAGE and DUNS)
Compare the location and division of the company that performed the past performance contract reference effort to the location and division of the company that is proposed to perform this solicitation’s effort. Note: Location and Division of the past performance contract reference shall be the same as the Location and Division performing this instant solicitation.
e. Period of Performances
Compare the period of performance of the past performance contract reference to the period of performance actually performed under that past performance contract reference for the Offeror or principal team member.

g.1 SCOPE OF EFFORT

Scope of work proposed under contract reference
Required Under This Solicitation's SOW

Identify the Statement of Work, Performance Work Statement, Specifications, Statement of Objectives, and/or Contract Data Requirements Lists (CDRLs) specific sections and or paragraphs used to support its rationale below:

Supporting SOW paragraphs are Instructional Media Design Package (SOW 3.5.1), IMI Media Types (SOW 3.5.2), Performance Support and Structured On-the-Job Training Media Types (SOW 3.5.3), Complex Media Types (SOW 3.5.4), Train the Trainer (SOW 3.5.7) and Course Pilot (SOW 3.5.8) of the instant solicitation SOW.

Offeror to complete its rationale why its past performance contract reference is relevant to the scope of effort for this solicitation and the Offeror cites the paragraph reference(s) of the portion of the past performance contract reference’s Statement of Work, Performance Work Statement, Specifications, Statement of Objectives, and/or Contract Data Requirements Lists (CDRLs) used to support its rationale:

End Scope of Effort g.2 MAGNITUDE OF EFFORT

Past Performance Contract Reference

1. Total dollar amount of the prime or principal subcontractor on the past performance contract reference.

2. Total dollar amount of the prime or principal subcontractor’s relevant past performance contract reference

Required Under This Solicitation

1. Proposed total dollar amount of the prime or principal subcontractor on the instant solicitation. This amount should match the amount identified in Section L.B.2.1.(a)(i).

Insert Amount here (Amounts #1 and #2 can be the same but might not be. For example, a contract with a CLIN 0001 for ICW of $2M and a CLIN 0002 for an Airplane of $100M will only have a total relevant dollar amount of $2M.):

1.

2.

Insert Amount here (should be same amount in Section L.B.2.1.(a)(i):

1.

The prime or principal subcontractor to compare the relevant total dollar amount of the past performance contract reference to the proposed amount it is to complete for the instant solicitation.

End Magnitude of Effort

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .