Atch J.5 - Past Performance Survey - 8-2-24.docx
DOCX document 48 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 86614624Q00006
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Survey email form related to a federal contract opportunity for the Innovation in Affordable Housing Student Design and Planning Competition solicitation number 86614624R00003.
The survey requests information on the offeror's relevant past performance, including experience in services to expand product/service user base through marketing and outreach, as well as development and production of webinars and other content. The survey includes a section for the offeror to provide a description of the services performed, and a section for the reference to provide adjectival ratings and comments on the offeror's quality, schedule, cost control, management, small business subcontracting, and regulatory compliance. The form provides definitions for the adjectival ratings of Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, and Unsatisfactory.
The related federal contract opportunity is a commercial item solicitation, issued as a Request for Quotations (RFQ) under FAR Part 13.5, for support services related to the Innovation in Affordable Housing Student Design and Planning Competition for the Department of Housing and Urban Development. The solicitation has been updated to number 86614624Q00006 and includes revisions to the requirements, attachments, and proposal instructions.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Atch J.8 - Questions-Answers - 08-15-24 Final.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Atch J.1 - Nondisclosure-Agreement-between-HUD-and-Contractor-Employee - 8-2-24.docx | DOCX document | |
| 86614624Q00006 Amendment 0001 - 08-15-24.pdf | ||
| Atch J.2 - Labor Mix-Level of Effort Spreadsheet for Multiple - Year_ 8-15-24.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Atch J.7 - Price Proposal Spreadsheet - 8-15-24.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Atch J.3 - Past Performance Information Spreadsheet -8-2-24.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Atch J.4 - Past Performance Narrative - 8-2-24.docx | DOCX document | |
| Atch J.6 - Section B Prices and Contractor Personnel - 8-15-24.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment __J.5__ - Past Performance Survey Email Survey to CPOFTW@hud.gov Email Subject Line - Name of Offeror Company – 86614624R00003 Innovation in Affordable Housing Student Design and Planning Competition
PAST PERFORMANCE SURVEY
Relevant Past Performance for this solicitation is as follows: Relevant efforts are those that involve one or more of the following:
(1) Experience in services to expand the user base of products and services through targeted marketing of data products to various user groups, including social media marketing; developing survey data products such as factsheets or infographics that are tailored to the needs of specific user groups; and performing targeted outreach.
(2) Experience in development, production, and scheduling of new live or recorded webinars, updating of existing webinars, publishing of messages to the user community, and publication of short articles, PAST PERFORMANCE PROJECT IDENTIFICATION (To be filled out by the Offeror):
This past performance survey is to be completed on the designated contractor as designated below:
OFFEROR PRIME CONTRACTOR NAME:_________________________________________________________ OFFEROR PRIME CONTRACTOR DUNS / EIN NO:_________________________________________________
| CONTRACTOR |
| Click here to enter text. |
| CONTRACT or ORDER NUMBER: |
| Click here to enter text. |
| PROJECT TITLE: |
| Click here to enter text. |
| TOTAL PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE, INCLUDING OPTIONS |
| Click here to enter text. |
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES PERFORMED BY OFFEROR: (To be filled out by the Offeror):
Offeror summarizes services performed by the Offeror:
PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE INFORMATION (To be filled out by the Reference):
| NAME: |
| Click here to enter text. |
| TITLE: |
| Click here to enter text. |
| AGENCY or CUSTOMER: |
| Click here to enter text. |
| PHONE: |
| Click here to enter text. |
| Click here to enter text. |
| CONTRACT OR ORDER VALUE |
| Click here to enter text. |
CONCURRENCE WITH DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES ABOVE:
[ ] Concur [ ] Do Not Concur Additional Comments (if any):
For each of the Five (5) criteria listed below, the rater must choose One (1) Adjectival Rating by checking the box, as applicable. The Reference should submit supportive narrative in the additional comments to substantiate the rating for any rating that is checked Exceptional, Very Good, Marginal or Unsatisfactory, If Cost Control is N/A, please explain why. HUD may draw stronger conclusions for CPARs and Past Performance Surveys with supportive narrative that substantiates the rating for any rating that is checked “Exceptional or Very Good” than those without supportive narrative.
1. QUALITY
| RATING |
| Adjectival Rating |
| Definition |
Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective
Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective
Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory
Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: (Provide comments below if rating is Exceptional, Very Good, Marginal, or Unsatisfactory)
2. SCHEDULE
| RATING |
| Adjectival Rating |
| Definition |
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: : (Provide comments below if rating is Exceptional, Very Good, Marginal, or Unsatisfactory)
3. COST CONTROL
| RATING |
| Adjectival Rating |
| Definition |
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Not Applicable
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: (Provide comments below if rating is Exceptional, Very Good, Marginal, or Unsatisfactory)
4. MANAGEMENT
| RATING |
| Adjectival Rating |
| Definition |
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: (Provide comments below if rating is Exceptional, Very Good, Marginal, or Unsatisfactory)
5. SMALL BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTING (if applicable)
| RATING |
| Adjectival Rating |
| Definition |
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
|_| Not Applicable Not Applicable
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: : (Provide comments below if rating is Exceptional, Very Good, Marginal, or Unsatisfactory)
6. REGULATORY COMPLIANCE
| RATING |
| Adjectival Rating |
| Definition |
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: : (Provide comments below if rating is Exceptional, Very Good, Marginal, or Unsatisfactory)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .