ATCH 5 Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 397 KB Posted

Attached to
Dorm Unaccompanied Housing Wi-Fi
Solicitation number
FA466126Q0074
Issued by

About this file

This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire issued by the United States Air Force for solicitation FA466126Q0074 concerning Unaccompanied Housing Wi-Fi Internet Services at Dyess Air Force Base, Texas. The questionnaire is designed to evaluate contractor past performance history as a primary consideration in the award selection process and must be completed by respondents with direct knowledge of the contractor's performance on similar efforts.

The questionnaire requires respondents to provide general information about the offeror (name, address, CAGE/DUNS, contact details) and respondent information (name, title, organization, contact information), followed by contract information including contract title, period of performance, contract number, total contract value with all modifications and options, and a description of contract effort. The evaluation section uses a six-point performance rating scale: Exceptional (E), Very Good (V), Satisfactory (S), Marginal (M), Unsatisfactory (U), and Not Applicable (N/A). Respondents must rate contractor performance across 19 specific evaluation areas including personnel qualifications, quality control procedures, schedule adherence, warranty defect resolution, subcontractor management, preventive maintenance of telecommunications equipment, work order completion, technical accuracy, and record maintenance. Additionally, respondents must indicate whether the contractor received any Contract Discrepancy Reports, Letters of Concern, or Cure Notices, and whether they would award another contract to the contractor. Completed questionnaires should be returned via email to Bennie Simmons (bennie.simmons@us.af.mil) and SrA Way Spikes (way.spikes@us.af.mil) at 7th CONS/PKB.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

FA466126Q0074

PAST PERFORMANCE OUESTIONAIRE

The below-named Contractor/Offeror is being considered for award of a contract for Unaccompanied Housing Wi-Fi Internet Services at Dyess AFB, TX. A primary consideration in our selection process is the Contractor's history of performance of similar efforts. Please make every effort to be thorough in your answers/comments. Completed questionnaires can be returned via email to the following:

7th CONS/PKB ATTN: Bennie Simmons and SrA Way Spikes Email: bennie.simmons@us.af.mil and way.spikes@us.af.mil

A. GENERAL INFORMATION

Offeror's Name:

Address:

Offeror's Cage/DUNS:

Telephone Number:

Point of Contact:

B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION

Name:

Title:

Organization & Address:

Telephone: FAX: _

Email:

mailto:victor.camacho.2@us.af.mil mailto:amanda.fragoso@us.af.mil mailto:cris.hernandez@us.af.mil

C. CONTRACT INFORMATION

Contract Title:

Period of Performance:

Contract Number:

Total contract value, including all modifications and options:

Description of contract effort:

D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION

The Air Force will use your survey responses to determine a level of confidence, based on the Offeror's past performance record, concerning the Offeror's ability to successfully perform our requirement in accordance with the contract.

RESPONDENT WILL NOT FURNISH ANY PAST PERFORMANCEINFORMATION TO

OFFEROR SUBMITTING A PROPOSAL FOR THIS SOLICITATION.

In the table below, indicate your rating for the contractor's performance by placing an "X" in the appropriate block to the right of each question. Provide supporting information for each response in the space provided. Attach additional pages if more space is needed. The performance rating scale is defined as follows:

Code Performance Rating

E EXCEPTIONAL - Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government's benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

V VERY GOOD - Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the Government's benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

S SATISFACTORY - Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

M MARGINAL - Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

U UNSATISFACTORY -Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

NIA NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, performance was not observed, or information was not available. Do not know.

E. PERFORMANCE EVALUATION AREAS

Please use the above ratings and their assigned definitions to describe the Offeror's performance in the following areas:

The Contractor: E V s M

1. Assigned personnel with the required skills to accomplish the work.

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

2. Demonstrated the ability to, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

3. Home office participated in solving significant local problems.

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

4. Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

5. Followed approved quality control plan. SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

6. Identified problems as they occurred. SUPPORTING

INFORMATION:

u NIA

The Contractor: E V s M u NIA

7. Displayed initiative to solve problems.

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

8. Developed realistic progress schedules.

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

9. Met established project schedules.

INFORMATION:

10. Provided timely resolution of warranty defects.

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

11. Hired experienced subcontractors.

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

12. Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner.

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

13. Completed appropriate preventive maintenance of telecommunication equipment.

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

14. Completed work orders on schedule.

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

15. Managed work orders without hindering operation and maintenance efforts. SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

16. Provided accurate and appropriate technical solutions. SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

The Contractor: E V s M u NIA

17. Maintained maintenance and work order records.

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

18. Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task.

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

19. How would you rate the contractor's overall performance on this contract?

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

F. Did the Contractor receive any Contract Discrepancy Reports, Letters of Concern, or Cure Notices? If yes, please describe:

G. If given the opportunity, would you award another contract to this Contractor?___

Please explain response below:

Signature of Respondent Date_

Job Title:

Thank you for taking the time to complete this questionnaire.

LEGEND OF TERMS

OFFEROR: The Contractor for which past performance is being evaluated

SOLICITATION NUMBER: The procurement document number the Government uses to identify a specific Request for Proposal (RFP)

RESPONDENT: The person and/or organization evaluating past performance

CONTRACT NUMBER: If the Offeror had a contract or purchase order with your company/firm, the identifying contract number associated with awarded contract/purchase order

CONTRACT TITLE: Project title of work performed

CONTRACT VALUE: Contract/purchase order total dollar value, including all modifications and options

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF WORK: Describe type of work being performed, to include personnel, equipment, tools, supervision, and other items and services.

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

PAST PERFORMANCE OUESTIONAIRE
A. GENERAL INFORMATION
B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION
C. CONTRACT INFORMATION
D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION
RESPONDENT WILL NOT FURNISH ANY PAST PERFORMANCEINFORMATION TO OFFEROR SUBMITTING A PROPOSAL FOR THIS SOLICITATION.
E. PERFORMANCE EVALUATION AREAS
The Contractor: E V s M

LEGEND OF TERMS

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .