Atch 5 Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 50 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Whiteman AFB Central Steam Plant Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA462522R1004
About this file
This document is a solicitation for central steam plant maintenance services at Whiteman Air Force Base. The Air Force is seeking proposals for base year plus four option years of maintenance services for the base's central steam plant and distribution system. Proposals are due by May 12, 2022 and the contract will be awarded as a 100% small business set-aside. The North American Industry Classification System code for this work is 561210 for facilities support services. Site visits will be held on April 20, 2022 and questions are due by April 27, 2022. The solicitation incorporates Department of Labor wage determinations. Proposals should include separate sections for pricing, technical capability and past performance. Technical capability and past performance will be more important than price in the evaluation. The contractor will be required to comply with Department of Defense and Air Force regulations.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Article 4 LOU Criterion.pdf | ||
| Whiteman Sick Leave MOU 8-16-21.pdf | ||
| Whiteman Sick Leave MOU 2-8-22.pdf | ||
| 22R1004 CSP Combo 18 May 2022.pdf | ||
| 22R1004 CSP Combo 17 May 2022.pdf | ||
| Atch 1 22R1004 Heat Plant PWS 17 May 22.pdf | ||
| WD 2015-5089 Rev 19 dated Mar 15 2022.pdf | ||
| 22R1004 CSP QA.pdf | ||
| 22R1004 Site visit sign-in.pdf | ||
| Atch 1 22R1004 Heat Plant PWS 2 Feb 22.pdf | ||
| 22R1004 CSP Combo 6 Apr 2022.pdf | ||
| Atch 4 - Provisions and Clauses dated 7 April 22.pdf | ||
| 22R1004 PWS Atch 1 Government Assets 12 Oct 21.pdf | ||
| Atch 3 CBA 191001.pdf | ||
| Atch 1 22R1004 Heat Plant PWS 2 Feb 22.pdf | ||
| Atch 2 WD CBA-2021-298 Rev 0 Dated 19 Aug 2021.pdf | ||
| Atch 6 Price Schedule and Amendment Acknowledgement.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
Show all 17
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
CUI
When completed, this document is Source Selection Information IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104.
FA462522R1004, Attachment 4 The 509th Contracting Squadron of the Air Force Global Strike Command is in the process of competitively selecting a source for Central Steam Plant maintenance on Whiteman AFB. Whiteman Air Force Base (WAFB) has many heating and industrial processes requiring the use of high-pressure steam. A Central Steam Plant (CSP) and an extensive distribution loop meet this demand. The Air Force (AF) owns this combined system. A Government Contractor provides operation and maintenance.
One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the offerors’ past performance on contracts or other work efforts which reflect the offerors’ ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from organizations such as yours, which have had first-hand experience with the offeror, for the evaluation of the offerors’ performance on those contracts or work efforts.
Our areas of interest regarding the offeror are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire. In order to meet the acquisition milestones, we request your written response no later than twenty-one (21) calendar days after your receipt of this letter. This schedule will allow us sufficient time to analyze the data prior to the start of source selection.
To assist you in preparing your response and expediting your reply, the questionnaire may be filled out electronically and e-mailed to 509CONS.PKA.Services@us.af.mil (Attn: SSgt Ryan Hopkin). Please call SSgt Hopkin at 660-687-5462 or Tammie Clippert at 660-687-5425 if you have any questions. Your completed questionnaire will become a part of the official source selection records.
Your assistance is greatly appreciated and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this Source Selection.
Tammie Clippert Contracting Officer
Attachment Past Performance Questionnaire
Controlled By: 509 Bomb Wing Controlled By: 509th Contracting Squadron CUI Category: PROCURE/SSEL Distribution/Dissemination Controls: FED ONLY POC: Tammie Clippert, tammie.clippert@us.af.mil, 660-687-5425
Section 1: Contract Identification
| A. Contractor (Company/Division): |
| Click or tap here to enter text. |
| B. Contract Number: |
| Click or tap here to enter text. |
| C. Contract Type (e.g., fixed price, cost reimbursable, etc.): |
| Click or tap here to enter text. |
| D. Project Title: |
| Click or tap here to enter text. |
| E. Brief Project Description: |
Type project description here.
F. Period of Performance
| 1. Original Completion Date: |
| Click or tap to enter a date. |
| 2. Actual Completion Date: |
| Click or tap to enter a date. |
| 3. Reason for difference (if applicable): |
| Click or tap to enter a date. |
| G. Contract Dollar Value |
| 1. Original contract dollar value: |
| $Click or tap here to enter text. |
| 2. Actual contract dollar value: |
| $Click or tap here to enter text. |
3. Reasons for difference (if applicable):
Click or tap here to enter text.
H. Description of work performed:
Type description of work here.
| I. Was this a competitively awarded contract? |
| ☐Yes ☐ No |
| J. Contractor’s Role: |
| ☐ Prime Contractor ☐ Subcontractor |
Section 2: Customer or Agency Identification
| A. Customer or agency name: |
| Click or tap here to enter text. |
| B. Customer or agency description (if applicable): |
| Click or tap here to enter text. |
| C. Geographic description of work performed under this contract (i.e., local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands): |
| Click or tap here to enter text. |
Section 3: Respondent Identification
| A. Respondent’s name: |
| Click or tap here to enter text. |
| B. Respondent’s title: |
| Click or tap here to enter text. |
| C. Respondent’s phone/fax number/e-mail address: |
| Click or tap here to enter text. |
Section 4: Performance Information
In the table below, indicate your rating for the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block to the right of each question. Provide supporting information for each response in the space provided. Attach additional pages if more space is needed. The performance rating scale is defined as follows:
Code Performance Rating
E EXCEPTIONAL – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
V VERY GOOD – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
S SATISFACTORY – Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
M MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
U UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
| N/A | NOT APPLICABLE – Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, performance was not observed, or information was not available. Do not know. |
| The Contractor: | |
| E | |
| V | |
| S | |
| M | |
| U | |
| NA |
1. Developed and maintained a cooperative and productive professional working relationship through all phases of the contract.
Comments:
2. Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.
3. Kept/Provided a full and comprehensive record of all required actions, as required by the terms of the contract.
4. Demonstrated the ability to complete work in a safe and timely manner.
5. Promptly, identified problems, hazardous material, or other site issues to the Agency.
6. Maintained adequate oversight of subcontractor personnel and of work performed.
7. Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and corrective action was effective.
8. Worked diligently to complete the effort with no site abandonment exceeding five (5) working days.
9. Paid all employees, subcontractors, and suppliers as required by the terms of the contract.
10. Discarded all waste or hazardous material in accordance with state, federal, local, and environmental procedures/regulations.
11. Provided and used the proper personal protective equipment (PPE) for all work in accordance with OSHA regulations.
13. Partnered with the Agency to find cost effective solutions to issues encountered during the course of work.
14. How would you rate the contractor’s overall performance on this contract?
15. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain.
☐ Yes ☐ No
17. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain.
EXPLANATION:
☐ Yes ☐ No
Additional remarks (these are important; please include comments):
[click and pick the date]
Respondent’s Signature Date
Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!
Please return this completed questionnaire to:
Mailing Address:
SSgt Ryan Hopkin 660 Tenth Street, Suite 222 Whiteman AFB MO 65305
E-Mail to: 509CONS.PKA.Services@us.af.mil (Attn: SSgt Ryan Hopkin) CUI Page 6 of 6
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .