Atch_5_Past_Perf_Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 240 KB Posted

Attached to
Replace Shake Roof-TIMU Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
140P5424R0004
Issued by
Department of the Interior National Park Service Southeast Region

About this file

This document contains a past performance questionnaire for Solicitation Number 140P5424R0004 to replace the shake roof at the Timuquana Unit of the National Park Service Southeast Region. The questionnaire requests ratings on the contractor's management, quality, cost, and general performance on a previous contract. It asks for details of the previous contract such as the contractor and subcontractor names, contract value, period of performance, and description of services provided. Respondents are asked to provide ratings in various categories measuring the contractor's management, communication, responsiveness, problem-solving abilities, and overall performance. Space is also provided for comments on the contractor's strongest and weakest attributes as well as any other relevant remarks.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Replace Shake Roof-TIMU, newest first.
File Type Posted
Sol_140P5424R0004_Amd_0003.pdf PDF
Sol_140P5424R0004_Amd_0002.pdf PDF
Sol_140P5424R0004_Amd_0001.pdf PDF
Atch_1_to_Amd_1_QandAs_0001.pdf PDF
Atch_2_to_Amd_1_Report_0001.pdf PDF
Sol_140P5424R0004.pdf PDF
Atch_4_Site_Visit_Info.pdf PDF
Atch_1_SOW.pdf PDF
Atch_2_DOL_DBA_WD.pdf PDF
Atch_3_Drawings_and_Photos.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

140P5424R0004 Attachment 5

N/A=NOT APPLICABLE U=UNSATISFACTORY M=MARGINAL S=SATISFACTORY VG=VERY GOOD E=EXCEPTIONAL

Page 1 of 2 Pages

PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

For use in Solicitation # 140P5424R0004, Replace Shake Roof-TIMU

(This questionnaire, when completed, shall not be disclosed to anyone outside the Government)

Contractor: Contract#: ________________________________________

Prime or Sub? ________ Contract Value at Award: $ ____________ Final Contract Value: $ ______________________

Contract Type: _______________________ Description of Service: _

Period of Performance: __________________________________ Date Questionnaire Completed: ________________

PLEASE FILL IN THE FOLLOWING RESPONDENT INFORMATION:

Name of Evaluator: ___________________________________ Organization: __________________________________

Phone #: ____________________ Fax #: ____________________ Email: ____________________________________

Position Title: _____________________________ Dates of Involvement in Contract: _____________________________

When responding, circle the corresponding letter (using the key at the bottom of the page) which most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation.

MANAGEMENT:

1. Management performance……………………………………………………….…. N/A U M S VG E

2. Effective Communication……………………………………………………………N/A U M S VG E

3. Working relationship ………………………….……..…………………………...… N/A U M S VG E

4. Responsiveness to requirements……….……………………………… N/A U M S VG E

5. Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority.…… N/A U M S VG E

6. Complied with gov’t or other regulations and industry standards…………….…… N/A U M S VG E

7. Willingness to resolve problems in:

(a) Scheduling Projects…………………………………………………….…….. N/A U M S VG E

(b) Quality Control……………………………………………………….…….… N/A U M S VG E

8. Ability to resolve problems in:

(a) Scheduling Projects………………………………………………….……..… N/A U M S VG E

(b) Quality Control………………………………………………………….….… N/A U M S VG E

9. To your knowledge, has contractor had any contracts terminated for default?

(If YES, please explain in “REMARKS”) ...…………………………………....… …….. ….. YES NO

10. Has your organization ever elected to not exercise an option due to contractor’s poor performance? (If YES, please explain in “REMARKS”) …………….. ….. YES NO

140P5423R0025 Attachment 6

Page 2 of 2 Pages

QUALITY

11. Were modifications issued due to contractor failure to meet technical requirements and/or delivery/cost schedules? (If YES, explain in “REMARKS”) …….. ….... YES NO

12. Has a cure notice ever been issued? ...(If YES, explain in “REMARKS”)……… …….. ….... YES NO

13. Has a show-cause letter ever been issued? (If YES, explain in “REMARKS”)… …….. ….... YES NO

COST

14. Ability to meet the terms of the contract within the contractually-agreed price(s).. N/A U M S VG E

15. Have contract concessions/changes ever been made due to contractor’s failure to accurately estimate costs? (If YES, explain in “REMARKS”)………………..…. …….. ….. YES NO

16. Were the proposed costs for new items and/or requests for equitable adjustments considered reasonable?............................................................................................. …….. ….. YES NO

17. Have there been any disputes/claims relative to the contract? (If YES, explain in

“REMARKS”)………………………………………………………………..…… …….. ….. YES NO

18. Was the Contractor able to provide current, accurate and complete billing?........... …….. ….. YES NO

GENERAL

19. Contractor’s Overall Cooperation...………………………………………………. N/A U M S VG E

20. Contractor’s Overall Performance…………………………….…………………... N/A U M S VG E

21. Did the Contractor meet contract performance time and/or delivery schedule?...... …….. ….. YES NO

22. Would you award similar contracts to this contractor? (If NO, explain in

“REMARKS”)………………………………………………………………….…. …….. ….. YES NO

23. What do you think was the Contractor’s strongest management attribute and why?

24. What was the Contractor’s weakest management attribute and why? Did the Contractor correct, or attempt to correct the weaknesses?

25. Remarks (areas having significance when considering this contractor for a similar contract; exceptional and unsatisfactory ratings):

THANK YOU IN ADVANCE FOR YOUR ASSISTANCE

Please email to Mary_Stefanos@nps.gov (specifying 140P5424R0004 in subject line) once completed

N/A=NOT APPLICABLE U=UNSATISFACTORY M=MARGINAL S=SATISFACTORY VG=VERY GOOD E=EXCEPTIONAL mailto:Mary_Stefanos@nps.gov

Contractor:
Contract:
Prime or Sub:
Contract Value at Award:
Final Contract Value:
Contract Type:
Description of Service:
Period of Performance:
Date Questionnaire Completed:
Name of Evaluator:
Organization:
Phone:
Fax:
Email:
Position Title:
Dates of Involvement in Contract:
Management:
1: [Rating]
2: [Rating]
3: [Rating]
4: [Rating]
6: [Rating]
7: [Rating]
0:
0: [Rating]
1: [Rating]
8:
0: [Rating]

5: [Rating]

Dropdown4: [Yes/No]
Dropdown5:
0: [Yes/No]
1: [Yes/No]
3: [Yes/No]
4: [Yes/No]
2:
0: [Yes/No]
1: [Yes/No]
3: [Yes/No]
4: [Yes/No]
2: [Yes/No]
Text6:
Text7:
Text8:
Dropdown9: [Yes/No]

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .