Atch 4 Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 31 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Maintenance and Repair of Hangar Doors
- Solicitation number
- FA5613-22-Q-0014
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire for a federal contract solicitation for maintenance, repair, and inspection services for hangar doors on Ramstein Air Base in Germany. The solicitation is identified as FA5613-22-Q-0014 and is issued by the Department of the Air Force United States Air Forces in Europe - Air Forces Africa. Responses to the past performance questionnaire are due by September 27, 2022 at 1500 hours CEST and should be returned directly to the contracting officer or contracting specialist listed. The past performance questionnaire requests information about the contractor's previous experience including contract details, performance ratings, and overall performance.
View the file
Other files
Show all 15
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ)
A. RETURN COMPLETED SURVEY FORM BY 27 SEPTEMBER 2022, 1500 hrs (0300 p.m.) CEST TO:
Beatrice Meier/Contracting Specialist
Shannon Hochmuth/Contracting Officer
| 700 CONS/PKA |
| and |
| 700 CONS/PKA |
beatrice.meier.1.de@us.af.mil shannon.hochmuth@us.af.mil
+49-6371-405-4109
+49-631-536-3015
This acquisition is for maintenance, repair, and inspection services for hangar doors on Ramstein Air Base, Germany. Please provide past performance information as requested in FAR provision 52.212-2, Evaluation — Commercial Products and Commercial Services, and in the Addendum to FAR provision 52.212-1, Instructions to Offerors — Commercial Products and Commercial Services, below.
B. GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:
Contractor’s Name: Address:
Telephone Number: _
Email Address: _
Point of Contact:
Project Title or Brief Description of Work*:
Contract Number*: Contract Amount:
Contract Period or Dates of Performance*:
| Contractor performed as the | Prime Contractor | Subcontractor Key Personnel |
| Teaming Partner | Joint Venture Partner |
To be completed by the respondent and returned directly to the contracting office.
* Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the past ten (10) years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.
C. RATER INFORMATION:
Name of Rater:
Title:
Address: _
Phone Number:
FA5613-22-Q-
Attachment
Past
Performance
Questionnaire Page of
Email Address: _
D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (A or U) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF Unacceptable (U).
| A |
| U |
| Acceptable |
| Unacceptable |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub- element may have contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory. |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.
| The contractor: |
| Acceptable |
| Unacceptable |
| 1. |
| Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements and adequate project supervision at |
the place of performance.
| 2. |
| Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and/or replace, if |
necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.
| 3. |
| Provided adequately trained personnel. |
| 4. |
| Interfaced and cooperated with government quality assurance personnel (or corporate/agency equivalent) after being awarded the contract and/or commencement of |
project performance.
| 5. |
| Maintained sanitary conditions within the work |
environment.
| 6. |
| Provided effective quality control and/or inspection |
procedures to meet contract requirements.
| 7. |
| Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies pursuant to their quality control procedures and established procedures to prevent recurrence of |
discrepancy.
| 8. |
| Identified problems as they occurred and/or suggested |
alternative approaches to problem resolutions.
| 9. |
| Displayed initiative to solve problems and follow-up to |
ensure desired results were achieved.
| 10. |
| Provided timely and courteous service to guests. |
| 11. |
| Was responsive to contract changes (if applicable). |
| 12. |
| Provided adequate supervision and manpower to meet |
established schedules.
| 13. |
| Contractor adequately coped with any sudden surge in |
requirements (if applicable).
| 14. |
| Contractor adequately coped with short notice |
requirements.
| 15. |
| How would you rate the vendor's overall performance? |
REMARKS/COMMENTS:
RETURN COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRES DIRECTLY TO THE CONTRACTING OFFICER
(See POCs in paragraph A)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .