ATCH 2 SSS Moodle Modernization - Past Performance Questionnaire PPQ_07242026.docx
DOCX document 50 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 90MC26Q0006
- Issued by
- Not on record
About this file
Summary: Past Performance Questionnaire
This is a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) template designed to evaluate contractor experience and qualifications for the SSS Moodle Learning Management System (LMS) Modernization project. The document serves as an assessment tool for vendors to demonstrate their relevant past performance on similar projects and their capability to successfully execute the modernization effort.
The questionnaire requires vendors to provide detailed information about their experience with learning management system implementations, Moodle platform experience, and system modernization projects. Respondents must document specific past performance examples that demonstrate technical expertise, project management capability, and successful delivery of comparable LMS solutions. The template likely includes sections for describing project scope, timeline, budget, team qualifications, and measurable results achieved. This PPQ is a critical evaluation criterion within the solicitation process, enabling the Selective Service System to assess whether prospective contractors possess the necessary experience and proven track record required to successfully modernize their LMS infrastructure using Moodle.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT 2CUI//SP-PROCURE
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)
Selective Service System Solicitation #90MC0026Q0006 Please complete this Questionnaire and e-mail to Contracting Officer, G. Hendricksen e-mail: georgette.hendricksen@sss.gov and the Contract Specialist, Shimere Cooper, e-mail: scooper@sss.gov
CUI//SP-PROCURE
We are currently in the process of preparing our narrative Request for Quotation (RFQ) for the Selective Service System Moodle Modernization Requirement, Solicitation Number 90MC0026Q0006. As part of our submission, we have listed you as a reference on our performance for this type of service with your agency under the previous/current contract listed below. Your input on our performance is therefore requested.
Please complete this Questionnaire and e-mail it to the Contracting Officer, email: Georgette.Hendricksen@sss.gov and the Contract Specialist, email scooper@sss.gov
Questionnaire is due to Ms. Hendricksen and Ms. Cooper NLT 2:00 PM Eastern Standard Time on August 14, 2026. Questionnaire must be submitted via email directly to the Contracting Officer and Contract Specialist from a corporate e-mail account.
If you will not be available on August 14, 2026, for verification of this Past Performance Evaluation, please indicate another POC for the Contracting Officer/Contract Specialist to contact.
Alternate POC Name: ________________________________________
Alternate POC Phone number: _________________________________
Alternate POC E-mail address: _________________________________
Thank you.
NAME OF OFFEROR:
Phone:
E-Mail:
I. Current or Historical Contract Information
CONTRACT REFERENCED:
1. Contract or Identifying Number: ________________________________________________
2. Contract Value: _____________________________________________________________
3. Period of Performance: ______________________________________________________________________________
4. Brief description of items or services provided:
5. Name of Person Completing Questionnaire: _______________________________________
Agency/Company:
Title: ___________________________________ Phone: _________________________________
E-mail: _____________________________________________________________________
II. EVALUATION. Please rate the Contractor using the guide below. Explanatory narratives for as many responses as possible would be appreciated. These narratives need not be lengthy, just detailed. Attach additional pages if more space is needed.
Evaluation Definitions –
The following definitions should be used in the assessment of Contractor performance.
| EXCEPTIONAL |
| Performance EXCEEDS MOST contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns. |
| GOOD |
| Performance EXCEEDS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns, for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were highly effective. |
| SATISFACTORY |
| Performance MEETS contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed contains minor issues or concerns, for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective. |
| MARGINAL |
| Performance MEETS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed includes significant problems, issues, or concerns for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were only somewhat effective. |
| UNSATISFACTORY |
| Performance DID NOT MEET contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed includes serious problems, issues, or concerns for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective. |
| NOT APPLICABLE (N/A) |
| Performance information is not recent or relevant as defined in the Solicitation. Unable to provide assessment. |
Past Performance Evaluation
Question 1. Performance
What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet your requirements?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Performance
Comments, if any.
Questions 2. & 3. Timeliness & Resolution of Issues
What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to provide products or services in a timely manner and resolve any issues?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Timeliness
Ability to Resolve Problems
Comments, if any.
Question 4. Overall Rating of Contractor’s Performance
What is your overall rating of Contractor’s performance (requirements, schedule, and price) on contract being assessed?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
General Comments:
Question 5. Contractor’s Performance for Future Projects
Based on the contractor’s performance, would you award another contract to this company?
Why or why not?
General Comments:
2CUI//SP-PROCURE
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .