ATCH 2 Readiness Simulation - Past Performance Questionnaire PPQ_07222026.docx
DOCX document 49 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 90MC26Q0005
- Issued by
- Not on record
About this file
This is a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) template for the Selective Service System's Readiness Simulation (RS) solicitation (90MC0026Q0005). The questionnaire is designed to be completed by references listed by offerors to evaluate a contractor's past performance on similar work. Responses must be submitted via corporate email to Contracting Officer Georgette Hendricksen (georgette.hendricksen@sss.gov) and Contract Specialist Cane Toussaint (cane.toussaint@sss.gov) no later than 2:00 PM Eastern Standard Time on August 14, 2026. If the reference contact is unavailable on that date, an alternate point of contact must be provided.
The questionnaire requires references to rate contractor performance across five key areas: (1) ability to meet requirements, (2) timeliness and issue resolution capability, (3) problem-solving effectiveness, (4) overall performance rating, and (5) likelihood of awarding a future contract. Ratings use a five-point scale (Exceptional, Very Good/Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, Unsatisfactory) plus a Not Applicable option. References must also provide details about the referenced contract including contract number, value, period of performance, and a brief description of services delivered. Detailed narrative comments are requested to support each rating. The questionnaire template includes spaces for the offeror's name and contact information, the reference contact's details, and supporting documentation fields.
View the file
Other files
Show all 12
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT 2CUI//SP-PROCURE
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)
Selective Service System Solicitation #90MC0026Q0005 Please complete this Questionnaire and e-mail to Contracting Officer, G. Hendricksen e-mail: georgette.hendricksen@sss.gov and the Contract Specialist, Cane Toussaint, e-mail: cane.toussaint@sss.gov
CUI//SP-PROCURE
We are currently in the process of preparing our narrative Request for Quotation (RFQ) for the Selective Service System Readiness Simulation Requirement, Solicitation Number 90MC0026Q0005. As part of our submission, we have listed you as a reference on our performance for this type of service with your agency under the previous/current contract listed below. Your input on our performance is therefore requested.
Please complete this Questionnaire and e-mail it to the Contracting Officer, email: Georgette.Hendricksen@sss.gov and the Contract Specialist, email Cane.Toussaint@sss.gov
Questionnaire is due to Ms. Hendricksen and Mr. Toussaint NLT 2:00 PM Eastern Standard Time on August 14, 2026. Questionnaire must be submitted via email directly to the Contracting Officer and Contract Specialist from a corporate e-mail account.
If you will not be available on August 14, 2026, for verification of this Past Performance Evaluation, please indicate another POC for the Contracting Officer/Contract Specialist to contact.
Alternate POC Name: ________________________________________
Alternate POC Phone number: _________________________________
Alternate POC E-mail address: _________________________________
Thank you.
NAME OF OFFEROR:
Phone:
E-Mail:
I. Current or Historical Contract Information
CONTRACT REFERENCED:
1. Contract or Identifying Number: ________________________________________________
2. Contract Value: _____________________________________________________________
3. Period of Performance: ______________________________________________________________________________
4. Brief description of items or services provided:
5. Name of Person Completing Questionnaire: _______________________________________
Agency/Company:
Title: ___________________________________ Phone: _________________________________
E-mail: _____________________________________________________________________
II. EVALUATION. Please rate the Contractor using the guide below. Explanatory narratives for as many responses as possible would be appreciated. These narratives need not be lengthy, just detailed. Attach additional pages if more space is needed.
Evaluation Definitions –
The following definitions should be used in the assessment of Contractor performance.
| EXCEPTIONAL |
| Performance EXCEEDS MOST contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns. |
| GOOD |
| Performance EXCEEDS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns, for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were highly effective. |
| SATISFACTORY |
| Performance MEETS contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed contains minor issues or concerns, for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective. |
| MARGINAL |
| Performance MEETS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed includes significant problems, issues, or concerns for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were only somewhat effective. |
| UNSATISFACTORY |
| Performance DID NOT MEET contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed includes serious problems, issues, or concerns for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective. |
| NOT APPLICABLE (N/A) |
| Performance information is not recent or relevant as defined in the Solicitation. Unable to provide assessment. |
Past Performance Evaluation
Question 1. Performance
What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet your requirements?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Performance
Comments, if any.
Questions 2. & 3. Timeliness & Resolution of Issues
What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to provide products or services in a timely manner and resolve any issues?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Timeliness
Ability to Resolve Problems
Comments, if any.
Question 4. Overall Rating of Contractor’s Performance
What is your overall rating of Contractor’s performance (requirements, schedule, and price) on contract being assessed?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
General Comments:
Question 5. Contractor’s Performance for Future Projects
Based on the contractor’s performance, would you award another contract to this company?
Why or why not?
General Comments:
2CUI//SP-PROCURE
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .