Atch 05 Evaluation Plan Revised.pdf

PDF 25 KB Posted

Attached to
Tunnel 9 Burst Diaphragms IDIQ Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA9101-20-R-0002
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Test Center

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Tunnel 9 Burst Diaphragms IDIQ, newest first.
File Type Posted
Atch 01 FA910120R0002 DO 01 Offer Information Rev1.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
FA9101-20-R-0002 Burst Diaphragms IDIQ - Questions and Answers.pdf PDF
Atch 01 FA910120R0002 DO 01 Offer Information .xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
FA910120R0002 Combined Synopsis Solicitation.pdf PDF
Atch 04 Drawing 80_1126.pdf PDF
Atch 03 Drawing 77_1088.pdf PDF
Atch 02 Burst Diaphragm IDIQ Statement of Work.pdf PDF
Atch 06 FAR_DFARS_AFFARS Prov and Clauses.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

EVALUATION PLAN

for FA9101-20-R-0002

1. Basis for Award

a. The Government intends to award up to three (3) firm-fixed-price (FFP) IDIQ contracts resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror(s) whose offer(s), conforming to the solicitation, is both the lowest price and technically acceptable (LPTA).

b. The Government reserves the right to evaluate offers and make award without seeking additional information from offerors through exchanges or discussions. Therefore, the offeror’s initial offer should contain the offeror’s best terms from a price, schedule, and performance standpoint.

c. Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and provide complete accompanying rationale at least two (2) calendar weeks before the established proposal due date. Failure to provide an offer in accordance with the terms, conditions, and structure of the solicited requirement will result in the offer being rejected prior to price or technical evaluation.

2. Evaluation Information:

a. The CO will begin the evaluation process by conducting a compliance review for determination of basic offer adequacy prior to conducting evaluations. The Government reserves the right to obtain additional information from offerors solely for making a responsibility determination after receipt of offers. Requests for responsibility information do not constitute exchanges. By submission of the offer, offerors agree that all items proposed will be utilized for the duration of the contract.

b. Offerors shall propose a unit price and corresponding total price for all Contract Line Item Numbers (CLIN) on Attachment 1, FA9101-20-R-0002, Offer Information, Tab “FA9101-20-F-xxxx, DO 0x.” The Government will reject any offer that fails to cite a unit price and corresponding total price for each CLIN. Offerors are not required to utilize the spreadsheet provided, it is provided for convenience. If an offeror elects to use a different product, all information in the “Offeror Information” and “FA9101-20-F- xxxx, DO 0x” tabs shall be included.

The first basic IDIQ contract will be awarded to the lowest Total Evaluated Price (TEP) that is also technically acceptable. Award of the subsequent contracts will be made to the offeror(s) whose proposal(s) is (are) considered to represent the second and third with a target of the best value(s) to the Government by having the second and third lowest TEPs that are still technically acceptable.

The first delivery orders for those quantities in the attachment above will be awarded at the same time as the basic contract. One (1) delivery order will be awarded to each of the basic IDIQ awardees whose proposal(s) is (are) considered to represent the best value to the Government based on the stated evaluation criteria. This will result in the sum of the awarded delivery order being less than the TEP, and this may result in the sum of the awarded delivery order not being correlated with the TEP. This delivery order will be considered the IDIQ minimum requirement for the selected awardee. The minimum delivery order quantity will be ten (10) burst diaphragms.

c. Evaluation will begin starting with the three (3) lowest priced offerors according to their total evaluated price (TEP). If the lowest priced offers are determined to be technically acceptable on the basis of section c. below, the evaluation process stops at that point. Award shall be made to those offerors without further consideration of any other offers. If any of the lowest priced offerors are not determined to be technically acceptable, the next lowest priced offeror will be evaluated and the process will continue (in order by price) until up to three (3) offerors are determined to be technically acceptable, or until all offerors are evaluated.

3. Evaluation Factors:

a. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:

Price Technical Acceptability

b. Price:

Offers will be ranked according to their TEP which will be calculated as the sum total of the CLINs in the attachment noted in 2b above.

A price analysis will be conducted in accordance with FAR 15.404-1. Comparison of the proposed prices among offerors in response to the solicitation is the preferred and intended price analysis technique.

Other techniques and procedures, if deemed necessary, may be used to ensure a fair and reasonable price, to include, but not limited to, the following: comparison of previously proposed costs/prices and previous government and commercial contract costs/prices with current proposed costs/prices for the same or similar service/items; comparison with competitive market costs/prices of similar indexes;

GSA Schedule(s) or Department of Labor wage/salary indexes; or comparison of proposed costs/prices with the Independent Government estimate.

The CO has determined there is a high probability of adequate price competition in this acquisition.

Upon examination of the initial offers, if the CO's determines adequate price competition exists, no additional cost information will be requested. However, if at any time during this competition the CO determines that adequate price competition no longer exists, offerors may be required to submit other than certified cost or pricing data to the extent necessary for the CO to determine that the prices proposed are fair and reasonable

c. Technical Acceptability:

c.1. Offers will be evaluated by a technical advisor and rated in accordance with Table 2. Documents submitted in response to this solicitation not meeting the requirements of this plan may make the offer not technically acceptable.

Table 2 – Technical Ratings

Rating Definition

Acceptable Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation and Technical Acceptability Evaluation Factors 1 and 2.

Unacceptable Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation and Technical Acceptability Evaluation Factors 1 and 2.

c.1.1. Technical Acceptability Evaluation Factor 1, Offeror shall certify that their proposal meets and complies with all items in the Statement of Work (SOW).

2. Evaluation Information:
3. Evaluation Factors:
Table 2 – Technical Ratings

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .