ASBESTOS AND LPB ASSESSEMEN REPORT 191127.pdf

Limited Asbestos Assessment Report

Building 3107 – Consolidated Brig

Joint Base Charleston (Weapons Station)

Goose Creek, South Carolina

S&ME Project No. 4213-19-254

Assessment Performed by:

11-27-2019

William R. Seaborn (SCDHEC Accreditation #MP-01317) Date

Report Prepared by:

11-27-2019

James McMillan (SCDHEC Accreditation #BI- 01643) Date

PREPARED FOR:

ADC Engineering

12256 Yeamans Hall Road

Hanahan, SC 29410

PREPARED BY:

S&ME, Inc.

620 Wando Park Boulevard

Mt Pleasant, SC 29464

November 27, 2019

S&ME, Inc. | 620 Wando Park Boulevard | Mt Pleasant, SC 29464 | p 843.884.0005 | www.smeinc.com

November 27, 2019

ADC Engineering

12256 Yeamans Hall Road

Hanahan, South Carolina 29410

Attention: Mr. Greg Jones, PE, LEED, AP gregj@adcengineering.com

Reference: Limited Asbestos and Lead-Based Paint Assessment Report

Joint Base Charleston (Weapons Station) – Building 3107 Brig

Goose Creek, South Carolina

S&ME Project No. 4213-19-254

Dear Mr. Jones:

S&ME, Inc. (S&ME) is pleased to provide this report summarizing the limited asbestos and lead-based paint assessment performed at the referenced site, in accordance with S&ME Proposal No. 42-1900617 dated June 26, 2019. The following sections include the project background, sampling and analysis procedures, findings and results, and conclusions and recommendations.

This report is provided for the sole use of ADC Engineering and Joint Base Charleston. Use of this report by any other parties will be at such party's sole risk and S&ME, Inc. disclaims liability for any such use or reliance by third parties. The results presented in this report are indicative of conditions only during the time of the assessment and of the specific area referenced. The information provided in this assessment report should not be used as a bidding document, and field conditions should be verified.

We appreciate the opportunity to provide you with our industrial hygiene services. If you have any questions concerning this report, please call us at (843) 884-0005.

Sincerely, S&ME, Inc.

James L. McMillan James L. Killingsworth, CHMM

Staff Industrial Hygienist Environmental Services Area Manager/V.P.

Attachments mailto:gregj@adcengineering.com

Limited Asbestos and Lead-Based Paint Assessment Report

Joint Base Charleston (Weapons Station) – Building 3107 Brig

Goose Creek, South Carolina

S&ME Project No. 4213-19-254

November 27, 2019 ii

Table of Contents

Executive Summary

1.0 Background

2.0 Site and Project Description

2.1 Purpose

2.2 Site Description

3.0 Assessment Procedures

3.1 Asbestos Containing Materials

3.2 Lead-Based Paint

4.0 Findings and Results

4.1 Asbestos Containing Materials

4.2 Lead-Based Paint

5.0 Conclusions and Recommendations

5.1 Asbestos Recommendations

5.2 Lead-Based Paint Recommendations

6.0 Assumptions and Limitations

Appendices

Appendix I – Summary of Asbestos Results

Appendix II – Diagram of Bulk Sample Locations

Appendix III – Copy of Inspector’s SCDHEC License

Appendix IV – Laboratory Analysis Sheets and Chain of Custody Records

Appendix V – Summary of XRF Lead Analyzer Readings

November 27, 2019 1

Executive Summary

An asbestos and lead-based paint assessment was conducted on November 12 and 13, 2019, limited to the walls, and ceiling grid and interstitial area above. The assessment was performed based on the Design Work Order

(DWO) identified as Repair Brig 3107 HVAC C2 Mech Rm – Repair Lighting – Repair Galley Ceiling – Repair Site

Drainage – Weapons Station, Project DKGV 19-1073225. The purpose of the assessment was to identify the presence of asbestos containing materials (ACMs) and lead-based paint and glazing to support planned renovation activities and facilitate the work described in the referenced DWO. The assessment also complies with federal, state, and local asbestos requirements regarding identification of ACMs that may be disturbed due to renovation or demolition.

Building 3107, otherwise referred to as the Naval Consolidated Brig, is two-story and approximately 150,000 square feet in size. Areas within the structure consist of six prisoner holding areas (Alpha 1 & 2, Bravo 1, 2, 3, & 4), and various office and common areas. Interior wall finishes consist of concrete masonry unit (CMU), limited drywall, and wood. Ceiling finishes consist of concrete, drywall, and suspended ceilings with acoustical tiles. Floor finishes consist of unfinished concrete, vinyl, carpet, and ceramic floor coverings. The structure was occupied on the day(s) of our assessment.

Asbestos Containing Materials

The suspect ACMs sampled and analyzed as part of this limited assessment included drywall and associated joint compound, acoustical ceiling tiles, carpet mastic, mastic associated with rubber cove base, mastic associated with heating, ventilating, and air conditioning (HVAC) ductwork, fire proofing, spray-applied ceiling texture, and mastics associated with pipe insulation. Of the representative materials sampled and analyzed as part of this assessment, no ACMs were identified.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control

(SCDHEC), and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) defines a material as an ACM if an asbestos content greater than one percent (>1%) is detected in a representative sample.

If additional suspect ACMs not addressed in this report are discovered during the planned renovation activities, bulk samples should be collected by a SCDHEC licensed inspector and analyzed for asbestos content prior to disturbance or disposal of the suspect materials. This report should also be provided to the contractor(s) to assist with compliance with applicable State and Federal regulations.

Lead-Based Paint

A lead-based paint and lead-containing materials assessment was performed concurrently with the asbestos assessment, of representative suspect painted and lead-containing components associated with the referenced structure. The components were analyzed using direct measurement X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) technology using a Heuresis Pb200i (serial #1852). For the purpose of this assessment, painted and glazed surfaces with lead concentrations meeting the SCDHEC disposal limit (0.7 mg/cm2) are considered lead-based paint.

November 27, 2019 2

Of the representative suspect lead-based paints and glazed materials tested, the following exhibited lead concentrations meeting the SCDHEC disposal limit of 0.7 mg/cm2.

• Glazing on porcelain sinks (limited).

Low levels of lead were also detected in other surfaces tested, which are applicable to the standards of the OSHA

29 CFR 1926.62 (Lead in Construction) dependent upon the tasks impacting those surfaces.

Lead-based paint and lead containing products, as defined by the SCDHEC, require proper handling and disposal.

The identified components coated with lead glazing may remain in place or, if subject to removal, be disposed in a

Class II or Class III landfill.

Paint coatings may be present that contain low levels of lead that cannot be detected by X-ray fluorescence, and may be applicable to OSHA regulations 29 CFR 1926.62. The quantities reported by XRF may be useful in determining the relative risk associated with various demolition tasks, for example disturbances to paints with low lead levels may be less likely to result in airborne lead exposures in excess of the OSHA Action Level.

This summary is for convenience of the reader and should not be completely relied upon without reviewing the full contents of this report, including appended materials.

November 27, 2019 3

1.0 Background

S&ME was contracted by ADC Engineering to perform an asbestos and lead-based paint assessment, limited to the walls, ceiling grid, and interstitial space in Building 3017 (Brig) located on Joint Base Charleston (Weapons

Station) in Goose Creek, South Carolina. The scope of planned renovations is described in the Design Work Order

(DWO) identified as Repair Brig 3107 HVAC C2 Mech Rm – Repair Lighting – Repair Galley Ceiling – Repair Site

Drainage – Weapons Station, Project DKGV 19-1073225. The assessment was subsequently performed on

November 12 and 13, 2019, by James McMillan and Bill Seaborn, both with S&ME. The assessment was requested to identify the presence of ACMs and lead-based paint and glazings associated with the project areas to support planned renovation activities. The assessment also complies with federal, state, and local asbestos requirements regarding identification of asbestos containing building materials that may be disturbed due to renovation or demolition.

The limited asbestos assessment was conducted to assess, sample, and identify ACMs in accordance with regulatory requirements. The identification of ACMs will aid in the prevention of occupational exposures and/or environmental releases of airborne asbestos. Identification of ACMs also complies with Title 40 Code of the

Federal Regulations, part 61, and State regulation 61-86.1 enforced by the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (SCDHEC), along with Title 29 Code of Federal Regulations, part 1926 enforced by the

Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). The following sections describe the assessment procedures used, results of the suspect ACMs sampled and analyzed, and conclusions and recommendations related to ACMs.

The purpose of the lead testing was to assess and identify lead coatings and glazings associated with the project areas in the referenced structure. The identification of these materials will aid in the compliance of occupational exposure (OSHA) and/or environmental releases of airborne lead dust in accordance with OSHA 29 CFR 1926.62

(Lead in Construction) and provide information to determine proper disposal of lead-based paint coated components and debris in accordance with the SCDHEC and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

2.0 Site and Project Description

2.1 Purpose

The purpose of the assessment was to identify the presence of ACMs and lead-based paint and glazings prior to renovation activities in Building 3107 (Brig). The assessment was limited to the walls, ceilings, and interstitial space above, and included materials and finishes to be impacted by the planned renovations, as described in the referenced DWO identified as Repair Brig 3107 HVAC C2 Mech Rm – Repair Lighting – Repair Galley Ceiling –

Repair Site Drainage – Weapons Station, Project DKGV 19-1073225. An assessment strategy appropriate for this purpose was presented in our proposal and is described in this report. The report should be interpreted only with regard to the specific location and materials referenced.

November 27, 2019 4

2.2 Site Description

Building 3107, otherwise referred to as the Naval Consolidated Brig, is two-story and approximately 150,000 square feet in size. Areas within the structure consist of six prisoner holding areas (Alpha 1 & 2, Bravo 1, 2, 3, & 4), and various office and common areas. Interior wall finishes consist of concrete masonry unit (CMU), limited drywall, and wood. Ceiling finishes consist of concrete, drywall, and suspended ceilings with acoustical tiles. Floor finishes consist of unfinished concrete, vinyl, carpet, and ceramic floor coverings. The structure was occupied on the day(s) of our assessment.

3.0 Assessment Procedures

3.1 Asbestos Containing Materials

The assessment was performed by observing, assessing and sampling suspect ACMs associated with the referenced project areas. The possibility exists that suspect materials were undetected in inaccessible areas. If additional suspect ACMs not identified in this report are discovered during destructive activities, bulk samples must be collected by a SCDHEC licensed inspector and analyzed for asbestos content prior to disturbance or disposal of the suspect materials.

The suspect ACMs were quantified and subject to a physical condition assessment. A sampling strategy was then developed to provide representative samples in accordance with the SCDHEC and EPA. Suspect ACMs observed were classified based on their condition (good, damaged, or significantly damaged) and potential for disturbance.

Bulk samples of suspect ACMs were collected by a SCDHEC licensed inspector. The bulk samples were then extracted from suspect ACMs and recorded on a chain of custody record and submitted to our in-house Polarized

Light Microscopy (PLM) laboratory. The samples were subsequently analyzed by PLM, and confirmation analysis was performed by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) by EMSL Analytical, for non-friable organically bound materials reported negative by PLM. The laboratories are located in Charlotte, North Carolina and are accredited by the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP), which is administered by the National

Institute of Standards and Technology.

Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM)

The suspect materials were analyzed by trained microscopists using PLM techniques coupled with dispersion staining in accordance with EPA Test Method Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations, Chapter I (1-1-87 edition), Part

763, Subpart F-APPENDIX A. This method identifies asbestos mineral fibers based on six optical characteristics:

morphology, birefringence, refractive index, extinction angle, sign of elongation and dispersion staining colors.

The laboratory analysis reports the specific type of asbestos identified (there are six asbestos minerals) and the percentage of asbestos present.

Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)

One representative sample from each suspect non-friable organically bound homogeneous material, which exhibited negative results via PLM analysis, was analyzed by trained microscopists via TEM, in accordance with

ASTM E2356 per SCDHEC requirements.

November 27, 2019 5

3.2 Lead

Lead testing was performed on representative painted and glazed components associated with the project area.

The components were analyzed with a Heuresis Pb200i XRF spectrum analyzer (serial #1852). The suspect finishes were selected based on the color of the topcoat and the underlying paint layers and/or the substrate on which it was applied. The possibility exists that lead-based paint and glazed finishes are present in those inaccessible areas such as pipe chases, wall voids, etc. The SCDHEC defines a lead-based paint as any paint or coating product containing lead at concentrations equaling 0.7 mg/cm2 or greater by XRF testing. For the purpose of the assessment, paint containing 0.7 mg/cm2 or greater was considered lead-based paint due to the planned demolition activities.

The OSHA does not recognize a threshold level of lead for definition purposes, only the airborne concentration of lead a worker is exposed. The current OSHA regulations recognize an airborne action level of 30 micrograms per cubic meter (µg/m3) during an eight-hour day and a permissible exposure limit of 50 µg/m3.

4.0 Findings and Results

4.1 Asbestos Containing Materials

The suspect ACMs sampled and analyzed as part of this limited assessment included drywall and associated joint compound, acoustical ceiling tiles, carpet mastic, mastic associated with rubber cove base, mastic associated with heating, ventilating, and air conditioning (HVAC) ductwork, fire proofing, spray-applied ceiling texture, and mastics associated with pipe insulation. Of the representative materials sampled and analyzed as part of this assessment, no ACMs were identified.

The EPA, SCDHEC, and OSHA defines a material as an ACM if an asbestos content greater than one percent (>1%) is detected in a representative sample.

A summary of asbestos results is provided in Appendix I, and exhibits the sample number, location, type of material tested, approximate quantity of the material sampled, condition of the material, and corresponding result for each sample. A diagram of bulk sample locations is provided in Appendix II, and a copy of the inspectors’

SCDHEC licenses are provided in Appendix III. The laboratory analyses and chain-of-custody records are provided in Appendix IV.

4.2 Lead

Based on the assessment and testing performed on November 12 and 13, 2019, of the suspect components associated with the referenced project areas, the following exhibited lead concentrations meeting the SCDHEC disposal limit of 0.7 mg/cm2:

• Glazing on porcelain sinks (limited)

Low levels of lead were also detected in other surfaces tested, which are applicable to the standards of the OSHA

29 CFR 1926.62 (Lead in Construction) dependent upon the tasks impacting those surfaces.

November 27, 2019 6

The summary of XRF readings is provided in Appendix V, and should be reviewed in full.

5.0 Conclusions and Recommendations

The asbestos and lead-based paint assessment performed on November 12 and 13, 2019, limited to the walls, ceiling grid, and interstitial space in Building 3017 (Brig) located on Joint Base Charleston (Weapons Station) in

Goose Creek, South Carolina did not identify the presence of ACMs. Limited lead glazing was identified and is applicable to the SCDHEC and EPA disposal standards. Low levels of lead were also identified that are applicable to the standards of the OSHA.

This report should be provided to the contractor(s) to assist with compliance with applicable State and Federal regulations.

5.1 Asbestos Recommendations

If additional suspect ACMs not addressed in this report are discovered during the planned renovation activities, bulk samples must be collected by a SCDHEC licensed inspector and analyzed for asbestos content prior to disturbance or disposal of the suspect materials.

5.2 Lead Recommendations

Lead-based paint and lead containing products, as defined by the SCDHEC, require proper handling and disposal only if scheduled for disturbance. The identified components coated with lead glazing may remain in place, or if subject to removal, be disposed in a Class II or Class III landfill.

Destructive actions to paint containing detectable levels of lead (e.g. component removal, demolition, sanding, grinding, burning, paint preparation, etc.) will require the contractor comply with the standards of the OSHA regulation 29 CFR 1926.62 (Lead in Construction), including but not limited to training, initial exposure monitoring, the use of personal protective equipment, and medical surveillance.

Paint coatings may be present that contain low levels of lead that cannot be detected by X-ray fluorescence, and may be applicable to OSHA regulations 29 CFR 1926.62. The quantities reported by XRF may be useful in determining the relative risk associated with various demolition tasks, for example disturbances to paints with low lead levels may be less likely to result in airborne lead exposures in excess of the OSHA Action Level.

6.0 Assumptions and Limitations

This report is provided for the sole use of the ADC Engineering and Joint Base Charleston. Use of this report by any other parties will be at such party’s sole risk, and S&ME disclaims liability for any such use or reliance by third parties. The results presented in this report are indicative of conditions only during the time of the sampling period and of the specific areas referenced. Under no circumstances is this report to be used as a bidding document, or as a project design or specification.

November 27, 2019 7

S&ME performed the services in accordance with generally accepted practices of reputable environmental consultants undertaking similar studies at the same time and in the same geographical area. S&ME has endeavored to meet this standard of care. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is intended or made with respect to this report or S&ME’s services. Users of this report should consider the scope and limitations related to these services when developing opinions as to risks associated with the site.

The asbestos and lead-based paint assessment was limited to the walls, ceiling grid, and interstitial space in

Building 3017 (Brig) in concurrence with the DWO identified as Repair Brig 3107 HVAC C2 Mech Rm – Repair

Lighting – Repair Galley Ceiling – Repair Site Drainage – Weapons Station, Project DKGV 19-1073225. The findings of the asbestos assessment were based largely on visual observations within the amount of time available. The findings do not warrant that all asbestos-containing materials have been identified; suspect asbestos-containing materials may be present in areas not readily-accessible to observation. In addition, the actual locations and quantities of materials determined to contain asbestos may vary from those herein. Apparent homogeneous sampling areas may vary in actual asbestos content due to previous renovations, maintenance or related operations. The possibility exists that suspect materials were undetected in inaccessible or concealed areas such as under carpeting or multiple flooring layers, and inside pipe chases or wall voids. If additional suspect materials are discovered during the planned destructive activities, bulk samples must be sampled and analyzed by qualified entities.

The findings of the lead-based paint assessment were based largely on visual observations and the specific number of areas analyzed. The findings do not warrant that all painted and glazed surfaces containing lead have been identified; different underlying painted surfaces which contain lead could exist under similar top layers. Also, apparent similarly painted surfaces may vary in actual lead content.

Appendices

Appendix I – Summary of Asbestos Results

Summary of Asbestos Results

NWS Building 3107 - Brig

Goose Creek, South Carolina

S&ME Project No. 4213-19-254

Date(s) of Sampling: November 12 & 13, 2019

HA Material Description Material

Location

2Approx.

Quantity

Cat.

(F/I/II)

Type

Condition/

Potential for

Disturbance

Sample

Number

Sample

Location

1Type and Percent

Asbestos

254-DW-01 Admin Closet ND

254-DW-02 Galley ND

254-DW-03 Prisoner Weights ND

254-JC-01 Admin Closet ND

254-JC-02 Prisoner Weights ND

254-JC-03 Prisoner Weights ND

254-JC-04 Galley ND

254-JC-05 Galley ND

254-CT1-01 Quarterdeck ND

254-CT1-02 Gym (staff) ND

254-CT1-03 Admin ND

254-CT2-01 Medical Corridor ND

254-CT2-02 Programs Corridor ND

254-CT2-03 Visiting Areas ND

254-CT3-01 Security Admin ND

254-CT3-02 Security Admin ND

254-CT3-03 Security Admin ND

254-CB-01 Quarterdeck ND

254-CB-02 Visiting Area ND

254-CB-03 Security ND

254-DM1-01 Quarterdeck ND

254-DM1-02 Programs ND

254-DM1-03 Alpha 1 Pipe Chase ND

Table I: Summary of Asbestos Results

DW Drywall Misc.

Sur.

8,000 SF F Misc. N/A

31,500 SF F Misc. N/A

Joint Compound

Ceiling Tile (2 x 2, white, pinhole)

Lobby, Medical, Admin

Ceiling Tile (2 x 4, white, worm track)

Various Rooms and

Corridors

Ceiling Tile (2 x 4, white, pinhole) Security Admin

Mastic (beige) associated with

HVAC equipment

Various Areas

Throughout

JC

CT1

CT2

CT3

CB

DM1

Misc. N/A

Mastic (tan) associated with

Rubber Cove Base

Various Areas

Throughout 4,200 LF NF Cat I Misc. N/A

1,800 SF F

6,500 SF NF Cat I Misc. N/A

Admin, Galley, Prisoner Weight

Room, Restroom

Ceilings

4,125 SF F N/A

Goose Creek, South Carolina

S&ME Project No. 4213-19-254

Date(s) of Sampling: November 12 & 13, 2019

HA Material Description Material

Location

2Approx.

Quantity

Cat.

(F/I/II)

Type

Condition/

Potential for

Disturbance

Sample

Number

Sample

Location

1Type and Percent

Asbestos

Table I: Summary of Asbestos Results

254-DM4-01 Alpha 1 Pipe Chase ND

254-DM4-02 Bravo 3 Pipe Chase ND

254-DM4-03 Programs ND

254-DM5-01 Bravo 4 Chase ND

254-DM5-02 Bravo 4 HVAC Room ND

254-DM5-03 Bravo 4 HVAC Room ND

254-DM6-01 HVAC Room Bravo 2 ND

254-DM6-02 HVAC Room Bravo 3 ND

254-DM6-03 HVAC Room Bravo 4 ND

254-FP-01 Quarterdeck ND

254-FP-02 Corridor at Quarterdeck ND

254-FP-03 Security ND

254-FP-04 Medical Corridor ND

254-FP-05 Gym (staff) ND

254-FP-06 Admin ND

254-FP-07 Alpha 2 ND

254-TX2-01 R&R Conference ND

254-TX2-02 R&R Conference ND

254-TX2-03 R&R Conference ND

254-TX2-04 R&R 111 ND

254-TX2-05 R&R 112 ND

HVAC Rooms and

Chases in Bravo 4

Mastic (brown/white) associated with HVAC ducts

HVAC Room

Bravo 2

150 SF NF Cat I Misc. N/A

100 SF NF Cat I Misc. N/A

Mastic (white) associated with various pipes and HVAC equipment

TX2

DM4

DM5

DM6

FP N/AFire Proofing Throughout 120,000 SF F Sur.

Mastic (brown) associated with HVAC equipment

Various Areas

Throughout 4,250 SF NF Cat I Misc. N/A

N/A Spray-applied Ceiling Texture

(coarse)

R&R (cells and conference room) 2,200 SF F Sur.

Goose Creek, South Carolina

S&ME Project No. 4213-19-254

Date(s) of Sampling: November 12 & 13, 2019

HA Material Description Material

Location

2Approx.

Quantity

Cat.

(F/I/II)

Type

Condition/

Potential for

Disturbance

Sample

Number

Sample

Location

1Type and Percent

Asbestos

Table I: Summary of Asbestos Results

254-TX-01 Alpha 1 ND

254-TX-02 Alpha 1 ND

254-TX-03 Alpha 1 - Bravo Side ND

254-TX-04 Alpha 2 ND

254-TX-05 Alpha 2 SQ ND

254-TX-06 Bravo 3 ND

254-TX-07 Bravo 2 ND

254-PI-01 Mechanical Room C1 ND

254-PI-02 Mechanical Room C1 ND

254-PI-03 Mechanical Room C2 ND

254-FS-01 Alpha 2 HVAC ND

254-FS-02 Alpha 2 HVAC ND

254-FS-03 Alpha 2 HVAC ND

254-EJ-01 Alpha 1 HVAC ND

254-EJ-02 Alpha 2 HVAC ND

254-EJ-03 Alpha 2 HVAC ND

254-PM1-01 Mechanical Room C1 ND

254-PM1-02 Mechanical Room C1 ND

254-PM1-03 Mechanical Room C2 ND

254-PM2-01 Mechanical Room C1 ND

254-PM2-02 Mechanical Room C1 ND

254-PM2-03 Mechanical Room Boiler ND

PM2

TX

PI

FS

EJ

PM1

Spray-applied Ceiling Texture

(soft, fine)

Prisoner cells and catwalks ceilings

(excludes Bravo 4)

42,200 SF F Sur. N/A

N/A

Gasket material (black) associated with HVAC Air

Handlers

Various HVAC Air

Handlers 300 LF NF Cat I Misc.

N/A

Fire-Stop Mastic (red) HVAC Rooms 20 SF NF Cat I Misc. N/A

Mastic (white) associated with foam-glass pipe insulation joints

Mechanical Rooms 650 LF NF Cat I Misc.

N/A Mastic (beige) associated with foam-glass pipe insulation Mechanical Rooms 650 LF NF Cat I Misc.

N/A

Mastic (beige/white) associated with fiberglass pipe insulation

Mechanical Rooms 425 LF NF Cat I Misc.

Goose Creek, South Carolina

S&ME Project No. 4213-19-254

Date(s) of Sampling: November 12 & 13, 2019

HA Material Description Material

Location

2Approx.

Quantity

Cat.

(F/I/II)

Type

Condition/

Potential for

Disturbance

Sample

Number

Sample

Location

1Type and Percent

Asbestos

Table I: Summary of Asbestos Results

254-DW2-01 Bravo 4 ND

254-DW2-02 Bravo 4 ND

254-DW2-03 Bravo 4 ND

254-JC2-01 Bravo 4 ND

254-JC2-02 Bravo 4 ND

254-JC2-03 Bravo 4 ND

254-JC2-04 Bravo 4 ND

254-JC2-05 Bravo 4 ND

SF = square feet Misc. = Miscellaneous LPD = low potential for disturbance

LF = linear feet Sur = Surfacing PD = potential for disturbance

F= friable TSI = Thermal System Insulation PSD = potential for significant disturbance

NF = non-friable G = good ND = No Asbestos Detected

Cat I = Category I D = damaged NA = Not Applicable

Cat II = Category II SD = significantly damaged EA = each

EPA, SCDHEC and OSHA defines a material as asbestos containing if an asbestos content greater than one percent (>1%) is detected in a representative sample.

Quantities are estimated, and should not be used for bidding purposes, as field conditions should be verified.

Samples analyzed by TEM to confirm negative results reported by PLM analysis.

DW2

JC2

Bravo 4 Soffits 2,200 SF F N/A

Joint Compound Sur.

Drywall Misc.

Appendix II – Diagram of Bulk Sample Locations

INMATE

GYM

254-PM2-03

254-DW-02

254-JC-04

254-JC-05

254-FP-06

254-CT1-03

254-JC-01

254-DW-01

254-CB-01

254-FP-01

254-CT1-01

254-DM1-01

254-CT2-03

254-CB-02

254-FP-02

254-PI-01

254-PM1-01

254-PM1-02

254-PM2-01

254-PM2-02

254-TX2-04

254-TX2-05

254-FP-05

254-CT1-02

254-CT3-03

254-CT3-02

254-DM1-03

254-DM4-01

254-FP-03

254-CB-03

254-CT3-01

254-DM-03

254-TX2-01

254-TX2-02

254-TX2-03

254-CT2-02

254-DM4-03

254-TX-04

254-CT2-01

254-FP-04

254-PM1-03

254-PI-03

254-DM4-02

254-DW-03

254-JC-02

254-JC-03

254-DM5-01

R&R

CLINICAL/POST

TRAINING

MECH

SECURE

GYM

PROGRAMS

LEG

MECH

VISIT

GALLEY

ADMIN

ALPHA

BRAVO

B-1

C2

MECH

C3

ALPHA

BRAVO

ALPHA

BRAVO

ALPHA

BRAVO

~ OPEN ~

~ OPEN ~

~ OPEN ~

~ OPEN ~

~ OPEN ~

C1

ALPHA

BRAVO

ALPHA

BRAVO

A-1

A-2

B-3

B-2

B-4

~ OPEN ~

MAIN

MECH

PRISONER

MANAGMENT

MED

LEGEND

BULK SAMPLE LOCATION254-XX-XX

NOTES: NO ASBESTOS WAS DETECTED IN THE BULK SAMPLES

COLLECTED AND ANALYZED.

LEAD-CONTAINING MATERIALS (>0.7 mg/cm²)

- GLAZING ON PORCELAIN SINKS (LIMITED)

254-TX-05

254-TX-03

254-TX-02254-TX-01

254-DM1-02

T P r o j e c t s E N

V A

D C

J B

C

N

W S

B l d g

B r i g

A s b

L B

P G o o s e

C r e e k C

A D

C o n s t r u c t i o n d w g

FIGURE NO.

SCALE:

DATE:

PROJECT NUMBER

0 60 120

(IN FEET)GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET)GRAPHIC SCALE

LIMITED ASBESTOS AND LEAD-BASED PAINT ASSESSMENT

FIRST FLOOR

BUILDING 3107 BRIG

GOOSE CREEK, SOUTH CAROLINA

4213-19-254

AS SHOWN

11-27-2019

N

LEGEND

BULK SAMPLE LOCATION254-XX-XX

~ OPEN ~

~ OPEN ~

~ OPEN ~

~ OPEN ~

~ OPEN ~

254-EJ-01

254-EJ-02

254-FS-01

254-FS-02

254-FS-03

254-DW2-02

254-JC2-01

254-JC2-02

254-JC2-03

254-DM5-02

254-DM5-03

254-DW2-02

254-DW2-03

254-JC2-04

254-JC2-05

254-DM6-01

254-DM6-02

254-DM6-03

254-EJ-03

ALPHA

BRAVO

B-1

ALPHA

BRAVO

ALPHA

BRAVO

ALPHA

BRAVO

ALPHA

BRAVO

ALPHA

BRAVO

A-1

A-2

B-3

B-2

B-4

NOTES: NO ASBESTOS WAS DETECTED IN THE BULK SAMPLES

COLLECTED AND ANALYZED.

LEAD-CONTAINING MATERIALS (>0.7 mg/cm²)

- GLAZING ON PORCELAIN SINKS (LIMITED)

254-FP-07

254-TX-06

254-TX-07

T P r o j e c t s E N

V A

D C

J B

C

N

W S

B l d g

B r i g

A s b

L B

P G o o s e

C r e e k C

A D

C o n s t r u c t i o n d w g

FIGURE NO.

SCALE:

DATE:

PROJECT NUMBER

0 60 120

(IN FEET)GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET)GRAPHIC SCALE

LIMITED ASBESTOS AND LEAD-BASED PAINT ASSESSMENT

SECOND FLOOR

BUILDING 3107 BRIG

GOOSE CREEK, SOUTH CAROLINA

4213-19-254

AS SHOWN

11-27-2019

N

Appendix III – Copy of Inspector’s SCDHEC License

South Carolina

Department of Health and Environmental Control

Asbestos License

Bill Seaborn

Air Sampler AS-00416 Building Inspector BI-01317

S&ME, INC. / 620 Wando Park Blvd. / Mt. Pleasant, SC 29464 / p 843.884.0005 / f 843.881.6149 / www.smeinc.com http://www.smeinc.com/

South Carolina

Department of Health and Environmental Control

Asbestos License

James McMillan

Building Inspector BI-01643

Air Sampler AS-00539

S&ME, INC. / 620 Wando Park Blvd. / Mt. Pleasant, SC 29464 / p 843.884.0005 / f 843.881.6149 / www.smeinc.com

Appendix IV – Laboratory Analysis Sheets and Chain of

Custody Records

Charleston Branch 620 Wando Park Blvd.

Mt. Pleasant SC 29464

Asbestos Analysis Summary

Client Job

Client Name

Date Analyzed

Date Received

11/15/2019

11/15/2019

ADC Eng. Bldg 3107 Brig.

9771D Southern Pine Boulevard

Charlotte, NC 28273

704-940-1830 Fax 704-565-4929

NVLAP Lab Code 102075-0

POLARIZED LIGHT MICROSCOPY

Performed by EPA 600/R-93/116 Method

Non-Asbestos Fibrous Non-Fibrous

Lab ID: Sample #: Appearance %/Type

Job Number 4213-19-254

Asbestos Comments %/Type %/Type

5 CELLULOSE 95 GYPSUM19-8332 254-DW-01 TAN/BEIGE FIBROUS ND

5 CELLULOSE 95 GYPSUM19-8333 254-DW-02 TAN/BEIGE FIBROUS ND

2 CELLULOSE

<1 GLASS

98 GYPSUM19-8334 254-DW-03 BEIGE FIBROUS ND

100 OTHER19-8335 254-JC-01 WHITE NONFIBROUS ND

For heterogeneous samples easily separated into subsamples, and for layered samples, each component is analyzed separately. ND = None Detected (Asbestos Not

Present In Representative Sample). RCF= (Refractory Ceramic Fiber) The results relate only to the items tested.

The sample may not be fully representative of the larger material in question. This sheet may not be reproduced except with permission from SME, Inc. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Although Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM/Dispersion Staining)

(Method EPA 600/R-93/116) is the specified method for analysis of bulk material samples for asbestos under the EPA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act, there have been reports that this method may not identify asbestos when fiber sizes are extremely small or if they are bound in a resinous material. Such materials include floor tile, mastic and asphaltic roofing. Currently, reanalysis by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) to verify results of <1% or "None Detected" for these materials is recommended.

Analyzed by: Jane Wasilewski Jane Wasilewski Laboratory ManagerAdditional Comments:

Non-Asbestos Fibrous Non-Fibrous

Lab ID: Sample #: Appearance %/Type

Job Number 4213-19-254

Asbestos Comments %/Type %/Type

100 OTHER19-8336 254-JC-02 WHITE NONFIBROUS ND

100 OTHER19-8337 254-JC-03 WHITE NONFIBROUS ND

100 OTHER19-8338 254-JC-04 WHITE NONFIBROUS ND

100 OTHER19-8339 254-JC-05 WHITE NONFIBROUS ND

98 MINERAL WOOL 2 OTHER19-8340 254-CT1-01 GREY FIBROUS ND

45 MINERAL WOOL

30 CELLULOSE

25 PERLITE19-8341 254-CT1-02 GREY FIBROUS ND

For heterogeneous samples easily separated into subsamples, and for layered samples, each component is analyzed separately. ND = None Detected (Asbestos Not

Present In Representative Sample). RCF= (Refractory Ceramic Fiber) The results relate only to the items tested.

The sample may not be fully representative of the larger material in question. This sheet may not be reproduced except with permission from SME, Inc. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Although Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM/Dispersion Staining)

(Method EPA 600/R-93/116) is the specified method for analysis of bulk material samples for asbestos under the EPA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act, there have been reports that this method may not identify asbestos when fiber sizes are extremely small or if they are bound in a resinous material. Such materials include floor tile, mastic and asphaltic roofing. Currently, reanalysis by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) to verify results of <1% or "None Detected" for these materials is recommended.

Job Number 4213-19-254

Asbestos Comments %/Type %/Type

98 MINERAL WOOL 2 OTHER19-8342 254-CT1-03 GREY FIBROUS ND

60 CELLULOSE

5 MINERAL WOOL

35 PERLITE19-8343 254-CT2-01 GREY FIBROUS ND

55 MINERAL WOOL

30 CELLULOSE

15 PERLITE19-8344 254-CT2-02 GREY FIBROUS ND

55 MINERAL WOOL

30 CELLULOSE

15 PERLITE19-8345 254-CT2-03 GREY FIBROUS ND

45 MINERAL WOOL

35 CELLULOSE

20 PERLITE19-8346 254-CT3-01 GREY FIBROUS ND

45 MINERAL WOOL

35 CELLULOSE

20 PERLITE19-8347 254-CT3-02 GREY FIBROUS ND

For heterogeneous samples easily separated into subsamples, and for layered samples, each component is analyzed separately. ND = None Detected (Asbestos Not

Present In Representative Sample). RCF= (Refractory Ceramic Fiber) The results relate only to the items tested.

The sample may not be fully representative of the larger material in question. This sheet may not be reproduced except with permission from SME, Inc. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Although Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM/Dispersion Staining)

(Method EPA 600/R-93/116) is the specified method for analysis of bulk material samples for asbestos under the EPA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act, there have been reports that this method may not identify asbestos when fiber sizes are extremely small or if they are bound in a resinous material. Such materials include floor tile, mastic and asphaltic roofing. Currently, reanalysis by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) to verify results of <1% or "None Detected" for these materials is recommended.

Job Number 4213-19-254

Asbestos Comments %/Type %/Type

45 MINERAL WOOL

35 CELLULOSE

20 PERLITE19-8348 254-CT3-03 GREY FIBROUS ND

100 OTHER19-8349 254-CB-01 TAN NONFIBROUS ND

100 OTHER19-8350 254-CB-02 TAN NONFIBROUS ND

2 WOLLASTONITE 98 OTHER19-8352 254-DM1-01 BEIGE PLIABLE ND

2 WOLLASTONITE 98 OTHER19-8353 254-DM1-02 BEIGE PLIABLE ND

2 GLASS 98 OTHER19-8355 254-DM4-01 GREY PLIABLE ND

For heterogeneous samples easily separated into subsamples, and for layered samples, each component is analyzed separately. ND = None Detected (Asbestos Not

Present In Representative Sample). RCF= (Refractory Ceramic Fiber) The results relate only to the items tested.

The sample may not be fully representative of the larger material in question. This sheet may not be reproduced except with permission from SME, Inc. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Although Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM/Dispersion Staining)

(Method EPA 600/R-93/116) is the specified method for analysis of bulk material samples for asbestos under the EPA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act, there have been reports that this method may not identify asbestos when fiber sizes are extremely small or if they are bound in a resinous material. Such materials include floor tile, mastic and asphaltic roofing. Currently, reanalysis by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) to verify results of <1% or "None Detected" for these materials is recommended.

Job Number 4213-19-254

Asbestos Comments %/Type %/Type

2 GLASS 98 OTHER19-8356 254-DM4-02 GREY PLIABLE ND

2 SYNTHETIC 98 OTHER19-8358 254-DM5-01 WHITE PLIABLE ND

2 SYNTHETIC 98 OTHER19-8359 254-DM5-02 WHITE PLIABLE ND

100 OTHER19-8361 254-DM6-01 BEIGE PLIABLE ND

100 OTHER19-8362 254-DM6-02 BEIGE PLIABLE ND

15 CELLULOSE

5 GLASS

10 VERMICULITE

70 OTHER

19-8364 254-FP-01 GREY FIBROUS ND

For heterogeneous samples easily separated into subsamples, and for layered samples, each component is analyzed separately. ND = None Detected (Asbestos Not

Present In Representative Sample). RCF= (Refractory Ceramic Fiber) The results relate only to the items tested.

The sample may not be fully representative of the larger material in question. This sheet may not be reproduced except with permission from SME, Inc. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Although Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM/Dispersion Staining)

(Method EPA 600/R-93/116) is the specified method for analysis of bulk material samples for asbestos under the EPA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act, there have been reports that this method may not identify asbestos when fiber sizes are extremely small or if they are bound in a resinous material. Such materials include floor tile, mastic and asphaltic roofing. Currently, reanalysis by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) to verify results of <1% or "None Detected" for these materials is recommended.

Job Number 4213-19-254

Asbestos Comments %/Type %/Type

15 CELLULOSE

5 GLASS

10 VERMICULITE

70 OTHER

19-8365 254-FP-02 GREY FIBROUS ND

15 CELLULOSE

5 GLASS

10 VERMICULITE

70 OTHER

19-8366 254-FP-03 GREY FIBROUS ND

15 CELLULOSE

5 GLASS

10 VERMICULITE

70 OTHER

19-8367 254-FP-04 GREY FIBROUS ND

15 CELLULOSE

5 GLASS

10 VERMICULITE

70 OTHER

19-8368 254-FP-05 GREY FIBROUS ND

15 CELLULOSE

5 GLASS

10 VERMICULITE

70 OTHER

19-8369 254-FP-06 GREY FIBROUS ND

15 CELLULOSE

5 GLASS

10 VERMICULITE

70 OTHER

19-8370 254-FP-07 GREY FIBROUS ND

For heterogeneous samples easily separated into subsamples, and for layered samples, each component is analyzed separately. ND = None Detected (Asbestos Not

Present In Representative Sample). RCF= (Refractory Ceramic Fiber) The results relate only to the items tested.

The sample may not be fully representative of the larger material in question. This sheet may not be reproduced except with permission from SME, Inc. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Although Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM/Dispersion Staining)

(Method EPA 600/R-93/116) is the specified method for analysis of bulk material samples for asbestos under the EPA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act, there have been reports that this method may not identify asbestos when fiber sizes are extremely small or if they are bound in a resinous material. Such materials include floor tile, mastic and asphaltic roofing. Currently, reanalysis by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) to verify results of <1% or "None Detected" for these materials is recommended.

Job Number 4213-19-254

Asbestos Comments %/Type %/Type

100 OTHER19-8371 254-TX2-01 BEIGE NONFIBROUS ND

100 OTHER19-8372 254-TX2-02 BEIGE NONFIBROUS ND

100 OTHER19-8373 254-TX2-03 BEIGE NONFIBROUS ND

100 OTHER19-8374 254-TX2-04 BEIGE NONFIBROUS ND

100 OTHER19-8375 254-TX2-05 BEIGE NONFIBROUS ND

2 VERMICULITE

98 OTHER

19-8376 254-TX-01 BEIGE NONFIBROUS ND

For heterogeneous samples easily separated into subsamples, and for layered samples, each component is analyzed separately. ND = None Detected (Asbestos Not

Present In Representative Sample). RCF= (Refractory Ceramic Fiber) The results relate only to the items tested.

The sample may not be fully representative of the larger material in question. This sheet may not be reproduced except with permission from SME, Inc. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Although Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM/Dispersion Staining)

(Method EPA 600/R-93/116) is the specified method for analysis of bulk material samples for asbestos under the EPA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act, there have been reports that this method may not identify asbestos when fiber sizes are extremely small or if they are bound in a resinous material. Such materials include floor tile, mastic and asphaltic roofing. Currently, reanalysis by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) to verify results of <1% or "None Detected" for these materials is recommended.

Job Number 4213-19-254

Asbestos Comments %/Type %/Type

2 VERMICULITE

98 OTHER

19-8377 254-TX-02 BEIGE NONFIBROUS ND

2 VERMICULITE

98 OTHER

19-8378 254-TX-03 BEIGE NONFIBROUS ND

2 VERMICULITE

98 OTHER

19-8379 254-TX-04 BEIGE NONFIBROUS ND

2 VERMICULITE

98 OTHER

19-8380 254-TX-05 BEIGE NONFIBROUS ND

2 VERMICULITE

98 OTHER

19-8381 254-TX-06 BEIGE NONFIBROUS ND

2 VERMICULITE

98 OTHER

19-8382 254-TX-07 BEIGE NONFIBROUS ND

For heterogeneous samples easily separated into subsamples, and for layered samples, each component is analyzed separately. ND = None Detected (Asbestos Not

Present In Representative Sample). RCF= (Refractory Ceramic Fiber) The results relate only to the items tested.

The sample may not be fully representative of the larger material in question. This sheet may not be reproduced except with permission from SME, Inc. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Although Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM/Dispersion Staining)

(Method EPA 600/R-93/116) is the specified method for analysis of bulk material samples for asbestos under the EPA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act, there have been reports that this method may not identify asbestos when fiber sizes are extremely small or if they are bound in a resinous material. Such materials include floor tile, mastic and asphaltic roofing. Currently, reanalysis by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) to verify results of <1% or "None Detected" for these materials is recommended.

Job Number 4213-19-254

Asbestos Comments %/Type %/Type

3 WOLLASTONITE 97 OTHER19-8383 254-PI-01 BEIGE NONFIBROUS ND

3 WOLLASTONITE 97 OTHER19-8384 254-PI-02 BEIGE NONFIBROUS ND

2 SYNTHETIC 98 OTHER19-8386 254-FS-01 RED FIBROUS ND

2 SYNTHETIC 98 OTHER19-8387 254-FS-02 RED FIBROUS ND

4 CELLULOSE 96 OTHER19-8389 254-EJ-01 BLACK STICKY ND

4 CELLULOSE 96 OTHER19-8390 254-EJ-02 BLACK STICKY ND

For heterogeneous samples easily separated into subsamples, and for layered samples, each component is analyzed separately. ND = None Detected (Asbestos Not

Present In Representative Sample). RCF= (Refractory Ceramic Fiber) The results relate only to the items tested.

The sample may not be fully representative of the larger material in question. This sheet may not be reproduced except with permission from SME, Inc. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Although Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM/Dispersion Staining)

(Method EPA 600/R-93/116) is the specified method for analysis of bulk material samples for asbestos under the EPA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act, there have been reports that this method may not identify asbestos when fiber sizes are extremely small or if they are bound in a resinous material. Such materials include floor tile, mastic and asphaltic roofing. Currently, reanalysis by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) to verify results of <1% or "None Detected" for these materials is recommended.

Job Number 4213-19-254

Asbestos Comments %/Type %/Type

2 CELLULOSE 98 OTHER19-8392 254-PM1-01 BEIGE PLIABLE ND

2 CELLULOSE 98 OTHER19-8393 254-PM1-02 BEIGE PLIABLE ND

2 WOLLASTONITE 98 OTHER19-8395 254-PM2-01 BEIGE PLIABLE ND

2 WOLLASTONITE 98 OTHER19-8396 254-PM2-02 BEIGE PLIABLE ND

3 CELLULOSE

2 GLASS

95 GYPSUM19-8398 254-DW2-01 TAN/BEIGE FIBROUS ND

3 CELLULOSE

2 GLASS

95 GYPSUM19-8399 254-DW2-02 TAN/BEIGE FIBROUS ND

For heterogeneous samples easily separated into subsamples, and for layered samples, each component is analyzed separately. ND = None Detected (Asbestos Not

Present In Representative Sample). RCF= (Refractory Ceramic Fiber) The results relate only to the items tested.

The sample may not be fully representative of the larger material in question. This sheet may not be reproduced except with permission from SME, Inc. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Although Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM/Dispersion Staining)

(Method EPA 600/R-93/116) is the specified method for analysis of bulk material samples for asbestos under the EPA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act, there have been reports that this method may not identify asbestos when fiber sizes are extremely small or if they are bound in a resinous material. Such materials include floor tile, mastic and asphaltic roofing. Currently, reanalysis by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) to verify results of <1% or "None Detected" for these materials is recommended.

Job Number 4213-19-254

Asbestos Comments %/Type %/Type

2 GLASS

<1 CELLULOSE

98 GYPSUM19-8400 254-DW2-03 BEIGE FIBROUS ND

100 OTHER19-8401 254-JC2-01 WHITE NONFIBROUS ND

100 OTHER19-8402 254-JC2-02 WHITE NONFIBROUS ND

100 OTHER19-8403 254-JC2-03 WHITE NONFIBROUS ND

100 OTHER19-8404 254-JC2-04 WHITE NONFIBROUS ND

100 OTHER19-8405 254-JC2-05 WHITE NONFIBROUS ND

For heterogeneous samples easily separated into subsamples, and for layered samples, each component is analyzed separately. ND = None Detected (Asbestos Not

Present In Representative Sample). RCF= (Refractory Ceramic Fiber) The results relate only to the items tested.

The sample may not be fully representative of the larger material in question. This sheet may not be reproduced except with permission from SME, Inc. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Although Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM/Dispersion Staining)

(Method EPA 600/R-93/116) is the specified method for analysis of bulk material samples for asbestos under the EPA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act, there have been reports that this method may not identify asbestos when fiber sizes are extremely small or if they are bound in a resinous material. Such materials include floor tile, mastic and asphaltic roofing. Currently, reanalysis by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) to verify results of <1% or "None Detected" for these materials is recommended.

EMSL Analytical, Inc.

10801 Southern Loop Blvd Pineville, NC 28134

Tel/Fax: (704) 525-2205 / (704) 525-2382 http://www.EMSL.com / charlottelab@emsl.com

EMSL Order: 411911308

Customer ID: SMEI54

Customer PO:

Project ID:

Attention: Jane Wasilewski Phone: (704) 940-1830

S&ME, Inc. Fax: (704) 565-4929

9771D Southern Pine Blvd. Received Date: 11/18/2019 3:35 PM

Charlotte, NC 28273 Analysis Date: 11/19/2019

Collected Date:

4213-19-254 (Phase 472)Project:

Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Non-Friable Organically Bound Materials by TEM via

EPA/600/R-93/116 Section 2.5.5.1

Sample ID Description Appearance % Matrix Material % Non-Asbestos Fibers Asbestos Types

254-CB-03

411911308-0001

Mastic Only Tan

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

100.0 None No Asbestos DetectedOther

254-DM1-03

411911308-0002

Mastic White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

100.0 None No Asbestos DetectedOther

254-DM4-03

411911308-0003

Mastic Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

100.0 None No Asbestos DetectedOther

254-DM5-03

411911308-0004

Mastic White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

100.0 None No Asbestos DetectedOther

254-DM6-03

411911308-0005

Mastic Tan

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

100.0 None No Asbestos DetectedOther

254-PI-03

411911308-0006

Mastic Only White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

100.0 None No Asbestos DetectedOther

254-FS-03

411911308-0007

Fire Stop Red

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

100.0 None No Asbestos DetectedOther

254-EJ-03

411911308-0008

Gasket Black

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

100.0 None No Asbestos DetectedOther

254-PM1-03

411911308-0009

Mastic White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

98.0 Fibrous_Other No Asbestos Detected2.0Other

254-PM2-03

411911308-0010

Mastic Tan

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

100.0 None No Asbestos DetectedOther

This laboratory is not responsible for % asbestos in total sample when the residue only is submitted for analysis. The above report relates only to the items tested. This report may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL Analytical , Inc. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample.

Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Pineville, NC

Initial report from: 11/19/2019 11:16:37

ASB_PLMEPANOB_0012_0002 Printed 11/19/2019 11:16:38AM Page 1 of 2

EMSL Analytical, Inc.

10801 Southern Loop Blvd Pineville, NC 28134

Tel/Fax: (704) 525-2205 / (704) 525-2382 http://www.EMSL.com / charlottelab@emsl.com

EMSL Order: 411911308

Customer ID: SMEI54

Customer PO:

Project ID:

Attention: Jane Wasilewski Phone: (704) 940-1830

S&ME, Inc. Fax: (704) 565-4929

9771D Southern Pine Blvd. Received Date: 11/18/2019 3:35 PM

Charlotte, NC 28273 Analysis Date: 11/19/2019

Collected Date:

4213-19-254 (Phase 472)Project:

Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Non-Friable Organically Bound Materials by TEM via

EPA/600/R-93/116 Section 2.5.5.1

Sample ID Description Appearance % Matrix Material % Non-Asbestos Fibers Asbestos Types

Analyst(s)

Aaron Hartley (10) Lee Plumley, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory

This laboratory is not responsible for % asbestos in total sample when the residue only is submitted for analysis. The above report relates only to the items tested. This report may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL Analytical , Inc. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample.

Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Pineville, NC

Initial report from: 11/19/2019 11:16:37

ASB_PLMEPANOB_0012_0002 Printed 11/19/2019…