Asbestos and Lead Survey Report B570.pdf
PDF 2 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Repair Maintenance Facility – B570 Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA441821R0014
About this file
This asbestos and lead survey report documents the results of testing conducted at Building 570 on Joint Base Charleston Air Force Base. Samples were collected from 29 homogeneous building material areas and 6 paint components. Laboratory analysis found none of the materials tested contained more than 1% asbestos. Three paint samples exceeded EPA's lead threshold of 0.5% and two exceeded SCDHEC's threshold of 0.06%.
The related federal contract opportunity is a 100% HUBZone set-aside solicitation to complete repairs at Maintenance Facility Hangar B570 at Joint Base Charleston Air Force Base in South Carolina. Offerors are to provide all labor, equipment, materials and supervision for project number DKFX 1054125. No award will be made until funds are available, and the government reserves the right to cancel the solicitation before or after the closing date without obligation to reimburse offerors. The Department of the Air Force Air Mobility Command is the issuing agency.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 21R0014 - B570 - Pre-Bid Questions and Answers_Revised.pdf | ||
| Solicitation Amendment 02 FA441821R00140002.pdf | ||
| B570 Site Visit Sign-in.pdf | ||
| 21R0014 - B570 - Pre-Bid Questions and Answers_R2.pdf | ||
| B570 Addendum 01 (Final).pdf | ||
| FP Sheets_ JBC B570 Revised RTA Drawings.pdf | ||
| Solicitation Amendment 01 FA441821R00140001.pdf | ||
| 06_20200916 Green Procurement B570.pdf | ||
| 21-05-14 JBC B570 RTA Drawings.pdf | ||
| 21-05-14 JBC B570 RTA Specs.pdf | ||
| Wage Determination.pdf | ||
| FA441821R0014 B570 20210603.pdf |
Show all 12
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Asbestos and Lead
Survey Report JBC AFB Building 570
North Charleston, South Carolina
July 9, 2020
Terracon Project No. EN207050B
Prepared for:
CEMS Engineering
Summerville, South Carolina
Prepared by:
Terracon Consultants, Inc.
North Charleston, South Carolina
Inspected by:
Craig Langford (SC ASB-22775)
Terracon Consultants, Inc. 1450 Fifth Street, West North Charleston, South Carolina 29405
P (843) 884 1234 F (843) 884 9234 terracon.com
July 9, 2020
CEMS Engineering and Architecture
108 Benton Lodge Road, Suite B
Summerville, South Carolina 29485
Attn: Mr. Dave Yensan, AIA
Project Architect/Manager
Email: dyensan@cems-ae.com
RE: Report for Asbestos and Lead Survey
JBC AFB Building 570
Terracon Project No: EN207050C
Dear Mr. Yensan:
Terracon Consultants, Inc. (Terracon) is pleased to present the results of the limited asbestos survey performed on May 13, 2020 of Building 570 located on the Joint Base Charleston (JBC)
Air Force Base (AFB) in North Charleston, South Carolina. We understand that this survey was requested due to the planned renovations and upgrades to the building.
Terracon appreciates the opportunity to provide environmental consulting services for CEMS
Engineering. If you should have any questions regarding this report, or if you need assistance with bid documents or project oversight during the building renovation, please contact the undersigned at (843) 277-8402.
Sincerely, Terracon Consultants, Inc.
Craig C. Langford, OHST T.A. (Andy) Rowland III, CIH Senior Industrial Hygienist Principal Authorized Project Reviewer mailto:dyensan@cem
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................... i
1.0 INTRODUCTION
2.0 BUILDING DESCRIPTION
3.0 ASBESTOS SURVEY
3.1 Regulatory Overview
3.2 Visual Assessment
3.3 Physical Assessment
3.4 Sample Collection
3.5 Sample Analysis
3.6 Findings and Recommendations
4.0 LEAD-BASED PAINT SURVEY
4.1 Regulatory Overview
4.2 Sampling and Analytical Protocol
4.3 Findings and Recommendations
5.0 LIMITATIONS / GENERAL COMMENTS
LIST OF APPENDICES
APPENDIX A - TABLE
Table 1 - Asbestos Survey Sample Summary
APPENDIX B – PHOTOGRAPH DOCUMENTATION
APPENDIX C – LABORATORY REPORTS
Asbestos Analytical Laboratory Data
APPENDIX D – INSPECTOR’S CREDENTIALS
Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable i
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This executive summary is intended as an overview for the convenience of the reader. The report should be reviewed in its entirety prior to making any decisions regarding this site.
Terracon Consultants, Inc. (Terracon) conducted an asbestos and lead survey for Building 570.
Building 570 is an approximately 42,900 ft2 structure that serves as a hanger for the AFB. CEMS
Engineering has been tasked to provide design services for the upgrades to the mechanical, fire suppressions system, and minor renovations to the interior portions of the building under Design
Work Order Opportunity #1054125 - Design Repair Maintenance Facility Building 570.
The asbestos survey was performed on May 13, 2020, by a South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (SCDHEC) licensed asbestos inspector in general accordance with our proposal fee, and CEMS Project No. 15-154U, Work Order #1 and the sampling protocols established in EPA 40 CFR 763 (Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act, AHERA) and the
SCDHEC Regulation 61-86.1 Standards of Performance for Asbestos Projects.
Twenty-nine (29) bulk samples were collected from eleven (11) homogeneous areas of suspect
ACM. Based on the results of laboratory analysis, none of the materials were identified as asbestos containing materials (ACMs) defined as containing >1% asbestos.
Six (6) paint-chip samples were collected from various components of the structure on the site.
Three samples were above the EPA definition of lead paint of 0.5% and two (2) were above the
SCDHEC definition of 0.06% by weight. All paint samples are considered lead containing based on OSHA regulations.
Sample
Number Description Location
Lead
Result
EPA
Lead
SCDHEC
Lead
0.5% 0.06%
Pb-01 Red Paint Fire Suppression Piping 0.38% No Yes
Pb-02 Grey Paint Steel Column 45% Yes Yes
Pb-03 Grey Paint Hanger Door 0.14% No Yes
Pb-04 Grey Paint Steel Column at Roll Up Door 33% No Yes
Pb-05 Grey Paint Floor <0.0080% No No
Pb-06 Grey Paint Stairwell to Upstairs Office 3.9% Yes Yes
Painted demolition debris may be disposed in a C&D Landfill. SCDHEC regulations require that the lead painted demolition debris be disposed in a permitted Class II landfill. Accumulations of paint wastes (chips, dust, flakes, etc.) and lead contaminated products or other debris shall be sampled and analyzed by the Toxicity Characteristic Leachate Procedure (TCLP) prior to disposal to determine is the waste is classified as hazardous, which would require disposal in a Subtitle C
Landfill.
Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 1
ASBESTOS AND LEAD SURVEY REPORT
JBC AFB BUILDING 570
NORTH CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA
PROJECT NO. EN207050C
INSPECTION DATE: MAY 13, 2020
REPORT DATE: JULY 9, 2020
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Terracon Consultants, Inc. (Terracon) conducted an asbestos survey for Building 570. The purpose of this survey was to sample and identify suspect asbestos-containing materials (ACM) and provide information regarding the identity, location, condition and approximate quantities of ACM in interior building components within the renovation scope. In addition, limited paint sampling was performed on various painted components that may be impacted by construction activities within the building to determine lead content.
The asbestos survey was performed on May 13, 2020, by a South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (SCDHEC) licensed asbestos inspector in general accordance with our proposal fee, and CEMS Project No. 15-154U, Work Order #1 and the sampling protocols established in EPA 40 CFR 763 (Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act, AHERA) and the
SCDHEC Regulation 61-86.1 Standards of Performance for Asbestos Projects.
Terracon understands that the building is scheduled to be renovated along with the mechanical and fire suppression system upgrades. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulation 40 CFR 61, Subpart M, National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP), prohibits the release of asbestos fibers to the atmosphere during renovation/demolition activities. NESHAP and
SCDHEC requires that potentially regulated asbestos-containing building materials be identified, classified and quantified prior to planned disturbances or demolition activities.
Suspect ACM was sampled in general accordance with the sampling protocols outlined in EPA
Regulation 40 CFR 763 Subpart E763.86 (Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act, AHERA) and SCDHEC Regulation 61-86.1 Standards of Performance for Asbestos Projects. Interior building components were surveyed and homogeneous areas of suspect asbestos-containing materials (ACM) were visually identified and documented. Although reasonable effort was made to survey accessible suspect materials, additional suspect but un-sampled materials could be located in walls, in voids or in other concealed areas. Samples were delivered to an accredited laboratory for analysis by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) and Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM), as required.
2.0 BUILDING DESCRIPTION
Building 570 is an approximately 42,900 ft2 structure constructed on a concrete slab. The building serves as a hanger facility for repairs to the AFB aircraft with the primary function of fuel cell
Asbestos and Lead Survey Report JBC AFB Building 570 ■ North Charleston, South Carolina July 9, 2020 ■ Terracon Project No. EN207050C
Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 2 maintenance. The CEMS Scope of Work (SOW) is outlined in the Design Work Order #1054125
Design Repair Maintenance Facility B570 provided by the Contracting Office of JBC. The intent of the project is to upgrade the fire suppression system, mechanical systems, and roofing. General repairs include painting interior finishes to offices, replacing/update ceiling tiles, repair interior finishes.
Suspect ACMs observed and sampled were:
◼ Floor tiles and mastics
◼ Ceiling Tiles
◼ Drywall/Joint Compound
◼ Mastics associated with Non-ACM foam glass and fiberglass insulation
◼ Mastic associated with rubber cove base
◼ Shingle/Felt
◼ Roofing Material (Field)
3.0 ASBESTOS SURVEY
The asbestos survey was conducted by SCDHEC licensed Asbestos Building Inspector Mr. Craig
C. Langford (License No. ASB-22775 Exp. 07/09/20). A copy of Mr. Langford’s license is included in Appendix D. The survey was conducted on May 13, 2020, in general accordance with the sampling protocols established by EPA Regulation 40 CFR 763 Subpart E 763.86, AHERA and
SCDHEC R. 61-86.1. A summary of survey activities is provided below.
3.1 Regulatory Overview
An ACM is defined as any material containing asbestos of any type in an amount greater than one percent (>1%). The asbestos NESHAP (40 CFR Part 61, Subpart M) regulates asbestos fiber emissions and asbestos waste disposal practices. It also requires the identification and classification of existing building materials prior to demolition or renovation activity. Under
NESHAP, asbestos-containing building materials are classified as either friable, Category I non-friable or Category II non-friable ACM. Friable materials are those that, when dry, may be crumbled, pulverized or reduced to powder by hand pressure. Category I non friable ACM includes packing materials, gaskets, resilient floor coverings and asphalt roofing products containing more than 1 percent (%) asbestos. Category II non-friable ACM are non-friable materials other than Category I materials that contain more than 1% asbestos.
Friable ACM, Category I and Category II non-friable ACM which is in poor condition and has become friable or which will be subjected to drilling, sanding, grinding, cutting or abrading and which could be crushed or pulverized during anticipated renovation/demolition activities are considered regulated ACM (RACM). RACM must be removed prior to renovation or demolition activities.
In the state of South Carolina, asbestos activities are regulated by the SCDHEC under the SCDHEC
Regulation 61-86.1 Standards of Performance for Asbestos Projects. The SCDHEC require that any asbestos-related activity conducted in a public building be performed by personnel licensed by
Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 3 the SCDHEC. The owner or operator must provide the SCDHEC with written notification of planned abatement and removal activities prior to the commencement of those activities. The SCDHEC requires 4 day notification for non-friable projects and 10 day notification for RACM projects.
Asbestos abatement must be performed by SCDHEC-licensed asbestos abatement contractors. A
SCDHEC-licensed Project Designer shall prepare a written abatement design for each abatement renovation project involving the removal of greater than 3,000 square, 1,500 linear, or 656 cubic feet of RACM. Third-party air monitoring must be conducted during the abatement of friable
(regulated) ACM. The SCDHEC asbestos regulations can be found at http://www.scdhec.gov. The
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Asbestos Standard for Construction
Industry (29 CFR 1926.1101) regulates workplace exposure to asbestos. The OSHA standard requires that employee exposure to airborne asbestos fibers be maintained below 0.1 asbestos fibers per cubic centimeter of air (0.1 f/cc) for an eight-hour time weighted average. The OSHA standard classifies construction and maintenance activities, which could disturb ACM, and specifies work practices and precautions which employers must follow when engaging in each class of regulated work. A full copy of the OSHA asbestos standard for general industry may be found at
OSHA’s website (www.osha.gov) and should be referenced for specific information.
3.2 Visual Assessment
Our survey activities began with visual observation of the interior of the unit within the renovation scope to identify apparent homogeneous areas of suspect ACM. A homogeneous area consists of building materials, which appear similar throughout in terms of color, texture and date of application.
Building materials which were not identified as concrete, glass, wood, masonry, metal or rubber were considered suspect ACM.
3.3 Physical Assessment
A physical assessment of each homogeneous area of suspect ACM was conducted to assess the friability and condition of the materials. A friable material is defined by the EPA as a material, which can be crumbled, pulverized or reduced to powder by hand pressure when dry. Friability was assessed by physically touching suspect materials.
3.4 Sample Collection
Based on our observations, bulk samples of suspect ACMs were collected in general accordance with SCDHEC and EPA sample collection protocols. Random samples of suspect materials were collected in each homogeneous area. Bulk samples were collected using wet methods as applicable to reduce the potential for fiber release. Samples were placed in sealable containers and labeled with unique sample numbers using an indelible marker.
The selection of sample locations and frequency of sampling was based on Terracon’s observations and the assumption that like materials in the same area are homogeneous in content.
http://www.scdhec.gov/ http://www.osha.gov/
Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 4
A summary of the suspect ACM samples collected during the survey is presented in Table 1 in
Appendix A. Photograph documentation is presented in Appendix B.
3.5 Sample Analysis
Bulk samples were submitted under chain of custody to EMSL Analytical Laboratories in Pineville, North Carolina for analysis by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) with dispersion staining techniques per EPA EPA/600/R-93/116. The percentage of asbestos, where applicable, was determined by microscopical visual estimation. EMSL is accredited under the National Voluntary Laboratory
Accreditation Program NVLAP.
Per the SCDHEC Regulation 61-86.1 Standards of Performance for Asbestos Projects, negative results for non-friable organically bound (NOB) materials such as flooring and roofing shall be verified with at least one TEM analysis. The additional analysis was performed by TEM in accordance with EPA/600/R-93/116 Section 2.5.5.1.
3.6 Findings and Recommendations
Twenty-nine (29) bulk samples were collected from homogeneous areas of suspect ACM. Table 1 in the Appendix A summarizes the results of the visual inspection, estimated quantities, and laboratory analyses. Photograph documentation is included in Appendix B. Asbestos laboratory analytical reports, certificates of analysis with the chain of custody, are included in Appendix C.
Based on the results of laboratory analysis, none of the materials were identified as asbestos containing materials (ACMs) defined as containing >1% asbestos.
Should suspect materials other than those which were identified during this survey be uncovered during or prior to the abatement and demolition process, those materials should be assumed asbestos-containing until sampling and analysis can confirm or refute their asbestos content.
Should future sampling indicate that the other material is asbestos containing, Terracon recommends removal of the asbestos-containing materials by a South Carolina licensed asbestos abatement contractor prior to renovation/demolition of the building.
4.0 LEAD-BASED PAINT SURVEY
4.1 Regulatory Overview
Lead is regulated by the EPA, SCDHEC and OSHA. The EPA and SCDHEC regulate lead use, removal, and disposal, and OSHA regulates lead exposure to workers. The EPA defines LBP as paint, varnish, stain, or other applied coating that contains lead equal to or greater than 1.0 mg/cm2, 5,000 mg/kg, or 0.5% by dry weight as determined by laboratory analysis. The SCDHEC regulations 61-107.19 require that painted demolition debris with a lead concentration greater than 0.06% by weight be disposed in a permitted Class II landfill.
Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 5
Accumulations of paint wastes (chips, dust, flakes, etc.) and lead contaminated products or other debris shall be tested by the Toxicity Characteristic Leachate Procedure (TCLP) prior to disposal to determine is the waste is classified as hazardous, which would require disposal in a Subtitle C
Landfill. Landfills should be contacted to determine their specific disposal requirements.
For the purpose of the OSHA lead standard, lead includes metallic lead, all inorganic lead compounds, and organic lead soaps. The complete OSHA standard for compliance can be found on OSHA’s website (www.osha.gov). A synopsis of the OSHA regulations (29 CFR 1926.62) and the applicability are as follows:
The OSHA Lead Standard for Construction (29 CFR 1926.62) applies to all construction work where an employee may be occupationally exposed to lead. All work related to construction, alteration, or repair (including painting and decorating) is included. The lead-in-construction standard applies to any detectable concentration of lead in paint, as even small concentrations of lead can result in unacceptable employee exposures depending upon on the method of removal and other workplace conditions. Under this standard, construction includes, but is not limited to, the following:
▪ Demolition or salvage of structures where lead or materials containing lead are present
▪ Removal or encapsulation of materials containing lead
▪ New construction, alteration, repair, or renovation of structures, substrates, or portions containing lead, or materials containing lead
▪ Installation of products containing lead
▪ Lead contamination/emergency clean-up
▪ Transportation, disposal, storage, or containment of lead or materials containing lead on the site or location at which construction activities are performed
▪ Maintenance operations associated with construction activities described above
4.2 Sampling and Analytical Protocol
Mr. Langford of Terracon conducted the lead-based paint (LBP) sampling May 13, 2020. The LBP sampling was conducted by collecting paint chip samples. The paint chip samples were collected from painted or lacquered surfaces of building components likely to contain LBP, based on apparent date of application. The paint samples were collected down to the surface substrate so as to include any underlying paint systems in the analysis. The random paint chip samples were selected based on current paint schemes and may not be inclusive of old paint systems covered with paneling, or existing painted systems. The paint chip samples were submitted to an ELAP approved laboratory for analysis of lead by NIOSH Method 7082M (atomic absorption).
4.3 Findings and Recommendations
Six (6) paint-chip samples were collected from various components of the structure on the site.
Three samples were above the EPA definition of lead paint of 0.5% and two (2) were above the http://www.osha.gov/
Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 6
SCDHEC definition of 0.06% by weight. All paint samples are considered lead containing based on OSHA regulations. Workers disturbing lead-containing paints should comply with the OSHA
Lead Standard for Construction (29 CFR 1926.62).
Sample
Number Description Location
Lead
Result
EPA
Lead
SCDHEC
Lead
0.5% 0.06%
Pb-01 Red Paint Fire Suppression Piping 0.38% No Yes
Pb-02 Grey Paint Steel Column 45% Yes Yes
Pb-03 Grey Paint Hanger Door 0.14% No Yes
Pb-04 Grey Paint Steel Column at Roll Up Door 33% YES Yes
Pb-05 Grey Paint Floor <0.0080% No No
Pb-06 Grey Paint Stairwell to Upstairs Office 3.9% Yes Yes
SCDHEC regulations require that the lead painted demolition debris be disposed in a permitted
Class II landfill. Accumulations of paint wastes (chips, dust, flakes, etc.) and lead contaminated products or other debris shall be tested by the Toxicity Characteristic Leachate Procedure (TCLP) prior to disposal to determine is the waste is classified as hazardous, which would require disposal in a Subtitle C Landfill. Landfills should be contacted to determine their specific disposal requirements. Metal components painted with lead-based paint may be recycled; however, the recycler should be contacted to determine their specific requirements. The analytical report is included in Appendix B.
5.0 LIMITATIONS / GENERAL COMMENTS
This survey was conducted in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in the same locale. The results, findings, conclusions and recommendations expressed in this report are based on conditions observed during our survey of the renovation areas. The results included herein apply to the renovation areas only and not the entire building. Based on the project scope of work, Terracon cannot make conclusions about asbestos content in the remainder of the building. If the renovation scope of work changes to include areas or materials other than sampled here, additional investigations will be necessary. The information contained in this report is relevant to the date on which this survey was performed, and should not be relied upon to represent conditions at a later date.
This report has been prepared on behalf of and exclusively for use by CEMS Engineering. for specific application to their project as discussed. Terracon does not warrant the work of regulatory agencies, laboratories or other third parties supplying information, which may have been used in the preparation of this report. No warranty, express or implied is made.
This report is not a bidding document. Contractors or consultants reviewing this report must draw their own conclusions regarding further investigation or remediation deemed necessary.
APPENDIX A
TABLE
W B
-0
H a ll a t L o c k e r
R o o m
P L M
N o A s b e s to s D e te c te d
W B
-0
L o c k e r
R o o m
P L M
N o A s b e s to s D e te c te d
W B
-0
H a ll a t D is p a tc h
R o o m
P L M
N o A s b e s to s D e te c te d
W B
-0
U p s ta ir s O ff ic e P
L M
N o A s b e s to s D e te c te d
W B
-0
U p s ta ir s O ff ic e P
L M
N o A s b e s to s D e te c te d
W B
-0
H a ll a t L o c k e r
R o o m
P L M
N o A s b e s to s D e te c te d
W B
-0
L o c k e r
R o o m
P L M
N o A s b e s to s D e te c te d
W B
-0
H a ll a t D is p a tc h
R o o m
P L M
N o A s b e s to s D e te c te d
C T
-0
U p s ta ir s O ff ic e P
L M
N o A s b e s to s D e te c te d
C T
-0
H a ll a t L o c k e r
R o o m
P L M
N o A s b e s to s D e te c te d
C T
-0
L o c k e r
R o o m
P L M
N o A s b e s to s D e te c te d
M P
M -0
M e c h a n ic a l R o o m
P L M
N o A s b e s to s D e te c te d
M P
M -0
M e c h a n ic a l R o o m
P L M
N o A s b e s to s D e te c te d
M P
M -0
M e c h a n ic a l R o o m
T E
M N o A s b e s to s D e te c te d
P M
-0
P
L M
N o A s b e s to s D e te c te d
P M
-0
P
L M
N o A s b e s to s D e te c te d
P M
-0
T
E M
N o A s b e s to s D e te c te d
P M
-0
P
L M
N o A s b e s to s D e te c te d
P M
-0
P
L M
N o A s b e s to s D e te c te d
P M
-0
T
E M
N o A s b e s to s D e te c te d
F T
-0
L o c k e r
R o o m
P L M
N o A s b e s to s D e te c te d
F T
-0
H a ll
P L M
N o A s b e s to s D e te c te d
F T
-0
H a ll
T E
M N o A s b e s to s D e te c te d
F T
-0
L o c k e r
R o o m
P L M
N o A s b e s to s D e te c te d
F T
-0
H a ll
P L M
N o A s b e s to s D e te c te d
F T
-0
H a ll
T E
M N o A s b e s to s D e te c te d
C B
M -0
H a ll
P L M
N o A s b e s to s D e te c te d
C B
M -0
H a ll
P L M
N o A s b e s to s D e te c te d
C B
M -0
H a ll
T E
M N o A s b e s to s D e te c te d
R M
-0
R o o f
F ie ld P
L M
N o A s b e s to s D e te c te d
R M
-0
R o o f
F ie ld P
L M
N o A s b e s to s D e te c te d
R M
-0
R o o f
F ie ld T
E M
N o A s b e s to s D e te c te d
R F
-0
R o o f
F la s h in g P
L M
N o A s b e s to s D e te c te d
R F
-0
R o o f
F la s h in g P
L M
N o A s b e s to s D e te c te d
R F
-0
R o o f
F la s h in g T
E M
N o A s b e s to s D e te c te d
S F
S q u a re
F e e t
L F
L in e a r
F e e t
S a m p le
N u m b e r
S a m p le
D e s c ri p ti o n
H A
S a m p le L o c a ti o n
A n a ly s is
M e th o d A n a ly ti c a l R e s u lt s C la s s if ic a ti o n
F ri a b le /N o n
F ri a b le
C u rr e n t
C o n d it io n
T A
B L
E
A S
B E
S T
O S
R E
S U
L T
S S
A M
P L
E S
U M
M A
R Y
J B
C A
F B
B U
IL
D
IN
G
N O
R T
H C
H A
R L
E S
T O
N
S O
U T
H C
A R
O L
IN
A
T E
R R
A C
O N
P R
O J
E C
T N
O
E N
C
J O
IN
T
B A
S E
C H
A R
L E
S T
O N
A
IR
F O
R C
E B
A S
E
E s ti m a te d
Q u a n ti ty
D ry w a ll
J o in t C o m p o u n d x
C e ili n g T ile
(W o rm tr a c k
H a n g e r
M e c h a n ic a l S y s te m
C C
U
M a s ti c a s s o c ia te d w it h
N o n -A
C M f ib e rg la s s in s u la ti o n
H A
-0
M is c e lla n e o u s
F ri a b le
/G o o d
,5
S
F
H A
-0
M is c e lla n e o u s
H A
-0
M is c e lla n e o u s
N o n -f ri a b le
/G o o d
S
F
H A
H o m o g e n e o u s A re a
P L M
P o la ri z e d L ig h t M ic ro s c o p y
T E
M
T ra n s m is s io n E le c tr o n M ic ro s c o p y
B o ld a n d s h a d e d it e m s a re i d e n ti fi e d A
C M s
Q u a n ti ti e s l is te d a b o v e a re e s ti m a te s t o b e u s e d f o r in s p e c ti o n p u rp o s e s o n ly a n d s h o u ld b e f ie ld -v e ri fi e d f o r a ll o th e r u s e s
Q u a n ti ti e s l is te d a b o v e s h o u ld n o t b e u s e d i n c o n s tr u c ti o n d o c u m e n ts o r b id s
H a n g e r
M e c h a n ic a l S y s te m
C C
U
H A
-0
M is c e lla n e o u s
N o n -f ri a b le
/G o o d
S
F
H A
-0
M is c e lla n e o u s
N o n -f ri a b le
/G o o d
H A
-0
M is c e lla n e o u s
N o n -f ri a b le
/G o o d
H A
-0
M is c e lla n e o u s
N o n -f ri a b le
/G o o d
M a s ti c
W h it e a s s o c ia te d w it h N o n -A
C M f o a m g la s s /f ib e rg la s s i n s u a lt io n
M a s ti c
W h it e a s s o c ia te d w it h N o n -A
C M f o a m g la s s /f ib e rg la s s i n s u a lt io n
B e ig e F lo o r
T ile
M a s ti c a s s o c ia te d w it h H
A
M a s ti c a s s o c ia te d w it h ru b b e r c o v e b a s e
H A
-0
M is c e lla n e o u s
H A
-0
S u rf a c in g
,2
S
F
M is c e lla n e o u s
M is c e lla n e o u s
R o o f
M a te ri a l (F ie ld
H
A -1
S h in g le
/M a s ti c s
H A
-1
N o n -f ri a b le
/G o o d
,0
S
F
N o n -f ri a b le
/G o o d
,0
S
F
F ri a b le
/G o o d
,3
S
F
L
F
N o n -f ri a b le
/G o o d
S
F
Pa ge o f 1
APPENDIX B
PHOTOPGRAPH DOCUMENTION
Building 570 Joint Base Charleston Air Force Base
Project No. EN207050C
Photo #1 General View – Upstairs Office Photo #2 General View – Control Room
Photo #3 General View – Breakroom/Workout Area
Photo #4 General View – Hall at Restroom
Photo #5 General view in Hanger Photo #6 General View – Entrance Hall
Photo #7 General View - Hanger Area – Fire Suppression System
Photo #8 General View – Pipe Mastic on Non- ACM pipe foam glass and fiberglass insulation
Photo #9 Pipe Mastic on Non-ACM pipe foam glass and fiberglass insulation
Photo #10 Pipe Mastic on Non-ACM pipe foam glass and fiberglass insulation
Photo #11 Mechanical Room Photo #12 General View of Roof
Photo #13 General View of Roof Photo #14 Lead Sample Pb-01 – 0.38%
Photo #15 Lead Sample Hanger Door Pb-03– 0.14%. Grey Column Paint; Pb-02 – 45% and Pb-04 33%.
Photo #16 Exterior View
No Photo
Photo #17 Exterior View Photo #18
APPENDIX C
LABORATORY REPORTS
Client Sample Description ConcentrationLab ID Analyzed Weight Lead
Collected
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
10801 Southern Loop Blvd, Pineville, NC 28134 Phone/Fax: (704) 525-2205 / (704) 525-2382 http://www.EMSL.com charlottelab@emsl.com
Attn: Craig Langford Terracon, Inc.
1450 Fifth Street West North Charleston, SC 29405
Received: 05/14/20 4:10 PM
EN207050C - Bldg. 570
Fax: (843) 884-9234 Phone: (843) 884-1234
Project:
Collected:
Test Report: Lead in Paint Chips by Flame AAS (SW 846 3050B/7000B)*
412004203 CustomerID: WPCE62 CustomerPO: EN207050C ProjectID:
EMSL Order:
0.2905 Site: Red Paint Fire System 412004203-0001Pb-01 0.38 % wt5/18/2020 g
0.2887 Site: Grey Column Paint 412004203-0002Pb-02 45 % wt5/18/2020 g
0.3095 Site: Hanger Door 412004203-0003Pb-03 0.14 % wt5/18/2020 g
0.3177 Site: Column at Roll Up 412004203-0004Pb-04 33 % wt5/18/2020 g
0.2846 Site: Hanger Floor 412004203-0005Pb-05 <0.0080 % wt5/18/2020 g
0.2479 Site: Stairwell to Upstairs 412004203-0006Pb-06 3.9 % wt5/18/2020 g
Kyle Collins, Technical Manager or other approved signatory
Test Report ChmSnglePrm/nQC-7.32.3 Printed: 5/18/2020 3:18:15 PM
*Analysis following Lead in Paint by EMSL SOP/Determination of Environmental Lead by FLAA. Reporting limit is 0.008 % wt based on the minimum sample weight per our SOP. Unless noted, results in this report are not blank corrected. EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report relates only to the samples reported above, and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. The report reflects the samples as received. When the information supplied by the customer can affect the validity of the results, it will be noted on the reoprt. "<" (less than) result signifies the analyte was not detected at or above the reporting limit. Measurement of uncertainty is available upon request. The QC data associated with the sample results included in this report meet the recovery and precision requirements unless specifically indicated otherwise. Definitions of modifications are available upon request.
Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Pineville, NC AIHA-LAP, LLC - ELLAP 192283
Initial report from 05/18/2020 15:18:15 http://www.EMSL.com mailto:charlottelab@emsl.com
OrderID: 412004203
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
10801 Southern Loop Blvd Pineville, NC 28134
Tel/Fax: (704) 525-2205 / (704) 525-2382 http://www.EMSL.com / charlottelab@emsl.com
412004206EMSL Order:
Customer ID: WPCE62
Customer PO: EN207050C
Project ID:
Attention: Phone:Craig Langford (843) 442-6658
Fax:Terracon, Inc. (843) 884-9234
Received Date:1450 Fifth Street West 05/14/2020 4:10 PM
Analysis Date:North Charleston, SC 29405 05/16/2020 - 05/18/2020
Collected Date:
Project: EN207050C/ JBC AFB Bldg. 570
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized
Light Microscopy
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous
Non-Asbestos Asbestos
% Type
WB-01-Joint Compound
412004206-0001
None DetectedCa Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
40%
60%
White
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Drywall - Joint
Compound
No drywall present
WB-01-Tape
412004206-0001A
None DetectedCa Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
15%
85%
Tan
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Drywall - Joint
Compound
WB-02-Joint Compound
412004206-0002
None DetectedCa Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
40%
60%
White
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Drywall - Joint
Compound
No drywall present
WB-03-Drywall
412004206-0003
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)95%Cellulose5%Gray
Fibrous
Homogeneous
Drywall - Joint
Compound
WB-03-Joint Compound
412004206-0003A
None DetectedCa Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
40%
60%
White
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Drywall - Joint
Compound
WB-04-Drywall
412004206-0004
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)82%Cellulose
Glass
15%
3%
Brown/White
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Drywall - Joint
Compound
WB-04-Joint Compound
412004206-0004A
None DetectedCa Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
35%
65%
White
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Drywall - Joint
Compound
WB-05-Drywall
412004206-0005
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)82%Cellulose
Glass
15%
3%
Brown/White
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Drywall - Joint
Compound
WB-05-Joint Compound
412004206-0005A
None DetectedCa Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
40%
60%
White
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Drywall - Joint
Compound
CT-01
412004206-0006
None DetectedPerlite
Non-fibrous (Other)
15%
25%
Cellulose60%Gray/White
Fibrous
Homogeneous
Ceiling Tile
CT-02
412004206-0007
None DetectedPerlite
Non-fibrous (Other)
15%
25%
Cellulose60%Gray/White
Fibrous
Homogeneous
Ceiling Tile
CT-03
412004206-0008
None DetectedPerlite
Non-fibrous (Other)
20%
20%
Cellulose60%Gray/White
Fibrous
Homogeneous
Ceiling Tile
MPM-01-Mastic
412004206-0009
None DetectedCa Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
5%
90%
Cellulose5%White
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Mech Room - Mastic
MPM-01-Wrap
412004206-0009A
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)40%Cellulose60%Tan
Fibrous
Homogeneous
Mech Room - Mastic
MPM-01-Insulation
412004206-0009B
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)1%Glass99%Tan
Fibrous
Homogeneous
Mech Room - Mastic
Initial report from: 05/19/2020 14:00:18
Page 1 of 3ASB_PLM_0008_0001 - 1.78 Printed: 5/19/2020 2:00 PM
Tel/Fax: (704) 525-2205 / (704) 525-2382 http://www.EMSL.com / charlottelab@emsl.com
412004206EMSL Order:
Customer ID: WPCE62
Customer PO: EN207050C
Project ID:
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized
Light Microscopy
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous
Non-Asbestos Asbestos
% Type
MPM-02-Mastic
412004206-0010
None DetectedCa Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
5%
91%
Fibrous (Other)4%Tan/White
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Mech Room - Mastic
MPM-02-Insulation
412004206-0010A
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)1%Glass99%Yellow
Fibrous
Homogeneous
Mech Room - Mastic
PM1-01-Mastic
412004206-0012
None DetectedCa Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
5%
91%
Cellulose
Fibrous (Other)
2%
2%
Gray/White
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
CCU #3 - Mastic -
Pipe Mastic
PM1-01-Insulation
412004206-0012A
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)1%Glass99%Yellow
Fibrous
Homogeneous
CCU #3 - Mastic -
Pipe Mastic
PM1-02
412004206-0013
None DetectedCa Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
5%
91%
Cellulose4%White
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
CCU #3 - Mastic -
Pipe Mastic
PM2-01-Mastic
412004206-0015
None DetectedCa Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
5%
91%
Cellulose
Fibrous (Other)
2%
2%
White
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
CCU #2 - Mastic -
Pipe Mastic
PM2-01-Insulation
412004206-0015A
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)1%Glass99%Yellow
Fibrous
Homogeneous
CCU #2 - Mastic -
Pipe Mastic
PM2-02
412004206-0016
None DetectedCa Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
5%
91%
Fibrous (Other)4%White
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
CCU #2 - Mastic -
Pipe Mastic
FT1-01-Floor Tile
412004206-0018
None DetectedCa Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
40%
60%
Gray
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
12" Beige Floor Tile -
Mastic
FT1-01-Mastic
412004206-0018A
None DetectedCa Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
5%
95%
Tan
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
12" Beige Floor Tile -
Mastic
FT1-02-Floor Tile
412004206-0019
None DetectedCa Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
40%
60%
Tan
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
12" Beige Floor Tile -
Mastic
FT1-02-Mastic
412004206-0019A
None DetectedCa Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
5%
94%
Cellulose1%Tan
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
12" Beige Floor Tile -
Mastic
CBM-01
412004206-0021
None DetectedCa Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
5%
95%
Tan
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Mastic Only - Cove
Base
CBM-02
412004206-0022
None DetectedCa Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
5%
95%
Beige
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Mastic Only - Cove
Base
RM-01
412004206-0024
None DetectedCa Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
15%
80%
Cellulose5%Black
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
T & G - Roof Field
Material
RM-02
412004206-0025
None DetectedCa Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
10%
82%
Cellulose
Glass
4%
4%
Black
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
T & G - Roof Field
Material
RF-01-Shingle
412004206-0027
None DetectedQuartz
Ca Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
5%
10%
80%
Synthetic5%Black
Fibrous
Homogeneous
Roof Flashing -
Shingle - Mastic
RF-01-Mastic
412004206-0027A
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Black
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Roof Flashing -
Shingle - Mastic
RF-02-Shingle
412004206-0028
None DetectedQuartz
Ca Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
5%
10%
75%
Synthetic10%White/Black
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Roof Flashing -
Shingle - Mastic
Page 2 of 3ASB_PLM_0008_0001 - 1.78 Printed: 5/19/2020 2:00 PM
Tel/Fax: (704) 525-2205 / (704) 525-2382 http://www.EMSL.com / charlottelab@emsl.com
412004206EMSL Order:
Customer ID: WPCE62
Customer PO: EN207050C
Project ID:
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized
Light Microscopy
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous
Non-Asbestos Asbestos
% Type
RF-02-Mastic
412004206-0028A
None DetectedCa Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
10%
80%
Cellulose
Glass
5%
5%
Black
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Roof Flashing -
Shingle - Mastic
RF-02-Silver Paint
412004206-0028B
None DetectedCa Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
5%
95%
Silver
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Roof Flashing -
Shingle - Mastic
Analyst(s)
Gloriana Ramirez (16)
Lacy Searcy (20)
Lee Plumley, Laboratory Manager or Other Approved Signatory
EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis . The above analyses were performed in general compliance with Appendix E to Subpart E of 40 CFR (previously EPA 600/M4-82-020 "Interim
Method"), but augmented with procedures outlined in the 1993 ("final") version of the method. This report relates only to the samples reported above, and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations . Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. All samples received in acceptable condition unless otherwise noted. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction for all non -friable organically bound materials prior to analysis. Estimation of uncertainty is available on request.
Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Pineville, NC NVLAP Lab Code 200841-0, VA 3333 00312
Page 3 of 3ASB_PLM_0008_0001 - 1.78 Printed: 5/19/2020 2:00 PM
Tel/Fax: (704) 525-2205 / (704) 525-2382 http://www.EMSL.com / charlottelab@emsl.com
EMSL Order: 412004206
Customer ID: WPCE62
Customer PO: EN207050C
Project ID:
Attention: Craig Langford Phone: (843) 442-6658
Terracon, Inc. Fax: (843) 884-9234
1450 Fifth Street West Received Date: 05/14/2020 4:10 PM
North Charleston, SC 29405 Analysis Date: 05/16/2020 - 05/19/2020
Collected Date:
EN207050C/ JBC AFB Bldg. 570Project:
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Non-Friable Organically Bound Materials by TEM via
EPA/600/R-93/116 Section 2.5.5.1
Sample ID Description Appearance % Matrix Material % Non-Asbestos Fibers Asbestos Types
MPM-03
412004206-0011
Mech Room - Mastic White
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
100.0 None No Asbestos DetectedOther
PM1-03
412004206-0014
CCU #3 - Mastic - Pipe
Mastic
White
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
98.6 Fibrous_Other No Asbestos Detected1.4Other
PM2-03
412004206-0017
CCU #2 - Mastic - Pipe
Mastic
White
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
98.9 Fibrous_Other No Asbestos Detected1.1Other
FT1-03-Floor Tile
412004206-0020
12" Beige Floor Tile -
Mastic
Pink
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
100.0 None No Asbestos DetectedOther
FT1-03-Mastic
412004206-0020A
12" Beige Floor Tile -
Mastic
Tan
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
100.0 None No Asbestos DetectedOther
CBM-03
412004206-0023
Mastic Only - Cove Base Tan/Beige
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
100.0 None No Asbestos DetectedOther
RM-03
412004206-0026
T & G - Roof Field
Material
Black
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
100.0 None No Asbestos DetectedOther
RF-03-Shingle
412004206-0029
Roof Flashing - Shingle -
Mastic
White/Black
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
99.71 Fibrous_Other No Asbestos Detected0.29Other
RF-03-Mastic
412004206-0029A
Roof Flashing - Shingle -
Mastic
Black
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
100.0 None No Asbestos DetectedOther
RF-03-Silver Paint
412004206-0029B
Roof Flashing - Shingle -
Mastic
Silver
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
100.0 None No Asbestos DetectedOther
This laboratory is not responsible for % asbestos in total sample when the residue only is submitted for analysis. The above report relates only to the items tested. This report may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL Analytical , Inc. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample.
Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Pineville, NC
Initial report from: 05/19/2020 14:00:13
ASB_PLMEPANOB_0012_0002 Printed 5/19/2020 2:00:26PM Page 1 of 2
Tel/Fax: (704) 525-2205 / (704) 525-2382 http://www.EMSL.com / charlottelab@emsl.com
EMSL Order: 412004206
Customer ID: WPCE62
Customer PO: EN207050C
Project ID:
Attention: Craig Langford Phone: (843) 442-6658
Terracon, Inc. Fax: (843) 884-9234
1450 Fifth Street West Received Date: 05/14/2020 4:10 PM
North Charleston, SC 29405 Analysis Date: 05/16/2020 - 05/19/2020
Collected Date:
EN207050C/ JBC AFB Bldg. 570Project:
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Non-Friable Organically Bound Materials by TEM via
EPA/600/R-93/116 Section 2.5.5.1
Sample ID Description Appearance % Matrix Material % Non-Asbestos Fibers Asbestos Types
Analyst(s)
Aaron Hartley (9)
Derrick Young (1)
Lee Plumley, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory
This laboratory is not responsible for % asbestos in total sample when the residue only is submitted for analysis. The above report relates only to the items tested. This report may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL Analytical , Inc. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample.
Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Pineville, NC
Initial report from: 05/19/2020 14:00:13
ASB_PLMEPANOB_0012_0002 Printed 5/19/2020 2:00:26PM Page 2 of 2
OrderID: 412004206
OrderID: 412004206
APPENDIX D
INSPECTOR CREDENTIALS
Terracon Consultants, Inc. 1450 Fifth Street, West North Charleston, South Carolina 29405
P (843) 884 1234 F (843) 884 9234 terracon.com
CRAIG C. LANGFORD
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL – ASBESTO SECTION
CONSULTANT/PROJECT DESIGN – PD-00032_EXP 07/10/20
CONSULTANT/BUILDING INSPECTOR ASB-22775_EXP 07/09/20
AIR SAMPLER/MONITOR ASB-22599_EXP 07/08/20
SUPERVISOR SA-03094_EXP 07/08/20
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .