Asbestos and Lead Survey_Bldg-649_20130301.pdf

Department of the Army Mission and Installation Contracting

Command Building 2021, Club Road

Fort Bliss, Texas

Asbestos and Lead-Based Paint Survey Building 649

Fort Bliss, Texas

March 2013 rxm assoc i ates l in e

ASBESTOS AND LEAD-BASED PAINT SURVEY

BUILDING 649

FORT BLISS, TEXAS

FOR

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

MISSION AND INSTALLATION CONTRACTING COMMAND

BUILDING 2021, CLUB ROAD

FORT BLISS, TEXAS

SUBMITTED

MARCH 21, 2013

TTL PROJECT NO. 7505.09

BPA AGREEMENT NUMBER W911SG-11-A-0002

BPA CALL NUMBER 0007

PREPARED BY

TTL ASSOCIATES, INC.

1915 NORTH 12TH STREET

TOLEDO, OHIO 43604-5305

(419) 324-2222

In associa t e! l•nc

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SCOPE OF WORI(

ASBESTOS SURVEY

LEAD BASED PAINT SURVEY

BUILDING DESCRIPTION

RESULTS

ASBES'J1OS

LEAD BASED PAINT

CALIBRATION OF THE XRF fNSTRUMENT

CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDA TJONS

LIMIT A TIO NS

APPENDIX A

APPENDIX B

APPENDIX C

APPENDIX D

APPENDIX E

APPENDIX F

Depanmcnt of Anny Building 649 Fm1 Bliss, Texas

LIST OF APPENDICES

CERTIFICA TlONS

HOMOGENEOUS SAMPLING AREAS

XRF SAMPLING RESULTS

SAMPLE LOCATIONS AND SITE DIAGRAMS

ANALYTICAL REPORT

PHOTOGRAPHIC DOCUMENTATION

In associatcs l • nc

March 20 13 Pa g c I i

SCOPE OF WORK

In accordance with the contract specifications and the technical requirements of the scope of work outlined in BPA Agreement Number W91 ISG-l l-A-0002 and BPA Call Number 0007, TTL Associates, Inc. (TTL) has perfonned a United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) asbestos survey and Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) lead-based paint (LBP) survey for Building 649. Survey activities were conducted in general accordance with 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 61.145 and the "Asbestos in Buildings: Simplified Sampling Scheme for Swfacing Materials. ( 1985) 560-5-85-030A.

The purpose of the NESHAP asbestos regulation is to protect human health and the environment by minimizing the release of asbestos when facilities that contain asbestos-containing material (ACM) are demolished or renovated. The U.S. EPA defines an ACM as a material that contains greater than one-percent asbestos by visual estimation or weight. HSA are areas containing materials that are similar in color, texture, and general appearance, and which appear to have been uniformly installed dming the same time period.

The purpose of the OSHA lead standards (29 CFR 1926.62) is to protect employees such as maintenance staff or construction personnel from the health effects of occupational exposures to lead. OSHA defines LBP as paint containing any amount of lead. OSHA regulates exposures to LBP by limiting airborne exposures to lead during worker acti vities that include disturbance of

LBP.

ASBESTOS SURVEY

The objective of the NESHAP asbestos survey was to detennine the presence of ACM and to collect the data necessary to comply with the NESHAP renovation/demolition inspection and notification requirements. To meet this objecti ve, TTL performed an asbestos survey to determine and quantify ACM in accessible areas within the building interior and exterior. The ACM survey included the following activities:

• Review of existing environmental documents (floor plans)

• Visual inspection of all accessible areas of the building

• Collection of bulk samples of identified suspect ACM per homogeneous material in accessible areas of the building

• AIHA and NVLAP accredited laboratory analysis of suspect ACM bulk samples by polarized light microscopy (PLM) to first positive result per homogeneous material

• Preparation of a fi nal repo11 that includes sample locations of representative ACM and the laborato1y's analytical repo11.

A Texas Department of Health Ce1t ified Asbestos Inspector conducted a NESHAP asbestos survey of the facility. Please refer to Appendix A for a copy of the Inspector's Certification.

Department of Anny Building 649 Fort Bliss, Texas

In assocoa1es l 1nc ra g C I I

The asbestos survey included the identification of suspect materials and the definition of homogeneous sampling areas (HSA), assessment of the condition of each material, estimation of the quantity of the suspect ACM, and collection of bulk samples from each identified HSA. An HSA is defined as a material that exhi bited similar physical characte1istics (e.g., texture, surface color, and appearance) and was applied or installed at the same time (if known) as observed by our inspector, utilizing professional judgment and experience.

The samples were collected using a coring device or other method, as appropriate, to collect a complete cross section of the suspect material. The samples of suspect ACM were analyzed by PLM using U.S. EPA Method 600/R-93/116 by EMSL Analytical, Inc. (EMSL) located at 8700 Jameel Road, Suite 190, Houston Texas. EMSL's asbestos laboratory is accredited by the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) which is administered by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). The laboratory accreditation number is included in the attached analytical report.

LEAD BASED PAINT SURVEY

The objective of the LBP survey was to detennine the presence of lead on painted surfaces. The fo llowing is the scope of fi eld activities conducted by TTL:

l) Conduct on-site paint testing using a portable X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) analyzer.

2) Collect basic information on paint conditions.

3) Photographs of the painted surfaces.

LBP is paint or other surface coatings that contain lead equal to or in excess of 1.0 milligram per square centimeter (mg/cni2) or more than 0.5 percent by weight or 5,000 parts per million by weight as established by the U.S. EPA and HUD regulations. OSHA does not define lead paint based on content. Any detectable lead in paint makes it lead paint for the purposes of complying with OSHA regulations to detennine worker exposure.

BUILDING DESCRIPTION

The building is currently used as an administration building. The exterior of the building is composed of brick with painted wood siding and trim. The roof of the building is asphalt shingles.

The inte1ior of the building was inaccessible at the time of the survey, therefore only the exte1ior was surveyed.

Dcpaitment of Anny Building 649 Fon Bliss, Texas

/TT

assoc i a t e,,inc

March 2013 ra g L: 12

RESULTS

ASBESTOS

A total of three suspect HSA were identified in Building 649, from which a total of nine samples were collected. Refer to the attached HSA Summary Table for a listing of the materials identified and the analytical results. ACM was identified in one suspect mate1ial. Refer to the Laboratory Analytical Results and associated Chain-of-Custody documentation. The following is a list of materials identified as asbestos-containing:

• Approximately 350 linear feet (1.f.) of Window and Door Caulk (HSA 649-04, 05, 06).

LEAD BASED PAINT

The survey on Building 649 was performed by Mr. Jose Morie!, a Texas Depa1iment of State Health Services certified Lead Inspector, Texas Certificate No. 2060856, on February 15, 20 12.

The building does not meet the U.S. EPA and HUD definition of "Target Housing" or "Child Occupied Facility" and therefore the site is not subject to regulations specific to LBP. The LBP inspection was conducted fo llowing the procedures outlined in Chapter 7 of the Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead-Based Paint in Housing, revised October 1997.

The physical condition of the building components and the paint were in fair condition at the time of the survey. All exterior homogenous painted surfaces were tested. The interior of the building was inaccessible at the time of the survey. The survey was conducted utilizing a Ni ton XLp 300A Series XRF analyzer Serial No. 10086, to measure the lead content of surface coatings on representative homogenous bui ld ing components. A homogenous component is a building mate1i al that is uniform in function, composition, texture, age, and generally appears consistent at various locations within the bui lding. The XRF instrument determines lead in all layers of paint.

LBP is paint or other surface coatings that contain lead equal to or in excess of 1.0 mg/cm2 or more than 0.5 percent by weight or 5,000 parts per million by weight as establ ished by U.S. EPA and HUD regulations. All but one of the XRF results tested equal to or greater than the regulatory limit of 1.0 mg/cm2 of lead. The fo llowing table identifies the positive paint.

No. Component

I Door Frame

2 Wood Panel

3 Window

Depanmcnt of Anny Building 649 Fort Bl iss, Tc.xas

Substrate w w w

Table 1.0 Identified Lead Based Paint

Condition Color Test Location

F Green South Wall East Door

I

F Green South Wall

F Green South Wall W indow I

FTT1

a s soc i' a t e s I i n c

Result (mg/cm2)

12.7

5.2

2. 1

P a ge 13

Table 1.0 Continued

Substrate Condition Color Test Location Result

No. Component (mg/cm2

South Wall Door 4 Door Frame w F Green Frame 2 3.8

5 Window w F Green South Wall Window 2 1.9

6 Window w F Green South Wall Window 3 2.6 South Wall Door

7 Door Frame w F Green Frame 3 4.6 South Wall Door

8 Door w F Green Frame 3 3 .1

9 Window w F Green North Side Window I 8.3

10 Window w F Green North Side Window 3 2.8

11 Window w F Green North Side Window 5 1.5

12 Door w F Green North Wall 12.5

13 Door Frame w F Green North Wall 6.2

14 Soffit w F Green North Wall 3.8

15 Soffit w F Green South Wall 1.7

16 Window w F Green West Wall Window 1 1.2

17 Window w F Green West Wall Window 2 8.2 East Wall

18 Window w F Green Window I 3.7 East Wall

19 Window w F Green Window2 1.6

CALIBRATION OF THE XRF INSTRUMENT

Before proceed ing with the survey of the painted surfaces, the XRF analyzer performed a self calibration check in accordance with the manufacturer' s quality control procedures. After the calibration, Mr. Morie! conducted calibration readings on a 1.0 mg/cm2 lead film provided by the manufacturer. The difference among the first calibration check average and the 1.0 mg/cni2 lead film was not greater than the 0.2 mg/cm2 calibration check limit obtained from the XRF Perfmmance Characteristic Sheet, the XRF instrument in use did not require co1Tection for substrate bias for any substrate encountered. No XRF readings above the upper limi ts of the inconclusive range were encountered. Because there were no inconclusive results, no paint chip samples were collected. Upon completion of the LBP Survey, Mr. Mo1i el collected two more calibration readings. The results were in accordance with the readings taken prior to the survey.

CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDATIONS

The U.S. EPA defines regulated asbestos-containing material (RACM) as: (a) F1iable asbestos material, (b) Category I non-friable ACM that has become friable, (c) Category I non-friable ACM that will be or has been subjected to sanding, giinding, cutting, or abrading, or ( d) Category II non-friable ACM that has a high probabi lity of becoming or has become crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by the forces expected to act on the material in the course of demolition or renovation operations.

Department of Anny Building 649 Fort Bliss, Texas

Pa g e / 4

No friable ACM was identified.

No Category I non-friable ACM identified.

The following Categorv II non-friable ACM was identified as ACM and might become RACM based on commonly used renovation/demolition techniques:

• Approximately 350 (l.f.) of Window and Door Caulk (HSA 649-04, 05, 06).

The NESHAP asbestos regulations require the removal of all RACM from a facility being demolished or renovated prior to beginning any activity that might damage or disturb the material. These rules apply to faci lities containing a combined amount of RACM of at least 260 linear feet, at least 160 square feet, or at least one cubic meter of facility components where length or area could not be measured. TTL recommends the removal of all of the identified ACM that will be disturbed by renovation/demolition activities by a li censed asbestos abatement contractor.

A written Notification of Intent to Renovate/Demolish fonn is required to be submitted to the State of Texas Department of State Health Services as the U.S. EPA designated authority at least ten working days prior to beginning any asbestos abatement and/or demolition project. There might also be additional State agency notification requirements.

Although the demolition/renovation of buildings containing LBP is not specifically regulated under NESHAP, the OSHA Construction Standards for Lead (29 CFR 1926.62) applies to all construction work where an employee may be occupationally exposed to lead. Care should be exercised during these activities so as to minimize worker exposures to lead in accordance with OSHA regulations.

Title X of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1992, which was promulgated under the jurisdiction of the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), sets forth the guidelines for addressing LBP hazards in residential housing. Title X defines LBP as paint containing greater than I mg/cni2 or 0.5% by weight. A LBP hazard, as defined under Title X, is "any condition that causes exposure to lead that would result in adverse human health effects and that comes from lead-contaminated dust, lead-contaminated soil, or lead-contaminated paint that is deteriorated or present on accessible, friction, or impact surfaces."

Local, State and Federal regulations must be fo llowed prior to conducting any renovation or demolition activities in the building. Removal and disposal of lead-containing materials shall be done in accordance with federal, state and local rules and regulations. All personnel handling LBP must be licensed and trained. Care should also be taken with materials containing less than

1.0 mg/cm2

Department of Anny Building 649 Fo 11 Bliss, Tc.,as

In assoc,at•s l •nc

Pa ge I S

LIMITATIONS

TTL has made reasonable efforts to identify and quantify suspect ACM based upon the standard of care in the environmental industry existing at the time of the survey. This survey only summarizes the potential presence and estimated quantities of visually observed ACM. Unless otherwise indicated, TTL did not perfonn any destructive testing and this survey is limited to areas that were accessible to and visually observed by TTL at the time of the survey. The inte1ior was inaccessible, there only the exte1ior was surveyed.

TTL's inspector made reasonable efforts to provide accurate quantities of suspect ACM associated with the site structures. Additional material disturbed during renovation or demolition activities should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis, especially materials that were previously hidden, obscured, or inaccessible, to detem1ine if the material is included in this survey. If a given material is not described in this survey or cannot be identified as a non-suspect material , the material should be assumed to contain asbestos and renovation and/or demolition activities should be halted until sampling and analysis can be accomplished. Parties conducting renovation and/or demolition activities should follow all applicable federal, state, and local regulations in handling identified and suspect ACM.

A LBP inspection does not identify hazards, measure exposure, or suggest solutions. A Lead Hazard Evaluation, which would include the collection and laboratory testing of dust samples of selected surfaces, could be perfo1med to fu1iher assess the hazard posed to building occupants.

The information contained in the repoti was based upon specific parameters and regulations in force at the time of the survey. The information herein is only for the specific use of the Department of the Army, Mission and Installation Contracting Command unless written authorization is obtained from TTL. TTL accepts no responsibility for the use, interpretation, or reliance by other parties on the infonnation contained herein, nor does this report represent an instrument ofregulatory compliance or an asbestos abatement specification.

Dcpanment of Anny Building 649 Fon Bliss, Texas

Fn assoc,at•sl1nc

March 201 3 P a gl· J6

TTL appreciates the continued opportunity to provide The Department of the Army with our environmental services. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please contact Mr. David Sawicki at (312)771-2539.

Sincerely, TTL Associates, Inc.

Walt Grabowski Manager, Industrial Hygiene Services

David L. Sawicki, CPG, PG Regional Manager, Chicago Office

V:\Toledo\Fort Bliss TX\Task Order IO - Surveys of 31 buildings - 00 IO 155432\Building 649\Report Bldg 649.docx

Depanment of Anny Building 649 Fort Bliss. Texas

P ag e 17

APPENDIX A

CERTIFICATIONS

FIT

assoc i ates line

American Indian Environment and Health Association

LEAD TRAINING DIVISION

Certificate# 7ME05111003EDER003

This is to certify that

Nicolas Rodriguez PO Box 922

Canutilla, TX 79930 has on 05/11/2010, in El Paso, TX completed an

EPA Model Lead Risk Assessor Refresher Course on 05/11/2010 - 05/11/2010 and passed the associated examination on 05/11/2010 with a score of 70% or better

Soc. Sec#: XXX-XX-37 42 Accrediation Expires:5/11/13

Thomas Bradford Mayhew A I EH A - P.O. Box 786 - Lawrence KS 66044 - 800-444-6382

TEXAS DEPARTJVIENT OF STATE HEALTH SERVICES

Be it known that

NICOLAS RODRIGUEZ

is certified to perform as a

Lead Risk Assessor in the State of Texas and is hereby governed by the rights, privileges and responsibilities set forth in Texas Occupations Code, Chapter 1955 and Title 25, Texas Adminjstrative Code, Chapter 295 relating to Texas Environmental Lead Reduction, as long as this license is not suspended or revoked.

David L. Lakey, M.D.

Commissioner -of Health

License Number: 2010222 Expiration Date: 7/15/2014

Void After Expiration Date

VOID IF ALTERED Control Number 6776 NON-TRANSFERABLE

_ _J ---~ ~ __I ' ~___J· ___JI -_I ~ ___jJ __J ___ __J t

~ l \

Texas Department of State Health Services

I

Asbestos Inspector

NICOLAS RODRIGUEZ

License No. 600932

Control No. 96925

Expirat ion Date: 1/20/2014

Texas Department of State Health Services

Asbestos Inspector

JOSE MORIEL

License No. 603220

Control No. 97233

Expiration Date: 3/5/2015

Jose Moriel -X Asbestos Inspector Refresher

Exp. 1/3/2014 SS# xxx-xx-7550

Mnyliew Envire1nme1!lal TYairti11R Associntcs

INCORPORATED

Certificate# MEF95CCE6A5D4B470

Jose Mariel has on 113/2013, in El Paso, TX completed the requirements for asbestos accreditation under Section 206 of TSCA Title II, 15 U.S. C. 2646

~~,N S, ~~, J\l ,\\"ll

• ; 11;

4-hr. Asbestos Building Inspector Refresher as approved by TX and the US E.P.A. under 40 C.F.R. 763 (AHERA) on 113/2013 - 1/312013 and passed the associated examination on 113/2013 with a score of 70% or better

P.O. Box 786

Soc. Sec#: XXX-XX-7550 Expiration: 1/3/2014

Lawrence, KS.66044 www.metaenvironmental.net

800 .444. 6382

Juan Ayala Instructor

Thomas Mayhew

President

TEXAS DEPARTNIBNT OF STATE HEALTH SERVICES

Be it known that

JOSEMORIEL

is certified to perform_ as a

Lead Inspector .

in the State of Texas and is hereby governed .by the rights, privileges and responsibilities set forth in Texas Occupations Code, Chapterl955 and Title 25, Texas Administrative Code, Chapter 295 relating.to Texas EnvironmentalLead,Reductio~, as long as this license is·not suspended or revoked.

David L. Lakey, M.D.

Commissioner of Health

Li~~n.se. ~~~:rop·~t::2060856

Expiration Date: 12/7/2013

Void After:Expiration; Date

VOJO: I_F )~LTERED , Control Number 617 4 NON-TRANSFERABLE

L,;;_;;;pJ b)'Ui0J l~·";{""'"'· - . ·i:-.-D __j __j __JI ·- __JI __JI __JI ___J __JI ____j _ _j __ _j ~-_j • -· JI ---· J _ _J

Mayhew Environ.mental Training Associates

INCORPORATED

Certificate# 7ME09271201AI00003

This is to certify that

Rauli Jo Rodriguez has on 09/29/2012, in El Paso, TX completed the requirements for asbestos accreditation under Section 206 of TSCA Title 11, 15 U.S. C. 2646

AlIERA Asbestos Inspector Training as approved by the State of Texas and the U.S.E.P.A. under 40 C.F.R. 763 (AHERA) on 09/27/2012 - 09/29/2012 and passed the associated examination on 09/29/2012 with a score o/70% or better

CM=J.OPTS.

Soc. Sec#: XXX-XX-8580 Accred itation Expires: 9/29/13

Jnstructvr Juan Ayala

President Thomas !Jrac{f'ord Mc~),hew

MET A - P.O. Box 786 - Lawrence KS 66044 - 800-444-6382

1.

L====================================-=--_-::_-_-:_-_-_·-_-_-_,,-. -__ -_-_---==-=-=--========================================-l

APPENDIXB

HOMOGENEOUS SAMPLING AREAS

associates l ine

HSA# Malortal Doscrlpllon 649-01, 02. 03 Window Glazing

649.04, 05, 06 Window and Door Caulking

649-07, 08, 09 Roof Malorial

TTL Projecl No. 7505.09

Frlablllty

NF-II

NF-D

NF-I

nomogonoous :>ampung woas I a0t0 ~ 649

, ..,,. A:1ss, TX

Functional Aroa Ttvo1inrv,ut

Total

Throughout

Total

Roof

Total

Quantlly Unlls Sample Numbor Sample Resulls

230 I.I. 649-01 . 02, 03 NEGATIVE

230 I.I, 350 I.I. 649.04, 05, 06 POSITIVE

350 I.I.

1,450 s.f. 649-07, 08, 09 NEGATIVE

1,450 s.f.

APPENDIX C

XRF SAMPLING RESULTS

associ a1es l inc

Lead Based Paint Inspection U.S. Department of the Army

For Bliss, Texas Building 649

No. Com~onent Substrate Cond. Color Test Location Results PbL Units

0 Calibration Calib. Cal. Calib. Calibration Negative 0 mg/cm"2

1 Door Frame w F Green S. Wall E. Door 1 Positive 12.7 mg/ cm "2 2 Wood Pannel w F Green South Wall Positive 5.2 mg/ cm "2 3 Window w F Green S. Wall Window 1 Positive 2.1 mg/ cm "2 4 Door Frame w F Green S. Wall Door Frame 2 Positive 3.8 mg/ cm "2

5 Window w F Green S. Wall Window 2 Positive 1.9 mg/ cm "2

6 Window w F Green S. Wall Window 3 Positive 2.6 mg/ cm "2 7 Door Frame w F Green S. Wall Door Frame 3 Positive 4.6 mg/ cm "2 8 Door w F Green S. Wall Door Frame 3 Positive 3.1 mg/ cm "2

9 Window w F Green N. Side Window 1 Positive 8.3 mg/ cm "2 10 Window w F Green N. Side Window 3 Positive 2.8 mg/ cm "2 11 Window w F Green N. Side Window 5 Positive 1.5 mg/ cm "2 12 Door w F Green N.Wall Positive 12.5 mg/ cm "2 13 Door Frame w F Green N.Wall Positive 6.2 mg/ cm "2 14 Soffit w F Green N.Wall Positive 3.8 mg/ cm "2 15 Soffit w F Green S.Wall Positive 1.7 mg/ cm "2 16 Window w F Green W. Wall Window 1 Positive 1.2 mg/ cm "2 17 Window w F Green W. Wall Window 2 Positive 8.2 mg/ cm "2 18 Window w F Green E. Wall Window 1 Positive 3.7 mg/ cm "2 19 Window w F Green E. Wall Window 2 Positive 1.6 mg/ cm "2

Substrate(Sbst): Drywall(DW)/Plaster(P)/Wood(W)/Metal(M)/Brick(B)/Concrete Mesonry Unit(CMU)/Ceramic Tile{CT)/Plastic(PL)/Concrete(C)/Transite Panel(TRP). Condition(Cond):

Intact( I) Fair( F)Poor(P )/Res u It: N egative(N) Positive ( P)

APPENDIX D

SAMPLE LOCATIONS AND SITE DIAGRAMS

1 •

4 ••

LEGEND

• SAMPLE LOCATION

NOT TO SCA1£

DRAWN

FIGURE 1.0

ASBESTOS SAMPLING LOCATION MAP

BUILDING 649

FORT BLISS, TEXAS

PREPARED FOR

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

FORT BUSS, TEXAS

CLW/03-15-13 CHECKED

REVISED APPROVED

JOB NO. 7505.09

DRAWING NUMBER

750509-36H

14.

10•

11.

14.

12•

13.

20•

LEGEND

• SAMPLE LOCATION

NOT TO SCALE

9 8 e 1s •17

ORAWN

7 6 e19

FIGURE 2.0

LEAD SURVEY

BUILDING 649

FORT BLISS, TEXAS

PREPARED FOR

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

FORT BUSS, TEXAS

CLW/03-1 5-1 3 CHECKED

REVISED APPROVED

JOB NO. 7505.09

DRAWING NUMBER

750509-37H

APPENDIXE

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn:

EMSL Analytical, Inc.

8700 Jameel Road, Suite 190, Houston, TX 77040

Phone/Fax: (713) 686-3635 / (713) 686-3645 http://www.emsl com houstonlab@emsl com

Raul Rodriguez TTL Associates, Inc.

1915 North 12th Street

Toledo, OH 43604

ProJect: Bldg 649 Fort Bliss, TX

Phone:

Fax:

Received:

Analysis Date:

Collected:

(419) 324-2222

(419) 321-6252

02/19/13 8:00 AM

2/25/2013

2/15/2013

EMSL Order:

CustomerlD:

CustomerPO:

ProjectlD:

151300690

TTL63

-fest Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M4-82-020 Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy

3ample r -01

,.,.300690-0001

( l-02

151300690-0002

( ) -03

151300690-0003 d-04 fi¼300690--0004

649-05 r-1:l00690--0005

649-06

300690--0006

~ -07

)00690--0007

Jenny Drape/a (6)

J ,n Mote (3)

Description Appearance

Throughout Green/Beige Exterior - Window Non-Fibrous Glazing Heterogeneous

Throughout Green/Beige Exterior - Window Non-Fibrous Glazing Heterogeneous

Throughout Green/Beige Exterior - Window Non-Fibrous Glazing Heterogeneous

Throughout Green/Beige Exterior - Window Non-Fibrous & Door Caulking Heterogeneous

Throughout Gray/Green/Beige Exterior· Window Non-Fibrous & Door Caulking Heterogeneous

Throughout Beige Exterior - Window Non-Fibrous & Door Caulking Homogeneous

Roof • Roof Materials

White/Black

Fibrous Homogeneous

Non-Asbestos Asbestos

% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Type

100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected

Inseparable paint / coating layer included in analysis

100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected

Inseparable paint / coating layer included in analysis

100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected

Inseparable paint / coating layer included in analysis

100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected

Inseparable paint/ coating layer included in analysis

96% Non-fibrous (other) 4% Chrysotile

Inseparable paint / coating layer included in analysis

96% Non-fibrous (other) 4% Chrysotile

Inseparable paint / coating layer included in analysis

10% Glass 90% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected

Michelle Leggett, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory

EMSL maintains liability l imited to cost or analysis. This report relates only 10 the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in run. without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no r nsibility for sample coUection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of rest results are the responsibility of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim p ,ct certification. approval, or endorsement by NVLAP. NIST or any agency or the federal go'1?mmenl. Non-friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL rr ,mends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless rf .. ,stcd by the client. building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum. wallboard. etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1%

Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical. Inc. Houston. TX NVLAP Lab Code 102106-0. AZ 0925. CO AL-15355, LA 04126, TX 300159

Initial report from 02/25/2013 13:31 :53

~ eport PLM-7.28.7 Printed: 2/25/2013 1:35:02 PM

Attn:

EMSL Analytical, Inc.

8700 Jameel Road, Suite 190, Houston, TX 77040

Phone/Fax: (713) 686-3635 / (713) 686-3645 http://www.emsl com houstonlab@emsl com

Raul Rodriguez TTL Associates, Inc.

1915 North 12th Street

Toledo, OH 43604

Project: Bldg 649 Fort Bliss, TX

Phone:

Fax:

Received:

Analysis Date:

Collected:

(419) 324-2222

(419) 321-6252

02/19/13 8:00 AM

2/25/2013

2/15/2013

EMSL Order:

CustomerlD:

CustomerPO:

ProjectlD:

151300690

TTL63

iest Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M4-82-020 Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy

)ample

0 -08

·, •. 300690-0008

("'"'IJ.09

100690-0009

Al ... 'fSl(s)

Jenny Drape/a (6)

J, ,n Mote (3)

Description Appearance

Roof• Roof White/Black Materials Fibrous

Homogeneous

Roof• Roof White/Black Materials Fibrous

Homogeneous

Non-Asbestos Asbestos

% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Type

10% Glass

10% Glass

90% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected

90% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected

Michelle Leggett, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory

EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL beam no r'f"fnsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use or test results are the responsibility of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim ~ '.ct certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP. NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non-friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL r~ nmends gravime1ric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless nc.,. ~sted by the client. building materials manufactured with multiple layer.; (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1%

Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Houston, TX NVLAP Lab Code 102106-0, AZ. 0925, co AL-15355, LA 04126, TX 300159

Initial report from 02/25/2013 13:31 :53 el"""(eport PLM-7 .28. 7 Printed: 2/25/2013 1 :35:02 PM THIS IS THE LAST PAGE OF THE REPORT. 2

1\11:i Orth ILth ~t., Toledo, l 43604-S]Js; Voice 4 il 324-~L.l2, f ax 419-24:8:8·:

Ship To Address: ATTN: RECEIVING LAB, 1915 North 12th St., Toledo, OH 43604-5305 Sent From: D Toledo D Plymouth lJ Detroit lJ Other _________________ _ 23990 Page __ of __

Project No.: -q-<;; ~ Client: \\\.-- I~ Parameters

P.O.No.: Project/Location: ~rla ( Pl ~Cl -Fiif+ 112-,l,~ .\X. /%

I I I ~~=:; Project Mgr.: Sampler's Nam~/J..l • O~ nd. / 8 .... <!:

.... ;§f 0

Sampler's Signature~().i i Q ~o-rP . I 0 'O "'

Phone No. i g, ~

Sample Date Time Sample I s ~ :5 Item ~

I!!

No. I.D. Sampled Sampled Type Matrix Location

Q. Lab#

1 ( o~O- o I 2(15 /,; W,Mow t:lr-, ,n l\ ~V(')\M n Ov..-\-- OiDt-tvio("

'JJ.] ..J

2 - (Y-2 \ 3 -07

_J_

4 (P,..{Cf- 04 Wind.ow I\;\ ¥tx) o.lA rtJ t;{- v"'J)y :,,lr,r,./"

Co v,. \ ¥-i'5 \ _J s - OS I

6 - OLP

7 LP~Y- o-=r

[2<x)F- 'Mr~w ti11lc, ~oof

8 - OP-i 9 ---C9

Item

~;;rr;df1.

Date I Time Received By: Date I Time LAB USE ONLY

No,< Z/15/,,I C tl,,...e,AIC-f'-r- 7. - I tli-11 I 1F1> 0"~ Were samples delivered D in person 0 by courier

Were samples preserved D in field 0 in lab D N/A

Item Relinquished By: Date

Time Received By: Date I Time Temp of samples oc

No.

I Did samples arrive Intact and sealed? D yes O no 0 N/A

Were proper containers used? D yes D no

Was container labeled properly for contents? U yes U no Item Relinquished By: Date I Time Received By: Date I Time Were samples packaged properly for type of m_aterial? u yes U no No.

I I Was shipping label completed properly per regulat ions?

(49 CFR 170, etc.) D yes O no

Item Relinquished By: Date

Time Received By: Date I Time

Samples were U accepted r &<i No. Comments: TAT

Distribution: Original plus one accompanies shipment (white and yellow); copy to coordinator field files (pink) Rev. 10/0!

APPENDIX F

PHOTOGRAPHIC DOCUMENTATION

In associat•s l i nc

Bldg 649

1. Bldg 649 2. South view of the bldg.

3. North side view of the building 4. View of roof

• We had no access to the inside of these building. We were only able to do t he inspection on all exterior materials.