APPENDIX A RFP Attachments W912ER22R0017 Air Traffic Control Tower Iraq.docx
DOCX document 59 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Amendment 0002 Air Traffic Control Tower, Iraq
- Solicitation number
- W912ER22R0017
About this file
This solicitation package includes attachments for a federal contract opportunity to repair and restore an air traffic control tower at Imam Ali Air Base in Iraq. The scope of work involves structural repairs, electrical upgrades including backup power systems, HVAC, fire suppression, plumbing, conveyance systems, and lightning protection. The project will comply with antiterrorism requirements. Offerors must complete forms providing details on corporate structure, past performance references, experience on similar projects in Iraq including on military bases, and cost breakdown. The solicitation is issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Middle East District for repair of the existing air traffic control tower with a period of performance of 365 calendar days. Inquiries must be submitted through ProjNet and proposals are due by the specified date in the solicitation.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
APPENDIX A
SOLICITATION ATTACHMENTS
| ATTACHMENT A | |
| CORPORATE CERTIFICATE/AUTHORITY TO BIND PARTNERSHIP |
| ATTACHMENT B |
| PERFORMANCE DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT |
| ATTACHMENT C |
| CONSTRUCTION EXPERIENCE FORM |
| ATTACHMENT D |
| PAST PERFORMANCE OVERVIEW SHEET |
| ATTACHMENT E |
| PROJECT SUMMARY FORM |
| ATTACHMENT F |
| PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ-0) |
| ATTACHMENT G |
| PROPOSAL SCHEDULE AND COST BREAKDOWN SHEET |
ATTACHMENT A
(Section 00 45 00 Representation and Certification)
CORPORATE CERTIFICATE/AUTHORITY TO BIND PARTNERSHIP
A. CORPORATE CERTIFICATE
If a corporation submits the proposal, the Corporate Certificate at paragraph A below must be submitted. If the proposal is submitted by a partnership, the Authority to Bind Partnership at paragraph B below must be completed and a copy of the partnership agreement included with the proposal.
CORPORATE CERTIFICATE
I, , certify that I am the (Title) of the corporation named as offer/contractor herein, that , who signed this proposal/contract on behalf of the offeror/contractor was then of said corporation; that said proposal/contract was duly signed for and on behalf of said corporation by authority of its governing body and within the scope of its governing body and within the scope of its corporate powers.
________________________________(CORPORATE SEAL)
(SIGNATURE)
B. AUTHORITY TO BIND PARTNERSHIP
This is to certify that the names and signatures of all partners are listed below and that the person signing the proposal had authority to actually bind the partnership pursuant to its partnership agreement. Each of the partners individually has full authority to enter into and execute contractual instruments on behalf of said partnership, with the United States of America except as follows: (State "none" or describe limitations, if any). This authority shall remain in full force and effect until such time as the revocation of authority by any cause whatsoever has been furnished in writing to and acknowledged by the Contracting Officer.
(Names and signatures of all partners)
(End of Certificate)
ATTACHMENT B
PERFORMANCE DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
1. Although not all subcontractors need to be listed, statement must include all major subcontractors, defined as those performing 30% or more of the total dollar value ($) of the contract.
2. Add more lines, if needed, to list more subcontractors.
3. The total “% of Work” column cannot total more than 100%.
4. REMINDER: All subcontractors completing 30% or more of the work require a letter of intent to be submitted.
5. See example below for details.
| Line |
| Company / Entity |
| Role |
| Scope of Work |
| % of Work |
| 1 |
| ABC Company |
| Offeror |
| Management, safety, QC, paving, surveying, masonry, misc. |
| 50% |
| 2 |
| Hamid & Sons, Inc. |
| Major Sub |
| MEP |
| 20% |
| 3 |
| Overhead Door Co. |
| Major Sub |
| Specialty roll-up doors |
| 15% |
| Line |
| Company / Entity |
| Role |
| Scope of Work |
| % of Work |
Offeror
ATTACHMENT C
EXPERIENCE FORM - INSTRUCTIONS
1. Use one form for each contract.
2. Forms may expand to more than one page, but remember that this form is only for greater weight considerations.
3. Do not make changes to any of the shaded blocks.
4. Complete all non-shaded blocks in the top summary section.
5. Place an “x” next to all Topics that are applicable to the specific contract (not all topics need to be addressed for each contract).
6. Complete the non-shaded “How experience gained” column to describe your experience with that specific topic and how it will enable successful performance on this project.
7. See example below for details.
Summary Section
| # |
| Contract Name / Title |
| Location (Country/Base or City) |
| Role |
| Value ($) |
| Start / End Dates |
| IMAM ALI AIRBASE, IRAQ |
| Prime |
| $10M |
| Mar 2022-Aug 2023 |
Contract Description - briefly describe the scope and summarize the salient features of the contract
Repair and construction of an air traffic control tower complete structural integrity, electrical power, backup electrical power including diesel generators, Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) systems, fire suppression systems, plumbing systems, conveyance systems, lightning grounding protection, doors, windows, floors and other building systems as required. Potable Water, Sanitary Sewer and Electrical Upgrades. Facilities will be designed as permanent construction in accordance with the DoD Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC) 1-200-01, General Building Requirements and UFC 1-200-02, High Performance and Sustainable Building Requirements. This project will comply with DoD antiterrorism/force protection requirements per UFC 4-101-01.
Specific Experience (paragraph letters below align with the solicitation evaluation criteria)
| Topic |
| How experience gained on listed contract will enable successful performance on the restoration of the Air Traffic Control Tower, Iraq B |
| x |
| a. Hiring/maintaining workforce |
| The contractor will need to provide a detailed description/ plan of how they plan to perform work with Iraqi personnel working in the Air Traffic Control Tower (ATCT). The period of performance for this repair project is 365 calendar days. The contractor will need to identify their workforce and be able to get them on Imam Ali AB in a timely fashion to complete daily activities. |
| x |
| b. Long Lead Procurement |
| Procurement for the repairs and upgrades to the ATCT along with tower support features (gen-set, water tanks, etc.). |
| x |
| c. Work Access |
| See below concerning Passes / badges on Iraq military base |
| x | |
| d. Obtaining Permits and Approvals | |
| See below concerning Permits / Approvals in Iraq |
x
Greater Weight
a. Similar Scope, $, complexity Greater weight will be given to those contractors with pervious ATCT work. Also, the contractor who has been able to perform the repairs with tower personnel present on previous projects will have greater weight ,as well as those contractors who have performed similar projects totaling approximately $10M and similar in magnitude.
| x | |
| Greater Weight. b. Iraq military installation | |
| Work was performed completely within the Imam Ali Air Base confines, giving us ample construction experience on an Iraq military installation. |
| x |
| Greater Weight |
c. Passes/badges on Iraq military base Work will be performed on Imam Ali Air Base with contractor who has considerable experience obtaining base passes and badges. The contractor will appoint an in-house Security Coordinator to manage the Site Security Plan and liaise with the Imam Ali Air Base authorities and the subcontracted private security firm, XXX company. The XXX company provided security and escorts and has previously worked on Imam Ali Air Base with success.
| x |
| Greater Weight |
d. Permits/Approvals in Iraq As described above in the Long Lead Procurement section, greater weight will be given to those contractors with pervious ATCT work. Also, the contractor who has been able to perform the repairs with tower personnel present on previous projects will have greater weight, as well as those contractors who have performed similar projects totaling approximately $10M and similar in magnitude
ATTACHMENT D
PAST PERFORMANCE OVERVIEW SHEET
List work which best illustrates current qualifications relevant to this award. Each project listed on this sheet should have a completed Project Summary Form (Attachment E). Mark Prime, Sub, or Joint Venture (ONLY ONE).
| Contract Name/Client, Location of Services |
| Prime |
| Sub |
| JV |
| Total Contract $ Amount |
| Offeror's Share of Responsibility for Total Construction Contract |
SAMPLE: Ellis Island Seawall Renovation/
| X |
| $10,000,000 |
| $10,000,000 |
1.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
| OFFEROR’S NAME |
| DATE |
ATTACHMENT E
PROJECT SUMMARY FORM
PROJECT No: (Circle one): 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Name of Reference Contact:_________________________________________
E-mail Address:___________________________________________________
Telephone Number:________________________________________________
Project Title: _____________________________________________________
Contract Number:_________________________________________________
Location of Project: _______________________________________________
Contract Amount (U.S. Dollar Amount): $_____________________________
Contract Award Date:_____________________________________________
Contract Completion Date:_________________________________________
Contract Duration (Period of Performance):___________________________
Description of the Project’s Scope and Magnitude:
Details of your company’s role and activities during construction of the project:
(Describe your role in this project. Include whether your firm participated as a prime or a subcontractor. SPECIFICALLY describe your roles and responsibilities in the design portion of the contract, if any. Provide details for any past performance problems encountered and the corrective actions taken.
ATTACHMENT F
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)
USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ)
CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor is to complete Blocks 1-4)
| 1. Contractor Information | |
| Firm Name: | CAGE Code: |
| Address: | DUNs Number: |
Phone Number:
Email Address:
Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:
2. Work Performed as: |_| Prime Contractor |_| Sub Contractor |_| Joint Venture |_| Other (Explain) Percent of project work performed:
If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):
3. Contract Information Contract Number:
Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):
Contract Type: |_| Firm Fixed Price |_| Cost Reimbursement |_| Other (Please specify):
Contract Title:
Contract Location:
Award Date (mm/dd/yy):
Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):
Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):
Explain Differences:
Original Contract Price (Award Amount):
Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):
Explain Differences:
4. Project Description:
Complexity of Work |_| High |_| Med |_| Routine
What project in Factor 1, paragraph b. is this project being used to qualify for? (One project can be used to qualify for more than one factor)
How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)
CLIENT INFORMATION (Client is to complete Blocks 5-8)
5. Client Information Name:
Title:
Phone Number:
Email Address:
6. Describe the client’s role in the project:
7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):
8. Client’s Signature:
NOTE: USACE REQUESTS THAT THE CLIENT COMPLETES THIS QUESTIONNAIRE AND SUBMITS DIRECTLY BACK TO THE OFFEROR. THE OFFEROR WILL SUBMIT THE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO USACE WITH THEIR PROPOSAL, AND MAY DUPLICATE THIS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FUTURE SUBMISSION ON USACE SOLICITATIONS. CLIENTS ARE HIGHLY ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT QUESTIONNAIRES DIRECTLY TO THE OFFEROR. HOWEVER, QUESTIONNAIRES MAY BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO USACE. PLEASE CONTACT THE OFFEROR FOR USACE POC INFORMATION. THE GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO VERIFY ANY AND ALL INFORMATION ON THIS FORM.
ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT
YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE
| RATING |
| DEFINITION |
| NOTE |
| (E) Exceptional |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective. |
| An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. |
| (VG) Very Good |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified. |
| (S) Satisfactory |
| Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract. |
| (M) Marginal |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner. |
| (U) Unsatisfactory |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating. |
| (N) Not Applicable |
| No information or did not apply to your contract |
| Rating will be neither positive nor negative. |
TO BE COMPLETED BY THE CLIENT
PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS
YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.
1. QUALITY
| a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts |
| E VG S M U N |
| b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance |
| E VG S M U N |
| c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance |
| E VG S M U N |
| d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance) |
| E VG S M U N |
2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:
| a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below) |
| E VG S M U N |
| b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract |
| E VG S M U N |
3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:
| a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project? |
| E VG S M U N |
| b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes; responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication) |
| E VG S M U N |
| c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer? |
| E VG S M U N |
| d) Overall customer satisfaction |
| E VG S M U N |
4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR
| a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force? |
| E VG S M U N |
| b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort |
| E VG S M U N |
| c) Government Property Control |
| E VG S M U N |
| d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel |
| E VG S M U N |
| e) Utilization of Small Business concerns |
| E VG S M U N |
| f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines |
| E VG S M U N |
| g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes |
| E VG S M U N |
| h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program) |
| E VG S M U N |
5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
| a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)? |
| E VG S M U N |
| b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client |
| E VG S M U N |
| c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns) |
| E VG S M U N |
| d) Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section. |
| Yes No |
| e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below. |
| Yes No |
| f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below. |
| Yes No |
6. SAFETY/SECURITY
| a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues? (Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.) |
| E VG S M U N |
| b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements. |
| E VG S M U N |
7. GENERAL
| a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues). |
| E VG S M U N |
| b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues) |
| E VG S M U N |
| c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below) |
| Yes No |
| d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor. |
| E VG S M U N |
Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks.
Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weakness, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk.
ATTACHMENT G
PROPOSAL SHEDULE AND COST BREAKDOWN SHEET
The Proposal Schedule and Cost Breakdown Sheet have been included separately as attachments in PDF.
“Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104”
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .