Appendix 2.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 367 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Tenant File Review IFB
- Solicitation number
- 23-551HDA-ASSET-B-36140
- Issued by
- Illinois
About this file
The document is an IFB (Invitation for Bid) from the Illinois Housing Development Authority (IHDA) seeking a vendor to perform tenant file reviews for occupied units in affordable multifamily rental housing developments in IHDA's portfolio. The review scope includes examining tenant files for compliance with program requirements such as tenant eligibility, income limits, lease terms, inspections, and certification/recertification activities. The IFB does not specify a quantity or list of properties, but indicates the reviews will be conducted on a sample basis. Responses to the IFB are required to be submitted electronically, with no paper submissions accepted. The IFB does not provide a specific due date or award date.
The IFB does not include details on pricing terms, set asides, incumbents, funding sources, or contract amounts. However, it indicates the selected vendor will be responsible for conducting file reviews, documenting findings, and submitting reports to IHDA. The IFB also references applicable regulations and program requirements the vendor must comply with, such as LIHTC, HOME, and Fair Housing guidelines.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Tenant File Review IFB Final.docx | DOCX document | |
| Appendix 1~8.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Vendor Q and A~4.pdf | ||
| ipg-active-registered-vendor-disclosure-formerly-forms-b-v.23.1.docx | DOCX document | |
| Pre-Bid Conference TEAMS Information~10.docx | DOCX document | |
| attachment-notice-of-electronic-submission-only-v-22-1~2.pdf | ||
| Appendix 3.docx | DOCX document | |
| Utilization Plan Version 21.0 4.12.2021~5.pdf | ||
| B36140 notice-of-award-form-v.23.1_2.pdf | ||
| vendor-disclosure-formerly-forms-a-v.23.3.docx | DOCX document | |
| BEP ADDENDUM B-36140.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Appendix 4.xls | XLS spreadsheet |
Show all 12
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Summary
| Illinois Housing Development Authority | Tenant File Review | |||
| 111 E. Wacker Dr., Suite 1000 | Summary Sheet | |||
| Chicago, Illinois 60601 | ||||
| (312) 836-5200 | Tax Credit - Initial or Periodic Review - LIHTC, 1602 and TCAP developments | |||
| Rev. 3/1/2023 |
Development Name & Address Owner Entity Since: (Mo/Yr)
Property / Site Manager's Name Since: (Mo/Yr)
Management Agent Organization Since: (Mo/Yr) No. of Units: Occupancy ERROR:#DIV/0!
Type of Program IHDA No. Loan Position(s) Total
Program
| Purpose of Report: | Initial Review | Tenant Type | Vacant | ||
| Triennial Review | Family | ||||
| Review Date: | Elderly | Date transferred | |||
| Mixed | to AM | PIS Date | |||
| SRO | |||||
| SLF/Assisted | Year of | TC Exp. Date | |||
| Living | Construction | ||||
| Special needs | |||||
| population |
| A. Maintenance & Security | A | C | TCD | D. File Review | A | C | TCD | ||||||
| 1. General Physical Condition | 6. Resident File Maintenance and Security | ||||||||||||
| I. Maintenance & Security Rating | 7. Household Information | ||||||||||||
| Superior | Above Average | Satisfactory | Below Average | 8. Verification | |||||||||
| Unsatisfactory | 9. Leases | ||||||||||||
| B. Leasing & Occupancy | A | C | TCD | 10. Inspections | |||||||||
| 2. Tenant Selection & Orientation | 11. Certification/Recertification Activities | ||||||||||||
| 3. Vacancy, Turnover & Market Conditions | 12. Move-Out File Review | ||||||||||||
| II. Leasing & Occupancy Rating | 13. Applicant Rejection Review | ||||||||||||
| Superior | Above Average | Satisfactory | Below Average | IV. File Review Rating | |||||||||
| Unsatisfactory | Superior | Above Average | Satisfactory | Below Average | |||||||||
| C. Training & Program Compliance | A | C | TCD | Unsatisfactory | |||||||||
| 4. Training | |||||||||||||
| 5. Program Compliance | |||||||||||||
| III. Training & Program Compliance Rating | |||||||||||||
| Superior | Above Average | Satisfactory | Below Average | ||||||||||
| Unsatisfactory |
| V. Rating of Overall Management Operation | Superior | Above Average | Satisfactory | ||
| Below Average | Unsatisfactory |
| Signatures: | |
| Review prepared by: | Review approved by: |
Name / Title Date Title Date
| Asset Manager | Supervisor - Rental Compliance | |
| Item | ||
| No. |
Development's Description
Non-IHDA HUD Subsidies
Unit Composition
Additional Addresses
Number and Type of Bldg.
Comments to Findings/Review Questions:
| Item |
| No. |
| d. Does the development maintain a waiting list of prospective tenants? Is the |
| list updated annually as required? How many are now on list? |
Questionnaire
| Management Review | |
| Questionnaire | (Tax Credit - Initial or Periodic Review - LIHTC, 1602 and TCAP developments) |
Part A: Maintenance & Security
| N/A | YES | NO | FNDGS | Remarks | |
| 1. General Physical Condition | |||||
| a. Which type of physical inspection was completed? |
| UPCS | Pass or Fail? |
| When completed |
| HQS | Pass or Fail? |
| When completed |
| LTOS | Pass or Fail? |
| When completed |
| Rural Development | Pass or Fail? |
| When completed |
| REAC | REAC Score |
| When completed |
1. General Physical Condition A C
I. Maintenance & Security Rating
Superior Above Average Satisfactory
Below Average Unsatisfactory
Part B: Leasing & Occupancy
| N/A | YES | NO | FNDGS | Remarks | |
| 2. Tenant Selection & Orientation |
| a. Does the development have an executed TSP? | ||
| Date TSP was signed by owner/agent: | ||
| 1.) Staff familiarity | ||
| 2.) Preferences including State mandated | ||
| 3.) Rent schedule attached |
b. Does the property have a written VAWA Emergency Transfer Plan?
| c. Is copy of current approved (within the past 5 years) Affirmative Fair Housing Marketing |
| Plan (AFHMP) at rental office? Date of last approved AFHMP: |
d. Is rental staff familiar with AFHMP?
e. Does site signage include the EHO logo?
f. Is the EHO poster displayed in offices and model units?
| g. If there has been advertising, | |
| 1.) was the EHO logo included? | |
| 2.) was it the appropriate size? |
h. Were the outreach efforts, as described in the AFHMP, performed annually?
Last outreach date:
| i. Does advertising and/or outreach program comply with AFHMP? | |
| Estimate racial mix of current tenants: |
White %
Black/African American %
American Indian/Alaska Native %
Asian %
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander %
Other %
| Estimate ethnic mix of current tenants: | |
| Hispanic or Latino | % |
Not Hispanic or Latino %
| j. Does the racial and ethnic mix breakdown reflect the target groups listed in the |
| current AFHMP? |
| k. What marketing efforts have been successful in attracting the target |
| populations (those "least likely to apply")? |
| l. How often is an evaluation made to measure the effectiveness of marketing |
| strategies to attract the "least likely to apply"? |
| m. If development is not reaching target marketing goals, what additional steps |
| has been taken? |
n. What staff positions are/will be responsible for affirmative marketing?
| o. Has the development's owner/agent/manager received complaints of |
| prohibited discrimination? |
| N/A | YES | NO | FNDGS | Remarks | |
| Cont'd (2. Tenant Selection & Orientation) | |||||
| p. In accordance with the Fair Housing Act: |
| 1.) Have policies & practices been modified so as not to discriminate |
| against persons with handicaps? |
| 2.) Is there a transfer policy along with a lease addendum for residents |
| (not requiring an accessible unit) who reside in accessible units? |
q. How many units are accessible?
| 0BR | 1BR | 2BR | ||
| 3BR | 4BR |
| Number of accessible units occupied by tenants with disabilities who require |
| the features of the unit? |
| How many units are adaptable? | |||||
| 0BR | 1BR | 2BR | |||
| 3BR | 4BR |
2. Tenant Selection & Orientation A C
3. Vacancy, Turnover & Market Conditions
a. Does the development maintain a wait list of prospective tenants?
Was annual update letter sent to applicants as required?
Date update letter was sent to applicant
Was wait list purged? When?
How many are currently on wait list?
Is the wait list currently open closed
Does the wait list include all required elements?
Were the applicants selected in proper order from the waiting list?
b. Is surrounding neighborhood market prosperous, average, or depressed?
c. Are surrounding neighborhood conditions improving, stable, or declining?
d. Are the market conditions affecting occupancy?
e. Is there saturation of affordable housing?
3. Vacancy, Turnover & Market Conditions A C
II. Leasing & Occupancy Rating
Superior Above Average Satisfactory
Below Average Unsatisfactory
Part C: Training & Program Compliance
| N/A | YES | NO | FNDGS | Remarks | |
| 4. Training |
| a. Does owner/agent have an ongoing training program for its staff? |
| Check types of training used. |
On-site (Frequency )
IREM NCHM HUD seminars Local colleges
Fair Housing training date
Energy conservation
Other (specify)
| b. Does owner/agent have a system to keep on-site staff informed of changes |
| in either HUD/IHDA policies or development operating procedures? |
How are updates communicated?
4. Training A C
5. Program Compliance
a. Was the Consolidated Certificate of Compliance received?
When:
| b. Have the quarterly Occupancy/Wait List reports been submitted for the current |
| period? |
5. Program Compliance A C
III. Training & Program Compliance Rating
Superior Above Average Satisfactory
Below Average Unsatisfactory
Part D: File Review
Summary of Tenant File Review
Number of program units Number of files reviewed
Name Unit Name Unit Name Unit
| N/A | YES | NO | FNDGS | Remarks | ||
| 6. Resident File Maintenance and Security | ||||||
| a. Are the files locked and secured in a confidential manner with access limited | ||||||
| to authorized staff only? |
| b. Is the owner/agent maintaining tenant files according to IHDA's | |
| documentation retention requirements? |
| Is the owner/agent properly disposing of tenant records (shred, burn, |
| pulverize etc.)? |
c. Is there a file organization system?
Is it followed consistently?
6. Resident File Maintenance and Security A C
7. Household Information
| a. Do the files contain all documentation, including application information, as | |
| required by Program Handbook? |
b. Does the application contain sufficient information to determine eligibility?
c. Was all move-in screening completed per the Tenant Selection Plan?
| d. Does the file contain the ethnicity and racial data certifications required per | |
| program? |
| e. Were the unit sizes appropriate for the household composition at the time | |
| of the file review and were household member(s) identified correctly? |
If a household was ineligible at move in, were exceptions granted?
7. Household Information A C
8. Verification
a. Have all eligibility criteria been verified and properly documented?
8. Verification A C
9. Leases
a. Were the correct program leases used?
b. Were the leases signed and dated by all parties?
c. Were all applicable addendums/attachments added to the lease?
d. Were security deposits collected in the correct amount for the program type?
e. Were pet deposits charged according to the pet policy?
9. Leases A C
10. Inspections
| a. Is the move-in inspection documented in the file and signed/dated by both tenant | |
| and owner/agent? |
| b. Are annual DSS inspections documented in the file and signed by both tenant | |
| and owner/agent? |
10. Inspections A C
11. Certification/Recertification Activities
| a. Were certification/recertification notices and processes performed in | |
| accordance with the Program Handbook? |
b. Was the Tenant Income Certification form (TIC) in the tenant file?
c. Were income and assets calculated correctly?
| Cont'd (11. Certification/Recertification Activities) |
| d. Were the correct rent and income limits used? |
| e. If tenants are paying their own utilities, do the current certifications reflect the | |
| correct utility allowance? |
11. Certification/Recertification Activities A C
12. Move-Out File Review
a. Did the move-out files include the required documentation?
12. Move-Out File Review A C
13. Applicant Rejection Review
a. Did the applicant rejection letter include the required criteria?
b. If appealed, were criteria met?
13. Applicant Rejection Review A C
IV. File Review Rating
Superior Above Average Satisfactory
Below Average Unsatisfactory
Instructions
| Summary |
| For each item reviewed, mark a block in column A (acceptable), or C (management to correct within 30 days). |
| After discussing items with owner or management agent, enter the estimated completion date in the TCD (Target Completion Date) column. |
Development name & address: include addresses for all buildings. Use summary page under Development Description if necessary for additional addresses.
If this is a scattered site, for example, use one address on the first page and list the remaining addresses in Development Description.
Owner entity: review management agreement, regulatory agreement, or audit. Use legal entity name.
Type of program: list all program types in senior loan position - i.e. HOME, Section 8 and/or Tax Credits. IHDA programs only - do not use abbreviations. Do not include LTOS, SRN or 811 here, as Rental Compliance does not monitor these programs. They are captured under Additional IHDA Program Units in the Development Description.
IHDA number: list all loan numbers by lien position (i.e. 17-2037-01), and IHDA TC number (federal & state). Use the Benedict numbering system, not the portfolio system.
Number of Program units: list for the highest IHDA position only
Transferred to AM: omit MLs. Obtain from DMS, Project Dates.
Year of construction: insert year built. Refer to project summary. If construction year is not indicated, ask owner/agent.
| Placed In Service (PIS) date: insert the PIS date for LIHTC properties. PIS date can be found in several places: | |
| 1. DMS: Project -> dates -> award dates | |
| 2. DMS: Award -> LIHTC tab | |
| 3. DMS: Buildings -> 8609 -> Allocation of Credit tab for each 8609 | |
| 4. Property's portfolio folder -> Initial Tax Credit Documents -> 8609 | |
| **If there are multiple PIS dates, use the last one. This determines the affordability period's end date. |
TC Expiration Date: when the Extended Use Period ends. See DMS>Award>LIHTC.
| Signatures |
| Review Prepared By: insert the digital signature of the AM who completed the review. |
Name / Title: type the name of the AM who completed the review
Review Approved By: the approving Rental Compliance Supervisor will insert their digital signature into the PDF version of the final report.
Name / Title: type the name of the Rental Compliance Supervisor.
| Development Description |
| Non-IHDA/HUD subsidies: identify program type, number of units and monitoring agency. |
| Unit composition: indicate each unit size at the development and the number of each type of unit. | |
| Please be thoughtful regarding the number format used, to avoid confusion. Examples of acceptable format are: | |
| three 1-bedroom units | |
| 3 one-bedroom units | |
| three 1BR units |
| Number and type of building: the type should be descriptive of the building style, i.e. high rise, townhouse, walk up, single-family home. |
| "Elevator building" does not give an indication of whether the building is low-, mid-, or high rise, for example. |
| Comments to Findings/Management Review Questions: |
| For each 'C' item checked, describe findings and give recommendation for correction. The corrective action should specify how the agent needs to correct the finding and what documentation or certification must be submitted to IHDA in order to resolve the finding. Explain any "Below Average" or "Unsatisfactory" rating. |
| For tenant file review findings: | |
| 1. Review your tenant files to create a summary of common findings, i.e. findings that occur in 50% or more of the files reviewed. Example: Most of the files reviewed did not have a move-in inspection signed by all parties. |
2. Create a “general finding” definition for each common finding throughout your file audit. List them all general findings first. The definitions are to be separate and used for a reference for the O/A on your MOR report. Example: General Finding A: 5 out of 10 files were missing income verifications; General Finding B: most files were using incorrect rent/income limits.
| 3. For each file reviewed, document the MOR/File Audit summary pg. 2, in this manner. In the finding section: | |
| Tenant first and last name | |
| Unit #, Move-in date, Effective date of certification reviewed (if different from move-in vert) | |
| List general findings. Example: General Findings A, B,C | |
| Detail each non-general finding. | |
| Detail how the finding is to be cured. | |
| 4. In cases where there were no findings in a file, identify the file in the same manner and indicate "No findings." |
| Format Example: |
| General Finding: A |
| In the majority of the files reviewed, the landlord verification was not completed. Management must either complete all screening as indicated in the TSP, or revise the TSP to reflect actual practices in place. Certify that a landlord verification will be completed for all applicants OR submit a copy of the revised TSP. |
| 1. Josephine Smith, Unit #108, Move-In 1/8/18 |
| General Findings: A, C |
Finding a: The file does not contain the credit check, criminal background check, or sex offender screening for adult household member Dante, as required by the Tenant Selection Plan. Management must either complete all screening as indicated in the TSP, or revise the TSP to reflect actual practices in place. In response, certify that a credit check, criminal background, and sex offender screening will be obtain for all future adult applicants and retained in the tenant file.
| 2. John Jenkins, Unit #515, Move-In 5/17/18, Annual Recertification 5/1/19 |
| No findings. |
| PART A: MAINTENANCE & SECURITY |
| 1. General Physical Condition |
| a. All properties are required to have a physical inspection based on the program type. If there has been no inspection in the past three years, contact your field inspector. The appropriate inspection type should be selected based on the applicable program: |
| UPCS - All programs EXCEPT Section 8 & 236, Risk Share, FAF & LTOS. Every three years. |
| HQS - Mod Rehab, FAF |
| LTOS - Rental Housing Support |
| Rural Development - accepted in lieu of UPCS for RD properties with IHDA tax credits |
| REAC - Section 8 & 236, Risk Share. Accepted in lieu of UPCS for S8/236 properties with IHDA tax credits. Periodic based on prior score (90-100: three years; 80-89: two years; 79 and below: one year). |
Check for pass/fail for the most recent physical inspection. Inspection date, type, and results can be reviewed in DMS under Monitoring > Project Monitoring > Program Inspection. Copies of the inspections, if needed, can be found in T:\Asset\Portfolio\Applicable Year\Inspection. If there has not been an inspection for the current year, review prior years and enter the most recent inspection date. If development failed their inspection verify current status with field inspector.
| 1. Make a comment if, at the time of the MOR, the physical inspection letter has been issued but the response is not due yet. |
| 2. Make a finding if, at the time of the MOR, the physical inspection letter has been issued, the response is due, but the property has not responded or resolved the findings. |
PART B: LEASING & OCCUPANCY
| 2. Tenant Selection & Orientation |
| a. Compare the owner's signature date on the TSP reviewed on-site with the TSP Approved Date indicated in DMS. If the TSP reviewed on-site has a more current date, Asset Manager must update DMS upon return to the office. |
If the property is using the IHDA TSP, the initial plan must be signed by IHDA, the owner, and agent. Subsequent plans must be signed by the owner and agent.
If the property is using a TSP reviewed by HUD, the HUD approval memo/letter must be attached. The TSP must be signed by the owner and agent.
If the property is not using the IDHA TSP, the IHDA approval memo must be attached. The TSP must be signed by the owner and agent. You may see this with new deals that are Housing Authorities, RAD deals, 811 deals, etc.
Review the plan utilizing the tab TSP Checklist-Other.
| If the property was allocated low income housing tax credits under the 2020 Qualified Allocation Plan (QAP) or after, the property's TSP must |
| include a preference for veterans. |
| How do I know what QAP the credits were allocated under? |
For 9% credits, this is noted on the reservation letter, which should be saved in the Initial Tax Credit Documents portfolio folder. In this example, this property's allocation falls under the 2018-2019 QAP:
For 4% credits, use the the date of the 42(m) letter. The 42(m) letter should be saved in the Initial Tax Credit Documents portfolio folder. In this example, this property's allocations falls under the 2020-2021 QAP:
| b. Review the transfer plan. Ensure the plan: | |
| 1. Details the measure of any priority given to tenants who qualify for an emergency transfer under VAWA in relation to other categories of individuals seeking transfers or placement on waiting lists |
2. Allows a tenant to transfer to a new unit when a safe unit is immediately available and the tenant would not have to apply in order to occupy the new unit
3. Describes policies for assisting tenants to make emergency transfers when a safe unit is not immediately available, both for situations where a tenant would and would not have to apply in order to occupy the new unit.
4. Describes policies for assisting tenants who have tenant-based rental assistance to make emergency moves with that assistance.
5. May require documentation, as long as tenants can establish eligibility for an emergency transfer by submitting a written certification to their housing provider, and no other documentation is required for tenants who have established that they are victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, or stalking to verify eligibility for a transfer.
| 6. Plan must be made available upon request, and must be publicly available when feasible. | |
| c. List date AMP was approved. If plan is expired and no new plan has been submitted to IHDA or HUD, this is a finding. If the AMP was submitted to HUD and it has not been approved, it is a finding if the plan is expired. |
d. Answer question.
e. Only the fair housing logo is required.
| f-g. Answer questions. |
| h. Must be a finding if no outreach has been conducted within the 12 month period prior to closing the waiting list. Waiting list must be closed based on TSP requirements. |
If the waiting list is managed by another agency, such as a housing authority, and 100% of applicants must come from that waiting list, mark N/A and make a comment in the remarks column indicating why outreach was not completed.
If less than 100% of units must be referred from another agency (such as SRN units), the agent must maintain a list & perform outreach for those units that do not require referral.
i. A development that provides affordable housing should keep track of race and ethnicity in their development. Tax Credit deals have to do the tracking to comply with HUD. Racial mix must equal 100%. Ethnic mix must equal 100%.
j. Detail the least likely to apply groups from the current approved AMP in the remarks section.
k. Add in remarks the successful outreach efforts such as local exhibits or other additional outreach efforts.
| l. Answer question. |
| m. If no additional steps have been taken a recommendation is required. |
| n. Indicate staff person/position in the remarks. |
| o. Prohibited discrimination means based on race, age, sex, handicap, familial status. If yes, please make a note here and describe in Attachment A. |
p2. Review IHDA TSP Exhibit B. A transfer addendum is required for developments with accessible units. The addendum must be signed only by tenants who move in to accessible units but do not require the features. This requirement does not apply to developments with no accessible units or when all units are accessible.
q. Review Management Plan, or TSP. An Accessible Dwelling Unit is a unit that is approached, entered, and used by physically-challenged people.
Accessible features include: Wide doors, sufficient floor space for wheelchairs, lower countertops, lever and loop type handles hardware, seats at bathing fixtures, grab bars in bathroom, knee spaces under sinks and counters, etc. Most accessible features are permanently fixed in place.
An adaptable dwelling unit is one constructed and equipped so it can be converted with minimal structural change for the use by persons with different types and degrees of environmental limitation.
Adaptable features include: An Adaptable unit has features that are either adjustable or capable of being easily and immediately added or removed to "adapt" the unit to individual needs or preferences.
| 3. Vacancy, Turnover and Market Conditions |
| a. Review copy of annual update letter sent to applicants and verify wait list was purged after updating (Compare to previous wait list). |
| See IHDA TSP, Exhibit H for guidance. |
| Required waiting list elements are found in Handbook 7465.1 (for Mod Rehab) or Exhibit H of IHDA's Tenant Selection Plan. |
| Identify the last three move-ins. Analyze the current wait list and the purged wait list to ensure that the applicants were processed in the proper order (i.e. chronological or preference). |
b./c. Determination of neighborhood market conditions should be made through both a visual assessment of the area by the asset manager, and a conversation with site staff. If conditions are other than stable/improving, explain how.
d. Market conditions that negatively affect the property should be indicated, i.e. job loss, college town, economic depression, location, etc.
e. If there is a saturation of affordable housing, explain how, i.e. two new senior developments are being constructed in the immediate area with more amenities, etc.
| 4. Training |
| a. Check types of training used. |
| Suggested trainings: tax credit, HOME, Fair Housing, etc. |
For Fair Housing, all properties must attend Fair Housing training. This should include office and maintenance staff. Recommendation is every 2-3 years.
Based on observations and conversation with staff during the review, make a finding or comment as necessary if extra training is needed for HOME, tax credits, etc.
b. Indicate in remarks column how management stays up-to-date with changes in HUD & IHDA policy.
| 5. Program Compliance |
| a. Obtain date from DMS. Certificate should be saved in Portfolio/Year/Correspondence. |
| e. Review occupancy & wait list reports due for the most recent quarter. Reports can be found at |
| T:\Occupancy & Waitlist Survey\YearQ#\Master Workbook. Make a comment if not submitted. |
| PART C: FILE REVIEW |
| A random file selection will be made using the randomizer. For 100% TC projects, the files will be limited to move-ins from the prior calendar year. |
Sample size: refer to the Federal Register Unit Table.
Random Selection
| Random selections are performed in the following manner: |
| • 100% LIHTC: If there are less new move-ins than the table requires, review only the new move-in files. If there are more new move-ins than the table requires, process the random selection. |
• Less than 100% LIHTC: selection is based on LIHTC units only
If the random selection does not include a move-in, request a file replacement from the rent roll. The selection should also include a move-out and rejection file.
| Always round up at .5%. Example: 24.2 = 24, 24.5 = 25 |
| 6. Resident File Maintenance and Security |
| a. Ask how tenant files are secured. Files should be in a locked file cabinet or locked file room. They should not be left on desks or in common areas that unauthorized staff, such as maintenance staff, can access them. |
b. Federal LIHTC regulations require that Owners retain records for each building in the project for at least 6 years after the due date (with extensions) for filing the federal income tax return for that year. The records for the first year of the credit period, however, must be retained for at least 6 years beyond the due date (with extensions) for filing the federal income tax return for the last year of the compliance period of the building. (From 8823 Guide, 2011 revision)
Ask how the owner is disposing of records. Are they being shredded, burned, etc.?
| c. If there is not an apparent filing system, or files are inconsistently organized, make a comment regarding organization. |
| 7. Household Information |
| a. For all required documents, refer to the "What should be in the tenant file?" for both move-in and recertification. |
b. Applications must be date and time stamped upon receipt. Application should ask for household composition, age, student status, sources of income and assets, assets disposed of for less than fair market value.
c. Refer to the TSP (section V) to determine which screening management has indicated. Make a finding if the file does not contain documentation of the indicated screening.
d. Answer question.
e. Refer to the occupancy standards in the TSP.
| Eligibility exceptions would include extenuating circumstances, such as initially failing the credit or background check, VAWA victims. |
| 8. Verification |
| a. Income, assets, student status, age, Social Security number, all criteria indicated in the TSP (credit check, landlord verification), etc. |
| 9. Leases |
| a. LIHTC program does not have a specific required lease. |
| b. Management and all adult household members must sign and date the lease on or before the effective date. |
| c. Tax credit developments must use a tax credit lease addendum. Properties may use the sample addendum found on IHDA's website. |
| Developments must ensure that the VAWA Addendum is attached to the Lease Agreement. |
d. The security deposit requirements, if any, vary. Discuss with the property to determine their deposit policy. Review the policy & compare to actual practice in place.
If a third party has paid the deposit on behalf of the tenant, the deposit amount must still be listed on the lease.
| e. Answer question. |
| 10. Inspections |
| a. The inspection must be jointly conducted prior to occupancy. |
| b. DSS inspections must be conducted at least once every 12 months. Annual inspection forms may be filed separately from the tenant file. Management must be able to document and provide evidence of completion of annual inspections. |
| 11. Certification / Recertification Activities |
| a. Verify dates the TICs & leases were signed, that income & assets, student status, etc. were verified prior to the effective date. Refer to 4350.3 Appendix 3 for items to be verified and acceptable verification methods. |
Include in Remarks section if rents exceed maximum rent level, missing or incorrect information on 50058 or TST-3 (TIC) forms.
100% LIHTC projects are not required to complete an annual recertification, unless combined with another program that has recertification requirements (i.e. Section 8). The recertification is for the applicable program, not for LIHTC. Student screening must still be completed every year.
Less than 100% LIHTC projects must complete a recertification annually, effective on the anniversary date of move-in.
b. The move-in certification and current three years must be retained in the active tenant file. Older years may be stored in an archived file, but must be made available at the auditor's request.
| d-e. Remark and make a finding if any income / limits / UAs are incorrect. |
| 12. Move-Out File Review |
| a. Documentation includes move-out notice (file should be documented if no notice was provided), move-out inspection, security deposit disposition letter (move-out statement), a copy of the refund check, if applicable. |
| 13. Applicant Rejection Review |
| a. Rejection letter must state the reason for the rejection, and advise applicants that the rejection may be appealed within 14 days. |
| b. Any appeal must be heard by someone other than the person who made the rejection decision. |
TSP Checklist - Other
| Illinois Housing Development Authority | Development Name: |
| Asset Management | IHDA Numbers: |
| Tenant Selection Plan (TSP) Checklist | Date of Review: |
| Other Programs (Non-Section 8) | Reviewed by: |
| FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY | Review TSP to ensure all topics are included and filled out accurately | ||||
| IHDA Required TSP Topics | References | Is it included? | Comments | ||
| 4350.3 Rev 1; IHDA LIHTC Manual; IHDA TSP Exhibits & Addendums; Notices; Memorandums | Yes | No | N/A | What is missing, not completed or incorrect (include page #)? What date was it corrected? | |
| I. Introduction | |||||
| A. Development Description | |||||
| B. Tenant Type | 3-2 | ||||
| C. Unit Distribution | 3-2 | ||||
| D. Rent Structure: Is current Rent Schedule attached? | 3-2; TSP Exhibit A | ||||
| E. Civil Rights and Non Discrimination Requirements | 4-4 | ||||
| 1-4. General, Fair Housing, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Age Discrimination Act of 1975. | April 4, 2016 HUD Application of Fair Housing to use of Criminal Records | ||||
| 5. Section 504 (applies to Federal Programs) | Section 504 HUD FAQ | ||||
| 6. Equal Access to Housing in HUD Programs Regardless of Sexual Orientation and/or Gender Identity (applies to Federal Programs) | HUD Notice 2015-01 for Federal Programs Equal Access to Housing | ||||
| 7. Executive Order 13166-Limited English Proficiency (applies to Federal Programs) | Executive Order 13166 | ||||
| 8. VAWA (applies to HOME and LIHTC) | VAWA 2005, & VAWA Reauthorizations in 2013 and 2019 | ||||
| * Military Status: It is illegal in Chicago to discriminate against veterans, active duty military personnel, members of the reserve and members of the National Guard. | 2016 Chicago Military Status Discrimination | ||||
| * Cook County Just Housing Amendment: Cannot consider criminal history more than 3 years old, cannot deny a housing application based on juvenile or adult arrest records & requires landlords perform an individualized assessment prior to denying housing application. | 1/1/2020 Just Housing Amendment Cook County | ||||
| II. Preferences | 4-1; 4-6 | ||||
| A. Establishing Preferences | 4-4; 4-6 | ||||
| 1. Existing Tenant Preferences (unit transfers) | 4-4,; Is TSP Exhibit B attached? | ||||
| 2. State Mandated Preferences (required on all IHDA properties) | 4-6 | ||||
| 3. Optional Preferences | 4-6, 4-26 List: | ||||
| a.ii. If property has SRN or Section 811, this preference must be selected. | |||||
| d. If the LIHTC property applied with the IHDA 2020-2021 QAP, Veterans preference must be selected. | IHDA 2020-2021 LIHTC QAP | ||||
| e. If there are multiple income limits at property, Existing Tenant Transfers must be selected. | |||||
| B. Verification of Preferences | 4-26; TSP Exhibit C | ||||
| C. Selection of Families for Program Participation based upon Preference | 4-15 | ||||
| D. When a Preference is Denied | 4-9; TSP Exhibit D | ||||
| E. Exceptions to the Preference Rule | 4-6 | ||||
| III. Pre-Application Card Processing | 4-3 | ||||
| A. Distribution of Pre-App or Pre-App Cards | TSP Exhibits E, F & G | ||||
| B. Processing Pre-Apps or Pre-App Cards | 4-14, 4-15 | ||||
| IV. Waiting List Procedures | 4-16 | ||||
| A. Creation of Waiting List | 4-16; TSP Exhibit H | ||||
| B. Changes to Income or Household Composition | 4-18 | ||||
| C. Contacting Persons on the Waiting List | 4-24 | ||||
| D. Updating the Waiting List | 4-19, 4-20, 4-21, 4-22; TSP Exhibit I, J & K | ||||
| E. Closing and Re-opening the Waiting List | 4-16 | ||||
| V. The (Interview) Screening Process | 4-7, 4-24 | ||||
| A. Application Requirements/Move In Screening | 4-7 | ||||
| B. Home Visits | 4-7, 4-27; TSP Exhibit L | ||||
| C. Completion of Application Process | |||||
| VI. Eligibility Requirements | 4-4 | ||||
| A. Income | 4-4 | ||||
| B. Date of Birth | 4-4 | ||||
| C. Social Security Number | 4-4; TSP Addendum 2 | ||||
| D. Student Eligibility Requirements-Federal Tax Credits - LIHTC | IHDA LIHTC Manual; TST-6 Form, Certification of Student Eligibility | ||||
| E. Student Eligibility Requirements-applies to HOME and is same rule as Section 8 | HUD Summary of 2013 HOME Final Rule 8/23/2013; IHDA Annual Student Certification HOME Program Form | ||||
| VII. Occupancy Standards | 3-23; 4-4; 4-19 | ||||
| VIII. Security Deposits (If applicable) | 6-2 | ||||
| IX. Rejection Criteria | 4-1, 4-9 | ||||
| A. Insufficient/Inaccurate Information on Application | 4-9; TSP Exhibit M | ||||
| B. Credit and Financial Standing | 4-27 | ||||
| C. Criminal Convictions/Current Drug Use | 4-7; 4-27 | ||||
| 1.a. 2014 HUD Memorandum: Use of Marijuana in Multifamily Assisted Properties. Medical Marijuana is illegal per Federal Gvmt. | 2014 HUD Use of Marijuana in Multifamily Assisted Properties | ||||
| * HUD Office of General Counsel Guidance on Application of Fair Housing Act Standards to the Use of Criminal Records by Providers of Housing. | April 4, 2016 HUD Application of Fair Housing Standards to the Use of Criminal Records | ||||
| * Cook County Just Housing Amendment: Cannot consider criminal history more than 3 years old, cannot deny a housing application based on juvenile or adult arrest records & requires landlords perform an individualized assessment prior to denying housing application. | 1/1/2020 Just Housing Amendment Cook County | ||||
| D. Household Characteristics | 4-4 | ||||
| E. Unsanitary Housekeeping | 4-27 | ||||
| F. Exception to Rejection Criteria -extenuating circumstances | 4-28 | ||||
| 1. Applicants with disabilities-mgt must consider reasonable accommodations | 4-29, 4-30 | ||||
| 2. HUD Guidance on use of arrest records | April 4, 2016 HUD Application of Fair Housing Act Standards to the Use of Criminal Records | ||||
| X. Rejection Procedures | 4-9 | ||||
| A. Written Notification | 4-9; Exhibit M | ||||
| B. Review of Rejected Applications (Right to appeal process) | 4-9 | ||||
| XI. Special Occupancy Categories (give priority to applicant with disabilities for an accessible unit) | 2-3; 4-4 | ||||
| XII. Amending the Tenant Selection Plan | 4-4 | ||||
| XII. Certification/Signatures | Per IHDA Legal Agreements | ||||
| A. Initial-is it signed by owner and agent? | What is the date signed? | ||||
| B. Post-Initial Updates: is it signed by owner and agent? | What is the date signed? Input date signed as TSP Approved date in DMS. | ||||
| C. Are Exhibits attached? | |||||
| D. Is TSP available for applicants & tenants to review upon request? (for on-site review) | 4-4 | ||||
| Revised 4/16/2021 |
https://www.hud.gov/sites/documents/15-01HSGN.PDFhttps://www.cookcountyil.gov/content/just-housing-amendment-human-rights-ordinancehttps://www.cookcountyil.gov/content/just-housing-amendment-human-rights-ordinancehttps://www.hud.gov/sites/documents/HUD_OGCGUIDAPPFHASTANDCR.PDFhttps://www.justice.gov/crt/executive-order-13166https://www.hud.gov/program_offices/fair_housing_equal_opp/disabilities/sect504faqhttps://www.hudexchange.info/programs/home/home-final-rule/section-by-section-summary/subpart-a/https://www.hud.gov/sites/documents/HUD_OGCGUIDAPPFHASTANDCR.PDFhttps://www.hud.gov/sites/documents/HUD_OGCGUIDAPPFHASTANDCR.PDFhttps://df7qosnywqs6g.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/2020-2021-QAP-Final.pdfhttps://www.hud.gov/sites/documents/USEOFMARIJINMFASSISTPROPTY.PDFhttps://www.chicago.gov/content/dam/city/depts/cchr/AdjSupportingInfo/AdjFORMS/2016%20Adjudication%20Forms/2016MilitaryStatusDiscriminationFactSheet.pdf image1.emf image2.png image3.png image4.png
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .