AOI-3D Scans Spiral 2.pdf

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

AIR FORCE INSTALLATION AND MISSION SUPPORT CENTER

Area of Interest: Advanced Facility Asset Visibility Program Spiral 2

26 May 2022

The Air Force Civil Engineer Center (AFCEC) Asset Visibility Division, Facilities Branch (COAF) requires support to implement advanced facility asset visibility techniques in support of multiple civil engineer business processes for the AF enterprise. Specifically, the support includes facility asset visibility enterprise system architecture development, collection of sustainable reality capture 3-dimensional (SRC3D) test data at four installations, and demonstration of the system architecture with an intuitive user-interface accessing the data collected during this project.

1. There are six primary civil engineer business “use cases” anticipated to benefit from process improvements enabled by the advent of facility interior data scanned using state-of-the-art 3D scanning and photography capability. These six business use cases are as follows:

a. BOS/BMC and GSU: Enhance oversight of Base Operating Support (BOS)/Base Maintenance Contract (BMC) activities and improve administration of remote geographically separate units (GSUs).

b. Facility Condition Assessment: Accelerate facility condition assessments (FCAs) including inventory and assessment data validation and data quality improvement efforts.

c. PM/CM: Enable increased efficiency and accuracy in planning preventive maintenance (PM) and corrective maintenance (CM) actions including bill of materiel development, anomaly analysis, problem troubleshooting, and advanced maintenance activities.

d. Emergency Response: Improve pre-emergency response planning and training to aid emergency response personnel in more rapidly familiarizing themselves with existing interior conditions and constraints relevant to providing highly effective fire and emergency services.

e. Planning Charrette Report (PCR) Support: Support improved project development efforts through enhanced PCRs based on accurate data depicting current facility interior conditions that are the target of the project planning effort.

f. Real Property (RP) Existence and Completeness (E&C) Surveys or Utilization Rate (UR) (RP E&C or UR): RP assessments can realize efficiencies if E&C surveys can be validated based on facility scan data which can eliminate travel time to view facilities. UR planning can be accomplished more efficiently using detailed interior data provided by 3D scans, and leadership decision presentations can be substantiated by compelling imagery showing actual conditions.

2. One of these business use cases will be the focus at each of the listed installations for purposes of this Spiral 2 project as listed in Table 1 below. This does not preclude any installation from proceeding on their own initiative to adopt 3D scan data into additional business use cases. The focus of this effort will be to cooperate with the designated installation civil engineer units to demonstrate the potential of the advanced facility asset visibility in the identified use case.

Table 1:

Business Use Case Primary Installation Facility Condition Assessment Altus AFB, OK Pre-Emergency Planning Patrick AFB, FL Planning Charrette Report Support Luke AFB, AZ RP Existence & Completeness or Utilization Rate Robins AFB, GA

3. Facility Asset Visibility Enterprise System Architecture Development: It is anticipated that at full implementation the enterprise architecture must be capable of supporting the scan and photography data needed to document approximately 82,000 unique facilities representing 600 million square feet and located at more than 100 installations around the world. The following information and requirements apply to the proposed system.

a. The proposed system must achieve/operate at Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) Impact Level (IL) 4 which is the data security standard applicable to data transfer in and out of storage and to the entire set of civil engineer business processes.

b. The proposed system must conform to the requirements of the AFIMSC Installation & Mission Support Geospatial Interoperability Reference Architecture (GIRA), latest version.

c. The proposed facility asset visibility system architecture must be capable of operating on the current and future AFNET architecture.

d. The proposed system architecture must be capable of beginning with limited data but capable of easily expanding to accommodate increased quantities of data as it is captured.

e. The proposed system architecture must be capable of obtaining an Authority to Operate on the AFNET and being listed on the AF Evaluated Products List

(EPL).

f. A system context diagram has been prepared to describe the proposed system’s operational context at the installation level. See attachment 1

g. A primary business use case context diagram has been developed in support of this primary Spiral 2 objective. See attachment 2.

h. An Interface Features Scope Tree Summary Diagram depicting the Operational User interface top level feature requirements has been included at Attachment 3, and an Interface Features Scope Tree Summary Diagram - Expanded Overview (three diagrams) has been included at Attachment 4.

i. The Typical End User and Technical End User Use Case Diagrams are included at Attachment 5. These illustrate the required capabilities of the user interface in a graphical format.

j. User access to the proposed system must be roles-based with a minimum of two roles: “Typical End User” and “Technical End User.” Anticipated user activities for these two user classes are portrayed graphically at Attachment 5. Additional or revised roles may be proposed for consideration and implementation.

k. User interface must be intuitive and streamlined.

l. Submittal requirements: For direct installation support, the Contractor shall submit as a minimum:

i. User training outline with identified goals and objectives at least one week prior to each training event

ii. Completed scan files upon completion of scanning and post-production processing work for each installation

iii. Recommended Enterprise Architecture diagrams with supporting details and estimates initially at three months after period of performance (POP) start date, with revisions at six months after POP start, 9 months after POP start, and final submittal on or prior to POP end date.

m. Other Submittals: Contractor shall identify proposed submittals and due dates (in addition to the minimum submittals) in their proposed technical approach project plan.

4. The Contractor shall capture 3D scans at the installations with the number of facilities and amount of square feet listed in Table 2 shown in Attachment 6.

a. The Contractor shall provide a complete interactive 3D model of designated facilities using Contractor-owned equipment. The purpose of this data collection is to provide a large data sample for use as each installation’s training platform initially for the designated business use cases, while using currently available advanced technology. This Spiral 2 solution is intended to demonstrate the proposed standardized approach (developed in Spiral 1) for capturing 3D Facility Interior Scans and presenting models for enterprise business use case implementation.

b. The Contractor shall acquire, edit, and provide 360-degree photographs, point-clouds, and 3D models of facilities.

5. The Contractor’s recommended facility 3D modeling solution and deliverables shall meet or exceed the following requirements:

a. Hardware: (No actual hardware to be provided in this effort.)

i. Provide recommended hardware solutions that are intuitive and easy to use.

ii. Provide modest-resolution acquisition (to meet the majority of end-use cases, with modelled accuracies to within 1% of actual measurements)

iii. Provide high-resolution acquisition (to meet the remaining end-use cases, with modelled accuracies to within 0.1% of actual measurements)

iv. Provide models to-scale to allow for measurements and condition assessments

v. Provide ability to capture model data in low light and inclement weather conditions

vi. Generate spatial modelling on site with no internet connectivity

vii. Incorporate photogrammetry, structured light, LIDAR and/or new emerging technology whenever feasible

b. Interface and Software (No actual software to be provided in this effort.)

i. Recommend interface and software solutions that are intuitive and easy to use that include redaction and export functions

ii. Recommend interface and software that is accessible on the U.S. Air Force network (as applicable).

iii. Recommend interface and software solution that enables viewing 360-degree photographs stored on local and network drives in a way that requires no install for individual users

c. Training

i. Provide training to Government personnel at each of the four locations on hardware and software operations during Spiral 2 effort on how to operate in the proposed system

d. Integration:

i. Recommend how to integrate the provided Hardware, Interface and Software, and Training solution

ii. Deliver scanned 3D models for each location in single standardized solution that is accessible on U.S. Air Force network

iii. Recommend best path and method to incorporate software/application solutions to the U.S. Air Force network

iv. Compare and contrast the best path and data acquisition method (consider an in-house vs contractor approach) at AF Enterprise scale

v. Determine feasibility of integration and output into existing sustainment management/ authoritative system(s) for storing and viewing captured data

vi. Build and deliver repeatable and sustainable process for internal Government personnel to create and use 3D models at all U.S. Air Force installations

vii. Provide data and 3D model information in accordance with current data standards at time of capture/rendering

viii. Follow all prescribed data standards

6. The Contractor shall demonstrate the possible business use case improvements for each use case at the installations designated to test improvements for their respective use case as listed in Table 1 above. This must include a demonstration conducted at each installation for an audience of installation personnel stakeholders. Contractor will provide a final detailed written report that at minimum outlines the solution for each business use case, the outcome of the demonstration at each base and any improvements or recommendations to improve each business use case for implementation on a larger scale.

Attachment 1

System Context Diagram

Attachment 2

Business Primary Use Case Diagram

Attachment 3

Interface Features Scope Tree Summary Diagram

Attachment 4

Interface Features Scope Tree Summary Diagram - Expanded Overview

Attachment 4 (continued)

Attachment 4 (continued)

Attachment 5

Typical and Technical End User Use Case Diagrams

Typical End User:

Attachment 5 (continued)

Technical End User:

Attachment 6

Installation Scan Workload Estimates

1. Table 2: Installation 3D Scan Workload Estimate

Installation Number of Facilities Facilities SF Totals Altus AFB, OK 24 1,000,046 Luke AFB, AZ 44 1,007,855 Robins AFB, GA 3 1,005,356 Patrick AFB, FL 4 539,142 Totals Total TBD Total TBD

2. Altus AFB, OK

Facility Name Facility Number

Facility

RPUID

Facilities

SF

Wing HQ 1 384920 15,147 Consolidated Support Facility 52 381705 67,275 HQ Group-Training Squadron 87 384519 101,514 Flight Sim Training 88 384520 15,540 Flight Sim Training 89 384521 43,615 Bowling Center 106 384959 16,781 SP Operations (Security Forces) 130 386382 12,880 Base Gym 156 386459 49,353 KC-46 Flight Trainer Facility 174 1307830 9,118 KC-46 Fuselage Trainer 181 1307803 10,591 HQ Group-54 ARS/56th/MX 193 383532 45,460 Comm Facility 215 383574 9,947 Weapons Systems Management Flight (MX) 228 383579 30,117 Fire Crash Rescue Station 267 383583 16,023 Large Maintenance Aircraft Dock(Hanger) 285 383590 126,254 Chapel 301 384445 13,042 CE Power Pro shop 346 385867 5,098 Base Engineer Admin (Main CE Bldg) 358 919852 128,737 Disaster Prep(Readiness Warehouse) 360 385876 6,381 Pavements and Ground Facility (Dirt Boys) 370 385881 9,183 Warehouse Supply & Equipment Base 394 381620 121,614 Base Supply Admin 395 381621 20,568 Maintenance Dock (Hanger) 514 381701 26,588 Aircraft Corrosion Control Hanger 517 381702 99,220 Totals 1,000,046

3. Luke AFB, AZ

Number

Facility

RPUID

Facilities

SF

HQ WG 11 472914 10,583

CONTRACTING 26 470072 14,527

OPEN MESS, NCO 161 469789 29,062

H/SHP, AUTOMOTIVE 235 469839 8,000

VEH MAINT SHP 291 470084 26,792

SHP A/SE STOR FCLT 404 470434 19,943

MAINT DOCK, S/A 408 470438 24,900

TNG AID SHP 415 470443 31,797

TNG AID SHP 417 470445 35,449

FR STN 450 470459 20,816

HQ WG 452 470813 12,785

OPS, BSE 453 470814 17,498

SQUAD OPERATIONS 471 1201412 23,268

SHP A/M ORGL 482 470829 10,221

MAINT DOCK, S/A 485 470830 32,250

FLY TNG CLASSROOM 500 471073 18,781

DH, AMN(DET) 545 471091 26,075

AIR CONTIONING PLANT BUILDING 547 471093 9,288

CHAPEL CEN 799 472368 14,780

SQ OPS 859 472389 14,207

MAINT DOCK, S/A 913 473062 46,802

MAINT DOCK, S/A 914 473063 44,170

MAINT DOCK, S/A 915 473064 38,469

ACFT COR CON 922 473620 20,508

SHP JET ENG I/MNT 930 473628 43,575

SHP JET ENG I/MNT 931 473629 42,953

FLD TNG FCLTY 936 473633 23,853

FLY TNG CLASSROOM 938 473635 24,642

SHP, AVIONICS 959 473656 28,951

SHP ACFT GEN PURP 995 468982 14,149

HQ GROUP 997 468984 12,010

MAINT DOCK, S/A 1022 471700 35,015

SATELLITE FIRE STATION 1029 472656 3,146

YOUTH CEN 1143 472949 29,776

BASE PERSONNEL OFC 1150 472953 126,585

SHP CONVL MUN 1236 473943 9,509

VEH MAINT SHP 1390 469207 10,959

TECH TNG CLASSROOM 1384 469202 13,305

ADMIN OFC, NON-AF 22 437835 13,752

MED AID STATION 41 438141 1,920

Number

Facility

RPUID

Facilities

SF

FR STN 314 730142 11,984

BE MAINT SHP 2007 437825 2,800

BE MAINT SHP 2008 437826 8,000

HQ GROUP 3096 438107 1,601

Totals 1,007,855

4. Robins AFB, GA

Number

Facility

RPUID

Facilities

SF

MULTI-USE ADMIN FACILITY 300 514946 412,134

MULTI-USE ADMIN FACILITY 301 514947 409,908

BASE SUPPLY ADMIN/WAREHOUSE 255 513911 183,314

Totals 1,005,356

5. Patrick AFB, FL

Number

Facility

RPUID

Facilities

SF

DEOMI 352 500366 92,175

Multiple Units 313 500688 170,751 HQ Group 425 500939 109,922 HQ Wing 423 500937 166,294 Totals 539,142