Amendment 2 PM DCSC-23-RFP-0166.pdf

PDF 234 KB Posted

Attached to
DC Courts Program Management Services
Solicitation number
Not on record
Issued by

About this file

This document is an amendment to a request for proposals for program management services for the District of Columbia Courts. Key details include:

  • The amendment provides responses to questions posed by potential offerors and extends the proposal submission deadline to October 30, 2023 between 10-12 PM Eastern Standard Time. Experience of key personnel may be submitted in lieu of corporate experience but will not be weighted equally. Contractor performance assessment reports are acceptable substitutes for past performance questionnaires.

  • The services required include program management for capital project facilities management. Offerors must provide a minimum of five past performance examples within the last ten years involving similar work. Construction managers must have a minimum of fifteen years of relevant experience. Questions will be answered individually as received rather than in batched responses.

  • The District of Columbia Courts is the agency issuing this special notice opportunity. No solicitation number was provided in the attached federal contract opportunity description.

  • This amendment provides clarification on an existing request for proposals and does not constitute a new solicitation.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Amendment 4 PM DCSC-23-RFP-0166.pdf PDF
Amendment 3 PM DCSC-23-RFP-0166.pdf PDF
Amendment 1 PM DCSC-23-RFP-0166.pdf PDF
Pre Bid Meeting for PgM Services Contract presentation.pdf PDF
Sign in.pdf PDF
Attachment J.18 Courts Preliminary FCA_d.pdf PDF
Attachment J.3 - Ethics in Public Contracting.pdf PDF
Attachment J.1 DC Courts GENERAL-PROVISIONS_2017 rev0517.pdf PDF
Attachment J.2 - Anti-Collusion Statement.pdf PDF
Attachment J.10.A Pricing Breakdown Sheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment J.7 Cert Regarding Drug Free Workplace.pdf PDF
Attachment J.5 Certificate of Eligibility.pdf PDF
Attachment J.19 CPFMD Invoice Verification Form.pdf PDF
Attachment J.9- Supplier Information Form DCCSF.pdf PDF
Attachment J.20 BioData Template.pdf PDF
Attachment J.8 Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf PDF
Attachment J.13.A Cable & Management Procedures Manual.pdf PDF
Attachment J.6 Tax Certification Affidavit.pdf PDF
Attachment J.14 Strategic Plan of the DC Courts 2023-2027.pdf PDF
Attachment J.11 CPFMD Org Chart.pdf PDF
Attachment J.13 DC Courts Design Standards_c.pdf PDF
Attachment J.17 CPFMD Integrated Program Schedule (CPFMD IPS).pdf PDF
Attachment J.12 District of Columbia Courts Facilities Master Plan 2019.pdf PDF
Attachment J.15 The Judiciary Square Master Plan – Washington, D.C. dated 4 March 2005.pdf PDF
Attachment J.11A Courts Org Chart.pdf PDF
1 Solicitation-_PgM_services_ DCSC-23-RFP-0166.pdf PDF
Attachment J.4 - Non-Discrimination.pdf PDF
Attachment J.16 CPFMD DBB Division 01—General Requirements specification.pdf PDF
Attachment J.10 Contractors Price Schedule.pdf PDF
Attachment J.13.A Cable Management Manual.pdf PDF
Show all 30

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Administrative Services Division Phone: 202.879.0476 Office of the Administrative Officer Fax: 202.879.7575

E-mail: Geofrey.Mack@dcsc.gov

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURTS

Administrative Services Division

Office: Gallery Place

616 H Street NW, 6th Floor Washington, DC 20001

Mailing Address: 500 Indiana Avenue NW

Washington, DC 20001-2131

AMENDMENT NO. 0002

TO: ALL PROSPECTIVE CONTRACTORS

AMENDMENT

ISSUE DATE: September 29, 2023

SUBJECT: Solicitation No. DCSC-23-IFB-0166

DC Courts PgM Services

PROPOSAL

SUBMISSION

DATE: October 30, 2023 by 10:00 AM -12:00 PM

Eastern Standard Time

Questions and Answers Round 1-

1) Please see Attachment- A to this Amendment 0001 – “Responses to Questions

Posed by Potential Offerors”.

ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS REMAIN UNCHANGED

One (1) copy of this amendment is being sent to all prospective Offeror’s. The prospective Offeror shall sign below and attach a signed copy of this amendment to each proposal to be submitted to the Courts in response to the subject solicitation or otherwise acknowledge this amendment with the signed offer as stated in the original solicitation documents.

Proposals shall be delivered in accordance with the instructions provided in the original solicitation documents.

Geoffrey A. Mack

Geoffrey Mack

Contracting Officer

Acknowledgement of this Amendment, together with the Offeror’s proposal, must be received by the District of Columbia Courts as stated in the solicitation no later than the closing date and time specified above for the receipt of proposals.

Cheryl R. Bailey, Ph.D.

Acting Executive Officer

Herbert Rouson, Jr., J.D.

Acting Deputy Executive Officer

Geoffrey A. Mack Acting Administrative Officer

Attachment A

Failure by the Offeror to properly acknowledge receipt of this Amendment Number 0002 may be cause for rejection of the proposal submitted by the Offeror in response to the subject solicitation.

This Amendment Number 002 is acknowledged and is considered a part of the proposal for Solicitation Number– Solicitation No. DCSC-23-RFP-0166 DC Courts PgM Services

Signature of Authorized Representative Date

Name of Authorized Representative

Title of Authorized Representative

Name of Offeror

Attachment A

From: Flor Rivera Q & A Round: 2

Program: Capital Project Facilities Management Division Date:

Email: maria.rivera@dccsystem.com Pages: 1 cc: Judith.Hill@dccsystem.gov DC Courts cc:

This Document includes the following:

- Solicitation Questions & Answers Round: 02

1. L.22.3 states offerors are to “provide a minimum of five (5) program past performance examples the offeror has been involved in within the last ten (10) years.” As a business, we are a new entity with very limited past performance, but the business consists of a team of individuals with extensive experience in this field. With that said, in lieu of corporate experience will you accept the experience of key personnel within the organization, and will that experience be given equal weight? Experience of key personnel will be acceptable, however will not be given equal weight.

2. Can a Contractor Performance Assessment Report (CPAR) substitute for a PPQ?

Yes

3. On page 34, section F5.3.3, the RFP states that Construction Managers are required to have a MINIMUM of 15 years of experience, would DC Courts consider accepting a PgMO Construction Manager with 10 years of experience? No

4. Are questions for this contract going to be answered as they come in, or will they be sent out all at once? They will be answered as they come in.

mailto:Kenneth.Evans@dccsystem.gov

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .