AMENDMENT_1.pdf

AMENDMENT 1: AG-24H8-S-17-0017

FR262 STA 215+65 AOP Culvert Replacement

SOLICITATION: AG-24H8-S-17-0017

The below information and attachments are hereby incorporated into this solicitation:

Q&A:

1. QUESTION: Can we substitute current PADOT Approved Superpave mix designs for approval. At least this supplier, no longer produces the FB-1. It’s no longer used by

PADOT.

RESPONSE: Superpave – we should use the current Penndot Superpave design mix and specifications for asphalt paving.

Geotech Report:

Two additional documents are attached as follows:

1. FS Longhouse Memo PA.pdf – this is the soils report for all the culverts along Longhouse scenic drive. The ones pertinent to this project are B-1, B-8 and B-9.

2. FR 262 control.pdf – this is a set of drawings that indicates where the soil borings are in relation to the benchmarks that are shown on the drawings.

Additional Information:

Price Breakdown: Only the line item schedule must be submitted for pricing. A completed line item schedule is required. The completed line item schedule will be considered the price breakdown.

Bid Bonds: Are required as stated in the solicitation. Bid Bonds CANNOT be sent electronically.

Only hardcopies are acceptable. Value of bid bonds must be 20% of the total proposal price.

Performance and Payment Bonds: Required by contractor who is awarded a resulting contract.

Bonds must be for the total value of the project if awarded the contract.

PA1Call: Required.

Page 1 of 6 Pages

Form FHWA-201 (Rev. 11-67)

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION

Use this form in lieu of transmittal slips within Dept. of Trans. When message comment is to be retained as file material. Do not prepare carbons. Not to be used in lieu of Form FHWA- 121 for informal correspondence. MINUTE-MEMO

SUBJECT: Subsurface Exploration, FS Longhouse Scenic Byway, Allegheny National Forest, PA

TO MESSAGE/COMMENT FROM/DATE

This Memorandum represents the results or our subsurface exploration and laboratory testing for the existing embankment in FS Longhouse Scenic Byway. The memorandum addresses the subsurface conditions encountered during our drilling operations.

1.0 Project Description and Scope

The project site is located in Allegheny National Forest in Pennsylvania and contains a number of culverts. The Forest Management expressed their concerns regarding the lack of information about the existing embankment materials and the need of such information for future development.

2.0 Subsurface Exploration Procedures and Results

A subsurface exploration program was conducted by the Eastern Federal Lands Highway Division (EFLHD) Subsurface Exploration Team from November 29th through December 4th, 2016. The field work consisted of drilling nine (9) soil borings (B-1 through B-9) at locations chosen by the Forest personnel. Boring locations were determined by measuring distances from features present on-site and by a hand held GPS. The approximate location of borings is provided in Attachment A. A brief description of the field work is listed below.

2.1 Soil Borings

Soil borings were drilled using a CME 750 ATV-mounted drill rig. Borings were advanced using 3 ¾-inch hollow stem augers (HSA). Soil samples were obtained using 2 ¼-inch. (outside diameter) split-barrel (split-spoon) sampler driven during Standard Penetration Tests (SPT) in general accordance with ASTM D 1586, Standard Method of Penetration Test and Split Barrel Sampling of Soils. SPT soil samples were typically recovered at

2.5 ft intervals to a depth of 20 ft below existing site grades and at 5 ft intervals thereafter, by driving the split-spoon sampler a distance of 24 inches into the undisturbed soil under the impact of a 140-lb automatic hammer free-falling 30 inches. The number of hammer blows required to advance the split-spoon sampler the middle 12 inches of the 24-inch sample interval is designated as the “Standard Penetration Resistance” or N-value.

The number of blows required to advance the sampler through each 6-in.

interval was recorded on field boring logs. The relative consistency of each cohesive sample was estimated using a calibrated pocket Penetrometer.

Recovered soil samples were visually examined and logged. Representative SPT samples and Shelby tube samples collected in the field were delivered to EFLHD Materials Testing facility in Sevierville, TN for testing and

M. Abouzakhm

Division Geotechnical Engineer

1/24/2017

Page 2 of 2 Pages

Use this form in lieu of transmittal slips within Dept. of Trans. When message comment is to

121 for informal correspondence. ADDENDUM MEMO storage. The sampling sequence and associated samples are presented on its appropriate boring log in Attachment B. Upon completion, boreholes were backfilled with auger cuttings.

Water levels, if present, were measured at the time of completion of each boring, again prior to backfilling the borehole.

2.2 Data Summary

The results of the field tests and measurements were recorded on the driller’s logs and appropriate data sheets in the field. These data sheets and logs contain information concerning the boring methods, samples attempted and recovered, indication of the presence of various materials such as gravel, pebbles, organic matter, or other non-soil materials and for observations of groundwater. They also contain interpretations of the subsurface conditions based on the performance of the equipment and cuttings brought to the surface by the drilling tools. Therefore, the field data represents both factual and interpretative information. The boring log provided in Attachment B represents a compilation of field and laboratory data and description of the soil samples by a geotechnical engineer. These records occasionally do not include all data recorded on driller’s logs and field data sheets, but do include all information considered relevant to the preparation of this Memorandum.

Groundwater level readings were made in the boreholes at the times and under the conditions stated on the boring logs. Fluctuations in groundwater level due to seasonal variations, rainfall, temperature, and other factors not evident at the time measurements were made should be expected.

2.3 Laboratory Testing

The purpose of the testing program was to aid in classification and evaluation of the engineering properties of soils encountered at the site.

Laboratory tests assigned included Moisture Content (AASHTO T 265), Atterberg Limits (AASHTO T 89 & T 90), Particle Size Analysis (AASHTO T 88), and Organic Content (T-194). All laboratory tests were tested in EFLHD Materials Testing facility in Sevierville, TN. All tests were conducted in accordance with the corresponding AASHTO and/or ASTM standard test methods. A summary of the laboratory test results conducted on selected soil samples is presented in Table 1. The laboratory testing results data is provided in Attachment C.

Page 3 of 2 Pages

Use this form in lieu of transmittal slips within Dept. of Trans. When message comment is to

Table 1 – Summary of Soil Laboratory Test Results

Boring No.

Sample No.

Depth (ft)

MC

LL

PL

PI

Fines

Classification

(AASHTO)

B-1 J-2 3-5 15.2 32 22 10 25.0 A-2-4(0) B-1 J-5 10-12 15.5 35 22 13 31.8 A-2-6(1) B-2 J-4 8-10 38.3 B-2 J-9 20-22 15.7 28 21 7 35.4 A-2-4(0) B-3 J-3 5-7 29.4 B-3 J-10 25-27 20.1 B-4 J-6 13-15 14.3 30 21 9 26.8 A-2-4(0) B-5 J-7 15-17 27.2 B-6 J-5 10-12 26.6 B-7 J-6 13-15 17 NP NP NP 7.0 A-1-a B-8 J-8 18-20 9.3 21 16 5 26.6 A-2-4(0) B-9 J-7 15-17 21.7 28 22 6 33.4 A-2-4(0)

MC: Moisture Content; LL: Liquid Limit; PL: Plastic Limit; PI: Plasticity Index; NP: Non Plastic

A summary of filed measurements is presented in Table 2.

Table 2 – Field Measurements

Boring No.

Location Total Depth (ft)

Depth to Groundwater

(ft)

Estimated Fill

Thickness (ft)

B-1 Sta. 215+65 37.0 27.35 20.0

B-2 Sta. 287+73

“Dutchman Run”

36.8* N/A 36.8

B-3 Sta. 340+23

“Elijah Run”

32.0 N/A 32.0

B-4 Sta. 421+57

“Little Dew Drop”

29.2* N/A 29.2

B-5 Sta. 440+99

“Dew Drop”

26.0 16.4 15.0

Page 4 of 2 Pages

Use this form in lieu of transmittal slips within Dept. of Trans. When message comment is to

B-6 Sta. 567+28

“Tributary to Moad Eddy Run”

20.0 N/A 8.0

B-7 Sta. 116+65

“Mud Lick Run”

22.0 N/A 18.0

B-8 Sta. 215+65

“Pipe east of the station”

22.0 N/A 18.0

B-9 Sta. 214+96 22.0 N/A 13.0

*: Auger Refusal All depths are below existing site grades

3.0 Findings

A brief description of the soil conditions encountered during the subsurface exploration conducted at the site is presented below. The stratification lines designating the interfaces between soil types on the boring logs in Attachment B represent approximate boundaries. The transition between materials may be gradual. It should be noted that one or more of the units may be absent at specific locations.

Asphalt Pavement – Asphalt pavement thickness encountered ranged between 0.2 ft (B-6) to 0.6 ft (B-3 and B-5).

Fill – Man-placed fill material was encountered below the pavement in all of the borings. The fill consisted primarily of Clayey Gravel with sand, Clayey Sand with gravel, and Silty Clayey sand with gravel. N-values recorded within the fill layer ranged from Weight of Hammer (WHO) to 39 blows per foot (bpf), indicating very loose to dense relative densities.

Natural Deposits – Underneath the fill material, natural deposits were encountered in Borings B-1, B-5, B-6, B-7, B-8, and B-9. These deposits consisted primarily of Silty Clayey sand with gravel and Clayey Sand with gravel. N-values recorded within the fill layer ranged from 7 bpf to 50/6”, indicating loose to very dense relative densities. This layer extended to the termination depths of the soil borings.

Page 5 of 2 Pages

Use this form in lieu of transmittal slips within Dept. of Trans. When message comment is to

Organic Content – Soil samples from Borings B-5 and B-7 yielded organic content of 5.2% and 3.8%, respectively.

Groundwater – Groundwater was encountered in Borings B-1 and B-5 at depths of 27.35 ft and 16.4 ft below existing site grades, respectively.

Fluctuation in the groundwater conditions due to seasonal weather changes should be anticipated.

Enclosures:

Attachment A: Borings Location Map Attachment B: Boring Logs Attachment C: Laboratory Testing Results

Page 6 of 2 Pages

Use this form in lieu of transmittal slips within Dept. of Trans. When message comment is to

Attachment A

Borings Location Map

Page 7 of 2 Pages

Use this form in lieu of transmittal slips within Dept. of Trans. When message comment is to

Attachment B

Borings Logs

SOIL BORING GENERAL NOTES

Drilling and Sampling Symbols

SS: Split Spoon - 1 3/8” I.D., 2” O.D., except where noted ST: Shelby Tube - 2” O.D., except where noted PA: Power Auger Sample

Water levels indicated on the boring logs are the levels measured in the boring at the times indicated. In pervious soils, the indicated elevations are considered reliable ground water levels. In impervious soils, the accurate determination of ground water elevations is not possible, even after several days, and additional evidence on ground water elevations must be sought.

VISUAL METHODS FOR SOILS CLASSIFICATION

Component Distinguishing Features

Boulders Larger than 12” (300 mm)

Cobbles 3” to 12” (75 mm to 12 mm)

Gravel Larger than No. 4 sieve and smaller than a 3” sieve, described with any of the following terms (or any combination):

Coarse 3” to 3/4” (75 mm to 19 mm) sieve Medium 3/4” to 3/8” (19 mm to 9.5 mm) sieve Fine 3/8” to No. 4 (9.5 mm to 4.75 mm) sieve

Sand The finest sand grains are just visible to the naked eye, while the largest would pass a No. 4

(4.75mm) sieve (pinhead size). Described with any of the following terms (or any combination):

Coarse No. 4 to No. 10 (4.75 mm to 2.0 mm) sieve Medium No. 10 to No. 40 (2.0 mm to 0.42 mm) sieve Fine No. 40 to No. 200 (0.42 mm to 0.075 mm) sieve

Silt 1. Lumps are easily crumbled when are-dried.

2. Feels gritty between the teeth.

3. A moist pat when shaken in the palm of the hand will appear shiny and wet. When squeezed it will appear dry and dull.

Clay 1. Lumps are comparatively hard when air-dried.

2. Threads (1/8” diameter) of considerable length will support their own weight when held by one end.

3. A moist pat will appear the same whether shaken in the palm of the hand or squeezed.

Order of Description

1. Soil Density (or consistency) – see table below

2. Color

3. Major Grain Size – Composes more than 50% of the sample

4. Modifying Term – “and” : 40% to 50% of the minor grain size

“some” : 30% to 40% “little” : 10% to 30%

“trace” : 10% or less

5. Minor Grain Size(s)

6. Other (plasticity, etc.)

7. Moisture Content (by field test) – “dry” : Absence of moisture, dusty, dry to the touch “moist” : Damp but no visible water

“wet” : Visible free water, usually soil is below water table

8. General Classification – Fill, Residual Soil, Weathered Rock

SOIL DENSITY (OR CONSISTENCY) TABLE

Coarse-Grained Soil (Gravel, Sand) Fine-Grained Soil (Clay, Silt)

Apparent Density SPT (# blows / ft) Consistency SPT (# blows / ft) Very loose 0-4 Very soft 0-2

Loose 5-10 Soft 3-4 Medium dense 11-30 Medium stiff 5-8

Dense 31-50 Stiff 9-15 Very dense >50 Very stiff 16-30

Hard >30

Examples:

1. Dense to very dense, brown to light brown, SILTY SAND, some gravel [A-7-6(10)]

(Moist)

-FILL-

Criteria for Describing Soil Structure

Description Criteria

Bed A sedimentary layer bounded by depositional surfaces.

Blocky A characteristic in which cohesive soil can be broken down into small angular lumps which resist further breakdown.

Bonded Attached or adhering.

Fissured Broken along definite planes of fracture.

Foliated Planar arrangement of textural or structural features.

Frequent More than one per foot of thickness.

Homogeneous Same color and appearance throughout.

Interbedded Alternating soil layers of different composition.

Laminae A very thin cohesive layer.

Layer A general term for material lying essentially parallel to the surfaces against which it was formed.

Lens A lenticular deposit, larger than a pocket.

Occasional One or less per foot of thickness.

Parting A very thin granular layer.

Pocket Small erratic deposits less than 12” in thickness.

Seam A thin layer separating two distinctive layers of different composition or greater magnitude.

Stratified Alternating layers of varying material or color.

Stratum A stratigraphic unit.

Varve A cyclic sedimentary couplet consisting of a coarser and a finer layer representing the variation in depositional energy resulting from the annual freeze-thaw cycle typically found in glaciolacustrine environments.

J-1

J-2

J-3

J-4

J-5

J-6

J-7

J-8

J-9

J-10

0.4

10.0

20.0

0.7

1.3

1.0

1.0

1.3

0.9

1.0

1.0

1.3

0.4 Asphalt Pavement, no base course was observed

Gray and tan, very loose to loose Clayey Gravel with sand Moist [A-2-4(0)]

-FILL-

Tan and gray, very loose to medium dense Clayey Sand with gravel Moist [A-2-6(1)]

-FILL-

Gray, hard, Shale

3-4-2-4

1-1-2-2

1-2-3-2

1-2-2-3

0-1-2-5

1-3-6-24

1-10-10-13

NR

0-13-18-24

19-41-50/6"

Standard Penetration Test Data

Boring Began:

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION

EASTERN FEDERAL LANDS HIGHWAY DIVISION

Inspector:

MATERIAL DESCRIPTION

Boring No.:

Groundwater Depth:

At Completion:

Completed:

Hole Diameter:

Boring Method:

Rock Core Diam:

Vane Shear

30 in.

140 lbs/AutomaticHammer Wt. & Type:

Encountered at:

After

Northing: 4630620.2 Easting: 672428.1

Caved at:

Hammer Drop:

Project Name:

N o.

FS Longhouse Scenic Byway, PA Project Datum:

(Blows / ft)

1493.0 ft

Undisturbed (UD)

11/29/16

R ec ft)

Water Content %

Project Location: Boring Location:

La ye r D ep th

(f t)

Ty pe

Weather:

SAMPLE

S P

T B lo w s pe r 6 in

. Plastic Limit

Boring was backfilled with drilling cuttings upon completion NR: No Recovery

Liquid Limit

SPT

U. S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Penetrometer (PP in tsf) Rock Core (RQD in %)

Surface Elevation:

27.4 ft

Sample Types:

BORING LOG

11/29/16 M. Elias

D. HutchinsOperator:

Sta. 215+65 hrs

29.0 ft

Remarks:

Auger Cuttings

G ra ph ic

L og

Allegheny National Forest

Density, Color, Plasticity, Size, Proportions, Moisture

D ep th S ca le

(f t)

E le va tio n (fe et

HSA

B-1

P P

3.75 in.

B O

R

IN

G L

O G

1/

/1

:4

- H

:\S O

IL

S

\P R

O S

P E

C

TI

V E

P R

O

JE

C

TS

\F S

L

IG

H

TH

O U

S E

D R

P A

-2

3-

\B

O R

IN

G

L O

G S

\M A

-2

4-

\F

S L

IG

H

TH

O

U S

E D

R P

A .G

P J

1492.6

1483.0

1473.0

Sheet: 1 of 2

12"

J-11

J-12

37.0

1.6

1.8

Gray, hard, Shale (Continued)

Boring was terminated @ 37.0 ft

14-25-36-50/5"

9-27-36-49

Standard Penetration Test Data

Boring Began:

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION

EASTERN FEDERAL LANDS HIGHWAY DIVISION

Inspector:

MATERIAL DESCRIPTION

Boring No.:

Groundwater Depth:

At Completion:

Completed:

Hole Diameter:

Boring Method:

Rock Core Diam:

Vane Shear

30 in.

140 lbs/AutomaticHammer Wt. & Type:

Encountered at:

After

Northing: 4630620.2 Easting: 672428.1

Caved at:

Hammer Drop:

Project Name:

N o.

FS Longhouse Scenic Byway, PA Project Datum:

(Blows / ft)

1493.0 ft

Undisturbed (UD)

11/29/16

R ec ft)

Water Content %

Project Location: Boring Location:

La ye r D ep th

(f t)

Ty pe

Weather:

SAMPLE

S P

T B lo w s pe r 6 in

. Plastic Limit

Boring was backfilled with drilling cuttings upon completion NR: No Recovery

Liquid Limit

SPT

U. S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Penetrometer (PP in tsf) Rock Core (RQD in %)

Surface Elevation:

27.4 ft

Sample Types:

BORING LOG

11/29/16 M. Elias

D. HutchinsOperator:

Sta. 215+65 hrs

29.0 ft

Remarks:

Auger Cuttings

G ra ph ic

L og

Allegheny National Forest

Density, Color, Plasticity, Size, Proportions, Moisture

D ep th S ca le

(f t)

E le va tio n (fe et

HSA

B-1

P P

3.75 in.

B O

R

IN

G L

O G

1/

/1

:4

- H

:\S O

IL

S

\P R

O S

P E

C

TI

V E

P R

O

JE

C

TS

\F S

L

IG

H

TH

O U

S E

D R

P A

-2

3-

\B

O R

IN

G

L O

G S

\M A

-2

4-

\F

S L

IG

H

TH

O

U S

E D

R P

A .G

P J

1456.0

Sheet: 2 of 2

J-3

J-4

J-5

J-6

J-7

J-8

J-9

J-10

0.4

1.5

0.9

1.4

1.7

1.4

1.0

1.4

1.0

1.7

0.5

1.5

1.5

2.5

0.4 Asphalt Pavement, no base course was observed

Gray and tan, loose to medium dense,Silty Clayey Sand with gravel Moist

-FILL-

[A-2-4(0)]

5-6-7-9

3-5-3-3

2-4-4-6

9-6-7-7

3-5-5-3

2-5-4-4

1-6-9-6

5-6-5-7

2-8-4-6

2-2-3-4

Standard Penetration Test Data

Boring Began:

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION

EASTERN FEDERAL LANDS HIGHWAY DIVISION

Inspector:

MATERIAL DESCRIPTION

Boring No.:

Groundwater Depth:

At Completion:

Completed:

Hole Diameter:

Boring Method:

Rock Core Diam:

Vane Shear

30 in.

140 lbs/AutomaticHammer Wt. & Type:

Encountered at:

After

Northing: 4630654.6 Easting: 671480.5

Caved at:

Hammer Drop:

Project Name:

N o.

FS Longhouse Scenic Byway, PA Project Datum:

(Blows / ft)

1407.0 ft

Undisturbed (UD)

11/30/16

R ec ft)

Water Content %

Project Location: Boring Location:

La ye r D ep th

(f t)

Ty pe

Weather:

SAMPLE

S P

T B lo w s pe r 6 in

. Plastic Limit

No groundwater was encountered during the drilling operation Boring was backfilled with drilling cuttings upon completion

Liquid Limit

SPT

U. S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Penetrometer (PP in tsf) Rock Core (RQD in %)

Surface Elevation:

Sample Types:

BORING LOG

11/30/16 M. Elias

D. HutchinsOperator:

Sta. 287+73 "Dutch Man Run" hrs

Remarks:

Auger Cuttings

G ra ph ic

L og

Allegheny National Forest

Density, Color, Plasticity, Size, Proportions, Moisture

D ep th S ca le

(f t)

E le va tio n (fe et

HSA

B-2

P P

3.75 in.

B O

R

IN

G L

O G

1/

/1

:4

- H

:\S O

IL

S

\P R

O S

P E

C

TI

V E

P R

O

JE

C

TS

\F S

L

IG

H

TH

O U

S E

D R

P A

-2

3-

\B

O R

IN

G

L O

G S

\M A

-2

4-

\F

S L

IG

H

TH

O

U S

E D

R P

A .G

P J

1406.6

J-12 36.8

1.5

0.3

Auger Refusal @ 36.8 ft

2-3-4-5

50/4"

Standard Penetration Test Data

Boring Began:

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION

EASTERN FEDERAL LANDS HIGHWAY DIVISION

Inspector:

MATERIAL DESCRIPTION

Boring No.:

Groundwater Depth:

At Completion:

Completed:

Hole Diameter:

Boring Method:

Rock Core Diam:

Vane Shear

30 in.

140 lbs/AutomaticHammer Wt. & Type:

Encountered at:

After

Northing: 4630654.6 Easting: 671480.5

Caved at:

Hammer Drop:

Project Name:

N o.

FS Longhouse Scenic Byway, PA Project Datum:

(Blows / ft)

1407.0 ft

Undisturbed (UD)

11/30/16

R ec ft)

Water Content %

Project Location: Boring Location:

La ye r D ep th

(f t)

Ty pe

Weather:

SAMPLE

S P

T B lo w s pe r 6 in

. Plastic Limit

No groundwater was encountered during the drilling operation Boring was backfilled with drilling cuttings upon completion

Liquid Limit

SPT

U. S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Penetrometer (PP in tsf) Rock Core (RQD in %)

Surface Elevation:

Sample Types:

BORING LOG

11/30/16 M. Elias

D. HutchinsOperator:

Sta. 287+73 "Dutch Man Run" hrs

Remarks:

Auger Cuttings

G ra ph ic

L og

Allegheny National Forest

Density, Color, Plasticity, Size, Proportions, Moisture

D ep th S ca le

(f t)

E le va tio n (fe et

HSA

B-2

P P

3.75 in.

B O

R

IN

G L

O G

1/

/1

:4

- H

:\S O

IL

S

\P R

O S

P E

C

TI

V E

P R

O

JE

C

TS

\F S

L

IG

H

TH

O U

S E

D R

P A

-2

3-

\B

O R

IN

G

L O

G S

\M A

-2

4-

\F

S L

IG

H

TH

O

U S

E D

R P

A .G

P J

1370.2

4"

J-3

J-4

J-5

J-6

J-7

J-8

J-9

J-10

0.6

1.7

1.5

1.4

0.9

1.7

1.4

1.7

1.0

1.0

1.7

0.6 Asphalt Pavement, no base course was observed

Gray and reddish brown, loose to medium dense, Clayey Sand with gravel Moist

-FILL-

9-9-8-8

4-10-8-6

3-5-6-8

5-8-8-13

6-7-11-11

6-7-8-7

9-8-6-7

6-4-5-7

2-2-5-11

4-8-17-18

Standard Penetration Test Data

Boring Began:

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION

EASTERN FEDERAL LANDS HIGHWAY DIVISION

Inspector:

MATERIAL DESCRIPTION

Boring No.:

Groundwater Depth:

At Completion:

Completed:

Hole Diameter:

Boring Method:

Rock Core Diam:

Vane Shear

30 in.

140 lbs/AutomaticHammer Wt. & Type:

Encountered at:

After

Northing: 4631068.6 Easting: 670319.9

Caved at:

Hammer Drop:

Project Name:

N o.

FS Longhouse Scenic Byway, PA Project Datum:

(Blows / ft)

1553.0 ft

Undisturbed (UD)

12/1/16

R ec ft)

Water Content %

Project Location: Boring Location:

La ye r D ep th

(f t)

Ty pe

Weather:

SAMPLE

S P

T B lo w s pe r 6 in

. Plastic Limit

No groundwater was encountered during the drilling operation Boring was backfilled with drilling cuttings upon completion

Liquid Limit

SPT

U. S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Penetrometer (PP in tsf) Rock Core (RQD in %)

Surface Elevation:

Sample Types:

BORING LOG

12/1/16 M. Elias

D. HutchinsOperator:

Sta. 340+23 "Elijah Run" hrs

Remarks:

Auger Cuttings

G ra ph ic

L og

Allegheny National Forest

Density, Color, Plasticity, Size, Proportions, Moisture

D ep th S ca le

(f t)

E le va tio n (fe et

HSA

B-3

P P

3.75 in.

B O

R

IN

G L

O G

1/

/1

:4

- H

:\S O

IL

S

\P R

O S

P E

C

TI

V E

P R

O

JE

C

TS

\F S

L

IG

H

TH

O U

S E

D R

P A

-2

3-

\B

O R

IN

G

L O

G S

\M A

-2

4-

\F

S L

IG

H

TH

O

U S

E D

R P

A .G

P J

1552.4

32.0

1.6

Boring was terminated @ 32.0 ft

6-7-10-18

Standard Penetration Test Data

Boring Began:

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION

EASTERN FEDERAL LANDS HIGHWAY DIVISION

Inspector:

MATERIAL DESCRIPTION

Boring No.:

Groundwater Depth:

At Completion:

Completed:

Hole Diameter:

Boring Method:

Rock Core Diam:

Vane Shear

30 in.

140 lbs/AutomaticHammer Wt. & Type:

Encountered at:

After

Northing: 4631068.6 Easting: 670319.9

Caved at:

Hammer Drop:

Project Name:

N o.

FS Longhouse Scenic Byway, PA Project Datum:

(Blows / ft)

1553.0 ft

Undisturbed (UD)

12/1/16

R ec ft)

Water Content %

Project Location: Boring Location:

La ye r D ep th

(f t)

Ty pe

Weather:

SAMPLE

S P

T B lo w s pe r 6 in

. Plastic Limit

No groundwater was encountered during the drilling operation Boring was backfilled with drilling cuttings upon completion

Liquid Limit

SPT

U. S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Penetrometer (PP in tsf) Rock Core (RQD in %)

Surface Elevation:

Sample Types:

BORING LOG

12/1/16 M. Elias

D. HutchinsOperator:

Sta. 340+23 "Elijah Run" hrs

Remarks:

Auger Cuttings

G ra ph ic

L og

Allegheny National Forest

Density, Color, Plasticity, Size, Proportions, Moisture

D ep th S ca le

(f t)

E le va tio n (fe et

HSA

B-3

P P

3.75 in.

B O

R

IN

G L

O G

1/

/1

:4

- H

:\S O

IL

S

\P R

O S

P E

C

TI

V E

P R

O

JE

C

TS

\F S

L

IG

H

TH

O U

S E

D R

P A

-2

3-

\B

O R

IN

G

L O

G S

\M A

-2

4-

\F

S L

IG

H

TH

O

U S

E D

R P

A .G

P J

1521.0

J-3

J-4

J-5

J-6

J-7

J-8

J-9

J-10

0.5

29.2

1.3

0.6

1.2

1.1

0.8

1.4

0.4

1.5

0.7

1.6

3.0

1.5

1.5

0.5 Pavement, no base course was observed

Brown to reddish brown and gray, loose to medium dense, Clayey Sand with gravel l Moist

-FILL-

Auger Refusal @ 29.2 ft

8-8-10-12

0-7-50/5"

1-9-7-10

3-6-7-8

12-27-12-10

3-3-6-8

3-5-5-7

6-9-7-7

6-5-7-6

3-7-7-9

Standard Penetration Test Data

Boring Began:

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION

EASTERN FEDERAL LANDS HIGHWAY DIVISION

Inspector:

MATERIAL DESCRIPTION

Boring No.:

Groundwater Depth:

At Completion:

Completed:

Hole Diameter:

Boring Method:

Rock Core Diam:

Vane Shear

30 in.

140 lbs/AutomaticHammer Wt. & Type:

Cloudy, snow 34 F

Encountered at:

After

Northing: 4632240.2 Easting: 669280.2

Caved at:

Hammer Drop:

Project Name:

N o.

FS Longhouse Scenic Byway, PA Project Datum:

(Blows / ft)

1460.0 ft

Undisturbed (UD)

12/2/16

R ec ft)

Water Content %

Project Location: Boring Location:

La ye r D ep th

(f t)

Ty pe

Weather:

SAMPLE

S P

T B lo w s pe r 6 in

. Plastic Limit

No groundwater was encountered during the drilling operation Boring was backfilled with drilling cuttings upon completion

Liquid Limit

SPT

U. S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Penetrometer (PP in tsf) Rock Core (RQD in %)

Surface Elevation:

Sample Types:

BORING LOG

12/2/16 D. Hutchins G. MoodyOperator:

Sta. 421+57 "Little Dew Drop" hrs

Remarks:

Auger Cuttings

G ra ph ic

L og

Allegheny National Forest

Density, Color, Plasticity, Size, Proportions, Moisture

D ep th S ca le

(f t)

E le va tio n (fe et

HSA

B-4

P P

3.75 in.

B O

R

IN

G L

O G

1/

/1

:4

- H

:\S O

IL

S

\P R

O S

P E

C

TI

V E

P R

O

JE

C

TS

\F S

L

IG

H

TH

O U

S E

D R

P A

-2

3-

\B

O R

IN

G

L O

G S

\M A

-2

4-

\F

S L

IG

H

TH

O

U S

E D

R P

A .G

P J

1459.5

1430.8

Sheet: 1 of 1

11"

J-3

J-4

J-5

J-6

J-7

J-8

J-9

J-10

0.6

15.0

26.0

1.1

1.6

1.3

1.4

1.1

1.7

1.8

1.4

1.0

0.7

2.75

2.0

0.6 Asphalt Pavement, no base course was observed

Gray and brown, loose to medium dense, Clayey Sand with gravel Moist

-FILL-

Gray to dark gray, loose to very dense, Silty Clayey Sand with gravel moist to wet Organic Content: 5.2%

Boring was terminated @ 26.0 ft

6-6-7-7

3-7-5-21

12-5-5-6

2-3-5-6

2-5-6-7

7-5-5-5

3-3-4-4

5-11-13-17

5-11-16-9

17-50/6"

Standard Penetration Test Data

Boring Began:

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION

EASTERN FEDERAL LANDS HIGHWAY DIVISION

Inspector:

MATERIAL DESCRIPTION

Boring No.:

Groundwater Depth:

At Completion:

Completed:

Hole Diameter:

Boring Method:

Rock Core Diam:

Vane Shear

30 in.

140 lbs/AutomaticHammer Wt. & Type:

Cloudy, snow 34 F

Encountered at:

After

Northing: 4632401.4 Easting: 668731.3

Caved at:

Hammer Drop:

Project Name:

N o.

FS Longhouse Scenic Byway, PA Project Datum:

(Blows / ft)

1416.0 ft

Undisturbed (UD)

12/2/16

R ec ft)

Water Content %

Project Location: Boring Location:

La ye r D ep th

(f t)

Ty pe

Weather:

SAMPLE

S P

T B lo w s pe r 6 in

. Plastic Limit

Boring was backfilled with drilling cuttings upon completion

Liquid Limit

SPT

U. S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Penetrometer (PP in tsf) Rock Core (RQD in %)

Surface Elevation:

16.4 ft

Sample Types:

BORING LOG

12/2/16 D. Hutchins G. MoodyOperator:

Sta. 440+99 "Dew Drop" hrs

18.0 ft

Remarks:

Auger Cuttings

G ra ph ic

L og

Allegheny National Forest

Density, Color, Plasticity, Size, Proportions, Moisture

D ep th S ca le

(f t)

E le va tio n (fe et

HSA

B-5

P P

3.75 in.

B O

R

IN

G L

O G

1/

/1

:4

- H

:\S O

IL

S

\P R

O S

P E

C

TI

V E

P R

O

JE

C

TS

\F S

L

IG

H

TH

O U

S E

D R

P A

-2

3-

\B

O R

IN

G

L O

G S

\M A

-2

4-

\F

S L

IG

H

TH

O

U S

E D

R P

A .G

P J

1415.4

1401.0

1390.0

6"

J-3

J-4

J-5

J-6

J-7

J-8

0.2

8.0

20.0

1.2

0.5

1.4

1.5

1.9

1.7

1.9

1.5

0.2 Asphalt Pavement, no base course was observed

Tan and brown to reddish brown, medium dense, Silty Clayey Sand with gravel Moist

-FILL-

Tan, dense to very dense, Clayey Sand with gravel Moist

Boring was terminated @ 20.0 ft

3-6-8-8

2-6-11-14

3-6-11-22

12-19-13-15

11-16-22-28

11-31-28-50/4"

25-31-25-32

9-14-19-17

Standard Penetration Test Data

Boring Began:

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION

EASTERN FEDERAL LANDS HIGHWAY DIVISION

Inspector:

MATERIAL DESCRIPTION

Boring No.:

Groundwater Depth:

At Completion:

Completed:

Hole Diameter:

Boring Method:

Rock Core Diam:

Vane Shear

30 in.

140 lbs/AutomaticHammer Wt. & Type:

39 F

Encountered at:

After

Northing: 4633531.7 Easting: 669117.3

Caved at:

Hammer Drop:

Project Name:

N o.

FS Longhouse Scenic Byway, PA Project Datum:

(Blows / ft)

1721.0 ft

Undisturbed (UD)

12/1/16

R ec ft)

Water Content %

Project Location: Boring Location:

La ye r D ep th

(f t)

Ty pe

Weather:

SAMPLE

S P

T B lo w s pe r 6 in

. Plastic Limit

No groundwater was encountered during the drilling operation Boring was backfilled with drilling cuttings upon completion

Liquid Limit

SPT

U. S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Penetrometer (PP in tsf) Rock Core (RQD in %)

Surface Elevation:

Sample Types:

BORING LOG

12/1/16 M. Elias

D. HutchinsOperator:

Sta. 567+28, Tributary to Moad Eddy Run hrs

Remarks:

Auger Cuttings

G ra ph ic

L og

Allegheny National Forest

Density, Color, Plasticity, Size, Proportions, Moisture

D ep th S ca le

(f t)

E le va tio n (fe et

HSA

B-6

P P

3.75 in.

B O

R

IN

G L

O G

1/

/1

:4

- H

:\S O

IL

S

\P R

O S

P E

C

TI

V E

P R

O

JE

C

TS

\F S

L

IG

H

TH

O U

S E

D R

P A

-2

3-

\B

O R

IN

G

L O

G S

\M A

-2

4-

\F

S L

IG

H

TH

O

U S

E D

R P

A .G

P J

1720.8

1713.0

1701.0

J-3

J-4

J-5

J-6

J-7

J-8

J-9

0.4

13.0

18.0

22.0

0.9

1.3

0.7

0.6

0.8

1.2

0.8

0.9

0.7

0.35 Asphalt Pavement, no base course was observed

Gray and brown to reddish brown, very loose to medium dense, Silty Clayey Sand Moist

-FILL-

Brown and gray, loose to medium dense, Poorly Graded Gravel with silt and sand Organic Content: 3.8% Moist

-FILL-

Tan, medium dense to dense, Silty Clayey Sand with gravel Moist

Boring was terminated @ 22.0 ft

5-12-8-8

3-4-5-3

2-2-2-2

WOH-2-3-2

6-3-3-3

2-10-27-11

0-1-5-9

0-34-15-15

0-10-13-14

Standard Penetration Test Data

Boring Began:

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION

EASTERN FEDERAL LANDS HIGHWAY DIVISION

Inspector:

MATERIAL DESCRIPTION

Boring No.:

Groundwater Depth:

At Completion:

Completed:

Hole Diameter:

Boring Method:

Rock Core Diam:

Vane Shear

30 in.

140 lbs/AutomaticHammer Wt. & Type:

Cloudy, sleet 35 F

Encountered at:

After

Northing: 4627624.5 Easting: 673803.4

Caved at:

Hammer Drop:

Project Name:

N o.

FS Longhouse Scenic Byway, PA Project Datum:

(Blows / ft)

1407.0 ft

Undisturbed (UD)

12/3/16

R ec ft)

Water Content %

Project Location: Boring Location:

La ye r D ep th

(f t)

Ty pe

Weather:

SAMPLE

S P

T B lo w s pe r 6 in

. Plastic Limit

No groundwater was encountered during the drilling operation Boring was backfilled with drilling cuttings upon completion

Liquid Limit

SPT

U. S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Penetrometer (PP in tsf) Rock Core (RQD in %)

Surface Elevation:

Sample Types:

BORING LOG

12/3/16 D. Hutchins

J. FarleyOperator:

Sta. 116+65 "Mud Lick Run" hrs

Remarks:

Auger Cuttings

G ra ph ic

L og

Allegheny National Forest

Density, Color, Plasticity, Size, Proportions, Moisture

D ep th S ca le

(f t)

E le va tio n (fe et

HSA

B-7

P P

3.75 in.

B O

R

IN

G L

O G

1/

/1

:4

- H

:\S O

IL

S

\P R

O S

P E

C

TI

V E

P R

O

JE

C

TS

\F S

L

IG

H

TH

O U

S E

D R

P A

-2

3-

\B

O R

IN

G

L O

G S

\M A

-2

4-

\F

S L

IG

H

TH

O

U S

E D

R P

A .G

P J

1406.7

1394.0

1389.0

1385.0

J-3

J-4

J-5

J-6

J-7

J-8

J-9

0.4

18.0

22.0

1.2

0.9

0.3

0.7

0.2

0.7

0.4

1.7

1.0

0.4 Asphalt Pavement, no base course was observed

Tan and gray, very loose to medium dense, Silty Clayey Sand Moist

-FILL-

Tan and gray, medium dense, Silty Clayey Sand with gravel [A-2-4(0)] Moist

Boring was terminated @ 22.0 ft

6-6-5-5

2-3-3-4

2-2-3-3

2-2-2-3

1-3-2-3

1-2-1-1

WOH-WOH-WOH-8

7-10-12-11

5-12-13-18

Standard Penetration Test Data

Boring Began:

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION

EASTERN FEDERAL LANDS HIGHWAY DIVISION

Inspector:

MATERIAL DESCRIPTION

Boring No.:

Groundwater Depth:

At Completion:

Completed:

Hole Diameter:

Boring Method:

Rock Core Diam:

Vane Shear

30 in.

140 lbs/AutomaticHammer Wt. & Type:

Cloudy, sleet 35 F

Encountered at:

After

Northing: 4629983.6 Easting: 672488

Caved at:

Hammer Drop:

Project Name:

N o.

FS Longhouse Scenic Byway, PA Project Datum:

(Blows / ft)

1466.0 ft

Undisturbed (UD)

12/3/16

R ec ft)

Water Content %

Project Location: Boring Location:

La ye r D ep th

(f t)

Ty pe

Weather:

SAMPLE

S P

T B lo w s pe r 6 in

. Plastic Limit

No groundwater was encountered during the drilling operation Boring was backfilled with drilling cuttings upon completion

Liquid Limit

SPT

U. S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Penetrometer (PP in tsf) Rock Core (RQD in %)

Surface Elevation:

Sample Types:

BORING LOG

12/3/16 D. Hutchins

J. FarleyOperator:

Sta. 215+65, Small pipe east of Sta.215+65 hrs

Remarks:

Auger Cuttings

G ra ph ic

L og

Allegheny National Forest

Density, Color, Plasticity, Size, Proportions, Moisture

D ep th S ca le

(f t)

E le va tio n (fe et

HSA

B-8

P P

3.75 in.

B O

R

IN

G L

O G

1/

/1

:4

- H

:\S O

IL

S

\P R

O S

P E

C

TI

V E

P R

O

JE

C

TS

\F S

L

IG

H

TH

O U

S E

D R

P A

-2

3-

\B

O R

IN

G

L O

G S

\M A

-2

4-

\F

S L

IG

H

TH

O

U S

E D

R P

A .G

P J

1465.6

1448.0

1444.0

J-3

J-4

J-5

J-6

J-7

J-8

J-9

0.4

13.0

22.0

1.4

0.5

0.9

1.0

0.2

1.5

1.1

1.0

1.5

0.4 Pavement, no base course was observed

Tan and gray, very loose to loose, Silty Clayey Sand Moist

-FILL-

Tan and gray, medium dense, Silty Clayey Sand with gravel Moist

[A-2-4(0)]

Boring was terminated @ 22.0 ft

8-5-4-5

1-3-3-2

2-2-2-2

1-1-2-3

1-3-2-2

19-21-5-3

1-3-11-13

3-11-13-16

5-11-15-19

Standard Penetration Test Data

Boring Began:

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION

EASTERN FEDERAL LANDS HIGHWAY DIVISION

Inspector:

MATERIAL DESCRIPTION

Boring No.:

Groundwater Depth:

At Completion:

Completed:

Hole Diameter:

Boring Method:

Rock Core Diam:

Vane Shear

30 in.

140 lbs/AutomaticHammer Wt. & Type:

Cloudy, fog 37 F

Encountered at:

After

Northing: 4629990.2 Easting: 672462.9

Caved at:

Hammer Drop:

Project Name:

N o.

FS Longhouse Scenic Byway, PA Project Datum:

(Blows / ft)

1467.0 ft

Undisturbed (UD)

12/4/16

R ec ft)

Water Content %

Project Location: Boring Location:

La ye r D ep th

(f t)

Ty pe

Weather:

SAMPLE

S P

T B lo w s pe r 6 in

. Plastic Limit

No groundwater was encountered during the drilling operation Boring was backfilled with drilling cuttings upon completion

Liquid Limit

SPT

U. S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Penetrometer (PP in tsf) Rock Core (RQD in %)

Surface Elevation:

Sample Types:

BORING LOG

12/4/16 D. Hutchins G. MoodyOperator:

Sta. 214+96 hrs

Remarks:

Auger Cuttings

G ra ph ic

L og

Allegheny National Forest

Density, Color, Plasticity, Size, Proportions, Moisture

D ep th S ca le

(f t)

E le va tio n (fe et

HSA

B-9

P P

3.75 in.

B O

R

IN

G L

O G

1/

/1

:4

- H

:\S O

IL

S

\P R

O S

P E

C

TI

V E

P R

O

JE

C

TS

\F S

L

IG

H

TH

O U

S E

D R

P A

-2

3-

\B

O R

IN

G

L O

G S

\M A

-2

4-

\F

S L

IG

H

TH

O

U S

E D

R P

A .G

P J

1466.6

1454.0

1445.0

Page 8 of 2 Pages

Use this form in lieu of transmittal slips within Dept. of Trans. When message comment is to

Attachment C

Laboratory Testing Results

SOIL DATA

NO.

AASHTODESCRIPTION

DEPTHSAMPLE

SOURCESYMBOL

Project No.:

Project:

Client:

Particle Size Distribution Report

P E

R C

E N

T F

IN

E

R

100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001200 GRAIN SIZE - mm

% + 3"

% GRAVEL

CRS. FINE

% SAND

CRS. MEDIUM FINE

% FINES

SILT CLAY

in in in

1- 1/ in in

3/ in

1/ in

3/ in

#4 #1

#2

#3

#4

#6

#1

#1

#2

0.0 5.9 34.3 16.6 11.4 6.8 25.0

(ft.)

FR 262

Longhouse Scenic Bypass

FHWA/EFLHD

Sta. 215+65 B-1/J-2 3-5 Clayey gravel with sand A-2-4(0)

Particle Size Distribution Report

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION

EASTERN FEDERAL LANDS HIGHWAY DIVISION

0.0 5.3 23.3 20.9 10.6 8.1 31.8

Sta. 215+65 B-1/J-5 10-12 Clayey sand with gravel A-2-6(1)

0.0 0.0 15.1 15.2 12.6 18.8 38.3

Sta. 287+73 B-2/J-4 8-10

0.0 3.7 21.1 23.3 7.3 9.2 35.4

Sta. 287+73 B-2/J-9 20-22 Silty, clayey sand with gravel A-2-4(0)

0.0 11.6 14.5 15.5 13.1 15.9 29.4

Sta. 340+23 B-3/J-3 5-7

AASHTODESCRIPTION

DEPTHSAMPLE

SOURCESYMBOL

Project No.:

Project:

Client:

Particle Size Distribution Report

P E

R C

E N

T F

IN

E

R

100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001200 GRAIN SIZE - mm

% + 3"

% GRAVEL

CRS. FINE

% SAND

CRS. MEDIUM FINE

% FINES

SILT CLAY

in in in

1- 1/ in in

3/ in

1/ in

3/ in

#4 #1

#2

#3

#4

#6

#1

#1

#2

0.0 13.1 21.5 15.5 10.3 19.5 20.1

(ft.)

FR 262

Longhouse Scenic Bypass

FHWA/EFLHD

Sta. 340+23 B-3/J-10 25-27

Particle Size Distribution Report

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION

EASTERN FEDERAL LANDS HIGHWAY DIVISION

0.0 3.6 28.7 19.0 10.4 11.5 26.8

Sta. 421+57 B-4/J-6 13-15 Clayey sand with gravel A-2-4(0)

0.0 0.0 11.6 7.6 17.2 36.4 27.2

Sta. 440+99 B-5/J-7 15-17 T-194= 5.2%

0.0 5.7 35.1 15.6 10.6 6.4 26.6

Sta. 567+28 B-6/J-5 10-12

0.0 20.2 29.7 7.5 15.1 20.5 7.0

Sta. 116+65 B-7/J-6 13-15 Poorly graded gravel with silt and sand /T-194= 3.8% A-1-a

AASHTODESCRIPTION

DEPTHSAMPLE

SOURCESYMBOL

Project No.:

Project:

Client:

Particle Size Distribution Report

P E

R C

E N

T F

IN

E

R

100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001200 GRAIN SIZE - mm

% + 3"

% GRAVEL

CRS. FINE

% SAND

CRS. MEDIUM FINE

% FINES

SILT CLAY

in in in

1- 1/ in in

3/ in

1/ in

3/ in

#4 #1

#2

#3

#4

#6

#1

#1

#2

0.0 1.1 28.1 15.3 14.7 14.2 26.6

(ft.)

FR 262

Longhouse Scenic Bypass

FHWA/EFLHD

Sta. 215+65 B-8/J-8 18-20 Silty, clayey sand with gravel A-2-4(0)

Particle Size Distribution Report

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION

EASTERN FEDERAL LANDS HIGHWAY DIVISION

0.0 7.0 16.0 15.7 9.8 18.1 33.4

Sta. 214+96 B-9/J-7 15-17 Silty, clayey sand with gravel A-2-4(0)

INDEXLIMITLIMITCONTENTNO.

PLASTICITYLIQUIDPLASTICWATERDEPTHSAMPLE

NATURAL

SOURCESYMBOL

Project No.:

Project:

Client:

LIQUID AND PLASTIC LIMITS TEST REPORT

(ft.)

AASHTO

FR 262

Longhouse Scenic Bypass

FHWA/EFLHD

A-2-4(0)10322215.23-5B-1/J-2Sta. 215+65

LIQUID AND PLASTIC LIMITS TEST REPORT

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION

EASTERN FEDERAL LANDS HIGHWAY DIVISION

A-2-6(1)13352215.510-12B-1/J-5Sta. 215+65

A-2-4(0)7282115.720-22B-2/J-9Sta. 287+73

A-2-4(0)9302114.313-15B-4/J-6Sta. 421+57

A-1-aNPNVNP17.013-15B-7/J-6Sta. 116+65

10 30 50 70 90 110

LIQUID LIMIT

P

LA

S T

IC

IT

Y

IN

D E

X

PI

=L

L-

A-4 or A-2-4 A-5 or A-2-5

A-7-6

A-6 or A-2-6

A-7-5 or A-2-7

INDEXLIMITLIMITCONTENTNO.

PLASTICITYLIQUIDPLASTICWATERDEPTHSAMPLE

NATURAL

SOURCESYMBOL

Project No.:

Project:

Client:

LIQUID AND PLASTIC LIMITS TEST REPORT

(ft.)

AASHTO

FR 262

Longhouse Scenic Bypass

FHWA/EFLHD

A-2-4(0)521169.318-20B-8/J-8Sta. 215+65

LIQUID AND PLASTIC LIMITS TEST REPORT

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION

EASTERN FEDERAL LANDS HIGHWAY DIVISION

A-2-4(0)7251810.41-3B-9/J-1Sta. 214+96

A-2-4(0)6282221.715-17B-9/J-7Sta. 214+96

10 30 50 70 90 110

LIQUID LIMIT

P

LA

S T

IC

IT

Y

IN

D E

X

PI

=L

L-

A-4 or A-2-4 A-5 or A-2-5

A-7-6

A-6 or A-2-6

A-7-5 or A-2-7