Addendum_ISPS - RFQ Questions and Responses.pdf
PDF 338 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Idaho Springs Police Station
- Solicitation number
- 2024-7
- Issued by
- Clear Creek County, Colorado
About this file
This document is an Addendum containing Questions and Responses for the Idaho Springs Police Station Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for a Construction Manager/General Contractor (CM/GC) project in Idaho Springs, Colorado. The document addresses eight specific inquiries from potential bidders regarding project details, including hazardous materials testing, underground structures, floor modifications, claims/litigation history, bonding requirements, submission guidelines, and wage rates.
Key clarifications include confirmation that no hazardous materials testing has been performed, no known underground structures exist, and the floor slope will be evaluated during the Design Development phase. The project requires a Performance Bond and Payment Bond for the full contract price, with bonds remaining in effect for two years after Final Completion. Notably, prevailing wage rates do not apply to this project, and contractors are advised to include a minimum 5-year claims/litigation history. The bonding capacity requirement is $5,000,000, and the project is expected to commence construction in May 2025, involving renovation of a former citywide banks building into a new police station.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Idaho Springs Police Station
RFQ CM/GC
Questions & Responses:
1. The design calls for open ceilings in certain areas. Has any hazardous materials testing been done?
Response: No
2. Given the history of the building, Any underground structures we need to be aware of?
Response: No known underground structures.
3. We noticed a slope in the floor from the front of the vault toward the existing front doors, is it you intention to keep it or remove it?
Response: During the Design Development phase, the team, including the CM/GC, will determine budgetary scope for revisions to existing floor slabs.
4. Claims/Litigation History – is it acceptable to include history for the last 5 years? For reference, the AIA A305 Contractor’s Qualification Statement stipulates a 5 year horizon.
Response: Include a minimum history of 5 years.
5. Please confirm that the demonstrated bonding capacity for this project should be $5,000,000 as noted in the minimum qualifications on page one of the RFQ documents and shall be reflected as such in a letter from the bonding agent. Section R.l on page 12 reflects a lower amount.
Response: Under Section 6.04 of the City’s Construction Agreement, the “Contractor shall furnish a Performance Bond and a Payment Bond, each in the full amount of the Contract Price, as security for the faithful performance and payment of all Contractor’s obligations under the Contract Documents, including the warranty. These bonds shall remain in effect at least until two (2) years after the date of Final Completion.”
6. As clarified during the pre-bid meeting, please confirm the items required for the Step 1 submission are outlined in Part I (pages 4, 5, and 6 of the RFQ documents).
Response: Confirmed
7. Please confirm items required for the general contractors invited to Step Two are outlined in Part
R (pages 10, 11, and 12 of the RFQ documents).
Response: Confirmed
8. Does prevailing wage rates apply to this project?
Response: No
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .