Addendum FAR 52.212-2.docx
DOCX document 18 KB Posted
- Attached to
- On Island Reference Laboratory Testing and Courier Services at Triple Army Medical Center, Hawaii
- Solicitation number
- W81K0225QA026
- Issued by
-
Department of the Army Medical Command
About this file
This document is an Addendum to FAR 52.212-2 for a Request for Quotation (RFQ) for On Island Reference Laboratory Testing and Courier Services at Tripler Army Medical Center in Hawaii. The Department of the Army Medical Command intends to issue multiple pre-priced Blanket Purchase Agreements (BPAs) to responsible suppliers, with the solicitation (W81K0225QA026) being a 100% Small Business Set-Aside. Quotes will be evaluated on three factors: Technical Capability, Past Performance, and Price, with contractors required to submit their current price list and technical information.
Key details include a response deadline of April 25, 2025 at 10:00 am HST, with quotes to be submitted via email to leslie.m.takayama.civ@health.mil. The procurement falls under NAICS code 621511 with a size standard of $41.5M. Suppliers must meet acceptability standards for technical requirements and past performance, provide fair and reasonable pricing, and demonstrate responsibility. The government intends to establish BPAs without discussions, expecting initial quotes to represent the quoter's best technical and pricing terms.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Solicitation - W81K0225QA026_AMD 02.pdf | ||
| Amendment 2 to W81K0225QA026.pdf | ||
| Amendment 1 to W81K0225QA026.pdf | ||
| Solicitation - W81K0225QA026_AMD 01.pdf | ||
| PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT Rev 2.docx | DOCX document | |
| Terms and Conditions for BPA.docx | DOCX document | |
| Addendum to FAR 52.212-1.docx | DOCX document | |
| Solicitation - W81K0225QA026.pdf | ||
| PWS Att 1 - Price List.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
52.212-2 ADDENDUM
EVALUATION – COMMERCIAL ITEMS
Paragraph (a) is hereby replaced with the following:
(a) The Government intends to issue multiple pre-priced Blanket Purchase Agreements (BPAs) to the responsible suppliers of goods and/or services whose quotation conforming to the solicitation is technically acceptable, whose past performance is acceptable and provides fair and reasonable prices. BPAs will be established in accordance with FAR 13.303, Blanket Purchase Agreements and FAR 13, Simplified Acquisition Procedures.
Except communications conducted for the purpose of minor clarifications, the Government intends to evaluate quotes and establish BPAs without discussions. Therefore, each initial quote should contain the quoter’s best terms from a technical and pricing standpoint. However, the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if it is later determined by the Contracting Officer to be necessary.
EVALUATION FACTORS. The following factors shall be used to evaluate quotations:
Factor 1. Technical Capability Factor 2. Past Performance Factor 3. Price
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY (FACTOR 1). The quote should consist of written documentation to provide sufficient narrative and supporting data to address how the quote meets the minimum requirements identified in the Performance Work Statement (PWS). The following ratings will be used in evaluating each quote:
| ADJECTIVE |
| DEFINITION |
| Acceptable |
| Quote clearly meets the minimum requirements identified in the Performance Work Statement |
| Unacceptable |
| Quote does not clearly meet the minimum requirements identified in the Performance Work Statement. |
Note: To receive consideration for award, a rating of “Acceptable” must be achieved for all technical requirements.
PAST PERFORMANCE (FACTOR 2). Performance Confidence Assessment provides insight into a quoter's probability of successfully completing the solicitation requirements based on the quoter’s performance record on recent, relevant, and similar contract efforts. The number and severity of problems (if any), the demonstrated effectiveness of corrective actions taken (if required) and the overall performance record are taken into consideration.
Each quoter's Past Performance will be evaluated and assigned an adjectival rating. The following rating scheme for Performance Risk will be used:
| ADJECTIVE |
| DEFINITION |
| Acceptable |
| Based on the quoter’s performance record and the confidence assessment, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the quoter will successfully perform the required effort, or the quoter’s performance record is unknown. (See note below.) |
| Unacceptable |
| Based on the quoter’s performance record and the confidence assessment, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the quoter will be able to successfully perform the required effort. |
Note: A quoter with a rating of “Unacceptable” will not be considered for award.
Evaluation of past performance will be subjective based on consideration of all relevant facts and circumstances. The currency, content, general trends, and relevance of the information in contractor's performance will be considered.
The Government may also consider and use any additional information from its own files, databases, references provided by the quoter, or from any source, as it deems appropriate. The Government may survey references to verify information provided and may survey other sources known to the Government.
If adverse past performance information is obtained, the respective point of contact will be contacted to obtain additional information about the circumstances surrounding the situation. Quoters will be given an opportunity to address unfavorable reports of past performance to which the quoter has not had a previous opportunity to respond.
If a quoter does not have a past performance history relating to the solicitation, the quoter will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably, and a neutral rating will be given for this factor. A neutral rating is considered acceptable.
PRICE (FACTOR 3) is not rated. Price analysis will be used to evaluate a quoter’s price and the extent to which it is fair and reasonable. The Government may determine that a quotation is unacceptable if prices are significantly unbalanced.
BPAs will be established with suppliers who submit quotes possessing all the following characteristics:
1) Meets the acceptability standards for non-price factors (e.g., Technical and Past Performance),
2) Conforms to the solicitation,
3) Is from a prospective contractor who is responsible (as defined in Federal Acquisition Regulation Part 9). (As part of a responsibility determination and pre-award risk assessment, the Contracting Officer will review the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information Systems (FAPIIS) and System for Award Management (SAM)), and,
4) Provides prices that are determined to be fair and reasonable.
Paragraph (b) is hereby addended and reads as follows:
(b) If the Government establishes a BPA with a supplier, the supplier shall indicate acceptance of the BPA by written notice to the Government. The Government may, by written notice to the supplier, at any time before acceptance occurs, withdraw, amend, or cancel the BPA. Note that once a BPA is established, the Government is obligated only to the extent of authorized purchases actually made under the BPA.
(End of Addendum to FAR 52.212-2)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .