Addendum - 52.212-2, Evaluation.pdf
PDF 143 KB Posted
- Attached to
- FURNISH & INSTALL CAMERA SYSTEM
- Solicitation number
- FA446025Q0341
About this file
This document is an Addendum to Solicitation 52.212-2 for Commercial Products and Commercial Services dated November 2021, outlining the government's evaluation process for selecting a contractor. The evaluation will proceed in three stages: (1) assessing site visit attendance, (2) ranking offers by price, and (3) conducting a technical capability evaluation. Offerors must submit documentation of two similar projects completed within the past three years, demonstrating comparable project size and scope. The technical evaluation will determine if offers are "Acceptable" or "Unacceptable" based on meeting specifications in the Performance Work Statement, with the government continuing to evaluate offers until at least three offerors receive an "Acceptable" technical rating. The contract will be awarded to the offer representing the best value to the government, with technical and past performance considered equally important in the selection process.
View the file
Other files
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ADDENDUM
52.212-2, Evaluation—Commercial Products and Commercial Services. (Nov 2021)
1. The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:
1.1. Site Visit Attendance.
1.2. Price.
1.3. Technical Evaluation/Capability.
2. By submission of its offer, the offeror agrees to abide by all terms, conditions, and provisions included in the solicitation. Offers/Offerors that fail to furnish required representations or information, or reject the terms and conditions of the solicitation may be considered non-responsive and/or excluded from consideration. (IAW 52.212-1)
3. Technical and past performance, when combined, are considered equal in importance.
4. Evaluation Factors and Process Defined:
4.1. First the Government will deem the quote reviewable based on site visit attendance.
4.2. Second, the Government shall rank all responsive offers by price.
4.2.1. An offeror’s total evaluated price will include the total of all Contract Line Items as outlined in this solicitation or any associated attachments.
4.2.2. The Government reserves the right to deem an offeror's overall quotation to be unresponsive in the event that incomplete, unreasonable, or unbalanced pricing is submitted.
4.3. Third, the Government will look at the vendors technical capability and conduct a Technical
Evaluation, starting with the lowest priced evaluated responsive offer, to determine if they are
“Acceptable” or “Unacceptable,” based on the offer/offeror meeting requirements as outlined in the solicitation or any associated attachments.
4.3.1. “Technical capability”, To demonstrate technical capability offerors shall submit documentation of two (2) similar projects completed within the past three (3) years, demonstrating experience with projects of comparable size and scope. This documentation should detail the project scope, completion dates, and customer contact information.
ADDENDUM
52.212-2, Evaluation—Commercial Products and Commercial Services. (Nov 2021)
4.3.2. “Acceptable” means: the documentation of “Technical capability” and the description on the submitted quote DOES meet the specifications and requirements as described in the
Performance Work Statement (PWS), or associated attachments.
4.3.3. “Unacceptable” means: the documentation of “Technical capability” and the description on the submitted quote DOES NOT meet the specifications described in the Performance Work
Statement (PWS), or associated attachments. An unacceptable technical description will result in offer/offeror being removed from further consideration.
4.3.4. The Technical Evaluation processing of offers will continue (in order by price) until the
Government determines that at least three (3) offerors are determined to have an
“Acceptable” technical rating.
4.3.4.1. If there are less than 3 offers/offerors, the Government will perform a Technical
Evaluation on ALL offers/offerors.
4.3.4.2. If no offer/offeror is determined to be “Acceptable,” then no award will be made, and the Contracting Officer will re-evaluate the requirement.
4.4. Third, once the requisite number of offers/offerors have been evaluated for both Price and
Technical Capability/Acceptance, the Government will make an award to the offer/offeror. This offer/offeror represents the best value to the Government.
5. The Government reserves the right to communicate with all, some, or none of the offerors to address any issues, if necessary. The Government also reserves the right not to select a contractor, depending on the quality of the offers/offerors submitted and the availability of funds.
6. A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer’s specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .