Addendum 1~4.pdf
PDF 119 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- S-C25102-00012961
- Issued by
- Marion County, Oregon
About this file
This is Addendum #1 to the Invitation to Bid (ITB) for Marion County, Oregon's PW1651-25 project for the Construction of Asphalt Concrete Resurfacing of Various Marion County Roads, issued on 3/3/2025. The addendum addresses several clarifying questions and revisions to the original bid documents, including corrections to project numbering, guardrail specifications, and bid schedule discrepancies. The addendum provides updated guidance on drawing interpretations, specifically addressing rock embedment requirements, MGS (Midwest Guardrail System) specifications, and contingency items for road resurfacing projects.
The addendum resolves key technical questions from potential bidders, such as clarifying that MGS guardrail should be used throughout the project, confirming the applicable standard drawings, and explaining the inclusion of 8' and 11' posts as contingency items. The revisions aim to provide more precise information to bidders, potentially helping to standardize bid responses and reduce ambiguity in the project specifications. The document suggests that the bid schedule and plan sets have been updated to more clearly match project locations and requirements, which could help contractors more accurately prepare their bids for the Marion County road resurfacing project.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PW1651-25 - ITB - Construction of Asphalt Concrete Resurfacing of Various Marion County Roads Page 1 of 2
ADDENDUM #1
TO THE
INVITATION TO BID
PW1651-25 - ITB - CONSTRUCTION OF ASPHALT CONCRETE RESURFACING OF
VARIOUS MARION COUNTY ROADS
ISSUED ON 3/3/2025 9:00:00 AM
The following information in this addendum, hereby become part of the Invitation To Bid. It is essential that all prospective Offerors note the content of this Addendum.
A. Invitation to Bid – Revised
a. REVISED ITB POSTED
B. Question and Answers:
1. We noticed there is a discrepancy between the project summary list and the bid schedule for project # 5 (Saratoga Dr.). Bid item 810.450, Midwest Downstream Anchor Terminal, is listed in the Project summary list but not in the Bid Schedule. Which one is correct?
a. Please see revised fillable bid schedule issued in Addendum 1.
2. Drawing RD406 doesn’t show rock embedment? What drawing is applicable.
a. RD406 is applicable. Match embankment and required depths with or without rock embedment and follow Federal Lands Highway Division Standard Drawing 617-13 (attached).
3. Project Plan number and names to no match the plans- Saratoga in the Bid schedule is Project #5, in the plans it is area #2, Monitor Mckee rd in the Bid schedule is project #2, in the plans it is area #1.
a. The plan set was revised to clearly show which locations correspond to which projects in the bid schedule.
4. Plan sheet #c03 note #4 talks about Midwest Guardrail Bridge rail end protection for 51 feet, Is that intended to be MGS Guardrail?
a. Yes, MGS throughout. The Type B endpiece should be W beam.
5. Plan sheet C03 doesn’t show where any of the bid items for Midwest Guardrail is installed?
a. Notes 2-8 reference ODOT Standard Drawings for MGS. Follow as applicable.
6. Plan sheet C02 and C03 don’t have any Thrie Beam B end Pcs, I don’t see a need for that bid item.
a. The thrie beam end pieces are included in the guardrail transition bid items and were deleted from the revised bid schedule.
7. Plan sheets C02 and C03 don’t indicate the need for any 8 and 11 posts?
a. 8’ and 11’ posts may be needed and are included in the bid schedule for this reason as a contingency item.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .