Addendum 1_FMP RFP_FINAL.pdf
PDF 160 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Forest Management Plan RFP
- Solicitation number
- S-62900-00000753
- Issued by
- Marion County, Oregon
About this file
This document is an Addendum to a Request for Proposal (RFP) issued by the State of Oregon Department of Forestry for technical services associated with the development of the Western Oregon Forest Management Plan and corresponding Implementation Plans that will implement the Western Oregon Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP). The addendum clarifies that proposers must submit all proposal documents via email and that electronic signatures are acceptable for the required signatures. It also specifies the reasons the agency may reject a proposal, including failure to substantially comply with the RFP requirements, lack of responsibility, inappropriate contact with state representatives, attempt to influence the Evaluation Committee, or if the proposed costs are found to be unreasonably high.
The RFP covers the jurisdictions of Marion County and the City of Salem. Proposers must submit their cost information as a separate email attachment. If a proposer believes any part of its proposal is exempt from disclosure under Oregon's Public Records Law, it must submit a redacted version along with the Affidavit of Trade Secret. The agency reserves the right to reject the highest ranking proposal and move to award to the next subsequent highest ranking proposal if the prices are found to be unreasonably high.
View the file
Other files
Show all 13
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FOREST MANAGEMENT PLAN
Request for Proposal (RFP)
RFP# S-62900-00000753- Addendum #1
RFP# S-62900-00000564- Addendum #1 Page 1
This Addendum modifies the above referenced Request for Proposals (RFP) only to the extent indicated herein. All other areas not specifically mentioned or affected by this Addendum shall remain in full force. This Addendum shall be added as a part of the Original Solicitation.
The RFP is hereby amended as follows (new language is indicated by underlining and deleted language is indicated by brackets):
This addendum clarifies that Proposer must submit all proposal documents via email and that electronic signatures are acceptable in all instances where a signature is required.
3.2 MINIMUM SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS
3.2.1 Proposal Format and Quantity
Proposal should follow the format and reference the sections listed in the Proposal Content Requirements section (RFP section 3.4). Responses to each section and subsection should be labeled to indicate the item being addressed. Proposal must describe in detail how requirements of this RFP will be met and may provide additional related information. Cost information must be submitted as a separate [sealed envelope] email attachment.
Proposer shall submit its Proposal [using only white 8 ½” x 11” Recycled Paper], without extensive art work, unusual printing, or other materials not essential to the utility and clarity of the Proposal. Proposer shall submit an original, bearing the Proposer’s authorized representative’s Signature (electronic signature is acceptable). [and three (3) copies of its Proposal]. In addition, if Proposer believes any of its Proposal is exempt from disclosure under Oregon Public Records Law (ORS 192.410 through 192.505), Proposer shall complete and submit the Affidavit of Trade Secret (Attachment B) and a fully redacted version of its Proposal, both sent via email, clearly identified as the redacted version.
3.3.8 Proposal Rejection
Agency may reject a Proposal for any of the following reasons:
• Proposer fails to substantially comply with all prescribed RFP procedures and requirements, including but not limited to the requirement that Proposer’s authorized representative sign the Proposal [in ink] via electronic signature.
• Proposer fails to meet the responsibility requirements of ORS 279B.110.
• Proposer makes any contact regarding this RFP with State representatives such as State employees or officials other than the SPC or those the SPC authorizes, or inappropriate contact with the SPC.
• Proposer attempts to inappropriately influence a member of the Evaluation Committee.
• Proposal is conditioned on Agency’s acceptance of any other terms and conditions or rights to negotiate any alternative terms and conditions that are not reasonably related to those expressly authorized for negotiation in the RFP or Addenda.
• Proposal costs too much. Agency may reject the highest ranking Proposal and move to award to the next subsequent highest ranking Proposal if the prices within the higher ranking Proposal are found to be unreasonably high.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .