Appendix B.docx

DOCX document 31 KB Posted

Attached to
Biosequence Search
Solicitation number
ACQ-27-0065
Issued by

About this file

This file is an appendix containing current-state workflow tables documenting the existing processes for biological sequence searching and prior art analysis at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). Table B-1 outlines the ten-step sequence search workflow, beginning with confirming searchable sequence listings and proceeding through case file review, identification of search-relevant sequence features, search path selection, search strategy development, search submission, status monitoring, results retrieval, results review, and application of results in examination. The workflow involves multiple systems and tools including PE2E-DAV, SLIC, ABSS (Automated Biological Sequence Search), STIC-EIC, and NCBI BLAST, with examiners and STIC-EIC personnel serving as primary actors. Key challenges identified include manual interpretation requirements, high manual burden in search strategy generation, tool selection dependencies on examiner experience, large and fragmented result files, and time-intensive alignment reviews.

Table B-2 describes the ABSS result review workflow comprising eight steps: organizing result files by database and query, reviewing summary tables to identify highest-level hits, assessing alignment displays for sequence feature correspondence, identifying duplicate records, linking hits to source references, comparing results across files, prioritizing references based on claim scope, and preparing outputs for examination use. Primary burdens and risks throughout this workflow include file fragmentation across databases, difficulty triaging large numbers of hits, labor-intensive alignment review processes, duplicate-heavy outputs, manual and time-consuming tracing from hits to underlying references, and the absence of automated ranking by legal relevance. These workflows serve as the baseline for the related RFI seeking next-generation biosequence search solutions utilizing Super Intelligence-assisted capabilities to improve efficiency and quality in patent examination.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Appendix A.docx DOCX document
Appendix C.docx DOCX document
RFI Attachment 3 - Question and Answer Sheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
RFI Attachment 1 - RFI Response Template_v0.1.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Appendix D.docx DOCX document
ACQ-27-0065 - RFI Biosequence Tool.pdf PDF
RFI Attachment 2 - Biosequence Search SOO.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Date: May 1, 2026 Appendix B. Current-State Workflow Tables Table B-1. Current-state sequence search workflow

Workflow
Step No.
Step Name
Primary Actor
Systems / Tools
Key Inputs
Core Action
Key Output
Main Burden / Risk
Current-State Sequence Search Workflow
1
Confirm sequence listing is searchable
Examiner
PE2E-DAV, SLIC
Application number, sequence-listing status
Verify that a valid certified sequence listing is available for search
Searchable listing confirmed or issue identified
Searching cannot proceed if listing is defective or uncertified
Current-State Sequence Search Workflow
2
Review case file
Examiner
PE2E-DAV, sequence listing
Claims, specification, sequence listing, annotations, related file information
Review the application to understand the claimed subject matter and relevant sequence context
Initial understanding of claim scope and sequence issues
Case files may be lengthy, technical, and voluminous
Current-State Sequence Search Workflow
3
Identify search-relevant sequence features
Examiner
PE2E-DAV, sequence listing
SEQ ID NOs, fragments, percent identity language, fusions, variants, wildcards, modified residues
Determine what sequence embodiments and structural limitations must be searched
Search targets identified
Requires manual interpretation of technical and legal claim language
Current-State Sequence Search Workflow
4
Select search path
Examiner
ABSS, STIC-EIC 1600 request form, NCBI BLAST where permitted
Search targets, claim breadth, expected prior art context
Decide whether to use ABSS self-service, a customized STIC search request, textual searching, or a combination
Search path selected
Tool selection depends on examiner experience and search complexity
Current-State Sequence Search Workflow
5
Develop search strategy
Examiner
ABSS, STIC-EIC 1600 request form
Search targets, expected hit types, sequence type, database choices
Determine query groupings, search type, search parameters, and databases
Search instructions prepared
High manual burden; no automated search-strategy generation
Current-State Sequence Search Workflow
6
Submit search
Examiner or STIC-EIC 1600
ABSS, STIC request form, SWFT
Search instructions
Run self-service search or submit customized search request
Search submitted and queued
Broad or complex cases may exceed normal limits or require special handling
Current-State Sequence Search Workflow
7
Monitor search status
Examiner
Email confirmation, SWFT, PE2E-DAV
Submission confirmation, workflow status
Track whether searches are running or completed
Search completion confirmed
Results may be posted at different times across files and databases
Current-State Sequence Search Workflow
8
Retrieve search results
Examiner
PE2E-DAV, GenBase UI
ABSS result files
Open result files by query and database
Results available for review
Multiple files may need separate review
Current-State Sequence Search Workflow
9
Review search results
Examiner
PE2E-DAV, GenBase UI
Summary tables, alignments, duplicate listings, identifiers
Manually review results to identify potentially relevant hits and references
Candidate prior art references identified
Result files can be large, repetitive, and difficult to triage
Current-State Sequence Search Workflow
10
Apply results in examination
Examiner
Examination record tools
Candidate references, search record
Document the search and use the references in examination
Search documented and examination proceeds
Requires translation of technical search output into examination use

Table B-2. ABSS result review workflow

Workflow
Step No.
Step Name
Primary Actor
Systems / Tools
Key Inputs
Core Action
Key Output
Main Burden / Risk
ABSS Result Review Workflow
1
Organize result files
Examiner
PE2E-DAV, GenBase UI
Result files by database and query
Open and organize all files associated with the search
Review set assembled
Files may be fragmented across databases and posting times
ABSS Result Review Workflow
2
Review summary tables
Examiner
PE2E-DAV, GenBase UI
Scores, query-match values, sequence identifiers, lengths
Identify the highest-level hits for initial triage
Preliminary list of hits
Large numbers of hits can obscure the most relevant references
ABSS Result Review Workflow
3
Review alignments
Examiner
PE2E-DAV, GenBase UI
Alignment displays, local similarity data
Assess how closely each hit corresponds to the claimed sequence features
Technical understanding of hit relevance
Alignment review is labor-intensive and repetitive
ABSS Result Review Workflow
4
Review duplicate records
Examiner
PE2E-DAV, GenBase UI
Duplicate listings, identifiers, dates
Determine whether multiple hits point to the same or related records
Duplicates grouped mentally by reviewer
Duplicate-heavy outputs increase review time
ABSS Result Review Workflow
5
Link hits to source references
Examiner
PE2E-DAV, GenBase UI, patent/publication sources
Sequence identifiers, accession numbers, patent identifiers
Trace hits back to the underlying references
Underlying documents identified
Moving from hits to references is manual and time-consuming
ABSS Result Review Workflow
6
Compare results across files
Examiner
PE2E-DAV, GenBase UI
Hits from multiple databases and queries
Consolidate overlapping or recurring references
Cross-file understanding of the result set
Relevant references may be spread across many files
ABSS Result Review Workflow
7
Prioritize references
Examiner
Examiner judgment
Consolidated result set, claim scope
Determine which references are most likely relevant to examination
Prioritized prior art set
No automated ranking by likely legal relevance
ABSS Result Review Workflow
8
Prepare for examination use
Examiner
Examination record tools
Prioritized prior art set
Incorporate relevant references into the search record and examination analysis
Examination-ready search output
Requires both technical and legal synthesis

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .