A2 Past Performance_Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 326 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Grounds Maintenance Services - JBMDL Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA4484-23-R-0010
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire for evaluation of contractor performance on a previous grounds maintenance services contract. The questionnaire requests information on the contractor's name, contract number, dollar amount, dates of performance, and ratings from 0 to 5 on 25 performance criteria such as providing qualified personnel, following quality control procedures, timely resolution of issues, and overall performance. It also asks if the contractor was issued a cure notice, if the respondent would award another contract, CPARS ratings, and acreage and types of grounds maintained.
The related federal contract opportunity is a solicitation for grounds maintenance services at Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst in New Jersey. Services include mowing over 3,000 acres including airfields, snow removal, and ditch maintenance. The solicitation number is FA4484-23-R-0010 and was issued by the Air Force Air Mobility Command. Response and award dates are not provided.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 29
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
A. GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:
Contractor’s Name: Address:
Telephone Number:
Fax Number:
Point of Contact:
Project Title or Brief Description of Work (Include Estimated Acreage):
Contract Number Provided by Offeror: Dollar Amount:
Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror:
*Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 5 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.
Contractor performed as the: Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel.
B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:
Name of Respondent: Title:
Address: Telephone Number:
Fax Number: Email Address:
C. EMAIL COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO: lisa.goodwin.2@us.af.mil; and ramnarine.mahadeo.1@us.af.mil.
D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the number on the scale of 0 to 5 that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. Indicate Not Applicable (N/A) as necessary.
PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS.
PERFORMANCE
RATING
DEFINITION
(5) Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
(4) Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
(3) Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
(2) Marginal
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
(1) Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
(0) Not Applicable Unable to provide a score. Performance in this area is not applicable to the effort assessed.
CONTRACTOR’S NAME: ___________________ CONTRACT NUMBER __________
The contractor:
1. Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.
0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A
2. Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.
0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A
3. Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements.
0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A
4. Home office participated in solving significant local problems.
0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A
5. Followed approved quality control plan. 0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A
6. Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.
0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A
7. Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.
0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A
8. Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies. 0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A
9. Identified problems as they occurred. 0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A
10. Suggested alternative approaches to problems. 0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A
11. Displayed initiative to solve problems. 0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A
12. Was responsive to contract changes. 0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A
The contractor:
13. Provided adequate project supervision. 0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A
14. Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner. 0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A
15. Cooperated with Government personnel after award. 0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A
16. How would you rate the contractor's overall performance?
0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A
17. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.”
YES/NO
18. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.”
YES/NO
19. Is the contractor rated in CPARS? YES/NO/NA
20. Did the contractor manage at least 3,000 acres of mowing operations?
YES/NO/NA
21. Did the contractor manage airfield mowing operations? YES/NO/NA
22. Did the contractor operate on an active airfield? YES/NO/NA
23. Did the contractor conduct or provide snow removal operations? YES/NO/NA
24. Did the contractor maintain ditches? YES/NO/NA
25. Did the contract provide licenses, certifications for state pesticide application (weed control)?
YES/NO/NA
Remarks:_____________________________________________________________________________
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .