A2 Past Performance_Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 326 KB Posted

Attached to
Grounds Maintenance Services - JBMDL Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA4484-23-R-0010
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Air Mobility Command

About this file

This document contains a past performance questionnaire for evaluation of contractor performance on a previous grounds maintenance services contract. The questionnaire requests information on the contractor's name, contract number, dollar amount, dates of performance, and ratings from 0 to 5 on 25 performance criteria such as providing qualified personnel, following quality control procedures, timely resolution of issues, and overall performance. It also asks if the contractor was issued a cure notice, if the respondent would award another contract, CPARS ratings, and acreage and types of grounds maintained.

The related federal contract opportunity is a solicitation for grounds maintenance services at Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst in New Jersey. Services include mowing over 3,000 acres including airfields, snow removal, and ditch maintenance. The solicitation number is FA4484-23-R-0010 and was issued by the Air Force Air Mobility Command. Response and award dates are not provided.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Grounds Maintenance Services - JBMDL, newest first.
File Type Posted
A9 Appendix B Lakehurst Mowing Map TE-5.pdf PDF
A5 Appendix B McGuire Mowing Map TE-1.pdf PDF
McGuire and Lakehurst overall adjustments.pdf PDF
Questions and Answers 4 Aug 23.pdf PDF
McGuire TE-1 Map Clarifications 4 Aug 23.pdf PDF
FA448423R0010_Amendment 0001 Conformed Copy.pdf PDF
A18 Pricing Schedule.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
A19 Pricing List for CLINS X016_ X020_X022.XLSX XLSX spreadsheet
A9 Appendix B Lakehurst Mowing Map TE-5.pdf PDF
FA448423R0010_Amendment 0001.pdf PDF
A19 Pricing List for CLINS X020 and X022.XLSX XLSX spreadsheet
A8 Appendix B NAVAIR Mowing Map TE-4.pdf PDF
A16 Wage Determination OC 2015-4195 rev23.pdf PDF
A11 Appendix B LKH Airfield Estimated Ditch Area TE-7.pdf PDF
A18 Pricing Schedule.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
A12 Appendix K OSS Snow Removal TE-1.pdf PDF
A9 Appendix B Lakehurst Mowing Map TE-5.pdf PDF
A7 Appendix B McGure Estimated Ditch Area TE-3.pdf PDF
A5 Appendix B McGuire Mowing Map TE-1.pdf PDF
A3 Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan.docx DOCX document
A14 Appendix 4 Contractor - Security Forces.pdf PDF
A13 Appendix K NAVAIR Snow Removal TE-2.pdf PDF
A10 Appendix B NAVAIR Estimated Airfield Ditch Area TE-6.pdf PDF
A1 Past Performance_Cover_Letter.pdf PDF
Solicitation - FA448423R0010.pdf PDF
A6 Appendix B McGuire Comm Gate 9 Map TE-2.pdf PDF
A17 87th Safety Booklet for Civilian Contractors.pdf PDF
A15 Wage Determination BC 2015-4191 rev 23.pdf PDF
A4 Performance Work Statement.docx DOCX document
Show all 29

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

A. GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:

Contractor’s Name: Address:

Telephone Number:

Fax Number:

Point of Contact:

Project Title or Brief Description of Work (Include Estimated Acreage):

Contract Number Provided by Offeror: Dollar Amount:

Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror:

*Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 5 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.

Contractor performed as the: Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel.

B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:

Name of Respondent: Title:

Address: Telephone Number:

Fax Number: Email Address:

C. EMAIL COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO: lisa.goodwin.2@us.af.mil; and ramnarine.mahadeo.1@us.af.mil.

D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the number on the scale of 0 to 5 that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. Indicate Not Applicable (N/A) as necessary.

PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS.

PERFORMANCE

RATING

DEFINITION

(5) Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

(4) Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

(3) Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

(2) Marginal

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

(1) Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

(0) Not Applicable Unable to provide a score. Performance in this area is not applicable to the effort assessed.

CONTRACTOR’S NAME: ___________________ CONTRACT NUMBER __________

The contractor:

1. Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.

0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

2. Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.

0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

3. Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements.

0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

4. Home office participated in solving significant local problems.

0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

5. Followed approved quality control plan. 0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

6. Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.

0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

7. Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.

0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

8. Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies. 0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

9. Identified problems as they occurred. 0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

10. Suggested alternative approaches to problems. 0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

11. Displayed initiative to solve problems. 0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

12. Was responsive to contract changes. 0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

The contractor:

13. Provided adequate project supervision. 0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

14. Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner. 0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

15. Cooperated with Government personnel after award. 0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

16. How would you rate the contractor's overall performance?

0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

17. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.”

YES/NO

18. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.”

YES/NO

19. Is the contractor rated in CPARS? YES/NO/NA

20. Did the contractor manage at least 3,000 acres of mowing operations?

YES/NO/NA

21. Did the contractor manage airfield mowing operations? YES/NO/NA

22. Did the contractor operate on an active airfield? YES/NO/NA

23. Did the contractor conduct or provide snow removal operations? YES/NO/NA

24. Did the contractor maintain ditches? YES/NO/NA

25. Did the contract provide licenses, certifications for state pesticide application (weed control)?

YES/NO/NA

Remarks:_____________________________________________________________________________

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .