A-E Synopsis_Solicitation.pdf

AE Synopsis Template

Revised Aug 2024

N39430-25-R-0018 INDEFINITE DELIVERY/INDEFINITE QUANTITY CONTRACT FOR

ARCHITECT-ENGINEER SERVICES FOR WATERFRONT TANK INSPECTION AND

ASSESSMENT, CONUS/OCONUS AS LISTED BELOW:

OCONUS: Is defined as worldwide; any areas outside of the continental United States.

CONUS: Is defined as follows: Northeast, Southeast, Mid-Atlantic Region, Northwest, Southwest, Gulf Coast and Great Lakes areas (excludes Channel Islands, Puerto

Rico, Alaska, U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam and US Territories).

Description: ALL INFORMATION NEEDED FOR INTERESTED PARTIES TO SUBMIT A

STANDARD FORM SF 330; ARCHITECT ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS IS

CONTAINED HEREIN. THERE IS NO SEPARATE REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP)

PACKAGE TO DOWNLOAD.

This procurement will result in one Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract for multi-discipline Architect-Engineer (AE) services for inspection, assessment, engineering and design services in support of Sustainment, Restoration and Modernization

(SRM) for water tank structures at U.S. Navy, Department of Defense (DoD) and other

Government installations including work worldwide. These services will be procured in accordance with 40 USC Chapter 11, Selection of Architects and Engineers, as implemented by

FAR Subpart 36.6. The IDIQ contract will be for a base period of one year and four one-year option periods (if exercised). The total fee for the contract term shall not exceed $6,000,000.

The guaranteed minimum for the contract term (including option years) is $10,000. Firm-fixed price task orders will be negotiated for this contract. There will be no dollar limit per task order and no dollar limit per year. The estimate start date is Mar 2026.

This proposed Waterfront Tank Inspection and Assessment CONUS/OCONUS contract is being solicited on a RESTRICTED basis exclusively to small businesses. The Small Business size standard classification is North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) Code

541330 Engineering Services. The Government seeks the most highly qualified firm to perform the required services, based on the demonstrated competence and qualifications, in accordance with the selection criteria.

The market research study N3943025C2007 conducted by Naval Facilities Engineering and

Expeditionary Warfare Center (NAVFAC EXWC) included an assessment of relevant qualifications and capabilities of potentially qualified firms. As a result of the market research analysis, a determination was made to set aside this procurement to small businesses only. The

NAVFAC EXWC small business office concurs with this decision.

The types of A-E services expected to be performed under this contract include, but are not limited to: pre-bid water tank inspections in accordance with applicable standards of the

American Water Works Association (AWWA); engineering analysis of existing conditions in comparison to current regulations and requirements; comparison between previous inspection reports and/or drawings of the facilities; engineering calculations for structural analysis with or

Revised Aug 2024 without previous design calculations; failure analysis and forensic engineering; documentation of findings; generation of recommendations, including cost estimates for follow-on actions, and invitation for bid contract plans and specifications; including rehabilitation schedules.

All assessments will be performed under the auspices of a registered professional engineer. The registered professional engineer shall supervise the writing of the detailed inspection report.

Less frequent additional products and services may include generation of construction contract drawings using computer-aided design and drafting (CADD), specifications produced in

SPECSINTACT, use of the Unified Facilities Guide Specifications (UFGS); bid analyses; post construction award services (PCAS); procedures and guidelines documents; engineering report and submittal review; database population; standardized reporting documentation; engineering calculations; static and dynamic structural calculations; seismic vulnerability assessments and development of retrofit schemes; and training specifically geared toward water tank inspection/execution and procedures. On the occasion when diving inspections are conducted, they shall meet the requirements of the current U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Safety and

Health Requirements Manual EM-385-1-1 (Currently March 2024).

A water tank facility for U.S. Navy purposes is defined as any permanent structure that stores water. Water tank facilities include, but are not limited to, standpipes, reservoirs, elevated tanks, underground storage or any similar structure that serves as a water supply, or as a reservoir for maintaining equal water pressure in a water system. Water tank facilities may store potable water or be used for fire protection purposes or storing non-potable water. Tanks are manufactured from a variety of materials including fiberglass, steel, or concrete. A dam or related structure to impede water flow is not considered a water tank facility. Interested firms are advised to ensure System of Award Management (SAM) registration is current at time of offer submission and must remain valid through award. If SAM registration lapses during the solicitation and evaluation period, the offer will no longer be eligible for award. For instructions on registering with SAM, see the SAM website at https://www.sam.gov/.

The awarded contract will be subject to specific provisions addressing the avoidance of organizational conflicts of interest. The prime firm for this contract will be required to perform throughout the contract term.

Interviews may be scheduled with firms slated as the most highly qualified. Firms slated for interviews may be asked to clarify information contained in the SF330 submittal. Elaborate presentations are not desired.

Security Requirements: Work performed will be at the SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED level. The government does not anticipate the need for a security clearance; however, if clearances are subsequently required the contractor shall comply with SECNAV M5510.30, SECNAV Instruction M-5239.2, and Department of Defense (DoD) 8570.01-M. The contractor shall establish and maintain an access list of those employees working on the Contract. U.S.

citizenship is required for access to inspection sites.

SELECTION CRITERIA:

Firms responding to this synopsis will be evaluated to determine the most highly qualified firms

Revised Aug 2024 to perform the required services in accordance with the published selection criteria. Failure to comply with instructions, or provide complete information, may affect the firm’s evaluation or disqualify the firm from further consideration. Specific selection criteria include:

1. Professional Qualifications

2. Specialized Experience

3. Safety Program

4. Program Management and Capacity

5. Quality Control Program

6. Past Performance

7. Volume of Work

Selection criteria are listed in descending order of importance. Criteria (7) is of the least importance and will be used as a tiebreaker among equal firms.

Criterion 1- Professional Qualifications (SF330, Part I, Sections E & G):

Firms will be evaluated on professional qualifications, competence, and experience of the proposed key personnel in providing services to accomplish the tasks required under this contract, including participation in example projects as outlined in SF330, Part 1, Section G.

Key personnel are individuals who will have major contract or project management responsibilities and/or will provide unusual or unique expertise. Specific disciplines that must be included in key personnel are:

(1) Inspection/Assessment Qualifications

• Project Manager (s) – U.S. licensed Professional Engineer with a minimum of three (3) years as lead for water tank inspections/assessments or development of water tank facility projects

• Competent Person (s) – NACE/SSPC/API certified inspector with a minimum of three (3) years of leading water tank inspection/assessments. List all Fall Protection Training, Sprat Training, Confined Space Training, or OSHA Training with dates achieved

• Water Tank Inspector/Evaluator - NACE/SSPC/API certified inspector with a minimum of three (3) years of water tank inspection experience. List all Fall Protection Training, Sprat Training, Confined Space Training, or OSHA Training with dates achieved

• ROV Operator (s) – NACE/SSPC/API certified inspector with a minimum of three (3) years water tank inspection experience and ROV operation. List all Fall Protection

Training, Sprat Training, Confined Space Training, or OSHA Training with dates achieved

In addition, the firm/team shall have the capacity to support at minimum, two simultaneous facility inspections while still meeting the requirements of the contract.

Revised Aug 2024

Submission Requirements (SF330, Part I, Sections E & G):

SF330, Part I, Section E. Provide resumes for all proposed key personnel that illustrate experience in the work proposed under this contract. Resumes are limited to one (1) page and should indicate professional registration, certification, licensure and/or accreditation in appropriate disciplines; cite recent (within the past three (3) years) project-specific experience in work relevant to the services required under this contract; and indicate proposed role in this contract. Also indicate in this section (Section E) the participation of key personnel in example projects noted in SF330, Part 1, Section G.

Criterion 2- Specialized Experience (SF330, Part I, Section F):

Firms will be evaluated on specialized experience in the performance of services similar to those anticipated under this contract through the evaluation of experience in:

1. Dry inspections of water storage tanks

2. Wet inspections of water storage tanks using ROV

3. Preparation of Plans and Specifications for repairs of water storage facilities

4. Structural condition assessments, including the use of destructive and non-destructive techniques

5. Seismic analysis of water storage tanks

6. Wet inspections of water storage tanks utilizing divers following EM-385-1-1 requirements.

7. Preparation of water tank inspection/assessment reports and repair cost estimates, including

Form DD1391.

8. Providing engineering submittals in electronic format(s). Submittals include, but are not limited to: inspection reports and drawings, structural inventory and appraisal data, and contract bid documents.

9. The capacity to maintain schedule for report submission while simultaneously executing field operations.

Firms may be considered more favorably by demonstrating a condition rating system that assigns a numerical rating to each style of water tank facility inspected and that provides homogeneity across differing structures.

Submission Requirements (SF330, Part I, Section F):

Provide a maximum of four (4) projects completed within the past three (3) years immediately preceding the date of issuance of this notice that best demonstrate specialized experience of the proposed team in the areas outlined above. Sufficient information to determine the date of

Revised Aug 2024 completion of the project must be included in the project description or the project will not be considered. If more than the maximum number of projects are submitted, the Government will only evaluate projects up to the maximum number authorized in the order submitted.

All projects provided in the SF330 must be completed by the actual office/branch/regional office/individual team member proposed to manage and perform work under this contract.

Projects not meeting this requirement will be excluded from consideration in the evaluation. To enable verification, firms should include the Unique Entity Identifier number along with each firm name in the SF330 Part 1, Section F, block 25, “Firm Name” Include a contract number or project identification number in block 21. Include an e-mail address and phone number for the point of contact in block 23(c). In block 24, include in the project description the contract period of performance, award contract value, current contract value, and a summary of the work performed that demonstrates relevance to specialized experience as outlined above. For projects performed as a subcontractor or a joint venture involving different partners, specifically indicate the value of the work performed as a subcontractor or by those firms proposed for this contract, and identify the specific roles and responsibilities performed as a subcontractor or by those firms on the project rather than the work performed on the project as a whole. If the project description does not clearly delineate the work performed by the entity/entities offering/teaming on this contract, the project could be eliminated from consideration.

NOTE: If the firm is a joint venture, projects performed by the joint venture should be submitted; however, if there are no projects performed by the joint venture, projects may be submitted for either joint venture partner illustrating the experience pertinent to this solicitation, not to exceed a total of eight (8) projects. Firms failing to provide projects from all joint venture partners will be considered to have not met the requirements of the criterion.

Projects shall be submitted on the SF-330 at Part I, Section F and shall be completed projects.

Projects not completed will be excluded from evaluation consideration. For submittal purposes, a task order on an IDIQ contract is considered a project, as is a stand-alone contract award. Do not submit an IDIQ contract as an example project. Instead, list relevant task orders or stand-alone contract awards that fit within the definition above. The Government will not evaluate information provided for an IDIQ contract. Examples of project work submitted that do not conform to this requirement will not be evaluated.

All information for Criterion 2 should be submitted in SF330, Part I, Section F. The

Government WILL NOT consider information submitted in addition to Part 1, Section F in evaluation of Criterion 2.

Criterion 3 – Safety Program (SF330, Part I, Section H):

The Government is seeking to determine that the Offeror has consistently demonstrated a commitment to safety and that the Offeror plans to properly manage and implement safety procedures for itself and its subcontractors. The evaluation will collectively consider the DART rate, TCR, Technical Approach to Safety, and other sources of information available to the

Government as part of such collective evaluation. The board will evaluate the DART rates and

TCR to determine if the Offeror has demonstrated a history of safe work practices taking into account any negative trends and extenuating circumstances that impact the rating.

Revised Aug 2024

1. DART Rate: The board will evaluate trends over the last five years considering changes that take it from one risk level (or more) to the next up or down. Negative trends occurring above moderate risk levels require the offeror to provide a detailed explanation that includes any corrective actions taken for improvement.

a. Missing data without an explanation is considered a deficiency.

b. Declining trends that push the risk levels from Moderate Risk (MR) or higher to Low Risk

(LR) or Very Low Risk (VLR) would indicate a strength.

c. An increasing DART rate trend could be considered a weakness (i.e. MR or better to High

Risk (HR) or Extremely High Risk EHR)) if an acceptable explanation is not provided for any trends that rise above Moderate.

d. This chart correlates the DART rate to the level of risk:

Risk DART Rate

Very Low Risk Less Than 1.0

Low Risk From 1.0 to 1.99

Moderate Risk From 2.0 to 2.99

High Risk From 3.0 to 4.0

Extremely High Risk Greater than 4.0

2. TCR Rate: The board will evaluate trends over the last five years considering changes that take it from one risk level (or more) to the next up or down. Negative trends occurring above moderate risk levels require the offeror to provide a detailed explanation that includes any corrective actions taken for improvement.

a. Missing data without an explanation is considered a deficiency.

b. Declining trends that push the risk levels from Moderate Risk (MR) or higher to Low

Risk (LR) or Very Low Risk (VLR) would indicate a strength.

c. An increasing TCR rate trend could be considered a weakness (i.e. MR or better to High

Risk (HR) or Extremely High Risk EHR)) if an acceptable explanation is not provided for any trends that rise above Moderate.

d. This chart correlates the TCR rate to the level of risk:

Risk TCR Rate

Very Low Risk Less Than 2.49

Low Risk From 2.5 to 3.49

Moderate Risk From 3.5 to 4.49

High Risk From 4.5 to 5.99

Extremely High Risk Greater than 6.0

3. The Technical Approach to Safety Narrative. To determine the degree to which the Offeror:

Revised Aug 2024

a. Describes a viable SMS that addresses elements, such as Management/Leadership involvement, Employee involvement, Hazard prevention, Hazard control, Worksite analysis, and Safety and health training, to include the standard(s) used to benchmark the SMS.

b. Describes a methodical process of evaluating subcontractor’s safety performance in their selection process.

c. Describes a logical management plan to hold themselves and their subcontractors accountable for adhering to the safety requirements of the contract.

d. The Technical Approach to Safety narrative shall be limited to two (2) single-sided pages or one (1) double-sided page. Information on pages beyond this will not be considered.

4. The Government reserves the right to review other available sources (public/Government internal) of information. These may include but are not limited to OSHA data, NAVFAC’s

Contractor Incident Reporting System (CIRS), Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting

System (CPARS), Electronic Contract Management System (eCMS), etc.

Submission Requirements:

The Offeror shall submit the following information: The Days Away from Work, Restricted

Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rate; and Total Case Rate (TCR) for the specified five (5)

Calendar Years (CY), as well as a safety narrative, as described further below. For a partnership or joint venture, the Offeror shall submit separate DART rates and TCR for the specified five

(5) CY for each contractor who is part of the partnership/joint venture; however, only one safety narrative is required. Any fatalities experienced within this 5-year timeframe must be explained in detail, to include root cause and corrective actions.

NOTE: DART and TCR shall not be submitted for subcontractors

1. DART Rate: Submit five (5) previous complete calendar years’ [CY2024, CY2023, CY2022, CY2021, and CY2020] worth of data (not an overall average). If the Offeror has no DART rate for any year, affirmatively state so and explain why. Should a negative trend occur above moderate risk levels, an acceptable/detailed explanation is required that includes any corrective actions taken for improvement.

a. DART cases include injuries or illnesses resulting in death, days away from work, and/or restricted work or transfer to another job days beyond the day of injury/illness.

b. Calculation of DART rate: Multiply the total number of DART cases by 200,000, and then divide by the number of employee labor hours worked.

DART RATE =

Number of DART Incidents x 200,000

Total Number of Employee Labor Hours Worked

Revised Aug 2024

2. TCR Rate: Submit five (5) previous complete calendar years’ [CY2024, CY2023, CY2022, CY2021, and CY2020] worth of data (not an overall average). If the Offeror has no TCR rate for any year, affirmatively state so and explain why. Should a negative trend occur above moderate risk levels, an acceptable/detailed explanation is required that includes any corrective actions taken for improvement.

a. TCR cases include injuries or illnesses resulting in death, days away from work, restricted work or transfer to another job days beyond the day of injury/illness, medical treatment beyond first aid, or loss of consciousness.

b. Calculation of TCR rate: Multiply the total number of TCR incidents by 200,000, and then divide by the number of employee labor hours worked.

TCR RATE =

Number of TCR Incidents x 200,000

Total Number of Employee Labor Hours Worked

3. Technical Approach to Safety: Submit a narrative that addresses the following:

a. Describe the Offeror’ s approach to implementing and executing a Safety Management

System (SMS) including Management/Leadership involvement, Employee involvement, Hazard prevention, Hazard control, Worksite analysis, and Safety and health training, to include the standard(s) used to benchmark the SMS.

b. Describe the evaluation process used to select potential subcontractors.

c. Describe the processes of how the Offeror will oversee safety compliance of subcontractors at all levels throughout performance of the contract (to include the Offeror’s own in-house workforce).

d. The Technical Approach to Safety narrative shall be limited to two (2) single-sided pages or one (1) double-sided page.

4. The Government reserves the right to review other available sources (public/Government internal) of information. These may include but are not limited to OSHA data, NAVFAC’s

Contractor Incident Reporting System (CIRS), Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting

System (CPARS), Electronic Contract Management System (eCMS), etc.

Criterion 4- Program Management and Capacity (SF330, Part I, Section H):

Firms will be evaluated on the firm’s ability to plan for and manage work under the contract, the capacity to accomplish the work in the required time, and to field and accomplish up to four

(4) separate inspection projects concurrently in the required timeframe; these four (4) inspections will consist of two (2) ground-based storage tank dry inspections with an inspection team of three (3) personnel each, and two (2) ROV or “wet” inspection with an inspection team of two (2) personnel. Capacity includes maintaining a schedule for report submission while simultaneously executing field operations.

Revised Aug 2024

Submission Requirements (SF330, Part I, Section H):

1. Provide an organizational chart for the team and discuss the management plan for this contract and personnel roles in the organization. Describe the ability of the firm to manage, coordinate and work effectively with team members, both internal staff and consultants. Discuss the history of working relationships with team members, including joint venture partners where applicable.

2. Describe the firm’s present workload and the availability of the project team

(including subject matter experts) for the specified contract performance period.

Describe the workload/availability of the key personnel during the anticipated contract performance period and the ability of the firm to provide qualified backup staffing for key personnel to ensure continuity of services. General statements of availability/capacity may be considered less favorably.

Criterion 5- Quality Control Program (SF330, Part I, Section H):

Firms will be evaluated on the strength of the quality control program proposed by the firm to ensure quality products and services under this contract and means of ensuring quality services from their subject matter experts/subcontractors.

Submission Requirements (SF330, Part I, Section H):

Describe the quality control program that will be utilized for all deliverables of this contract and the management approach for quality control processes and procedures. The description shall:

1. Explain the quality control program, including an example of how the plan has worked for one of the projects submitted as part of the SF330, Section F or how the plan will work if it has not been used previously.

2. Provide a quality control process chart showing the inter-relationship of the management and team components. Identify the quality control manager and any other key personnel responsible for the quality control program and a description of their roles and responsibilities.

3. Describe specific quality control processes and procedures proposed for this contract. A narrative of the firm’s quality control methods outlining specific personnel (including their discipline/specialty) and procedures for water tank inspections, diving operations, technical report preparation, structural assessments, analysis and design services is required for review.

Of special interest are the quality control processes in place that minimize the Government’s effort to quality assess (QA) the firm’s work product for errors, omissions, and quality.

4. Describe how the firm’s quality control program extends to management of subcontractors.

a. Cradle to grave of inspection data; from field inspectors to report writing, to approval process including specific personnel discipline/specialty

b. Submit firms typical, representative report generated from an inspection/assessment for each inspection method; Dry, ROV and Diving. This can be one report covering all three or three separate reports. Reports will be evaluated on professional appearance, quality of photo/video documentation, content related to: evaluation of interior and exterior coating

Revised Aug 2024 systems; and evaluation of the tank for compliance with existing structural, sanitary, safety standards and codes.

Criterion 6- Past Performance (SF330, Part I, Section H):

Firms will be evaluated on past performance with Government agencies and private industry in terms of work quality, compliance with schedules, cost control, and stakeholder/customer satisfaction. Evaluating past performance and experience will include information provided in

Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQs) or CPARS for Criterion 2 projects and may include customer inquiries, Government databases, and other information available to the Government including contacts with points of contact in other criteria. NOTE: Past performance information for projects listed under Criterion 2 may be given greater weight.

Submission Requirements (SF330, Part I, Section H):

SUBMIT A COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION FOR EACH PROJECT UNDER

CRITERION 2. IF A COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION IS NOT AVAILABLE, the Past

Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) (Attachment (A)) included in this notice is provided for the firm or its team members to submit to the client for each project included under Criterion 2, Specialized Experience. DO NOT SUBMIT A PPQ WHEN A COMPLETED CPARS IS

AVAILABLE.

IF A CPARS EVALUATION IS NOT AVAILABLE, ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Completed PPQs should be submitted with your SF330. If the firm is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before the response date set forth in this notice, firms should complete and submit with their responses the first page of the PPQ (Attachment (A)), which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). Firms may submit a PPQ previously submitted under a different Notice/RFP (legible copies are acceptable) as long as it is on the same form as posted with this Synopsis. Firms should follow up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If requested by the client, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the

Government's point of contact, Naval Facilities Engineering and Expeditionary Warfare Center

(NACFAC EXWC), Code CON74, Attn: China Park via email at china.park.civ@us.navy.mil, prior to the response date. Firms shall not incorporate by reference into their response PPQs or

CPARS previously submitted in response to other A/E services procurements. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation.

Firms may provide any information on problems encountered and the corrective actions taken on projects submitted under Criterion 1 Specialized Experience. Firms may also address any adverse past performance issues. Information shall not exceed two double-sided pages (or four single-sided pages) in total.

Awards, letters of commendation, certificates of appreciation, etc. shall not be submitted and will not be considered in the evaluation.

Revised Aug 2024

Criterion 7—Volume of Work (SF330, Part 1, Section H)

Firms will be evaluated in accordance with DOD Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement

(DFARS) Procedures, Guidance and Information (PGI) 236.602-1, from data extracted from the

Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS). Firms will be evaluated in terms of work previously awarded to the firm by DOD within the past twelve months with the objective of effecting an equitable distribution of contracts among qualified A&E firms including small, disadvantaged business firms, and firms that have not had prior DOD A&E contracts.

Submission Requirements (SF330, Part I, Section H):

Firms do not submit data for this factor.

SF-330 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

Architect-Engineer firms desiring to be considered for this contract must submit a completed

SF-330 package. The SF-330 shall be typed, one sided, at least 11-point Times New Roman or larger. Part I shall not exceed 48 single-sided 8.5 by 11 inch pages (the page limit does not include ISRs, certificates, PPQs, licenses, or the draft subcontracting plan, as required by the

Small Business Subcontracting criterion, nor does the page limit include cover sheets, dividers, or other requested documentation (e.g., joint venture agreement, proof of AE firm registration) provided that these do not contain any substantive information submitted in response to the synopsis or intended to demonstrate the qualifications of the firm). Part I pages shall be numbered sequentially. The organizational chart may be one page single sided 11 by 17 foldout, using 11-point font or larger (font limitations do not apply to graphics, captions or tables). Please include your Unique Entity Identifier and CAGE numbers in Block 30 of the

SF-330.

**In accordance with the FAR 36.601-4(b), contracts for architect-engineer services may only be awarded to firms permitted by law to practice the professions of architecture or engineering.

Firms must submit proof that they are permitted by law as required by FAR 36.601-4(b). If a firm is in a jurisdiction that requires AE firm registration, the firm must provide proof of registration. If a firm is in a jurisdiction that does not require AE firm registration, the firm must provide proof eligibility to practice (e.g., a summary explaining eligibility under the laws of that jurisdiction). Failure to submit the required proof could result in a firm’s elimination from consideration.

**Firms who are offering as a joint venture should include with their submission a copy of the joint venture agreement. Failure to include the joint venture agreement may result in the firm’s elimination from further evaluation.

Architect-engineer firms that meet the requirements described in this announcement are invited to submit one (1) electronic copy of the SF-330 to Naval Facilities Engineering and

Expeditionary Warfare Center (NACFAC EXWC), Code CON74, Attn: China Park via email at china.park.civ@us.navy.mil. Firms responding to this announcement by 10 October 2025 will be considered. THIS IS NOT A REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL.

Revised Aug 2024

Late responses will be handled in accordance with FAR 52.215-1. The points of contact are either China Park, Contract Specialist, at china.park.civ@us.navy.mil or Antonio M. Arias, Contracting Officer, at antonio.m.arias.civ@us.navy.mil.

If an SF 254/SF 255 is submitted for this solicitation, it will not be reviewed or considered. As required above, provide verifiable evidence that your firm is permitted by law to practice the professions of architecture or engineering (e.g., state registration number).

Facsimile SF-330's submissions are not authorized.

Inquiries concerning this procurement should include solicitation number and title and be forwarded via email to china.park.civ@us.navy.mil.