99SWC-S3694 - Reference Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 165 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Document Destruction Services
- Solicitation number
- 99SWC-S3694
- Issued by
- Nevada
About this file
This is a Reference Questionnaire document issued by the Nevada State Purchasing Division, Department of Administration, for solicitation number 99SWC-S3694 related to Document Destruction Services for multiple state agencies statewide. The questionnaire is designed to collect client feedback on vendors or subcontractors bidding for the contract opportunity. Completed reference questionnaires must be submitted to Miriam GM Garcia at miriam.garcia@admin.nv.gov by the due date of April 14, 2026, with the solicitation number included in the subject line. The document requests that all questions be answered comprehensively, with responses of "U/K" (unknown) or "N/A" (not applicable) permitted where information is unavailable or irrelevant.
The reference questionnaire contains thirteen evaluation items requiring vendors to provide ratings on a scale of 1-10, with ratings distributed as follows: 0 indicating poor or inadequate performance, 1-3 below average, 4-6 average, 7-9 above average, and 10 exceptional performance. Evaluation criteria include vendor knowledge and expertise, flexibility regarding scope and timeline changes, satisfaction with delivered materials and products, staff interaction dynamics, schedule adherence and timeliness of deliverables, customer service responsiveness, billing accuracy, problem resolution capability, business requirement flexibility, local office customer service where applicable, and likelihood of future recommendation. Completed questionnaires are designated as confidential business information pursuant to Nevada Revised Statutes 333.020(5)(b) and are not subject to public disclosure. The State reserves the right to contact references directly for additional clarification beyond written responses.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 99SWC-S3694 - Certification Regarding Lobbying.pdf | ||
| Quote Instructions.pdf | ||
| 99SWC-S3694 - RFP Document Destruction Service.pdf | ||
| 99SWC-S3694 - Cost Schedule.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 99SWC-S3694 - Terms and Conditions for Services.pdf | ||
| 99SWC-S3694 - Staff Resume.docx | DOCX document | |
| 99SWC-S3694 - Vendor Information Response.pdf | ||
| 99SWC-S3694 - Scope of Work.docx | DOCX document | |
| 99SWC-S3694 - Insurance Schedule.docx | DOCX document | |
| 99SWC-S3694 - Business Associate Addendum.docx | DOCX document | |
| 99SWC-S3694 - Standard Form Contract.docx | DOCX document |
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Nevada State Purchasing Division Department of Administration 515 E Musser St Ste 300 Carson City, NV 89701 purchasing.nv.gov nevadaepro.com
Revised 2024-10 Page 1 of 2
Reference questionnaire
Due Date 04/14/2026
Solicitation number 99SWC-S3694
Single point of contact name Miriam GM Garcia
Single point of contact email miriam.garcia@admin.nv.gov
Proposing vendor or subcontractor
Client providing the reference
Client contact name and title
Client telephone and email
Period of performance
1. CLIENT REFERENCE INSTRUCTIONS
1.1. As part of a formal solicitation the State of Nevada has requested vendors provide references from current and/or former clients for projects of similar size and scope. This reference questionnaire is to provide a client reference for the proposing vendor or subcontractor above. Once you have completed the reference questionnaire, please submit to the single point of contact via email, with the solicitation number in the subject line, no later than the due date above.
1.2. The State requests all questions be answered. If an answer is not known, please answer as ‘U/K’. If the question is not applicable, please answer as ‘N/A’. If additional space is needed to answer a question or provide a comment, please attach additional pages. If attaching additional pages, please place your company/organization name on each page and reference the appropriate RFP number.
1.3. Do not return the completed reference questionnaire to the proposing vendor. To allow for candid responses, completed reference questionnaires are designated as confidential business information by the Administrator pursuant to NRS 333.020(5(b) and not public information pursuant to NRS 333.333. In addition to the reference questionnaire, the State may contact references for further clarification.
1.1. Where a rating is requested, please provide a rating between 1-10. For all items, please provide any comments you feel would be helpful to the State in evaluation below each item. Poor or inadequate performance: 0; Below average performance: 1-3; Average performance: 4-6; Above average performance: 7-9; Exceptional performance: 10.
2. EVALUATION ITEMS
2.1. In what capacity have you worked with this vendor in the past? (no rating) https://purchasing.nv.gov/ https://nevadaepro.com/ https://www.leg.state.nv.us/nrs/nrs-333.html#NRS333Sec020 https://www.leg.state.nv.us/nrs/nrs-333.html#NRS333Sec020 https://www.leg.state.nv.us/nrs/nrs-333.html#NRS333Sec333
Page 2 of 2 Reference questionnaire
2.2. Vendor’s knowledge and expertise, rating:
2.3. Vendor’s flexibility relative to changes in scope and timelines, rating:
2.4. Your satisfaction with delivered materials, rating:
2.5. Dynamics and interaction between the vendor and your staff, rating:
2.6. Your satisfaction with products developed by the vendor, rating:
2.7. Was the schedule met and deliverables timely? Rating:
2.8. Overall customer service and timeliness in response and issue resolution, rating:
2.9. Accuracy and timeliness of billing, rating:
2.10. Vendor’s ability to quickly and thoroughly resolve a service-related problem, rating:
2.11. Vendor’s flexibility in meeting business requirements, rating:
2.12. Response time and customer service of local office, if applicable, rating:
2.13. Likelihood of recommending this vendor to others in the future, rating:
2.14. Which aspects of this vendor’s services are you most satisfied with? (no rating)
2.15. Would you recommend this vendor to your organization again? (no rating)
| 1. Client reference instructions |
| 1.1. As part of a formal solicitation the State of Nevada has requested vendors provide references from current and/or former clients for projects of similar size and scope. This reference questionnaire is to provide a client reference for the proposi... |
| 1.2. The State requests all questions be answered. If an answer is not known, please answer as ‘U/K’. If the question is not applicable, please answer as ‘N/A’. If additional space is needed to answer a question or provide a comment, please attach add... |
| 1.3. Do not return the completed reference questionnaire to the proposing vendor. To allow for candid responses, completed reference questionnaires are designated as confidential business information by the Administrator pursuant to NRS 333.020(5(b) a... |
| 1.1. Where a rating is requested, please provide a rating between 1-10. For all items, please provide any comments you feel would be helpful to the State in evaluation below each item. Poor or inadequate performance: 0; Below average performance: 1-3;... |
| 2. Evaluation items |
| 2.1. In what capacity have you worked with this vendor in the past? (no rating) |
| 2.2. Vendor’s knowledge and expertise, rating: |
| 2.3. Vendor’s flexibility relative to changes in scope and timelines, rating: |
| 2.4. Your satisfaction with delivered materials, rating: |
| 2.5. Dynamics and interaction between the vendor and your staff, rating: |
| 2.6. Your satisfaction with products developed by the vendor, rating: |
| 2.7. Was the schedule met and deliverables timely? Rating: |
| 2.8. Overall customer service and timeliness in response and issue resolution, rating: |
| 2.9. Accuracy and timeliness of billing, rating: |
| 2.10. Vendor’s ability to quickly and thoroughly resolve a service-related problem, rating: |
| 2.11. Vendor’s flexibility in meeting business requirements, rating: |
| 2.12. Response time and customer service of local office, if applicable, rating: |
| 2.13. Likelihood of recommending this vendor to others in the future, rating: |
| 2.14. Which aspects of this vendor’s services are you most satisfied with? (no rating) |
| 2.15. Would you recommend this vendor to your organization again? (no rating) |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .