9-5.1 Sample Proposal Evaluation Scoresheet with drop down (1).docx
DOCX document 198 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- UDOT2600128MH-1
- Issued by
- Utah
About this file
This is a Proposal Evaluation Scoresheet for a Request for Proposal issued by the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) to select a qualified consultant partner to provide expert guidance to the Utah Broadband Center (UBC) regarding administration, compliance, and subgrantee contracting for the federal Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment (BEAD) Program. The solicitation anticipates a single contract award. The evaluation process consists of two stages: a responsiveness determination stage that assesses four mandatory minimum requirements, and a detailed technical evaluation stage that scores proposals on a scale of 1 to 5 across five evaluation criteria totaling 100 possible points.
The mandatory minimum requirements that firms must satisfy to proceed to technical evaluation include ten years of legal experience in telecommunications, consultant experience working with state broadband offices, expert understanding of 2 CFR 200 and the BEAD Program, and expertise in telecommunications infrastructure contracting. The technical evaluation criteria assess expertise in administrative compliance within the telecommunications industry (30 points), BEAD program conditions and compliance (25 points), federal grant compliance and asset management for federally-funded projects (20 points), experience working with Tribal Nations (5 points), and a comprehensive compliance strategy description (20 points). The proposal receiving the highest total technical score will be determined eligible for award.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 5-Submittal Form- Debarment or Suspension, Conflicts, Tax Lien, Responsiveness.docx | DOCX document | |
| 1-6. Form- Business Confidentiality- check fields.doc | DOC document | |
| 4-8. FI170 (1).pdf | ||
| 2-3. Form- Cost Proposal Form.doc | DOC document | |
| 7-1.1 RFP General Information-BEAD Consultant .docx | DOCX document | |
| 8-2.1 SOW.docx | DOCX document | |
| 3-7. w-9 (2024 version).pdf | ||
| 6-4. Terms and Conditions Corrected.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
Solicitation #
Proposal Evaluation Score Sheet
Firm Name:
Evaluator: Date:
Determination:
NR = Non Responsive. Response does not address requirement.
Scoring:
1 = (Poor): The proposal fails to addresses the requirement described in the RFP or it addresses the requirement inaccurately or poorly.
2 = (Fair): The proposal addresses the requirement described in the RFP in an unsatisfactory manner 3 = (Good): The proposal addresses the requirement described in the RFP in a satisfactory manner;
4 = (Very Good): The proposal addresses the requirement described in the RFP and, in some respects, exceeds it.
5 = (Excellent): The proposal addresses and exceeds the requirement described in the RFP
Stage 1: Determination of Responsiveness:
| Mandatory Minimum Requirements |
| Pass |
| Fail |
| Notes |
1. 10 Years Legal Experience in Telecommunication
2. Consultant Experience Working with State Broadband Offices
3. Expert Understanding of 2 CFR 200 and the BEAD Program
4. Expertise in Telecommunications Infrastructure Contracting
Responses that fail in any of the above will not proceed on to the Technical Evaluation Stage.
Stage 2: Detailed Technical Evaluation:
Technical Evaluation
| EVALUATION CRITERIA |
| Points Possible |
| Score |
(1 - 5)
| Weight |
| Points |
1. Demonstrate expertise with administrative compliance within the telecommunications industry - (30 points)
| · Must provide detailed description of experience in administrative compliance within the telecommunications industry, including Federal and state statutes |
| 30 points |
| Choose an item. |
| X 6 |
2. Demonstrate expertise in BEAD program conditions and compliance - (25 points)
| · Must provide detailed description of experience with BEAD program conditions and compliance |
| 25 points |
| Choose an item. |
| X 5 |
3. Demonstrate expertise in federal grant compliance, audit response, regulatory compliance, and asset and property management for federally-funded projects - (20 points)
| · Must identify all State of Utah telecommunication laws and describe Respondent’s understanding of the laws |
| 25 points |
| Choose an item. |
| X 4 |
4. Demonstrate experience working with Tribal Nations - (5 points)
| · Must provide detailed description of legal experience in Federal grant compliance, specifically 2 CFR 200 |
| 5 points |
| Choose an item. |
| X 1 |
5. Description of Compliance Strategy - (20 points)
| · Must provide detailed description of legal experience in telecommunications contract law |
| 5 points |
| Choose an item. |
| X 1 |
Total Technical Evaluation Points (100 points possible)
The proposal with the highest total technical score will be determined to be eligible for award.
Proposal Evaluation Scoresheet Page of image1.png
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .