80KSC026R0023 Attachment L-02 Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 138 KB Posted
- Attached to
- 500-Ton Trailer-Mounted Air-Cooled Chiller
- Solicitation number
- 80KSC026R0023
About this file
This is a Past Performance Questionnaire template for NASA Kennedy Space Center Solicitation 80KSC026R0023. The document is designed to be completed by customers/raters who have direct experience with contractors to evaluate their past performance on completed or ongoing contracts.
Offerors must provide this questionnaire to past performance references, who submit completed forms to Contracting Officer Victoria Hargrave at victoria.c.hargrave@nasa.gov by September 14, 2026. Section I requires offerors to complete basic contract information including contractor name, project/contract number, performance period, contract value at award and completion, contractor status (prime or subcontract), and rater contact information. Section II, completed by the rater, requests identical contract details plus percentage and dollar value of work performed, rater involvement dates, and work description. The questionnaire uses a 1-5 rating scale (Unsatisfactory, Marginal, Satisfactory, Very Good, Exceptional) plus N/A option, with detailed definitions for each level. Raters evaluate eight performance areas: project management effectiveness; schedule adherence; technical requirement comprehension; personnel management and quality workmanship; deliverables and quality records; safety compliance; discrepancy resolution and corrective action timeliness; and whether cure notices, show cause letters, or terminations for cause/default were issued. The questionnaire concludes with a yes/no question on whether the rater would select the contractor again. Completed questionnaires receive confidential treatment and will not be disclosed outside the government.
View the file
Other files
Show all 13
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
NASA/KSC SOLICITATION 80KSC026R0023
ATTACHMENT L-02
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
NASA Kennedy Space Center’s solicitation requires offerors to provide this Past Performance Questionnaire to customers to complete and return to NASA. Past performance raters are requested to submit the completed questionnaires to the Contracting Officer identified below via e-mail, to arrive not later than September 14, 2026.
Completed questionnaires should be sent to:
Name: Victoria Hargrave Email: victoria.c.hargrave@nasa.gov Address: NASA John F. Kennedy Space Center
Kennedy Space Center, Florida 32899
Raters are requested to complete the questionnaire forms as written since altered or substituted questionnaires may not adequately address the information NASA will be evaluating.
SECTION I. THIS SECTION TO BE COMPLETED BY THE OFFEROR
Name of Contractor Being Evaluated:
Name of Project and Contract/Order Number:
Period of Contract Performance (dates):
Place of Contract Performance:
Contract Value at Award:
Contract Value at Completion or Current Contract Amount:
Contract Status (Prime or Subcontract?):
Point of Contact: (Rater) Name/Address/Office Phone Number/E-Mail Address:
INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
THIS SECTION TO BE COMPLETED BY THE RATER
(THIS QUESTIONNAIRE, WHEN COMPLETED, WILL NOT BE DISCLOSED TO
ANYONE OUTSIDE THE GOVERNMENT)
Name of Contractor Being Evaluated:
Name of Project and Contract/Order Number:
Period of Contract Performance (dates):
Place of Contract Performance:
Contract Value at Award:
Contract Value at Completion or Current Contract Amount:
Contractor’s Status (Prime or Subcontractor?):
Percentage and Dollar Value of Work Performed by the Contractor:
Dates of Rater’s Involvement in Program/Contract:
Brief Description of Work Performed:
Point of Contact: (Rater) Name/Address/Office Phone Number/E-Mail Address:
RATING DEFINITIONS:
On a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 being unsatisfactory and 5 being exceptional, please rate the contractor on the past performance areas included in this questionnaire. A rating of N/A should be used if the question is not applicable or the answer is unknown. Space is provided for any additional comments raters may want to provide. The definitions associated with the 1 to 5 ratings are provided below:
1. UNSATISFACTORY: Performance does (did) not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely (did not occur). The contractual performance contains (contained) serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear ineffective (were ineffective).
2. MARGINAL: Performance does (did) not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects (reflected) serious problem(s) for which the contractor has not yet identified acceptable corrective actions (did not provide acceptable corrective actions).
3. SATISFACTORY: Performance meets (met) contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects (reflected) some minor problems. Corrective actions being taken by the contractor appear to be effective (Corrective actions taken were effective).
4. VERY GOOD: Performance meets (met) contractual requirements and exceeds (exceeded) some of the Government’s expectations. The contractual performance reflects (reflected) some minor problems and corrective actions being taken by the contractor appear to be effective (Corrective actions taken were effective).
5. EXCEPTIONAL: Performance meets (met) contractual requirements and exceeds (exceeded) many of the Government’s expectations. The contractual performance reflects (reflected) few minor problems and corrective actions taken by the contractor appear to be highly effective (corrective actions taken were effective).
N/A: Not applicable or rater has not observed performance in this area.
NASA/KSC SOLICITATION 80KSC026R0022
CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE QUESTIONS
1. The effectiveness of the contractor’s overall project management ability (including but not limited to project managers, quality control managers, safety managers, and superintendents); labor (skilled and unskilled workers); equipment; supplies; tools; and financial resources to successfully perform, provide contract deliverables and complete work in a safe and timely manner.
1 2 3 4 5 NA
Comments:
2. The contractor’s ability to complete the project according to the contractor’s provided schedule and within the period of performance.
3. The contractor’s ability to understand and meet customer’s technical requirements.
4. The contractor’s ability to manage personnel to ensure quality workmanship.
5. The contractor’s ability to provide complete deliverables (reports, records) quality records as required.
6. The Contractor’s ability to comply with safety requirements.
7. The Contractor’s ability to resolve discrepancies in a timely and effective manner and the ability to report, investigate, and take corrective actions in a timely and effective manner.
8. Has the contractor’s performance required the issuance of any cure notices, show cause letters, or terminations for cause/default? (Please circle Yes or No).
Yes No
8. Would you select this contractor again?
Yes No
THIS COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE WILL NOT BE DISCLOSED TO ANYONE
OUTSIDE THE GOVERNMENT. THANK YOU FOR TAKING THE TIME TO
COMPLETE THIS QUESTIONNAIRE.
| Address: NASA John F. Kennedy Space Center |
| SECTION I. THIS SECTION TO BE COMPLETED BY THE OFFEROR |
| THIS SECTION TO BE COMPLETED BY THE RATER |
| CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE QUESTIONS |
| THIS COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE WILL NOT BE DISCLOSED TO ANYONE OUTSIDE THE GOVERNMENT. THANK YOU FOR TAKING THE TIME TO COMPLETE THIS QUESTIONNAIRE. |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .