VADR Change Log_synopsis.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 20 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Venture-Class Acquisition of Dedicated and Rideshare (VADR) Launch Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 80KSC021R0034_On-Ramp_Issue01
About this file
This change log summarizes anticipated revisions to the Venture-Class Acquisition of Dedicated and Rideshare (VADR) Launch Services solicitation to be issued by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Kennedy Space Center. Key changes include the addition of FAR clause 52.204-27 prohibiting ByteDance covered applications, revisions to the order of precedence and notification of award processes to reference updated FAR thresholds and procedures, and clarification that the mission success criteria and determination methodology must be approved by NASA and included in the Interface Control Document.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| CLIN2_VADR_LSIRD_Template_EXAMPLE.pdf | ||
| CLIN1_VADR_LSIRD_Template_EXAMPLE.pdf | ||
| SF30 Amendment 2.pdf | ||
| VADR Questions and Responses Amendment 1.pdf | ||
| SF30.pdf | ||
| VADR Change Log Amendment 1.pdf | ||
| VADR RFP_on-ramp 2023 Amendment 1.pdf | ||
| Attachment 03_CDRLS.pdf | ||
| For Reference_LAUNCH VEHICLE CERTIFICATION LSP PLN 324.01 Rev C.pdf | ||
| SF 1449.pdf | ||
| For reference_Public Law 105-303.pdf | ||
| Attachment 04_Definitions.pdf | ||
| Appendix A_Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf | ||
| For reference_original VADR Questions and Responses.pdf | ||
| VADR On-ramp cover letter.pdf | ||
| VADR RFP_on-ramp 2023.pdf | ||
| Attachment 01_SOW_Comformed_on-ramp 2023.pdf | ||
| Attachment 02_Meetings and Formal Reviews.pdf | ||
| Attachment 05_Launch Service Capabilities_Specs and Envs.pdf | ||
| Public Law 105303 Title II Section 201.pdf |
Show all 20
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sheet1
| For your convenience, the Government created this change log that notates anticipated updates/revisions from the original VADR RFP (link has provided in this posting) to the anticipated VADR RFP Rev A. Prospective offerors will be cautioned to review the VADR REV A. RFP (Early November) carefully and in its entirety to discern all changes, as the VADR Rev A. RFP takes precedence over the information provided herein. | |
| Change (From/To) | Affected Sections |
| RFP | |
| Incorporated clause, FAR 52.204-27 - Prohibition on a ByteDance Covered Application (JUN 2023) | 2.2 LISTING OF CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE |
| Added: 2.8 FAR 52.212-4(s)(1) ORDER OF PRECEDENCE. ANY INCONSISTENCIES IN THIS SOLICITATION OR CONTRACT SHALL BE RESOLVED BY GIVING PRECEDENCE IN THE FOLLOWING ORDER (TAILORED) AS FOLLOWS: |
(1) The schedule and description of supplies/services (Section 1, 2, and Statement of Work, excluding contract clauses incorporated by reference). The ICD (Attachment 03, CDRLS, VADR 1-2) shall take precedence over the Mission Solution (proposed solution). Any inconsistencies between the ICD and the Mission Solution shall be resolved by giving precedence to the ICD over the Mission Solution once the ICD is approved by the Government.
| (2) – (9) remain as cited. | 2.8 FAR 52.212-4(s)(1) ORDER OF PRECEDENCE. |
| From: "The RLSP will also provide the required method of submission (e.g. electronic and/or paper copy), basis upon which selection will be made, and (for orders expected to exceed $5.5 million) the relative importance of the evaluation factors as described in FAR 15.101-1(b)(2). |
| To: The RLSP will also provide the required method of submission (e.g. electronic and/or paper copy), basis upon which selection will be made, and (for orders expected to exceed the threshold in FAR 16.505 (b)(1)(iv)) the relative importance of the evaluation factors as described in FAR 15.101-1(b)(2). | 2.12.1.1 REQUEST FOR LAUNCH SERVICE PROPOSAL (RLSP) |
| From: For awards exceeding $5.5 million, Offerors will be notified of award in accordance with FAR 15.503(b)(1) and FAR 16.505(b)(6)(i) and a post-award debriefing may be requested and provided in accordance with FAR 15.506 and FAR 16.505(b)(6)(ii). |
| To: Offerors will be notified of award and a post-award debriefing may be requested in accordance with FAR 16.505(b)(6)(ii). | 2.12.1.4 RLSP TASK ORDER AWARD |
| From: The RFP will also provide the required method of submission (e.g. electronic and/or paper copy), basis upon which selection will be made, and (for orders expected to exceed $5.5 million) the relative importance of the evaluation factors as described in FAR 15.101-1(b)(2). |
| To: The RFP will also provide the required method of submission (e.g. electronic and/or paper copy), basis upon which selection will be made, and (for orders expected to exceed the threshold in FAR 16.505 (b)(1)(iv) the relative importance of the evaluation factors as described in FAR 15.101-1(b)(2). | 2.12.2.1 REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) FOR SPECIAL TASK ASSIGNMENTS |
| From: For awards exceeding $5.5 million, Offerors will be notified of award in accordance with FAR 15.503(b)(1) and FAR 16.505(b)(6)(i) and a post-award debriefing may be requested and provided in accordance with FAR 15.506 and FAR 16.505(b)(6)(ii). |
To: Offerors will be notified of award in accordance with FAR 15.503(b)(1) and a post-award debriefing may be requested in accordance with FAR 16.505(b)(6)(ii). 2.12.2.4 RFP TASK ORDER AWARD
| SOW Attachment 01 |
| From: NASA will determine whether the mission is a success or failure based on the application of the mission success criteria as defined in the RFP and ICD (VADR 1-2). |
To: Provide the recommended mission success criteria and determination methodology prior to the launch and the Final Flight Report (VADR 1-14) to enable determination of mission success as defined in the Interface Control Document (ICD) (VADR 1-2). NASA will determine whether the mission is a success or failure based on the application of the mission success criteria as defined in the Section 2.9, Mission Success Criteria of the base contract and the approved mission success criteria and determination methodology in the ICD. 1.3 Program Management paragraph (f)
Meetings and Formal Reviews Attachment 02
| CDRLS Attachment 03 |
| From: The Contractor’s proposed methods, including required vehicle telemetry measurements, ground observation, and analysis/reconstruction techniques, for verifying that each proposed mission success criterion is satisfied. Allowances for sensor measurement accuracy shall be explicitly identified and justified. The Contractors methodology shall be based on applicable flight related ICD requirements to be determined during ICD development and shall be used to determine the success of the mission. |
To: The Contractor’s shall provide a list of proposed criteria based on applicable flight related ICD requirements. The Contractor’s proposed methods, including required vehicle telemetry measurements, ground observation, and analysis/reconstruction techniques, for verifying that each proposed mission success criterion is satisfied. Allowances for sensor measurement accuracy shall be explicitly identified and justified. The criteria and methodology, which will be determined during ICD development, will be used to support the Contracting Officer’s determination of mission success. 4.0 Mission Success Criteria & Determination Methodology
Definitions Attachment 04
Launch Services Capabilities, Specifications and Environments Attachment 05
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .