Section_L_Appendix_4,_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 110 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Replace Substation 1100 Switchgear Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 80KSC0-19-R-0014
About this file
Section L Appendix 4, Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 80KSC019C0012_SSDD,_Signed_for_FBO.pdf | ||
| 80KSC019R00140003_with_Answers.pdf | ||
| 80KSC019R00140002_with_Answers.pdf | ||
| 80KSC019R00140001_with_DBA.pdf | ||
| Substation_Site_Visit_Sign_In_Log.pdf | ||
| Section_L_Appendix_2,_Acceptable_ID_Guide.pdf | ||
| 80KSC019R0014,_SF1442_Substation_1100_Solicitation.pdf | ||
| Attach_J-D,_Cert_of_Progress_Payment.pdf | ||
| Attach_J-C,_WD_FL20180001_Mod_2.pdf | ||
| Section_L_Appendix_1,_KSC_Form_28-889_Visitor_Badge_Request.pdf | ||
| Attach_J-A,_Project_Deliverables.pdf | ||
| Section_L_Appendix_3,_Pre-Proposal_Inquiry_Form.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attach_J-G,_PIV_KDP-KSC-P-3722.pdf | ||
| Attach_J-B,_KSC_Project_Specific_Requirements.pdf |
Show all 14
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
NASA/KSC SOLICITATION 80KSC019R0014
SECTION L - APPENDIX 4
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Replace Substation 1100 Switchgear
NASA Kennedy Space Center’s solicitation requires offerors to provide this Past Performance Questionnaire to customers to complete and return to NASA. Past performance raters are requested to submit the completed questionnaires to the contracting officer identified below via e-mail, to arrive not later than the proposal submission date.
Completed questionnaires should be sent to:
Name: C. M. Julius Williams Email: Christopher.M.Williams@nasa.gov
Raters are requested to complete the questionnaire forms as written since altered or substituted questionnaires may not adequately address the information NASA will be evaluating.
SECTION I. THIS SECTION TO BE COMPLETED BY THE OFFEROR
Name of Contractor Being Evaluated:______________________________________________
Name of Project and Contract/Order Number:________________________________________
Period of Contract Performance (dates):_____________________________________________
Place of Contract Performance:____________________________________________________
Contract Value at Award:_________________________________________________________
Contract Value at Completion or Current Contract Amount:______________________________
Contract Status (Prime or Subcontract?):_____________________________________________
Point of Contact: (Rater) Name/Address/Office Phone Number/E-Mail Address:
THIS SECTION TO BE COMPLETED BY THE RATER
(THIS QUESTIONNAIRE, WHEN COMPLETED, SHALL NOT BE DISCLOSED TO ANYONE
OUTSIDE THE GOVERNMENT)
Name of Contractor Being Evaluated:______________________________________________
Name of Project and Contract/Order Number:________________________________________
Period of Contract Performance (dates):____________________________________________
Place of Contract Performance:___________________________________________________
Contract Value at Award:________________________________________________________
Contract Value at Completion or Current Contract Amount:_____________________________
Contractor’s Status (Prime or Subcontractor?):_______________________________________
Percentage and Dollar Value of Work Performed by the Contractor:
Dates of Rater’s Involvement in Program/Contract:___________________________________
Brief Description of Work Performed:
Point of Contact: (Rater) Name/Address/Office Phone Number/E-Mail Address:
RATING DEFINITIONS:
On a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 being unsatisfactory and 5 being exceptional, please rate the contractor on the past performance areas included in this questionnaire. A rating of N/A should be used if the question is not applicable or the answer is unknown. Space is provided for any additional comments raters may want to provide. The definitions associated with the 1 to 5 ratings are provided below:
1. UNSATISFACTORY: Performance does (did) not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely (did not occur). The contractual performance contains (contained) serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear ineffective (were ineffective).
2. MARGINAL: Performance does (did) not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects (reflected) serious problem(s) for which the contractor has not yet identified acceptable corrective actions (did not provide acceptable corrective actions).
3. SATISFACTORY: Performance meets (met) contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects (reflected) some minor problems. Corrective actions being taken by the contractor appear to be effective (Corrective actions taken were effective).
4. VERY GOOD: Performance meets (met) contractual requirements and exceeds (exceeded) some of the Government’s expectations. The contractual performance reflects (reflected) some minor problems and corrective actions being taken by the contractor appear to be effective (Corrective actions taken were effective).
5. EXCEPTIONAL: Performance meets (met) contractual requirements and exceeds (exceeded) many of the Government’s expectations. The contractual performance reflects (reflected) few minor problems and corrective actions taken by the contractor appear to be highly effective (corrective actions taken were effective).
N/A: Not applicable or rater has not observed performance in this area.
CONTRACTOR’S TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE QUESTIONS
1. The effectiveness of the Contractor’s overall project management ability (including but not limited to project managers, quality control managers, trade integrators, safety managers, and superintendents); labor (skilled and unskilled workers); equipment; supplies; tools; and financial resources to successfully perform, provide contract deliverables and complete work in a safe and timely manner.
1 2 3 4 5 NA
Comments:
2. The Contractor’s ability to provide timely and effective contractor management attention at the job site and partner with the owner to resolve technical and schedule issues.
3. The Contractor’s ability to provide quality engineering shop drawings and accurate and complete as-built documentation.
4. The Contractor’s ability to complete work within the required timeframe(s).
5. The Contractor’s ability to maintain an operational facility while replacing the switchgear.
CONTRACTOR’S SAFETY PERFORMANCE QUESTION
6. The Contractor’s ability to report and take corrective actions on safety accidents/incidents in a timely manner.
CONTRACTOR’S CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION PERFORMANCE QUESTIONS
7. The contractor’s ability to provide prompt payment of employees, subcontractors, and suppliers for services and supplies performed/delivered under the contract.
8. The contractor’s compliance with Department of Labor requirements and resolution of reported violations/discrepancies.
9. Has the contractor’s performance required the issuance of any cure notices, show cause letters, or terminations for cause/default? (Please circle Yes or No)
Yes No
CONTRACTOR’S OVERALL CONTRACT PERFORMANCE
10. Would you select this contractor again? (Please circle Yes or No)
Yes No
THIS COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE WILL NOT BE DISCLOSED TO ANYONE OUTSIDE
THE GOVERNMENT. THANK YOU FOR TAKING THE TIME TO COMPLETE THIS
QUESTIONNAIRE.
File details come from the government source that posted it.