JMACC 80JSC026R0008 - Amendment 0002-Signed.pdf

OF PAGES

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

80JSC026R0008

I P

GE

I 124

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER

5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

0002 See block 168 N/A

6. ISSUED BY CODE 80JSC0 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE I NASA Johnson Space Center 2101 NASA Parkway Houston, TX 77058-3696 William Long, Contracting Officer Email: william.r.long@nasa.gov

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X) 9A AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

80JSC026R0008

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

02/27/2026

10A MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE I FACILITY CODE

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

IX] The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers IX] is extended. D is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a} By completing items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which indudes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, proVided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment. and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b}.

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor D is not D is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

The purpose of Amendment 0002 is to:

1. Extend the proposal due date from 04/06/2026 at 1 PM CST to 04/14/2026 at 1 :00 PM CST. Reference Section L.17 .2.

2. Incorporate Questions and Answers received on the JMACC Request for Proposal (RFP). See pages 6-23.

3. Replace the RFP in its entirety. See the Change Log on Pages 2-5.

All other terms and conditions remain unchanged

Except as provided herein, all terms and condrtions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 1 OA. as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect

15A NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR 15C. DATE SIGNED

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

Previous edition unusable

16A NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

William Long, Contracting Officer

168. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 16C. DATE SIGNED

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

Section Page Description of Change 1 L.17.9 L-20 Updated the Volume that the Model Contract shall be submitted from Volume III to Volumne V.

2 L.17.2 (a) L-13 Updated Proposal Due date to April 14, 2026.

3 L.17.2 Table L-2 L-14 Updated table to:

4 L.17.5 (a) L-15 Updated first sentence in first paragraph to: All Offerors, Prime or JV Partners, shall demonstrate past performance experience in all areas of the EA Phase 1A Task Order by submitting information on up to four past contracts, each valued at $20M or above.

5 L.17.5 (i) L-17 updated first paragraph to: Offerors shall provide the following performance data with explanatory remarks on contracts performed in the last three years. Offerors shall identify the applicable North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) Code for each contract and shall include points of contact for each contract. If a joint venture relationship is proposed, the same information shall be provided for each JV partner company proposed. Explanatory statements shall be included as appropriate. For all work performed on these contracts during the past three years, offerors shall provide the following:

6 L.17.5 (j) L-18 Removed the word "prime" from the first sentence in the first paragraph. Updated first paragraph now reads: The offeror, only if a large business (other than small business), shall provide a statement of small business participation (targets, record, and type of work subcontracted) over the last three years on work that is relevant to this effort, with special emphasis on the division of the company which will perform the proposed contract.

7 L.17.5 (k) L-18 added: (k) In the case where the offeror is a JV Partner, the JV Partners shall provide a list of the SOW sections that each contractor proposes to support.

8 M.3 (c) M-3 Removed "or team member" from the third sentence in the first pargraph. Updated first paragraph now reads: Three aspects are taken into consideration by the evaluation team when determining the offerors past performance confidence rating. These aspects are recency, relevance, and performance. The past performance of a prime will be compared to the work proposed to be performed by that prime and weighted accordingly in assigning the overall past performance adjectival rating to the offeror. The past performance of an existing joint venture will be weighted more heavily than work performed by its joint venture partners separately. This evaluation will consider what the corporate parent, affiliate, or other organizational entities (division(s), business units, segments) are responsible for and/or proposing to do on the JMACC effort and the specific resources (workforce, management, facilities, or other resources) to be employed and relied upon, such that the corporate parent, affiliate, or other organizational entity your company will have meaningful involvement in contract performance, in determining relevance. Offerors with past performance as part of a joint venture will be evaluated on the entirety of the work performed by the joint venture.

9 L.10 L-7 Anticipated Dates updated to: May 29, 2026 - May 29, 2029 May 30, 2029 - November 30, 2029

List of Changes from RFP to Amendment 0002

10 L.2 (b) L-2 Reduced the days the offeror agrees to hold prices in its offer firm for from 260 to 90. Updated paragraph now reads: Period for acceptance of offers. The Offeror agrees to hold the prices in its offer firm for 90 calendar days from the date specified for receipt of offers, unless another time period is specified in an addendum to the solicitation.

11 L.9 L-6 Reduced the days proposals will remain firm from 260 to 90.

Updated paragraph now reads: Proposals submitted in response to this solicitation will remain firm for at least 90 calendar days after the date specified for receipt by the Government unless a different period is proposed by the Offeror and shall contain a statement to this effect. Offerors shall insert 90 or the Offeror’s period into Block 17 of Standard Form 1442, Solicitation, Offer, and Award.

12 H H-1 Updated the following clauses incorporated by reference to:

1852.242-72 - Denied Access to NASA Facilities - Dec 2025 (Deviation) 1852.243-72 - Equitable Adjustments Deviation - Jul 2025 (Deviation) 1852.226-71 - Safety and Health Measures and Mishap Reporting - Feb 2026 1852.226-73 - Major Breach of Safety or Security with Alternate I - Feb 2026

13 All Applicable All Applicable All references to "Revolutionary FAR Overhaul (RFO)” within the solicitation have been replaced with "Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)". This change standardizes terminology to accurately reflect the applicable governing regulation.

14 C C-10 Added DRD-04 Environmental Compliance Reports under J-A Attachments 15 H H-3 - H-6 JSC 52.223-94 JSC Environmental Compliance (Feb 2025) -

Updated Paragraph (d) to: As applicable, the Contractor shall track and provide complete and accurate data on sustainable acquisitions of designated products or services, including JF1121 (Request for Sustainable Acquisitions Waiver for EPA- CPG items), or equivalent authorized waivers obtained if any, waste reduction/pollution prevention, waste generation/disposal and recycling/waste diversion, and well as construction/demolition and facility modification activities per DRD -04, Environmental Compliance Reports.

16 H H-3 - H-6 JSC 52.223-94 JSC Environmental Compliance (Feb 2025) - Updated Paragraph (e) to: The contractor shall notify JSC Occupational Health/Space Medicine Operations (SD) prior to any initial use, quantity change or different application of hazardous materials, including as applicable, obtaining a waiver (JF594, Request for Waiver to Use a Prohibited or Restricted Chemical) prior to purchasing a prohibited or restricted hazardous material, per DRD-04, Environmental Compliance Reports.

17 H H-3 - H-6 JSC 52.223-94 JSC Environmental Compliance (Feb 2025) - Updated Paragraph (f) to: If the Contractor manufactures, processes, otherwise uses, procures, or accumulates onsite hazardous materials as defined in this clause, the contractor shall develop and maintain an inventory listing the identity, hazards and quantity of the hazardous materials purchased, stored, processed, manufactured, and/or used onsite at JSC for the performance of the contract and provide quarterly/annual reports per DRD-04, Environmental Compliance Reports. The Contractor shall utilize the JSC hazardous material tracking and reporting system, including obtaining a JSC-specific Safety Data Sheet (SDS) identification number, as described within JPR 1700.1. Refer to Chapter 9 of JPR 1700.1, relating to controlling inventory and reporting hazardous material usage and releases.

18 H H-3 - H-6 JSC 52.223-94 JSC Environmental Compliance (Feb 2025) - Updated Paragraph (g) to: As applicable, the Contractor shall provide data on the use, management, and disposition of ozone depleting substances (ODS), per DRD-04, Environmental Compliance Reports.

19 H H-3 - H-6 JSC 52.223-94 JSC Environmental Compliance (Feb 2025) - Updated Paragraph (j) to: As applicable, the Contractor shall develop, maintain, and update, an Associated Contractor Agreement (ACA) with the JSC Environmental Management Office (EMO) Environmental Support Services Contractor (ESS) specifying the nature of compliance-related tasks, notifications/reports, frequencies, and expectations for timely, accurate, and complete documentation. The Contractor shall notify the Contract Officer, Contract Officer Representative and JSC EMO’s ESSC CO/COR on the status of the ACA negotiation process, upon initial ACA execution and subsequent updates of the ACA, in accordance with DRD-04, Environmental Compliance Reports.

20 L L-1 Added the follow clause to the Additional Regulation or Supplement Clauses Incorporated by Reference: 1852.226-72 - Safety and Health Plan - Feb 2026

21 L.17.6(a) L-19 Updated last parargraph to: The Offeror’s price proposal shall be submitted in one volume labeled Prime Offeror name - solicitation number - Cost-Price Volume.xlsx

22 L.18(c) L-22 52.228-1 Bid Guanantee (Sept 1996) - EA Phase 1A Order Only - Updated the amount of the bid guarantee price to $3,000,000.00. Updated paragraph now reads: The amount of the bid guarantee shall be 20% of the bid price or $3,000,000.00, whichever is less. All future Task Orders under JMACC will have individual Bid Guarantee requirements.

23 Attachment L-A - Model Task Order

B.2 Reduced the number of days that the Government has to award any of the Bid Options from 120 day to 0 days. Updated paragraph now reads: The Government has the authority to award all, some or none of the Bid Items based on the availability of funds. The intent is for the Government to execute award of the Base Bid and as many options as funding allows while maintaining the unilateral right to award any of the following Bid Options within 0 days after award of the Base Bid.

24 Attachment L-A - Model Task Order

PART II Added the following documents to the attachment list:

A-F-1 - Sketch SK-1 A-F-2 - Spec 012300-Sketch SK-2-Alternate #7 A-F-3 - 01 45 35 Rev.1 A-F-4 - Spray Booth A-F-5 - 01 23 00 Rev.1 A-F-6 - Short Circuit Study A-F- 7 - NASA JSC Structural Addendum 1 Stamped A-F-8 - 27 05 26 A-F-9 - 27 10 00.80 A-F-10 - 33 82 00 A-F-11 - 07 71 00 Rev. 1 A-L - Safety and Health Plan DRD

25 DRD - Environmental Compliance Reports

Box 1: DRD Title updated to: Environmental Compliance Reports DRD-04 Box 3: DRL Line Item No. updated to: N/A RFP/Contract No. updated to: TBD Box 7: Interrelationships updated to: Environmental Clause No. 52.223-94

26 Attachement J-A - DRD Security Requirements for Unclassified Resources

Removed any reference to the "phase in period" in the Initial Submission and replaced with 15 days after award. Updated statement now reads: Information System Security and C-SCRM Plan(s): For contractor-owned systems, due 15 days after award. Initial submission not required for existing, approved plans for Government-owned and Contractor-managed systems. For new Federal Information Systems, due with the delivery of the system.

Non-Federal System Certification: Prior to any transfer of NASA non-public information to the contractor, the contractor shall provide documentation of the certification of the non-federal system to the security officer of the NASA organization that owns the information (typically the organization responsible for the contract).

If the organization does not have an ISSO, the attestation shall be provided to the NASA Information Owner. Information on Employees in Sensitive Positions/Assignments Report: 15 days after award.

IT Security Point of Contact: 15 days after award.

IT Security Awareness Training: Training required prior to access to NASA information and systems.

IT Security Role Based Training: Foundational training is provided prior to performance of assigned role. Initial evidence showing completion due 15 days after award.

27 Attachement J-A - DRD Security Requirements for Unclassified Resources

Updated Interrelationship to: PWS/SOW Section 9.0

28 L.16(b)(4) L-12 Electronic Cover Sheet has been updated to PDF from word.

29 L.17.4 L-15 Removed last bullet point: In accordance with NFS 1815.300-70(b)(5), technical proposals are not required and will not be evaluated.

30 Attachment SF1442 Page 1 Box 13(d) have been reduced from 260 days to 90 days.

31 L.17.2 L-14 Removed, Offerors shall also submit Section K, Representations and Certifications, with all fill-ins completed from last paragraph.

32 L.17.8 L-19 Removed first bullet, Include Complete Representations & Certifications.

33 L.17.9 L-22 Added Attachment A-L Provide Initial Safety and Health Plan for EA Phase 1A with DRD Safety and

Health Plan to Table Model Task Order Sections.

34 B JSC 52.216-90 B-2 Updated clause 52.216-90 to add the word "cumulative". Clause now reads: In accordance with FAR 52.216-22, Indefinite Quantity, the contract guaranteed minimum amount* to be ordered under this contract is $5,000.00 and the contract Not to Exceed (NTE) amount* which may be ordered under this contract is $300,000,000.00 cumulative. The Government is not obligated to order more than the minimum specified but may order up to the NTE amount. The Contractor is obligated to fulfill orders issued, up to the NTE amount within the limits specified in FAR 52.216- 19 Order Limitations.

35 C 2.0 Contract Structure C-1 Updated third paragraph to add the work "cumulative". Updated paragraph now reads: The total ordering value under this IDIQ contract shall range from a minimum of $5,000 to a maximum of $300,000,000 cumulative over the life of the contract, inclusive of all task orders and option periods.

36 SF1442 Page 1 Box #10 Updated Proposal Submission link to:

https://nasagov.app.box.com/f/3da366424d7c4be8a0ef23006e3e62f9

37 L.12(c) L-8 Updated Proposal Submission link to:

https://nasagov.app.box.com/f/3da366424d7c4be8a0ef23006e3e62f9

Industry Questions Government Responses Section L.+B2:J1317.5 requires offerors to send Attachment L-B (PPQ) to references. If we have a final, official CPARS evaluation for a project, will the Government accept the CPARS instead of a new PPQ?

No. As stated in Section L.17.5, Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQs) are a required submission and must be sent to the references using Attachment L‑B. A CPARS evaluation is a separate and independent source of past performance information and cannot be submitted in place of a PPQ. Offerors may provide CPARS evaluations in addition to the required PPQs, but they are not an acceptable substitute.

Sections H-3 through H-5 - These sections mention "Environmental Compliance Reports" for sustainable acquisitions and hazardous materials. Are any of these specific Data Requirements Documents (DRDs) due with this initial proposal, or are they only required after a task order award?

Reference Attachment J-A DRD - Data Requirement Document (DRD) for the initial submission date for each individual DRD.

Section L.17.9 & Table L-2 - Section L.17.9 says to submit the Model Contract in Volume III. However, Table L-2 labels Volume III as the "Price Factor" and places the Model Contract in Volume V. Please confirm which volume should contain these documents.

Section L.17.9 has been updated to correct the Volume numbers. Offerors shall submit the Model Contract and Model Task Order in Volume V.

Section L.17.5 & Attachment A-J - Attachment A-J (JF 288 - Contractor Safety Statistical Information) is included in the solicitation, but Section L.17.5 does not explicitly ask for it. Do you require this form with the proposal? If so, in which volume should we include it?

No, NASA does not require the JF 288 to be submitted with the proposal. The successful offeror is required to submit JF 288 prior to the Notice to Proceed (NTP) being issued for EA Phase 1A and monthly until project is completed.

Section L.10 & Attachment J-A (DRD-02) - Attachment J-A requires DRD-02 (IT Security Plan) at the "start of phase-in". However, the RFP states there is a "0-day phase-in". Please clarify the exact due date for these IT security deliverables.

Because the RFP establishes a 0‑day phase‑in period, the Government confirms that the DRD‑02 IT Security Plan will be due 15 days after contract award. DRD-02 IT Security Plan initial submission date has been updated and included in Amendment 0002.

Section L.8 - Because of the complexity of the EA Phase 1A project—specifically the seven mandatory bid options and the 32.1% small business goal—would the Government consider a three-week extension to the March 30 deadline? This would allow us to provide a more competitive and thoroughly vetted proposal.

Amendment 0002 extends the JMACC proposal due date to April 14, 2026 at 1:00 P.M. CST.

Section L.10 - To help the Government start the evaluation process early, will you allow us to submit non-price volumes (such as Volume II: Past Performance or Volume IV: Environmental and Safety Data) before the final proposal deadline?

No. Offerors are required to submit an entire proposal (all information required by the solicitation to be determined responsive) by the due date specified in L.17.2, Proposal Arrangement, Page Limitations, Copies, and Due Dates. As stated in L.12(d) Electronic Submission of Proposals - Proposal Marking And Delivery Through NASA's EFSS Box (NOV 2024), Offerors should electronically submit their proposals not later than 1:00 p.m. Central Time one working day prior to the date specified for receipt of proposals, if offerors seek to coordinate with the Contracting Officer regarding the proposal’s receipt. NASA is not required to verify proposal receipt prior to the submission deadline.

Section L.17.5 - Current instructions limit past performance to projects completed within the last three years. To allow for more competitive proposals, would the Government consider extending the recency requirement to projects completed within the last seven (7) years?

No. The Government does not intend to extend the recency requirement in Section L.17.5. Past performance must reflect projects completed within the last three (3) years, as stated in the solicitation.

Table L-2, Section L.17.4, and SF 1442 Block 13b - Section L.17.4 requires offerors to provide a bonding capacity letter ($40M single / $300M aggregate) within Volume I. However, the RFP does not include FAR 52.228-1 (Bid Guarantee) in Section I, and Table L-2 is silent on the placement of a formal Bid Bond (SF 24). Please confirm: Is a formal Bid Bond (SF 24) required for the EA Phase 1A seed project? If a Bid Bond is required, in which volume should we include it? If a Bid Bond is not required, please confirm that the Bonding Capacity Letter in Volume I satisfies all proposal-stage bonding requirements.

Provision 52.228-1 Bid Guarantee has been added as L.18 on page L-21 though L-22. 52.228-1(c) The amount of the bid guarantee shall be 20% of the bid price or $3,000,000.00, whichever is less. All future Task Orders under JMACC will have individual Bid Guarantee requirements. This Bid Guarantee applies to Task Order EA Phase 1A. Table L-2 has been amended to include EA Phase 1A Bid Bond - SF24 to be submitted in Volume V. Volume I shall contain evidential documentation on surety letterhead that shows offerors are able to meet the $40M single/$300M aggregate bonding requirements to be eligible for the JMACC contract.

Section L.8 - The preproposal/pre-bid conference and site visit is Monday, March 9, 2026, from 2:00 P.M. to 5:00 P.M. Central Time. Questions regarding this RFP are due on or before Wednesday, March 11, 2026, 10:00 A.M. Central Time. This doesn’t leave much time to generate questions from observations at the site visit. Would the Government consider extending the question (RFI) deadline to March 20, 2026?

The deadline for submittal of questions were extended to 3/16/2026 at 10:00 AM per posted Amendment 0001.

Section L.6(d) - According to Section L.6(d), conference materials distributed at the preproposal/pre-bid conference will be made available via the Government-wide point of entry (GPE). Please provide a list of attendees from the Monday, March 9th Preproposal/Pre-bid conference.

The Government will be providing the Preproposal/Pre-bid conference Attendee List with Amendment 0002.

Would the Government please reconsider sending out the pre-proposal conference attendance list? This list is a valuable tool for bidding general contractors to locate interested trade contractors in the area and help us provide a competitive proposal to the Government.

The Government will be providing the Preproposal/Pre-bid conference Attendee List with Amendment 0002.

The RFP indicates a bid bond is required, please confirm the percentage of cost of work required for the bid bond.

Provision 52.228-1 Bid Guarantee has been added as L.18 on page L-21 though L-22. 52.228-1(c) The amount of the bid guarantee shall be 20% of the bid price or $3,000,000.00, whichever is less. All future Task Orders under JMACC will have individual Bid Guarantee requirements. This Bid Guarantee applies to Task Order EA Phase 1A. Table L-2 has been amended to include EA Phase 1A Bid Bond - SF24 to be submitted in Volume V. Volume I shall contain evidential documentation on surety letterhead that shows offerors are able to meet the $40M single/$300M aggregate bonding requirements to be eligible for the JMACC contract.

Page L-14 includes a chart with format requirements for each section of the response. This chart indicates multiple file types for each volume. The page L- 14 chart is in conflict with instructions in Section L.12.e, that reflects each volume should be one file. Please confirm the appropriate format for each volume

Amendment 0002 corrects the table on L-9 and removes the volume formatting. Table L-2 on page L-14 has been updated to remove format for each volume. Offerors are still required to submit documents in the specified format within that volume. Offerors are encouraged to include all individual proposal files within a single .zip file per L.12 Electronic Submission of Proposals.

For volumes that are required to be submitted in Word, can the offeror insert the PDF material (bonding, environmental and safety data, small business subcontracting plan, etc.) as a JPEG into the Word file? Or can these volumes also be submitted in PDF?

For all narrative sections of the proposal, Offerors shall submit Microsoft Word files that comply with Section L.16 (JSC 52.215‑113) and the RFP Table L-2.

Offerors shall not substitute scanned images or pictures of text. Where the solicitation requires submission of non‑narrative documents (e.g., bonding documents, schedules, or Past Performance questionnaires), those items may be submitted as PDF to preserve signatures and formatting.

JSC Multiple Award Construction Contract (JMACC) 80JSC026R0008 - RFP Questions and Answers

Attachment L-B, Past Performance Information Questionnaires, was shared with offerors in PDF format, yet page L-14 requires these to be returned in MS Word. Please confirm that PDF is a sufficient format to resubmit the attachment.

Yes, Past Performance Questionnaires can be submitted as a PDF. Amendment 0002 updates page L-14 Table L-2 accordingly.

Please confirm the appropriate volume to include the Small Business Subcontracting Plan. Page L-14 reflects Volume IV, but page L-18 indicates this should be in Volume II.

The Small Business Subcontracting Plan should be submitted in Volume IV per the instructions on Page L-14. Page L-18 L.17.5(j) is asking for a statement of small business participation over the last three years on work that is relevant to this effort as part of Volume II Past Performance.

Please confirm the file type required for Volume III. Page L-14 chart reflects two file types for this volume.

Amendment 0002 corrects the table on L-9 and removes the volume formatting. Table L-2 on page L-14 has been updated to remove the format for each volume.

Offerors are still required to submit documents in the specified format within that volume. Offerors are encouraged to include all individual proposal files within a single .zip file per L.12 Electronic Submission of Proposals.

RFI Extension As the site visit was on 03/09, will the government consider an RFI extension to the project? This will allow teams to fully engage after the site visit, fully digest the scope of work, and develop comprehensive RFIs for clarification.

The deadline for submittal of questions were extended to 3/16/2026 at 10:00 AM per posted amendment 1.

RFP Extension Can the government confirm they will extend the proposal due date at least 14 days from the date that all RFI responses are distributed to contractors? This will allow contractors efficient time to distribute to subcontractors and digest the materials.

Amendment 0002 extends the JMACC proposal due date to April 14, 2026 at 1:00 P.M. CST.

Section C., 2.0 Contract Structure "This solicitation may award fewer or more than four (4) IDIQ contracts…". Can the government please provide a more definitive number of anticipated awarded IDIQ contracts?

No, the government reserves the right to award fewer or more than four (4) IDIQ contracts.

L.17.5 Past Performance Factor, (a) "Offerors shall demonstrate past performance experience in all areas of the EA Phase 1A Task Order by submitting information on up to four past contracts, each valued at $20M or above.". Can the government please clearly identify what would be considered relevant experience to adequately address this section?

Relevant experience for purposes of the Past Performance Factor is defined and evaluated in accordance with Sections L.17.5 and M.3 (JPI 52.215‑115). The Government assesses relevance based on three required aspects: recency, relevance, and performance.

L.17.5 Past Performance Factor, (b) "Only contract period of performances within 3 years from the date of the JMACC original solicitation will be considered in the past performance evaluation.". Can the government confirm if in-progress construction is acceptable and if so, what percent complete is acceptable?

The Government confirms that in‑progress (ongoing) construction projects are acceptable, provided that the portion of the work being evaluated falls within the required three‑year recency window. There is no minimum percentage of completion required; however, offerors should ensure that sufficient performance history exists for the Government to meaningfully assess quality, schedule, management, and other past performance aspects.

Part I - 4.0 Representative Projects Per this section a majority of the anticipated work is renovation and upgrades therefore would the government consider renovation past performance in lieu of new construction (similar to the model task order) as relevant past experience?

The Government confirms that renovation past performance may be submitted and may be considered relevant past experience, provided the work is comparable in content, complexity, and size to the requirements of the JMACC contract, including the types of efforts reflected in the Model Task Order.

L.13 Safety and Health Plan This section states: "The offeror shall submit a detailed safety and occupational health plan as part of its proposal…..". When reviewing Table L-2, this Safety and Health Plan is not identified. Can the government confirm where this information should be provided? Since it pertains to the Model Contract, does the government want it provided in Volume V. Model Contract and Model Task Order EA Phase 1A?

L.13 Safety and Health Plan, the Safety and Health Plan are Task Order specific and should be included with the EA Phase 1A Model Task Order in Volume V.

Amendment 0002 Adds Safety and Health Plan to Table of Model Task Order Sections that appears on P. L-21 and L-22.

L.17.5 Past Performance Factor, (j) This section requires a small business participation statement and information as part of a response to Volume II. Past Performance. However this requirement is not listed on Table L-2 for this volume, nor does it outline the format and page requirement for this item. Can the government please confirm 1) what format this information is to be provided in, 2) if it counts towards the 10 page maximum for Volume II, or 3) if the small business participation information should be provide in Volume IV instead (as indicated in Table L-2)?

The Small Business Participation information described in Section L.17.5(j) is considered part of the normal Past Performance submission requirements and should be included in Volume II. A separate listing in Table L‑2 is not required. This information is required to be provided in MS word and is included within the existing 10‑page limit for Past Performance Description in Volume II. It should not be submitted in Volume IV.

L.17.2 Proposal Arrangement, Page Limitations, Copies, and Due Dates versus L.17.5 Item (b) in this section states that: "Offerors shall arrange their proposals as set forth below in Table L-2.". Table L-2 outlines the PP Introductory Material as the first item, which sequentially makes sense, but in section L.17.5 Past Performance Factor - Volume II, the introductory material is listed as item (h), which follows the additional items (a)-(g). Can the government confirm where the introductory material shall be placed?

Past Performance Introductory Material shall be submitted in accordance with the order provided in Table L-2.

1L.17.2 Proposal Arrangement, Page Limitations, Copies, and Due Dates, Table L-2 versus L.17.5 If we follow Table L-2 then the items outlined in L.17.5 should be rearranged. For example, L-2 states that Environmental and Safety Data should precede 4. Past Performance Information Questionnaires, but this is reverse in section L.17-5. Can the government confirm the proper order of these items?

For ease of the Government's evaluation of each Offeror's proposal, Offeror's shall follow the Volume outline and content as defined in Sections L.17.2, Table L‑2, and L.17.5. Offerors should ensure content and page limitations identified in Table L‑2 are fully met.

L.17.2 Proposal Arrangement, Page Limitations, Copies, and Due Dates Table L-2 versus L.17.5 Due to discrepancies with layout directions between L.17.2 and L.17.5, is it acceptable if the contractor organizes the response to Volume II. Past Performance (PP) Factor, in the order listed in Exhibit A.? This format follows the order in Table L-2 and adds a place for the Small Business Participation Plan.

Yes. It is acceptable for the contractor to organize Volume II – Past Performance in the order shown in Exhibit A. Exhibit A aligns with the updated structure of Table L‑2, including the placement of the Small Business Participation Statement (for large businesses), and provides a clear, consistent format for evaluation.

L.17.2 Proposal Arrangement, Page Limitations, Copies, and Due Dates, Table L-2 versus L.17.8. Representations and Certifications are required in section L.17.8 Volume IV. Responsibility Considerations, but are not identified in Table L-2 of section L.17.2. Can the government please confirm, 1) the Representations & Certifications belong in Volume IV, 2) what format is required, and 3) if there are page restrictions.

The Government has updated Table L‑2 to resolve prior inconsistencies and to clearly identify the required format, page limitations, and volume placement for all proposal components. Offerors shall reference the updated Table L‑2 for all requirements governing proposal structure, including the correct placement of items.

1L.17.2 Proposal Arrangement, Page Limitations, Copies, and Due Dates, Table L-2 versus L.17.8.Section L.17.8 requires Responsibility Information, which is not outlined in Table L-2. Can the government confirm, if 1) what format is required for this response, and 2) if there are any page restrictions?

The Government has updated Table L‑2 to resolve prior inconsistencies and to clearly identify the required format, page limitations, and volume placement for all proposal components. Offerors shall reference the updated Table L‑2 for all requirements governing proposal structure, including the correct placement of items.

1L.17.2 Proposal Arrangement, Page Limitations, Copies, and Due Dates Table L-2 versus L.17.8Due to discrepancies with layout directions between L.17.2 and L.17.8, is it acceptable if the contractor organizes the response to Volume IV. Responsibility Considerations, in the order listed in Exhibit B.?

This format follows the order in Table L-2 and adds a place for the Responsibility Information and Representations & Certifications.

The Government has updated Table L‑2 to resolve prior inconsistencies and to clearly identify the required format, page limitations, and volume placement for all proposal components. Offerors shall reference the updated Table L‑2 for all requirements governing proposal structure, including the correct placement of items.

1L.17.9 Model Contract and EA Phase 1A Model Task Order Section L.17.9 requires Section K. Representations & Certifications, but this information is listed as required in Volume IV. Responsibility Considerations. Can the government please confirm which volume Section K. belongs, or if they belong in both volumes?

While Section L.17.9 references Section K in connection with the Model Contract, the updated Table L‑2 designates Volume IV as the proper location for all Representations & Certifications.

L.16 Proposal Formatting Instructions Part (b) (4) of this section states: "An electronic cover sheet should be contained as the first page….". Can the government confirm what format (MS Word or PDF) the government would like the cover sheets?

The Government confirms that L.16 has been updated. The electronic cover sheet shall now be submitted as a PDF.

Section F.2 and F.6 c Fill- ins On pages 55 and 56 of the pre-proposal PDF, Section 4.2 Hazardous Material Identification and F.6 Key Personnel are designated as Fill-ins; however these sections are not listed in the RFP on page 24 of 106 under Section F - Deliveries or Performance. If these Fill-ins are required to be completed with our proposal please provide.

Yes. Although these sections do not appear in the abbreviated outline of Section F on page 24 of the RFP, both F.2 and F.6(c) are part of the Model Contract / Model Task Order contained within the RFP itself, and the RFP governs—not the pre‑proposal conference charts.

List of Personnel Per the Pre-Proposal Charts document, pages 52 and 56, F.6 List of Personnel is noted as a fill-in with our proposal submission; however since the price hold is 260 calendar days the names we include if required may not be valid when the project is awarded. Can the offerors include TBD under the list of personnel?

The price‑hold period has been updated to 90 days. With this adjustment, the Government anticipates that offerors will be able to propose Key Personnel whose names will remain valid for the duration of the price‑hold period. F.6(c) may not be submitted as “TBD”; offerors must provide the required personnel information, however key personnel will not be evaluated.

L.16 Proposal Formatting Instructions Must the offeror's include with the proposal the cybersecurity UID? If so, where should this information be provided?

The RFP does not require offerors to submit a cybersecurity UID as part of the proposal.

L.17.5 Past Performance Factor Per item (f) in this section Offerors are to, "submit the Past Performance Questionnaire, Attachment L-B, to all of the point of contact references....." Considering most government POCs will decline completion of PPQ if a completed CPARS exists, would the government allow for completed CPARS in lieu of completed PPQs?

No. As stated in Section L.17.5, Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQs) are a required submission and must be sent to the references using Attachment L‑B. A CPARS evaluation is a separate and independent source of past performance information and cannot be submitted in place of a PPQ. Offerors may provide CPARS evaluations in addition to the required PPQs, but they are not an acceptable substitute.

L.17.6 "Of the six bullets provided for evaluation the following three are similar types of documentation an offeror would provide for certified cost pricing data (which is not required). Could the government provide their rationale for wanting this information in the price proposal. Include a narrative portion that explains all judgmental elements of price projections and profit policies. Include a narrative portion that explains in detail all pricing and estimating techniques.

Disclose the basis of all projections, rates, ratios, percentages, and factors in sufficient detail to facilitate the Streamline Procurement Team’s (SLPT) understanding and ability to mathematically verify these estimating tools.

Include a narrative portion that explains all judgmental elements of price projections and profit policies."

The Government is not requesting certified cost or pricing data. However, to determine price reasonableness and, as applicable, cost realism, the SLPT needs enough basis‑of‑estimate detail to understand the offeror’s estimating methods, judgmental assumptions, and the bases for rates and factors.

Site Visit Can the government please provide a copy of the Site Visit Attendee list?

The Government will be providing the Preproposal/Pre-bid conference Attendee List as part of Amendment 0002.

Project Schedule Table L-2 outlines the Project Schedule (EA Phase 1A) to be provided in MS Word in Volume I. Can the government please confirm that the schedule should be in MS Word? Would the government consider P6 format (maybe converted to PDF) as our scheduler develops project schedules in P6?

Table L-2 has been revised to require the submission of project schedules in PDF.

L.12 Electronic Submission of Proposals Per item (c) in this section, the proposal files should be uploaded to the EFSS-Box. Can the government please provide a back-up submission alternative, should their be issues with delivery to the EFSS-Box (even if test files were submitted successful)? Can the government provide a DoD safe link?

The Government will not be providing a backup submission alternative, including DoD SAFE or other transfer methods. Offerors should ensure they are able to successfully access and upload files to the EFSS‑Box in advance of the proposal due date.

Bid Guarantee In Section 13 of the SF-1442, Block B indicates that an offer guarantee is required. However, FAR 52.228-1 (Bid Guarantee) does not appear in the current solicitation. Could you please confirm whether a bid guarantee will be required? If so, please advise on the required amount and the percentage for the bond.

Provision 52.228-1 Bid Guarantee has been added as L.18 on page L-21 though L-22. 52.228-1(c) The amount of the bid guarantee shall be 20% of the bid price or $6,000,000.00, whichever is less. All future Task Orders under JMACC will have individual Bid Guarantee requirements. this Bid Guarantee applies to Task Order EA Phase 1A.

L.2 52.212-1 Instructions to Offerors Item (b) in this section states that: "The Offeror agrees to hold prices in its offer firm for 260 calendar days…" Can the government confirm this bid hold is correct?

L.2 52.212-1 has been changed from 260 calendar days, to 90 calendar days.

L.2 52.212-1 Instructions to Offerors If the bid hold of 260 calendar days is correct, can the government confirm this program is to be awarded April 27, 2026?

L.2 52.212-1 has been revised to reduced the 260 days down to 90 calendar days. Proposed prices for the base bid and all bid options will be required to be held for 90 Calander days. The SF1442 has been updated in 13(d) to reflect this change. Offerors are encouraged to continue monitoring Sam.Gov and the Johnson Space Center Multiple Award Construction Contract (JMACC) for any potential changes to the Acquisition Milestone Schedule.

L.16 Proposal Formatting Instructions Item (2) in this section states that: "Text in diagrams, charts, tables, artwork, and photographs shall be no smaller than 12-point.". Will the government consider the use of no less than 9 or 10-point font for these items?

No, 12-point font is required by NASA procurement policy, JSC clause 52.215-113.

Mission Critical Dates - Model TO Are there any mission critical dates or other event dates contractors need to consider for mobilization / demobilizations / phasing?

No, not at this time.

Will this project adhere to the Buy American Act? yes, 52.225-9, 52.225-10, 52.225-11, 52.225-12 Will this project adhere to the Davis-Bacon Act? Yes, Page I-31, 7.0, Davis Bacon Wage Rates: Each solicitation shall identify the applicable Davis Bacon Wage Rate Decision(s) applicable to the particular construction project.

We respectfully request that the question/RFI deadline be extended to Monday, March 16, due to new information provided during the site visit. Offerors require additional time to coordinate with potential trade partners, prepare the necessary RFIs, and develop fully informed and competitive bids.

The deadline for submittal of questions were extended to 3/16/2026 at 10:00 AM per posted amendment 1.

L.2 FAR 52.212‑1, Instructions to Offerors states that offerors must hold their pricing firm for 260 calendar days from the date designated for receipt of offers, unless an addendum specifies otherwise. However, the March 9 pre‑proposal conference slides indicate that the Government may award all, some, or none of the bid items depending on funding availability, and that it may exercise its unilateral right to award Bid Options 1 through 7 within 260 days after award of the Base Bid. To ensure accurate interpretation, please confirm the following: 1) Whether the 260‑day period referenced in the solicitation applies only to the Government’s ability to award the bid options, or whether it also applies to the award of the Base Bid itself. 2) The required price‑hold period for the Base Bid—specifically, whether the Base Bid pricing must be held for 260 days from the bid receipt date or from the date of award.

L.2 52.212-1 has been revised to reduce the 260 days down to 90 calendar days. Proposed prices for the base bid and all bid options will be required to be held for 60 Calander days. The SF1442 has been updated in 13(d) to reflect this change. 1) The updated 90 calendar days applies to the Government's ability to award the base bid for EA Phase 1A and all bid options. 2) The required price-hold is from the date of proposal receipt.

Section L.13 (a), Safety and Health Plan states “the offeror shall submit a detailed safety and occupational health plan as part of its proposal.” However, the Safety and Health Plan is not referenced in Table L-2: Overview of Proposal Volumes, Page Limitations, Copies and Format. Please advise if the plan is required at proposal submission and, if so, which volume it should be in.

Section L.13(a) states that the offeror shall submit a detailed Safety and Health Plan as part of its proposal. Although the plan is not listed in Table L‑2, the requirement in Section L.13 remains applicable. The Government confirms that the Safety and Health Plan is required at proposal submission and should be included in Volume V, along with the Model Contract and the EA Phase 1A Model Task Order materials.

Will the Government allow offerors to submit completed CPARS evaluations in lieu of Past Performance Questionnaires for all projects with an existing CPARS record, as this approach relies on the Government’s official past performance system, reduces administrative delays, and improves evaluation accuracy, especially since many offerors have Government projects as prime contractors where evaluators complete CPARS and often will not complete a separate past performance questionnaire when a CPARS record already exists?

No. As stated in Section L.17.5, Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQs) are a required submission and must be sent to the references using Attachment L‑B. A CPARS evaluation is a separate and independent source of past performance information and cannot be submitted in place of a PPQ. Offerors may provide CPARS evaluations in addition to the required PPQs, but they are not an acceptable substitute.

L.17.8 Responsibility Considerations, Volume IV, states include complete Representations and Certifications. Should Offerors provide their complete representations and certifications record from SAM.gov?

No, Reference 52.204-7 System for Award Management—Registration (Deviation).

(c)(2) By submitting its offer, the Offeror verifies that, as of the date of its offer, its representations and certifications posted electronically in SAM for the provisions listed in paragraph (c)(1) of this provision are current, accurate, and complete. The Offeror’s representations and certifications in SAM are hereby incorporated by reference into its offer. Amendment 0002 removes a sperate submission requirement in L.17.8 and Table L.2.

We respectfully request a two to three week extension due to the current March 11th RFI deadline, occurring almost immediately after the March 9th site visit.

The close timing between the site visit and the deadline limits offerors’ ability to coordinate with trade partners and ultimately provide the government with fully informed, technically sound, and competitive proposals. Additional time will allow offerors to obtain clarifications, confirm constructability considerations, and incorporate essential input from trade partners.

The deadline for submittal of questions were extended to 3/16/2026 at 10:00 AM per posted amendment 1.

There isn’t a possibility that the past performance project minimum size could be lowered to $10 million could it?

The Government will not be lowering the past performance project minimum size requirement. The minimum value established in the solicitation remains unchanged and is considered necessary to ensure relevant and comparable experience

Please consider extending the RFI submission deadline to allow trade partners sufficient time to address any questions or clarifications in the Scope of Work that could affect the accuracy of their bids.

The deadline for submittal of questions were extended to 3/16/2026 at 10:00 AM per posted amendment 1.

The PowerPoint Presentation states that the Technical Solutions "should not exceed 20 single sided 8.5 x 11-inch electronic pages”. The solicitation states that VOLUME I TECHNICAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTOR has a 15-page limit. Is the TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS the same as the TECHNICAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTOR? If they are the same, please provide clarification on page limitation.

Yes, the Technical Solution and Technical Acceptability are the same. The Technical Acceptability Factor described in the solicitation is the correct and governing requirement, and the 15‑page limit stated in the RFP remains accurate. Please reference Table L.2 for the required documents in Volume I.

According to the RFP (Page 89 of 106), the PROJECT SCHEDULE (EA PHASE 1A) is included in VOLUME I TECHNICAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTOR. The PowerPoint presentation addresses a SUMMARY LEVEL SCHEDULE, which is not included in 20-page limit. Is the PROJECT SCHEDULE (EA PHASE 1A) the same as the SUMMARY LEVEL SCHEDULE? If that's the case, what else needs to be included as part of VOLUME I TECHNICAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTOR that would require 15- 20 pages?

The…